Go here, please.
BZ
P.S.
Thanks to CLA. And I would never mock Al Sharpton.
Let’s put things in context, first, shall we?
Raffi Williams is the son of former NPR Left-leaning host and writer Juan Williams.
Here is Juan Williams, above: Juan Williams is black.
Here is his son, Raffi Williams, above: Raffi Williams is black.
Just why would female Ebony magazine editor Jamilah Lemieux “step in it” last week, pray tell?
From Twitchy.com:
After being rudely treated by Ebony editor Jamilah Lemieux, RNC staffer Raffi Williams stuck up for himself and other minority conservatives. Well, Lemieux’s supporters evidently do think black conservatives have a place in society — as long as that place is isolated and soundproof.
But first, Jamilah clearly indicated she isn’t interested in listening to anyone:
There you go. An uninformed black chick calling a black guy white. Because she’s ignorant and now has her racist tendencies outed. She sees race where the issue of melanin doesn’t exist.
This occurred on Twitter. Ben Carson and Armstrong Williams will be publishing a new magazine for Conservatives and Ebony trashed it. Raffi Williams supported the attempt. The editor weighed in and, amongst other things, called Raffi white. But white or black isn’t right or wrong, it’s a matter of diversity of viewpoints.
“Oh great, here comes a White dude telling me how to do this Black thing. Pass.”
Once again, Leftists proving that they are serial racists and serial crushers of actual diverse melanin and diverse critical thinking. Raffi Williams is now a “race traitor.”
Ever wonder why this country cannot seem to get past its race issues? Plain and simple, it’s because a number of specifically-delineated black racists cannot and will not allow America to do so; it would diminish both their power and their cash. Ebony editor Jamilah Lemieux has had her Race Card already outed and is now categorized with the Race and Poverty Pimpish likes of Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, et al — just like the DHS employee who advocated “killing a lot of whites” and, incredibly, a 2013 poll that dared to show more Americans view blacks as racist than whites or Hispanics.
Finally, I say this: reverse the roles and realize how long the flames of the incident would have been continually fanned by Leftists in the DEM (Defeatist, Elitist Media) and AMM (American Media Maggots).
The Left simply wants to shut down thinking that is not completely congruent with their own, plain and simple. If you are black, you can only think one way. If white, another. How foolish and shallow is that?
BZ
“We Ask DNC Members: How Much of Opposition To Obama is Racist?
(from CNSNews.com)
by Matt Vespa
On February 28, MRCTV’s Dan Joseph decided to stop by the DNC winter meeting to ask committee members just how much of the opposition to President Obama is racist.
Joseph asked, How much of the opposition is race-based? And how much is policy based?
One commiteewoman said about half of the president’s detractors are against him because of his race, while another said it was over 50%.
There you have it. Anyone opposing Mr Obama simply must be a racist.
EXAMPLE TWO:
(from the WashingtonTimes.com)
by Phillip Swartz
For years, the Federal Communications Commission has allowed TV stations to execute joint operating agreements allowing themselves to outsource tasks such as advertising sales to group owners with more resources.
But when conservative columnist and entrepreneur Armstrong Williams recently purchased two stations, making him one of America’s few black owners of local TV affiliates, the commission unexpectedly decided to use his acquisition as a test case to review the practice.
The actions — coupled with other recent FCC decisions such as a plan to survey newsrooms that alarmed news media before it was withdrawn — have injected questions about whether a commission set up by Congress to be nonpartisan is now acting with a political litmus test under the Obama administration.
[And isn’t this a perfect post for Martin Luther King, Jr. Day — a situation that dishonors MLK.]
From Bloomberg.com:
President Barack Obama said that racial tensions may have softened his popularity among white voters within the last two years, according to a story posted on the New Yorker magazine’s website today.
“There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black president,” Obama said in the article by David Remnick, appearing in the magazine’s Jan. 27 edition.
But this time it’s not an Obama Minion claiming this.
It’s Obama Himself, throwing down the pettiest and cheapest card ever.
I am so tired of the hackneyed, puerile, obvious, cheap and patronizing old saw that Caucasoids are racist simply because of their melanin. I’d posit the reverse about blacks, having voted skin color over competence in 2008 and again in 2012. I am so over that trite card — the race card.
It’s what gets played when Obama — and his sycophants — have no other move. It’s what defense attorneys do in court when they lack a cogent argument and the facts and the case go against them: the cheap and personal attack.
Which is why I shall continue to point out the obvious on my blog: blacks can be every bit — or more — racist than Caucasoids.
And: they’ve got the GOWPs and the AMM in their pockets.
BZ
[Meanwhile, back at the ranch.]
I was scurrilously chasing down negative events in the life of Mr Obama (as in) . . .
- Tracked movements via key card, traced calls, searched email...
- FLASHBACK: Admin war on FOX...
- REPORT: DOJ Leaked Docs to Smear Fast & Furious Whistleblower...
- Administration's Two-Front War...
- RNC Chief: Obama Creating 'Atomsphere of Guerilla Warfare'...
- Congressman: Impeachment is an option...
- 'Richard Milhous Obama'...
. . . whilst in the process of seeking a new post topic, when I came upon this little ditty in the sidebar of a Washington Post article:
The Post tracked all homicides in D.C. between 2000 and 2011 to learn what happened to each case. It found that fewer than a third of the homicides have led to a conviction for murder or manslaughter. Find homicides in your neighborhood and see citywide trends here.
Some of my first thoughts:
– And this, DC, an area with a long and proud history of Management By Leftists whose first thought is to create infinite laws proscribing firearms.
– Because, apparently, all those anti-firearm laws have been to the great benefit of DC itself, yes?
– The citizens of DC buttressed, of course, in their witnessing and testimony in the numerous homicide investigations extant and in the past, secure in the knowledge that DC’s firearms laws will ensure their forthright and honest statements to the police, and that those black citizens and their families who have been victimized will stand up for their loved ones who have been heinously gunned down in cold blood.
– Unless, of course, those surviving family members happen to be of the same criminal ilk or gang of the victims and, due to that allegiance, find it incumbent not to cooperate in any fashion with the police.
– Because of the inherent doomed gangbanger and Free Cheese welfare lifestyle they have purposely chosen and purposely and steadfastly refuse to disavow. This is, after all, black-on-black crime.
For clarity, I now refer to a wonderful 1991 book by David Simon, “Homicide,” which spawned not only the TV show “Homicide” but Simon’s “The Wire” as well, whose detectives believed in the 10 Rules of a Homicide Investigation:
Let us now reflect on the wonders of Leftists and Demorats who began the trend of forcefully and systematically separating black fathers from the family unit in the 60s under the guise of LBJ’s Great Society, and whose steadfast political Free Cheese betrayal has resulted in the outright butchering of hundreds of thousands of black males, women, children, infants and the unborn due to violence and abortion.
Yeah, those gun laws, the Free Cheese, that certainly has had its benefits to the “black community” has it not, ladies and gentlemen?
BZ