Tag Archives: Rights of Americans

IRS: illegals who didn’t pay taxes deserve refunds

Posted on by

IRS ProtestAgain, every new day brings an new chunk of DC insanity to the nation.

From the WashingtonTimes.com:

IRS to pay back-refunds to illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes

by Stephen Dinan

Lawmakers fear illegals could use Obama amnesty to find ways to vote.

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen told Congress on Wednesday that even illegal immigrants who didn’t pay taxes will be able to claim back-refunds once they get Social Security numbers under President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty.

The revelation — which contradicts what he told Congress last week — comes as lawmakers also raised concerns Mr. Obama’s amnesty could open a window to illegal immigrants finding ways to vote, despite it being against the law.

Mr. Koskinen said he didn’t know how much money the tax refunds would cost, and said the White House never checked with him before announcing the amnesty. He said the maximum annual credit is between $500 and $600 for an individual.

Meanwhile, the concerns over voting are beginning to bubble up.Rep. Jim Jordan, Ohio Republican, will hold a hearing on the issue Thursday.Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, who has told Mr. Obama that illegal immigrants could find ways to vote thanks to his policy, is slated to testify.

There you go.  Isn’t that perfect?

First, that illegals who didn’t pay taxes will get tax refunds.

Second, that illegals who didn’t pay taxes and will get refunds may get to vote under Obamacare.

Every day, this nation becomes more insane under Demorat/Leftist “leadership.”

And goes to prove that Mr Obama is in fact in the process of attempting to Cloward-Piven this nation.

BZ

 

 Share

Obama’s perfect Cloward-Piven Strategy:

Posted on by

Barack ObamaIt would seem that Mr Obama has finally revealed his true purpose:

To keep Demorats in control in perpetuity.

Cloward-PivenDo what I call the Logical Extension.

First, understand the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

With that under your belt, now read from the DailyCaller.com:

Obama “Hopeful” Immigration Will Drown Conservatism

by Neil Munro

The spread of vibrant social diversity is constricting the GOP’s ability to champion conservative causes, such as smaller government and independent families, President Barack Obama said in a softball media interview.

“Over the long term, I’m pretty optimistic, and the reason is because this country just becomes more and more of a hodgepodge of folks,” Obama told Vox editor Ezra Klein.

Check where this is going.

“People are getting more and more comfortable with the diversity of this country, much more sophisticated about both the cultural differences but more importantly, the basic commonality that we have,” he said in his talk, which was recorded Jan 23.

But for Obama, “commonality” is a go-to euphemism for big, intrusive, nation-wide government by progressive experts.

The nation’s governors “all have a common interest, and that is making sure that their constituents — who are also my constituents — are able to gain opportunity, work hard, prosper, feel secure,” Obama said in a Dec. 5 comment about visiting governors. “That happens best when we work together, whether we’re talking about Democrats and Republicans and independents working together, or whether we’re talking about state, federal and local officials working together,” he said.

Further:

Free-market variety is contrary to a common purpose, Obama said Jan. 21. “Our media is all segmented now so that instead of just watching three stations, we got 600,” he said in an Idaho speech. “You got the [single] conservative station and the liberal stations. So everybody is only listening to what they already agree with. And then you’ve got political gerrymandering… so there are a lot of institutional forces that make it seem like we have nothing in common,” he said.

What does that mean to you?

To me it means: when the nation is consumed by a greater and greater number of illegal immigrants and by an increasing number of persons who will, in fact, vote themselves “largesse” (immigrants, of course, having the right to vote) because they find dependence on the government to be vividly attractive, then Conservatives and the GOP will have nothing to offer the population.

Meaning: the electorate will continue to vote, in perpetuity, for Free Cheese, thus eliminating any competition to Demorats.

Voila.  Mr Obama enables Cloward-Piven writ large over the entire nation.

A project being worked on with great vigor by Mr Barack Hussein Obama.

BZ

 

 Share

Net “neutrality” LIES from Obama:

Posted on by

Let’s see:

Obama is a liar.

He has been proven so time and again.

He lied about Obamacare.  Obamacare was passed in the dead of night, unilaterally.

Just like Obamacare, we have to wait for the FCC to institute “net neutrality” before we can read its true contents.

The FCC “won’t release the actual text of the regulations until after it approves them on Feb. 26.”

Sound vaguely familiar?

From NationalJournal.com:

Republican FCC Commissioner: Public Is Being Misled About Net-Neutrality Plan

by Brendan Sasso

“I have studied the 332-page plan in detail, and it is worse than I had imagined.”

February 10, 2015 The Federal Communications Commission is misleading the public about its 332-page plan to regulate the Internet, a Republican member of the commission said Tuesday.

The net-neutrality plan could in fact open the door to new fees and taxes, as well as government control over the prices that Internet providers charge their customers, Commissioner Ajit Pai told reporters.

The claims echo attacks from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who are also scrambling to thwart the new regulations. Committees in the House and Senate have launched investigations into whether President Obama inappropriately influenced the FCC’s decision, and Republican lawmakers are working on their own alternative net-neutrality legislation to override FCC action.

Read:

“The claim that President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet does not include rate regulation is flat-out false,” Pai said. “Indeed, the only limit on the FCC’s discretion to regulate rates is its own determination of whether rates are ‘just and reasonable,’ which isn’t much of a restriction at all.”

So-called “net neutrality” isn’t quite so neutral?

What a shock.

Not.

BZ

 

 Share