“I don’t know if you know the genesis of the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment comes from the right to protect themselves from slave revolts, and from uprisings by Native Americans. A revolt from people who were stolen from their land or revolt from people whose land was stolen from, that’s what the genesis of the second amendment is.”
This ridiculous statement, by a man who sees his entire world framed only in terms of melanin, is immured below:
I can only conclude two things from the facts in evidence:
1. Mr Glover is an uneducated dolt, and 2. Mr Glover is nothing more than a well-paid racist
Of course, Mr Glover has every right to say what he wishes. As I have every right to point out said verbal idiocies.
“For me, you don’t ever want to be defined by the color of your skin. You want to be defined by your work ethic, the person that you are, your character, your personality. That’s what I’ve tried to go out and do. I am an African-American in America. That will never change. But I don’t have to be defined by that.’’
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”
What conclusion can you draw other than a major high-ranking US federal government official is disinterested in upholding the First Amendment of the US Constitution?
Specifically, in July of this year, Representative Trent Franks (R – Arizona, 2nd District) speaks with AAG Perez in an attempt to acquire an affirmation of free speech.
Which, as you can see, was avoided like the proverbial plague.
Like attempting to nail Jello to a tree.
However, let me do what I call the “logical extension,” and that is this: “blasphemy” would include Islam. Perhaps Buddhism. Perhaps Hinduism. Perhaps Sikhism. Perhaps Shinto. Perhaps Rastafarianism. Perhaps Scientology.
But not to include either Christianity or Judaism. And trust me when I tell you: Islamwill be on TOP of the Blasphemic Heap.
Isn’t it reassuring to realize your foundational First Amendment is held in such high regard by members of the current Obama Administration?
The federal government has closed a criminal probe of alleged financial misconduct by Arizona lawman Joe Arpaio, who styles himself as “America’s toughest sheriff,” and no charges will be filed, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said on Friday.
A separate federal investigation relating to allegations of civil rights abuses by Arpaio’s office is continuing.
The announcement on Friday marked the end of an investigation that began in November 2010 at the behest of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to examine alleged financial improprieties by the county sheriff and his deputies.
A federal criminal inquiry into several of those matters was concluded last summer with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona declining to initiate criminal charges.
Maricopa County authorities were informed on Friday that federal prosecutors had likewise declined to bring charges in connection with allegations that the sheriff’s office had misused county credit cards or misspent money from jail facilities excise taxes.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been portrayed in the AMERICAN media as a racist, a criminal, responsible for the hateful and recriminative application of onerous, fatal, oppressive, unlawful, sexist, suppression of the basic and fundamental rights of Americans nationally. To include, of course, those persons who are NOT lawful American citizens but whose status is protected and/or ignored by the very administration tasked with enforcement: the US federal government.
To those of you who cared not for Sheriff Joe Arpaio and determined him to be racist and unlawful I say: under Mr Romney, I submit Sheriff Arpaio’s name for Secretary of Homeland Security.
