MSNBC’s host: Romney Engaging In The ‘Niggerization’ Of Obama

And this is an absolutely blasphemous and obscene characterization of Mr Romney by the DEM/MSM attempting to carry the water of Mr Obama on behalf of racists everywhere.

Because, as we all know, racists come in every color.

And this MSNBC host has certainly shown his:

On Thursday’s edition of MSNBC’s The Cycle the group discussed Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney‘s assertion that President Obama should “take [his] campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago.” Co-host Touré saw what he believes to be explicit racial connotations beneath what Romney was saying, calling it the “niggerization” of the campaign.

“That really bothered me,” he said. “You notice he said anger twice. He’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man. This is part of the playbook against Obama, the ‘otherization,’ he’s not like us.”

“I know it’s a heavy thing, I don’t say it lightly, but this is ‘niggerization,’” Touré said to the apparent shock of his co-panelists. “You are not one of us, you are like the scary black man who we’ve been trained to fear.”

In complete keeping with the racial divide, once again, it is racist to criticize Mr Obama’s POLICIES and mentioning his city of political origin.

Because, in truth, Mr Obama’s campaign does naught but promote division, hate and anger.  Mr Obama is the greatest Divisionist that I can think of in recent times.  He and his sycophants don’t promote unity or commonality; oh no.  They promote every divide possible, by race, by class, by sex, by age, by wage, by type of employment.

These are the tactics you take when you are a defense lawyer possessing no articulable defense.

In a related fashion, we’ve all heard and read of the incredibly stupid Joe Biden remarks recently made regarding “ya’all in chains.”  More of Pandering 101, and Ignorant Racial Insults 101.  It’s part and parcel of what Joe Biden does.  It’s in his job description and, mostly, Biden is fatuous entertainment on a good day, who merely exhibits his actual mental thickness and stupidity.  He wasn’t worth a post here, because he is primarily a vacuous airhead.  And yes, I’m being quite kind, truly.

Biden’s staff already tried to remove and influence media interest in his “ya’all” travesty.  That also went — oddly enough — unreported by the DEM/MSM.  Imagine that!

That said, the first black state governor in the history of the United States, Douglas Wilder (Virginia, from 1990 to 1994), weighed in on Mr Biden’s comments:

Douglas Wilder .   .   . told CNN that ‘without question’ Biden’s remarks in Danville, Virginia (though the veep seemed to think he was in North Carolina) ‘were appeals to race’.

He continued: ‘The important thing I got out of this was Biden separated himself from what he accused the people of doing. As a matter of fact, what he said is they are going to do something to y’all, not to me. Not us. So he was still involved with that separate American.

In another interview, with Fox News, Wilder said: ‘Slavery is nothing to joke about. And the history of this nation’s involvement with slavery is nothing to pass off in a joke.’

Suggesting that Biden was a liability to Obama, he added that ‘you can’t continue to make gaffe after gaffe after gaffe and believe that it’s going to be supportive of what you and the president are both trying to do’.

The racial division continues unabated.  Supported both tacitly and overtly by Mr Obama who — yet — doesn’t believe he’s divisive.

Refutation?  How about this:

To Mr Obama: with “friends” like Mr Toure and Mr Biden, who needs enemies?

BZ

P.S.
The DEM/MSM may be coprophagous.  I myself — as you all well know — am even remotely not.

 

 

Mitt Romney forges ahead: bad news for Obama

I’ve not addressed many of my posts, here, regarding Mitt Romney.

Because, admittedly, Mitt Romney wasn’t my first choice for the GOP.  That said, he is what he is and he holds what he holds.  And that is this: the GOP choice for president.

I could go green, I could go Libertarian, I could go any number of LOSER parties.  They just don’t have the clout, the numbers, the power.  Plain and simple.  It still comes down to Demorats vs the GOP.  And me voting Demorat whilst I still have a brain?  Uh, no: Never.

So I stacked my cards up with Mitt Romney.  And then I placed, shall we say, a lot of cash with Mr Romney.  To the point where I’ve been asked to attend a local dinner with him.  As I placed with my local 4th District federal representative, Tom McClintock, some months earlier.  When I walk a walk, I also talk a talk and fund a walk.  Ask TF or Bushwack.  Instead of shutting up, I put up.

And please remember, that said, he was far from my first choice.  People talk about the elder elements in both parties — I’d have to place Mr Romney on that periphery.  Although, just, a bit at the fringe because he hasn’t attained serial appointments for the past thirty years like much of the Staid GOP.  The Comfortable, Elder, Bloated, Moderate, Elite, Back-Slapping GOP.  The CEBMEBS.

Mitt Romney is potentially up 20 points amongst Caucasoid voters.

And as I surmised earlier, some black pastors aren’t quite so taken with Mr Obama’s stance on gay marriage.  To the point where they are actively advocating against Mr Obama.

Washington (CNN) – A group of conservative black pastors are responding to President Barack Obama’s support of same-sex marriage with what they say will be a national campaign aimed at rallying black Americans to rethink their overwhelming support of the President, though the group’s leader is offering few specifics about the effort.

To help himself — Mr Obama decided to donate $5,000 to himself!

That said, Mr Romney had an incredibly-positive visit to Israel which could be summarized in this fashion:

BY BRET STEPHENS

Mitt Romney infuriated Palestinians during his visit to Israel on the weekend by calling Jerusalem “the capital of Israel.” He then added insult to injury by noting—in the context of a discussion of “culture”—the “dramatically stark difference in economic vitality” between Israelis and Palestinians. A Palestinian official called the remark “racist.”

Racist?

How about “Culturist”?  Because, truly, the Palestinians exhibit a LOSING culture as contrasted to that of Israelis.

So there we go:

Again, as with Leftists, the truth gets kicked aside.

BZ