Tag Archives: Pew Research Center

State Dept stabs Trump by increasing flow of “refugees” to US

Posted on by

More proof that the tick-like embedded Obama-Obedient Deep State Loyalistas continue to subvert, undermine, compromise, diminish, impair and sabotage the presidency of Donald Trump, who won his spot not by imperial fiat but by playing according to the rules.

Leftists at the Department of State hate that. They hate his policies. They’ve already said so. They want more “refugees,” not fewer.

From Breitbart.com:

Report: Trump Administration to Nearly Double Rate of Refugee Admissions for Balance of FY 2017

by Michael Patrick Leahy

The New York Timesis reporting that the State Department will nearly double the rate of refugee admissions to the United States for the balance of FY 2017, from the current rate of 830 per week to 1,500 per week.

Of course, that’s at the behest of President Trump, right?

“Despite repeated efforts by President Trump to curtail refugee resettlements, the State Department this week quietly lifted the department’s restriction on the number of refugees allowed to enter the United States,” the Times reported on Friday.

The result could be a near doubling of refugees entering the country, from about 830 people a week in the first three weeks of this month to well over 1,500 people per week by next month, according to refugee advocates. Tens of thousands of refugees are waiting to come to the United States.

The State Department’s decision was conveyed in an email on Thursday to the private agencies in countries around the world that help refugees manage the nearly two-year application process needed to enter the United States.

In her email, Jennifer L. Smith, a department official, wrote that the refugee groups could begin bringing people to the United States “unconstrained by the weekly quotas that were in place.”

Uh-oh. Maybe not conducted on behalf of the President of the United States, one Donald John Trump.

It is unclear if the State Department made this upward adjustment with the knowledge and approval of President Trump. The Department of Justice, however, was apparently consulted.

Really? Just who within the DOJ? Was it from the top via Attorney General Jeff Sessions? No one seems yet to know.

“A State Department spokeswoman, speaking on the condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said the department had consulted the Department of Justice about its refugee quotas and had decided to adjust them,” the Times reported.

Again: who was “consulted”? Did this alleged “consultation” go right into the office of the AG himself? Did it somehow wend its way into the White House? Shock of shocks, I suspect not.

As of May 24, 45,533 refugees have been admitted to the United States in FY 2017, which began on October 1, 2016. Earlier this week, Breitbart News estimated that if the refugee entry rate continued at the level of 817 per week (the rate of the four most recent weeks), the total number of refugees admitted to the United States in FY 2017 by September 30 would be 60,672.

Do we even know where our current bulk of refugees are or where they went? How many entered? How many visa overstays? Of course we don’t because the Obama administration didn’t care and, more pointedly, didn’t want to know.

Stop. Let’s look at the numbers. I’ll wager you had no idea this great a flood was occurring right under our very noses. That’s 45,000 “refugees” into the US before the end of the 2017 federal fiscal year.

What is a federal fiscal year? Every FFY starts on October 1st and runs to the last day of September. Translated: there’s still a lot of FY 2017 remaining.

You want stats? Costs? How about this, where Rep. Scott DesJarlais speaks to Department of Homeland Security and State Department officials over the dangers of allowing refugees from Syria into the United States without the ability to properly vet them, including their likely terror ties.

Let’s also consult further statistics. From PewResearch.org:

A total of 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the U.S. in fiscal year 2016, making up almost half (46%) of the nearly 85,000 refugees who entered the country in that period, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center. That means the U.S. has admitted the highest number of Muslim refugees of any year since data on self-reported religious affiliations first became publicly available in 2002.

Your State Department wants more.

Opponents of the federal refugee resettlement program vigorously criticized the reported change in the Trump administration’s refugee admissions policy for FY 2017.

“Stunning news: Trump State Department opens the flood gates, refugee admissions will explode in coming weeks,” Ann Corcoran wrote at Refugee Resettlement Watch on Saturday.

“Betraying the voters who elected Donald Trump, the Department of State slipped the news to the contractors on Thursday who then slipped the news to the New York Times just as you were packing up for the beach or getting ready for a family barbecue using the federal government’s favorite holiday weekend trick to bury the news,” Corcoran added.

But wait. Muslims vs Christians? Sorry. Christians lose. Even Newsweek.com admits:

THE U.S. BARS CHRISTIAN, NOT MUSLIM, REFUGEES FROM SYRIA

by Elliott Abrams

The headline for this column—The U.S. Bars Christian, Not Muslim, Refugees From Syria—will strike many readers as ridiculous.

But the numbers tell a different story: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one-half of 1 percent.

One half of one percent. Oddly enough, that corresponds to the number of transgender persons in the US, the likes for which we must turn our society upside-down.

We’ll go to bat for transgenders but Christians can go to hell in their minority numbers?

The Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, the administrative part of the State Department that manages the inflow of refugees to the United States, continues to be run by holdovers from the Obama administration.

What a shock. I’m shocked. I’m sure you’re equally shocked. State Department underminers are still back at this:

  • Rigged primaries = FAILED;
  • Rigged debates = FAILED;
  • Rigged general = FAILED;
  • Rigged AMM = FAILED;
  • Rigged FBI = FAILED;
  • Rigged recount = FAILED;
  • Rigged “fake news” = FAILED;
  • Rigged “Russia hackers” = FAILED;
  • Rigged “Hamilton Electors” = FAILED.

What’s left? To undermine from the inside at the DOS. They have an agenda and they have made no bones about it.

Then this from CounterJihadReport.com:

Stunning news: Trump State Department opens the flood gates, refugee admissions will explode in coming weeks

Betraying the voters who elected Donald Trump, the Department of State slipped the news to the contractors on Thursday who then slipped the news to the New York Times just as you were packing up for the beach or getting ready for a family barbecue using the federal government’s favorite holiday weekend trick to bury the news.

Forget everything I said in my post yesterday about Trump’s “average” admissions. If they do as they are now saying they will, Donald Trump will be responsible for one of six highest resettlement years since 9/11.

The NYTimes.com reports:

U.S. Quietly Lifts Limit on Number of Refugees Allowed In

by Gardiner Harris

WASHINGTON — Despite repeated efforts by President Trump to curtail refugee resettlements, the State Department this week quietly lifted the department’s restriction on the number of refugees allowed to enter the United States.

The result could be a near doubling of refugees entering the country, from about 830 people a week in the first three weeks of this month to well over 1,500 people per week by next month, according to refugee advocates. Tens of thousands of refugees are waiting to come to the United States.

Tens of thousands. The bulk of whom are Muslim.

President Trump wanted a travel stay from primarily seven, then six Middle Eastern terror-oriented nations. He is getting the exact opposite, aided and abetted by black robed men and women nurturing and issuing their very own fake laws.

You can see how well that’s going for Europe. Do we really want that same state of affairs here in the United States? More deaths from persons who have no investment whatsoever in Western culture or civilization and, further, want not simply to be just indifferent but want to tear it down completely?

BZ

 

 Share

Voter fraud: 1 in 8

Posted on by

demorat-voter-fraud-cartoonThe Pew Research Center report recently made a shocking discovery.

And that is:

ONE in EIGHT voter registrations in the United States is significantly inaccurate or no longer valid. That amounts to — wait for it — EIGHTEEN MILLION people. Plus another FOUR MILLION people ineligible or dead voters on the rolls.

Let that seep into your brainulus for a moment or three.

What is the population of the United States? That would be 318 million persons.

Frankly, it makes me wonder how my mother and father are voting right now. Oh right; my mother died in 2002 and my father in 2009.

When Donald Trump states “the election is rigged” — considering all that has been revealed recently — could that be the actual understatement of understatements?

Go to my posts here and here for verification.

At worst, ponder the Broken Clock Theory.

At the most obvious, consider that, as of Tuesday, because of two James O’Keefe Project Veritas videos, there have been at least four firings or resignations of Leftists directly due to PV’s revelations. Just on Tuesday.

The collusion and corruption is absolutely unprecedented. “Homeland Security” shouldn’t be running national elections. Because of having input into thousands of elections, one corrupter would have to influence only only venue instead of many. Entirely too tempting.

That mentioned, I will always despise George Bush for creating “Homeland Security” in the first place. All you had to do, George, is DEMAND that all the alphabet agencies play nice amongst themselves or you’d cut their funds.

The “Bully Pulpit.” Who had it, GW?

One must “repair” voting discrepancies at the state and county level, since it’s not a federal issue. Oh yes; unless certain personnel make it a federal issue. Except that Patrick Kennedy of the State Department was offering a federal bribe, a “quid pro quo” if you will, to FBI agents for key postings — to look the other way in DNC and HRC investigations.

Don’t quote to me statistics or political incidents from the 1800s. Yes, politics was rough then. What they didn’t have is the digital age where hacking can be done by, literally, jammie-wearing, thumb-sucking, T-ball, PlaySkool Leftists sitting in their parents’ basements.

But perhaps the key question might be: can the DC swamp actually be drained? I make this analogy because, originally, the White House was constructed in a swamp that is now termed a “tidal plain.” Right. Word pablum.

And the actual overarching question that no one is addressing?

The largest hard fiscal “re-set” in the history of America and possibly the world is looming.

Despite all the massive forces arrayed against one of the THE worst Republican candidates in history, HRC officially stands at 45% to DT’s 39%. To me, that bespeaks volumes, absolute volumes.

Hillary can’t break 47%. Despite the incredible and staggering amount of illegal and adverse and biased ramparts behind her. And ALL of the American Media Maggots. 278 contiguous days without hosting an actual open press conference?

Trump is up 38 to 31 with Independents.

I still believe there are any number of Americans who are quiet, who won’t make themselves known, who — on any number of sexual, melanin levels — wait until they take that moment to step into a booth.

We can choose to devolve or evolve.

The corruption is widespread and systemic.

I ask each and every one of you #NeverTrump ‘ers: In 2020, just who is your perfect candidate of choice, The One who is so incredibly a savior and for whom you are so willing to sacrifice four to eight years? Why are they perfect? And why are they more important then than now?

I’m waiting.

BZ

 

 Share

The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America, Pt. II

Posted on by

Burqa

A US Muslim male in the company of his wife dressed in this fashion is not a “moderate Muslim” but, instead, someone to be watched quite carefully.

I first wrote about the myth of the so-called “moderate Muslim” here, when it was revealed by the Center For Security Policy that “of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.”

But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

Two more very important paragraphs from my first blogpost about the myth of the “moderate Muslim in America:

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

Understand this, however:

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

Read that again.  Violence is justified is justified to ensure shariah law.

So essentially, as WND.com wrote,

Poll: Most U.S. Muslims would trade Constitution for Shariah

‘Quran should be highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion’

by Leo Hohmann

Ben Carson’s comment that he would not support a Shariah-compliant Muslim for president because Islamic law is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution led to the former brain surgeon’s roasting among media talkers and politicians of all stripes.

He has been excoriated as “anti-Muslim,” “bigoted,” even “anti-American” and unfit for office.

With the exception, as I wrote here, is that Dr Carson merely states the truth because, as indicated repeatedly, Muslims in the US embrace Shariah Law over our own US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Further, where does the Muslim concept of “taqiyah” enter into the equation?  If you are unfamiliar with that term, you’d best click on the link.

Further, Leftists embrace CAIR as they embrace the ACLU.  Except that the ACLU doesn’t immediately want to kill you for religious reasons — say, if you’re a Christian..  Yet.

This is important because Omar Ahmad, one founder of CAIR — and CAIR makes no bones about its representation of Muslims in the United States of America — has said, in “a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.  The Quran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” ”

CAIR denied Ahmad made the statement and said the newspaper that printed his statement retracted it, but that was proven false.  In other words, Ahmad told the truth and CAIR lied.

This is another telling paragraph itself.

Ihsan Bagby of CAIR’s Washington office has said that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country,” Pipes reported in his 2006 article, “CAIR Islamists Fooling the Government.”

Islam can be conflictive in its statements, but that is dependent upon its goals at the time of the statement.  There is a general Muslim word called “taqiyah” representing the notion in Islam that Muslims should never tell the truth to infidels.  You and me, Western Civilization, those not believing in Islam, we are the infidels.  The unclean.  The ones who, like the Borg, need to be converted or killed.  Muslims are not ashamed to tell you this and to make the concept clear.  Google the word and check its meanings and various spellings.

Islam will frequently tell you what it is thinking and what it wants.  Many Muslims in America — a majority as indicated above — believe that Shariah Law is supreme over any other form of American law.  That is very clear.  On the other hand, Muslims have a duty to lie to infidels.

Therefore, Ahmad through CAIR, is representative of what Muslims in the US believe.  You can come to no other conclusion.  CAIR is happy to make the linkage itself.  They make it quite clear they wish to represent Muslims in America.  As noted above, a poll already indicates that a majority of sampled Muslims hold that Shariah Law should be the law of the United States.

Yes, I am certain there are moderate Muslims in America.

Just as I believe there are Muslims in America who do not practice Islam as demanded by the most devout and true of followers of Mohammad and of the Koran.

Those are the “moderate Muslims” in America, who would not survive their practice in the Middle East.  The Muslims who do not practice the Koran as strictly written.  If you are a “moderate Muslim,” you’re not doing it right and you yourself may be in danger of an Islamic re-tuning.

If you point out a “moderate Muslim” to me, I’ll point out someone who cannot recite a minimum of five surahs and hasn’t been to a mosque in months or years, whose wife doesn’t wear hajib and who doesn’t not have a beard or fear Mohammad.  Someone the rest of non-moderate Islam would consider too Westernized

Unless they are present in the US to blend in as they plot our infidel deaths.

There are the exceptions, you see.

hirsi-ali_-ayaan-B_W_Size4

Asked whether suicide bombing can be justified as a measure to defend Islam, 26 percent of American Muslims age eighteen to twenty-nine said yes. That is one quarter of the adult American Muslims under the age of thirty, and no matter how you count the number of Muslims in America (estimates vary from 2 million to 8 million), that is a lot of people.

– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician.

BZ

 

 Share

The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America

Posted on by

Muslim Who Is ModerateAnd it is a myth.  There now exist the statistics to prove it.  Which begins to lend credence to the graphic below.

Muslim Radical vs ModerateOf course, it is not proper or politically correct to state the obvious when the obvious is screamed to be stated — primarily by Islam itself.

The Center for Security Policy released the following information just this last month on June 23rd.

Poll of U.S. Muslims Reveals Ominous Levels Of Support For Islamic Supremacists’ Doctrine of Shariah, Jihad

Press Releases | | The Muslim Brotherhood in America, Understanding the Shariah Threat Doctrine

According to a new nationwide online survey (Below) of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.

Read this very carefully, Americans.  What is portrayed by your government and Leftists appears to be in direct contravention to the truth.

The numbers of potential jihadists among the majority of Muslims who appear not to be sympathetic to such notions raise a number of public policy choices that warrant careful consideration and urgent debate, including: the necessity for enhanced surveillance of Muslim communities; refugee resettlement, asylum and other immigration programs that are swelling their numbers and density; and the viability of so-called “countering violent extremism” initiatives that are supposed to stymie radicalization within those communities.

Overall, the survey, which was conducted by The Polling Company for the Center for Security Policy (CSP), suggests that a substantial number of Muslims living in the United States see the country very differently than does the population overall.  The sentiments of the latter were sampled in late May in another CSP-commissioned Polling Company nationwide survey.

But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

In this way Muslims appear to be something akin to the current occupants of the White House and DC: those pesky American laws simply don’t apply to me.

People who look upon Islam as nothing but another religion are duped and ignorant.  Islam is much more than a mere religion; it is a way of life, a duty, a political entity, something that crosses all aspects of Muslim life.  It crosses every aspect and influences and informs every decision made by a devout Muslim.

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

Understand this, however:

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

Note: please see the complete poll here.

Frank Gaffney writes:

The findings of the Center for Security Policy’s survey of Muslims in America suggests that we have a serious problem.  The Pew Research Center estimates that the number of Muslims in the United States was 2.75 million in 2011, and growing at a rate of 80-90 thousand a year.  If those estimates are accurate, the United States would have approximately 3 million Muslims today.  That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that shariah is “The Muslim God Allah’s law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad.”

“If telling the truth about something can get you killed, then that truth needs to be told again and again and again. And acting on that truth will save us.”

— Bosch Fawstin

BZ

 

 Share

Leftists pushing more gun control: when gun crime is still plunging and more Americans oppose gun control

Posted on by

Gun ControlOnce again, placing the logic, common sense, proportion and rationality of Leftists into question.

Despite the bedwetting hysteria of Leftists over cops and black male shootings.

From FoxNews.com:

Why most Americans oppose more gun control

by Dr John R Lott, Jr

A new Pew Research Center survey finds that, for the first time in their surveys, the majority of Americans oppose more gun control. Gallup and CNN polls tell a similar story. Opposition to gun control has been increasing over at least the last couple of decades.

Gun control groups have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to try to convince Americans that gun control is the answer. In 2013, gun owners’ groups — including the NRA — spent less than one seventh as much on television advertisements. This year looks to be even more lopsided, thanks to the unrelenting efforts of individuals such as Michael Bloomberg, George Soros and Gabriel Giffords.

Perceptions have changed dramatically, with most people now believing the “More Guns, Less Crime” hypothesis. Gallup recently asked Americans if they thought residents are safer with a gun in the home. People answered “Yes” by a margin of 63 to 30 percent. In 2000, Americans gave just the opposite answer by a margin of 51 to 35 percent. In 2013,[3]  Sixty percent of gun owners listed “Personal Safety/Protection” as the reason for owning a gun.

Academic research aligns with current public opinion. If you have a gun in the home, that gun is far more likely to prevent murder than it is to be used in an accidental shooting or to kill a loved one.

Facts in evidence.

Shame.

BZ

 

 Share