Rachel Jeantel Explains The Difference Between ‘Nigga’ And ‘Nigger’ To Piers Morgan

Rachel JeantelAs if that needed any kind of an explanation.

From MediaIte.com:

In the third part of Piers Morgan‘s extensive, exclusive interview with Trayvon Martin‘s friend Rachel Jeantel about her testimony in the George Zimmerman trial, the host asked his guest if there was anything she wished she’d said on the stand. Jeantel answered with one word: “Nigga.”

Jeantel explained to Morgan that “the whole world say it’s a racist word” but the version of the word that she testified Martin had used in reference to Zimmerman, spelled “n-i-g-g-a” doesn’t mean what most people think it means. It doesn’t mean a “black male” as Morgan assumed, she said, but rather any kind of man, including “Chinese” for example. Morgan helpfully pointed out that that’s the version rappers use in their music.

“But nigger,” Jeantel said, stressing the “-er.,” is a “racist word.” She said “I’d advise you not to be by black people” when you say that word, Jeantel explained, “because they’re not going to have it like that.” And this is not just in her community as Morgan posited but in the entire “generation.”

Okay.  So that explains it all.

There you have it.  Nigga vs Nigger.

With one salient observation:

  • ewgrif76 A fan of the 1st Amendment a day ago

    You’re an idiot, and any white man who grew up in the “ghetto” gets it and understands why black people use “N***A” amongst themselves…Zimmerman deserved the not guilty verdict, but you also deserve a swift kick to your ignorant mouth.

And you wonder why people don’t respect blacks?  Out of the mouth of babes and the ignorant.

BZ

obamacare-cartoon-2-a

 

Oakland: Police Stood Down As ‘Protesters’ Terrorized Drivers

Oakland PD Car, Zimmerman RiotsCops allowed Trayvon demonstrators to seize control of major street for three hours

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 15, 2013

One of the questions to emerge out of last night’s unrest in Oakland, where crowds protesting the George Zimmerman verdict turned violent and seized control of a major street for three hours, is why police withdrew from the area and allowed drivers to be terrorized.

According to a report by ABC 7, protesters had “complete control” of 14th and Broadway near Oakland City Hall and refused to let vehicles pass.

At about 8:30 p.m., police opened the intersection to traffic. But it quickly deteriorated when demonstrators surrounded frightened drivers who found themselves trapped. The crowd forced them to turn around.

Oakland police officers that had been near the corner retreated, leaving the helpless drivers without police protection. It’s unclear who gave that command.

It doesn’t matter who gave that command; police being ordered to do nothing against protesters is a time-honored tradition in the Bay Area, starting with former Mayor Diane Feinstein and her edict to let rioting homosexuals trash cop cars and buildings in 1979.  That’s the price you pay for living in the Bay Area and allowing yourself to be governed by Surrender Monkeys.  You want it, you bought it, you like it, go ahead and live it.

Let me be frank for a moment: there are perhaps two things worth saving in Oakland: Quinn’s Lighthouse Restaurant on the Embarcadero, and Jack London Square.  I couldn’t care less about anything else in that squalid town.  Let it burn.

BZ

 

 

Obama: using Trayvon Martin as nothing more than a political tool

Obama Race CardWay to go, Mr Obama; we would expect nothing less of you: take full advantage of the death of a black man to further enable your political ends.  How craven of you.

From NBCNews.com:

Obama: Honor Trayvon Martin by battling gun violence

President Obama called on the nation to honor Trayvon Martin a day after George Zimmerman was acquitted of his murder by asking “ourselves if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence.”

His comments came as family members of Zimmerman and Martin, as well as pundits, celebrities, and court observers had strong reactions to Saturday’s not guilty verdict, with those reactions taking various forms — from joy and outrage to Shakespearean references and calls for peace.

Leftists, Progressives and Demorats will call again and again for the limitation of our freedoms, to include restrictions on the Second Amendment — which lead to restrictions of the First and all other amendments in the Bill of Rights — and an increase in our taxes.

Restrictions and money — they both answer every Demorat question or problem.  Except they do not, and never have.  You cannot change a culture with money.  You cannot make blacks value the lives of its own young black men, with money.  You cannot eradicate gangs with money.  You cannot bring black fathers back into the lives of black children with money.

You can, however, drive the once-nuclear black family apart with money — welfare money.  You can pay blacks money to eliminate the influence of the father.  You can pay single-parent black families to continue to break apart and you can guarantee this breakdown (and thus a continual reliance on government) by never stopping the flow of welfare cash.  Then you can create generation after generation of blacks who have been highly incentivized to demand their Free Cheese, instead of promoting their ability to learn how to make cheese for themselves.  Independence vs dependence.  For votes.  Voting themselves “largesse.”

But little occurs in a vacuum so what, do you think, happened when traditional and nuclear black families were eliminated with purpose and profound naivete by Demorats?

Gangs happened.

Because people are primarily Social Animals.  And when you stop the Natural Family, the vacuum created embraces gangs.  Because gangs are, at their most base, a family enabling a sense of belonging and engendering loyalty.  Rewarding loyalty.

Restrictions and money.

Money solves nothing; it only serves to make the problems addressed more convoluted and expands government and its concomitant bureaucracy.  It pays administrators bloated sums for glotted directorates, broken group-think, ever-expanding budgets, and a mindset that continues to believe that removing our freedoms and then selling them back to us, when the bureaucracy so deigns, is a good thing.

Finally: thanks again, Mr Obama, for being on the wrong side of an issue and further exposing your racist aspects, noting your comment: “You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

Nothing like putting the force of the entire Presidential Bully Pulpit against a suspect where, in this country, persons are allegedly considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  Unless one wishes Napoleonic Law.  Or one is a racist.  Or perhaps even both when it serves.

Let us not forget that it was Mr Obama’s DOJ that paid people to protest against George Zimmerman.  If that isn’t biased and racist, I cannot conjure what is.  Yes; perpetrated under the cloak of the power of presidential authority.

I leave you with this clue from the very beginning: “At the time, police said they found no evidence to contradict Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense.”  [20][22][23]

One high-profile dead black man = wonderful political fodder for Mr Obama.

Your Loving Black President at work.

BZ

Obama Racist Words

 

 

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN: NOT GUILTY!

George ZimmermanI told you he would be found NOT GUILTY.

Let the stupidity in Florida commence.

BZ

P.S.
Blacks shall riot as whites rioted following the OJ Simpson verdict, yes?

Because, reasonably, all things are equal in the courts’ eyes, politics and thoughts of the law — are they not?

 

 

13,000 died needlessly at 14 worst UK healthcare facilities

Obama Care Too OldFrom the UKTelegraph.com:

The needless deaths of thousands of NHS patients will be exposed in a report this week.

Thirteen THOUSAND citizens.

Prof Sir Bruce Keogh will describe how each hospital let its patients down badly through poor care, medical errors and failures of management, and will show that the scandal of Stafford Hospital, where up to 1,200 patients died needlessly, was not a one-off.

The report will also pile pressure on Labour over its handling of the NHS, with the Conservatives likely to seize on it to attack Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary who was in charge of the NHS in England from June 2009 until May 2010.

This is, oddly enough, the same national healthcare system that was touted as so incredibly wonderful by those Leftists who swooned at the thought of its carbon copy being installed in the United States of America via ObakaKare.

But hey, no problem, thirteen-thousand persons killed [ In a medical system designed to save lives. – BZ ] via “alarming levels of infections, patients suffering from neglect and appalling blunders such as surgery performed on the wrong parts of bodies.”

Thank goodness there weren’t any really significant problems.

That ObakaKare, boy-o-boy. I simply cannot wait for the blivit to ensue.

National health care.  You want it?  You got it.

BZ

P.S.
Read this story by Cal Thomas for insight into the failure of UK’s socialized medicine.

But wait; maybe there is a true reason for socialized medicine: to significantly reduce the number of persons on the planet in order to enable Agenda 21.  In which case, NHS and ObakaKare are quite brilliant in their origins.

Article: “The impact of unacceptable wait time on health care patients’ attitudes and actions.”

Article: “How long do Canadians wait for health care?”