And that’s why I love Obama political cartoons.
Because humor isn’t funny unless it’s based in fact.
And Obama cannot even name those responsible for terror. He lives in a world of purple skies and unicorns and My Little Pony.
BZ
And that’s why I love Obama political cartoons.
Because humor isn’t funny unless it’s based in fact.
And Obama cannot even name those responsible for terror. He lives in a world of purple skies and unicorns and My Little Pony.
BZ
It would seem that Mr Obama has finally revealed his true purpose:
To keep Demorats in control in perpetuity.
Do what I call the Logical Extension.
First, understand the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
With that under your belt, now read from the DailyCaller.com:
by Neil Munro
The spread of vibrant social diversity is constricting the GOP’s ability to champion conservative causes, such as smaller government and independent families, President Barack Obama said in a softball media interview.
“Over the long term, I’m pretty optimistic, and the reason is because this country just becomes more and more of a hodgepodge of folks,” Obama told Vox editor Ezra Klein.
Check where this is going.
“People are getting more and more comfortable with the diversity of this country, much more sophisticated about both the cultural differences but more importantly, the basic commonality that we have,” he said in his talk, which was recorded Jan 23.
But for Obama, “commonality” is a go-to euphemism for big, intrusive, nation-wide government by progressive experts.
The nation’s governors “all have a common interest, and that is making sure that their constituents — who are also my constituents — are able to gain opportunity, work hard, prosper, feel secure,” Obama said in a Dec. 5 comment about visiting governors. “That happens best when we work together, whether we’re talking about Democrats and Republicans and independents working together, or whether we’re talking about state, federal and local officials working together,” he said.
Further:
Free-market variety is contrary to a common purpose, Obama said Jan. 21. “Our media is all segmented now so that instead of just watching three stations, we got 600,” he said in an Idaho speech. “You got the [single] conservative station and the liberal stations. So everybody is only listening to what they already agree with. And then you’ve got political gerrymandering… so there are a lot of institutional forces that make it seem like we have nothing in common,” he said.
What does that mean to you?
To me it means: when the nation is consumed by a greater and greater number of illegal immigrants and by an increasing number of persons who will, in fact, vote themselves “largesse” (immigrants, of course, having the right to vote) because they find dependence on the government to be vividly attractive, then Conservatives and the GOP will have nothing to offer the population.
Meaning: the electorate will continue to vote, in perpetuity, for Free Cheese, thus eliminating any competition to Demorats.
Voila. Mr Obama enables Cloward-Piven writ large over the entire nation.
A project being worked on with great vigor by Mr Barack Hussein Obama.
BZ
Let’s see:
Obama is a liar.
He has been proven so time and again.
He lied about Obamacare. Obamacare was passed in the dead of night, unilaterally.
Just like Obamacare, we have to wait for the FCC to institute “net neutrality” before we can read its true contents.
The FCC “won’t release the actual text of the regulations until after it approves them on Feb. 26.”
Sound vaguely familiar?
From NationalJournal.com:
by Brendan Sasso
February 10, 2015 The Federal Communications Commission is misleading the public about its 332-page plan to regulate the Internet, a Republican member of the commission said Tuesday.
The net-neutrality plan could in fact open the door to new fees and taxes, as well as government control over the prices that Internet providers charge their customers, Commissioner Ajit Pai told reporters.
The claims echo attacks from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who are also scrambling to thwart the new regulations. Committees in the House and Senate have launched investigations into whether President Obama inappropriately influenced the FCC’s decision, and Republican lawmakers are working on their own alternative net-neutrality legislation to override FCC action.
Read:
“The claim that President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet does not include rate regulation is flat-out false,” Pai said. “Indeed, the only limit on the FCC’s discretion to regulate rates is its own determination of whether rates are ‘just and reasonable,’ which isn’t much of a restriction at all.”
So-called “net neutrality” isn’t quite so neutral?
What a shock.
Not.
BZ