But wait; doesn’t that go directly against the LDAMM narrative?
Of course it does. Which is why you’ll read it here first. From TruePundit.com:
FBI: Lisa Page Dimes Out Top FBI Officials During Classified House Testimony; Bureau Bosses Covered Up Evidence China Hacked Hillary’s Top Secret Emails
Former top FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified during two days of closed-door House hearings, revealing shocking new Intel against her old bosses at the Bureau, according the well-placed FBI sources.
Alarming new details on allegations of a bureau-wide cover up. Or should we say another bureau-wide cover up.
The embattled Page tossed James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Bill Priestap among others under the Congressional bus, alleging the upper echelon of the FBI concealed intelligence confirming Chinese state-backed ‘assets’ had illegally acquired former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 30,000+ “missing” emails, federal sources said.
The Russians didn’t do it. The Chinese did, according to well-placed FBI sources.
So let’s just see how far this goes.
Let’s see how many media outlets are interested in this news.
Are they curious? Will they bury the lead? Will they at least mention this in passing?
Hand me some popcorn with extra butter and my glass of vodka.
The Sack Heads Radio Show on the SHR Media Network is no more; in its stead — same time and day — is the Sack Heads: AGAINST TYRANNY Show (an actual SHAT Show) helmed by Sack Heads Clint and Sack Heads BZ.
As one would expect, Clint and BZ tore through the gristle of today’s screaming headlines and ripped out the sinewy Tendons of Truth ensconced within, all from the Hoary Streets of Shatramento, Fornicalia, exposing the trembling toadies, sniveling jackanapes and fripperous fopdoodles infesting Leftist and Progressive ant farms nationally.
Featuring the effervescent contrarian Sack Heads CLINT, plus the unrestrained bulbosity of the ZEPPMEISTER — doubling your late night Conservative talk show pleasure with double the hosts — elements that, when combined, produce delayed borborygmus and, in some cases, true elegance. Some contents may have settled during shipping. Member FDIC. Batteries not included. Warranty void in Montenegro.
Following Sack Heads Shaun’s grandiose appearance last week, Clint was back in his customary chair with a bit of perturbation about the positioning of his camera. It was also pointed out, to Clint, how the table and microphone were now more “Clint-proof” in order to keep him from smacking the mic and making unsettling noises over the air that don’t sit well with those in the chat room.
However, Clint clearly possessed disdain for the new video cam position and let there be no question about his feelings as evidenced below.
Tonight Clint and BZ talked about a veritable gaggle — no, a shrewdness, a murmuration, an obstinancy, a warren, a pandemonium, a gaggle, a muster, a covey, an unkindness, a maelstrom, a knot, a shiver, an intrusion, a smack, a hive, a prickle, a cauldron of topics partially (but by no means fully or robustly) to include:
Don’t quote baseball lines, don’t throw rocks at strippers named Kiki;
The San Diego Padres haven’t been cat piss since Dan Fouts was quarterback;
Sack Heads Clint is a lean, mean, athletic machine;
Flying into San Diego’s Lindbergh Field isn’t for the faint of heart;
Sack Heads Clint saw a Lockheed U2;
Sack Heads Clint was testing to see if BZ was actually listening to what he says;
Bill Browder donates $400,000 to the HRC campaign from RUSSIA;
For DISH subscribers: your Hopper has recently been wired to play YouTube videos. You can now toss the SHAT Show onto your massive flatscreen TV and watch him in all of his obese, biased and politically-execrable potty-mouthed goodness. Quarter in a hat.
If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, click on the yellow button at the upper left.
If you care to watch the show on the SHR Media YouTube channel, click on the red arrow in the middle of the video. Please SUBSCRIBE to the SHR Media channel.
If you care to watch this episode on the SHR Media Facebook page (in glorious color, like any of the Quinn Martin productions), click right here. Kindly LIKE us and FRIEND us on Facebook.
BZ asks to remind everyone that the hosts only monitor the Shat Room at SHRMEDIA.COM — though there are Shat rooms on Facebook and YouTube. We can only monitor one Shat room at a time so, please, we ask that you partake of the SHR Media Shat room. Heavy sigh: if only BZ had a producer who could monitor them all.
-Want to listen to the SHAT Show archives in podcast? Go here.
-Want to watch the show live on Facebook? Go to the SHR Media Facebook page here.
-Want to watch past SHAT Shows on YouTube? Go here.
“SHAT is where it’s at.”
Thank you one and all for listening to, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right”!
Figure 1: The most arrogant, pompous, berating, snide, smug, self-righteous, biased and untrustworthy person recently displayed on US television. At least until another alphabet agency Deep State actor appears on US television.
Lisa Page ‘cooperative,’ ‘credible,’ lawmakers say after 5-hour closed-door session
by Amy Lieu
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and “credible” in a closed-door session Friday with select House committee members that lasted nearly five hours.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill.
Meadows said he thinks the American people “would be happy” with Friday’s transcribed interviews, the Washington Post reported.
“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency. … We’ve certainly learned additional things today,” Meadows said.
That would certainly be in direct contravention of what little information the superior and keening Peter Strzok deigned to parse out on Wednesday past.
Page, who defied a subpoena Wednesday, would have been held in contempt of Congress had she not appeared at Friday’s session, lawmakers said.
In the private testimony, she primarily answered questions about text messages with Peter Strzok that allegedly showed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump, the New York Post reported.
Meadows called Page a “credible witness,” as he walked out of the hearing, the report said.
“There is new information,” he told reporters. “And that information is credible.”
Lisa Page was, let’s be blunt, nothing more than a stepping stone in a whirlwind of choices Peter Strzok had to make in the past few years. Lisa Page was possessed of a, well, a certain “mien” the likes of which Strzok apparently couldn’t otherwise acquire at home or else he wouldn’t have strayed. Common soldiers united in thought, deed, pillow biting and politics. Say, isn’t that a new Austrian industrial music group, Pillow Biting and Politics — Kissenbeißen und Politik? Or a new Angela Merkel call-in radio show?
You, of course, remember this as the infamous Peter Strzok/Lisa Page illicit liaison in 2016 (perhaps even farther back) of a married man and an unmarried woman.
Was Louis Gohmert correct in this tactic? I suggest that, yes, clearly, he was.
Let’s be honest. Robert Mueller wasn’t going to fire and replace Peter Strzok until the day that the DOJ — not Mueller or any of his group — brought certain problems to Mueller’s attention. Strzok was doing God’s work on the Mueller team in keeping with his theme of “against Trump by any means.” Mueller had the latitude but, sadly, lost a very devoted soldier but only because Strzok was, well, stupid. Had the texts not been revealed or perhaps not even created on FBI/taxpayer equipment on FBI/taxpayer time, Mueller would have continued to be the happy bivalve/mollusk packed in sand. “Bias? What bias?”
Bank on it.
So this is an “expert counterintelligence agent,” one who hangs his ass out in a potential honey pot scheme, opens himself to potential blackmail by opposing agents or forces, and then conducts his biased business essentially “in the clear” in today’s digital age? We’re supposed to trust this guy? And then add in all of his numerous and egregious examples of bias in the HRC investigation and the Trump/Russia investigation? In the eyes of Strzok and others like him, yes, we are that daft.
Let me ask those who believe Strzok’s documented written biases didn’t affect his thoughts, deeds or actions this question: let’s insert your name for Trump’s in all those text messages. Peter Strzok is subject to sitting on a jury where you are the defendant. Would you want him seated in the jury? I mean, after all, he insists he can be completely unbiased.
Further, former FBI Assistant Director Andrew McCabe has already said something similar to “if I’m going down, others are going down with me.” Or words to that effect, Senator. Heh.
Is Andrew McCabe the as-yet unacknowledged proverbial floater in the punchbowl?
Perhaps an incredibly important adjunct question is this: why is McCabe free and Manafort behind bars in solitary confinement?