Obama Blames U.S. For Gun Violence In Mexico

From RealClearPolitics.com:

“Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States,” President Obama said during a speech at Mexico’s Anthropology Museum.

Unspoken was the fact that those so-called “deadly guns in Mexico” also sourced from the US government itself, via the “Fast & Furious” program under BATFE.  Univision in Mexico also discovered additional information about how the US government more fully armed the Mexican drug cartels.  Thank you, Mr Obaka, for your lies spewed directly upon the sovereign soil of Mexico on Friday.  A refresher for us all:

As with all else on the planet, whatever ill that occurs is the responsibility and fault of the United States of America.
Yes, the US is the root cause of all gang violence in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of all the gun violence in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of all the poverty in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of anyone in Mexico having a firearm in their possession.  If Mexico wanted to stop foreign gun violence, perhaps they should build their own firearms manufacturing facilities.  Then the drug cartels could take over these factories for their own ends and simply cut out the middle man.Let’s take a step back.  Ultimately, what is Mr Obama doing here?  I say it is this:

He is speaking directly to the new voters of the United States.  He is speaking directly to the new Tit-Sucking Underclass about to be created when amnesty occurs, and when Illegal Mexicans are allowed to be seated on juries and decide criminal and civil cases involving their drug-dealing and law-violating friends.

Because, you must ask, just how will these new Mexicans vote when amnesty passes and they remain in the United States, and when Obama and the Demorats continue to provide Free Cheese?  Why yes, that would be correct: Demorat.

Mr Obama was doing nothing more, on Friday in Mexico, than speaking to his newest conglomerate of voters.

More apologism, more breast-beating, more America bashing in order to pander and subjugate the country for the demographically-increasing Mexican Illegal Invader vote.

I feel comforted.

Don’t you?

BZ

 

 

Florida sheriff: “We want people to call us if the guy down the street says he hates the government”

From the PalmBeachPost:

Florida House and Senate budget leaders have awarded Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw $1 million for a new violence prevention unit aimed at preventing tragedies like those in Newtown, Conn., and Aurora, Colo., from occurring on his turf.

Bradshaw is readying a hotline and is planning public service announcements to encourage local citizens to report their neighbors, friends or family members if they fear they could harm themselves or others.

“We want people to call us if the guy down the street says he hates the government, hates the mayor and he’s gonna shoot him,” Bradshaw said. “What does it hurt to have somebody knock on a door and ask, ‘Hey, is everything OK?’ ”

Now, do the Logical Extension on this one.  .  .

BZ

 

CSI Syria:

If there were a better chain of custody.  .  .

From JTA.org:

Obama: ‘Chain of custody’ needed for Syria action

WASHINGTON (JTA) — President Obama said he needs to have all the facts on who used chemical weapons in Syria before taking further action.

“What we now have is evidence that chemical weapons have been used inside of Syria, but we don’t know how they were used, when they were used, who used them,” Obama said Tuesday at a news conference. “We don’t have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened. And when I am making decisions about America’s national security and the potential for taking additional action in response to chemical weapon use, I’ve got to make sure I’ve got the facts.”

“We don’t have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened.”

CSI Syria.

Obaka drew a red line.  Then he pulled that red line and kicked it up a few hundred thousand feet.

BZ

P.S.
Charles Krauthammer responds.

 

 

Two new polls: Americans fear government more than terror

Andy Stevens QuoteThe story from WND.com:

According to a pair of recent polls, for the first time since the 9/11 terrorist hijackings, Americans are more fearful their government will abuse constitutional liberties than fail to keep its citizens safe.

A Fox News survey polling a random national sample of 619 registered voters the day after the bombing found despite the tragic event, those interviewed responded very differently than following 9/11.

For the first time since a similar question was asked in May 2001, more Americans answered “no” to the question, “Would you be willing to give up some of your personal freedom in order to reduce the threat of terrorism?”

A similar poll sampling 588 adults, conducted on April 17 and 18 for the Washington Post, also discovered the change in attitude.

“Which worries you more,” the Post asked, “that the government will not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in order to investigate terrorism?”

The poll found 48 percent of respondents worry the government will go too far, compared to 41 percent who worry it won’t go far enough.

Perhaps there’s just a glimmer of hope left for the nation?  I wish I could say I were convinced of the trend.

But, as with the Leftist doctrine of the American Media Maggots, this information and the existence of these polls remains predominantly uncovered.

You’re welcome.  I exist to serve.

BZ

 

MSM in state of apoplexy over rumors Koch Bros interested in Tribune Co.

From the BlackSphere.net:

For far too long the Main Stream Media has smugly assumed they had all print and broadcast news sewn up neatly in their Lefty pockets.

But for the past week rumors that the Koch brothers are taking a long look at buying the Tribune Company has spread like wild fire in a pine-beetle ravaged forest.

Media Matters Joe Strupp writes that the scary idea of the brothers buying Tribune is:

…sparking concerns from newspaper staff members that attempts to influence the editorial process in favor of their far-right political views may follow.

Among those concerned is Clarence Page, a top Chicago Tribune columnist, who said he would oppose a takeover of the paper by David and Charles Koch because of “the fact that they seem to be coming in upfront with the idea of using a major news media as a vehicle for their political voice.

Moderates or even — gulp — Rightists getting “control” of another media outlet?

Say not so!

BZ