Tag Archives: shariah law

Shariah-compliant US government award favors Muslims

Posted on by

Islam and CoexistenceEveryone said, “no, it can’t happen here.  Clearly BZ, you are a racist.”

As if Islam were a “race,” you blithering idiots.  Islam isn’t just a religion, it’s a culture, an all-encompassing way of life that goes far beyond just a religion.  That is why Islam is so incredibly permeating and simultaneously dangerous.

I have been sent emails and had comments submitted to the blog (seldom published, due to the wonderful screening system of WordPress) telling me I was alternately racist, sexist, or was going to be converted or “removed.”  An Islamic euphemism for being “killed.”  You know, that inconvenient death thingie.

All due to, of course, my stance on Islam.  Because I expose the truth of Islam.  The truth becomes: “Islam is as Islam does.”  Not what people think Islam is or what it means, but what is actually perpetrated at the hands of Islam.

Muslims Prepare to Kill Coptic ChristiansDo you think for one minute, for example, that if twenty-one Muslims in orange jumpsuits were lined up on a beach in Italy and various Catholic verses read in Latin over those persons — who were subsequently beheaded on video whilst the leader extolled the virtues of Catholicism and excoriated those who disbelieved — that the world would debate at its leisure over whether they were truly beheaded on behalf of Catholicism?

What if this video was entitled “A message signed with blood to the nation of the scimitar”?  What if, in the video, the Catholics said “and we will conquer Mecca”?

[YouTube has since deleted the Message Signed With Blood video, as it would be biased to show Islam as it truly exists.  Instead, go here and click the video on the web page.]

And what if that rite were carried out numerous times, daily, throughout the globe?  What do you think the world’s opinion would be of Catholicism?  Of Christianity?  All prayers would be banned, priests injured or killed, churches razed, a pogrom of massive proportions in every country.  People wouldn’t be calmly discussing the issue over steaming cups of coffee.  There would instead be demands for action and in many cases there would be terrible violent retribution and death.

“No BZ, that can’t happen here, you racist,” it was written to me.  Then said to me later by an acquaintance who no longer reads my blog because I’m such a, well, racist.  You blithering idiot.  (His statement revealed much more about him than it did about me.)

Right.  It can’t happen here.

From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer

by Sean Higgins

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission won $240,000 in damages for two Muslim truck drivers after it sued their former employer for religious discrimination for firing the drivers for refusing to make beer deliveries.

The EEOC said that Star Transport Inc., a trucking company based in Morton, Ill., violated their religious rights by refusing to accommodate their objections to delivering alcoholic beverages.

“EEOC is proud to support the rights of workers to equal treatment in the workplace without having to sacrifice their religious beliefs or practices,” EEOC General Counsel David Lopez announced Thursday. “This is fundamental to the American principles of religious freedom and tolerance.”

How odd that, when dealing with Christianity however, there is little if any religious freedom or tolerance.  Ask Kim Davis at her county clerk’s office.  Ask Bremerton, WA Assistant Coach Joe Kennedy who’s about to be fired for kneeling at the 50-yard line and praying post-game.  Ask the Christian people who didn’t want to bake a cake for a gay wedding and were fined $135,000.  On and on it goes.

The case involved Star Transport’s firing of drivers Mahad Abass Mohamed and Abdkiarim Hassan Bulshale, both of Somali heritage, in 2009 after they refused to make beer deliveries for the company, citing their adherence to Islamic law. For devout Muslims, consuming or even being in contact with any alcoholic beverage is prohibited.

Let’s look up Star Transport Incorporated, of Morton, Illinois, shall we?  It seems that its site, http”//www.startransport.com, no longer functions.  Star Transport appears to have closed.  Its gates are locked and only one truck is present.  The phone is unanswered.  I know.  I called.  Now, 25 persons in Morton are without jobs.  One guess as to why, possibly, that may be?  Anyone?  Bueller?

Its a win/win.  Our friendly federal government, proud at having sued Star Transport, got to also ramp up its welfare, foodstamp and EBT rolls with more persons shoved out of a job.

We can — and must — accommodate Muslims, the ruling says.  But we don’t have to reciprocate and accommodate Christians in any manner whatsoever.

One very basic reason?

A Christian won’t behead you or shoot you if he or she loses their job or can’t pray or must bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Pretty simple, really.

It can happen here and it is happening here.

Your federal government is favoring Muslims over Christians.  it is literally picking religious sides.

Ah, good to know your federal tax dollars are being being spent to ensure the US is Shariah-compliant.

We loves us some Muzzies.

BZ

 

 Share

The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America, Pt. II

Posted on by

Burqa

A US Muslim male in the company of his wife dressed in this fashion is not a “moderate Muslim” but, instead, someone to be watched quite carefully.

I first wrote about the myth of the so-called “moderate Muslim” here, when it was revealed by the Center For Security Policy that “of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.”

But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

Two more very important paragraphs from my first blogpost about the myth of the “moderate Muslim in America:

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

Understand this, however:

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

Read that again.  Violence is justified is justified to ensure shariah law.

So essentially, as WND.com wrote,

Poll: Most U.S. Muslims would trade Constitution for Shariah

‘Quran should be highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion’

by Leo Hohmann

Ben Carson’s comment that he would not support a Shariah-compliant Muslim for president because Islamic law is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution led to the former brain surgeon’s roasting among media talkers and politicians of all stripes.

He has been excoriated as “anti-Muslim,” “bigoted,” even “anti-American” and unfit for office.

With the exception, as I wrote here, is that Dr Carson merely states the truth because, as indicated repeatedly, Muslims in the US embrace Shariah Law over our own US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Further, where does the Muslim concept of “taqiyah” enter into the equation?  If you are unfamiliar with that term, you’d best click on the link.

Further, Leftists embrace CAIR as they embrace the ACLU.  Except that the ACLU doesn’t immediately want to kill you for religious reasons — say, if you’re a Christian..  Yet.

This is important because Omar Ahmad, one founder of CAIR — and CAIR makes no bones about its representation of Muslims in the United States of America — has said, in “a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.  The Quran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” ”

CAIR denied Ahmad made the statement and said the newspaper that printed his statement retracted it, but that was proven false.  In other words, Ahmad told the truth and CAIR lied.

This is another telling paragraph itself.

Ihsan Bagby of CAIR’s Washington office has said that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country,” Pipes reported in his 2006 article, “CAIR Islamists Fooling the Government.”

Islam can be conflictive in its statements, but that is dependent upon its goals at the time of the statement.  There is a general Muslim word called “taqiyah” representing the notion in Islam that Muslims should never tell the truth to infidels.  You and me, Western Civilization, those not believing in Islam, we are the infidels.  The unclean.  The ones who, like the Borg, need to be converted or killed.  Muslims are not ashamed to tell you this and to make the concept clear.  Google the word and check its meanings and various spellings.

Islam will frequently tell you what it is thinking and what it wants.  Many Muslims in America — a majority as indicated above — believe that Shariah Law is supreme over any other form of American law.  That is very clear.  On the other hand, Muslims have a duty to lie to infidels.

Therefore, Ahmad through CAIR, is representative of what Muslims in the US believe.  You can come to no other conclusion.  CAIR is happy to make the linkage itself.  They make it quite clear they wish to represent Muslims in America.  As noted above, a poll already indicates that a majority of sampled Muslims hold that Shariah Law should be the law of the United States.

Yes, I am certain there are moderate Muslims in America.

Just as I believe there are Muslims in America who do not practice Islam as demanded by the most devout and true of followers of Mohammad and of the Koran.

Those are the “moderate Muslims” in America, who would not survive their practice in the Middle East.  The Muslims who do not practice the Koran as strictly written.  If you are a “moderate Muslim,” you’re not doing it right and you yourself may be in danger of an Islamic re-tuning.

If you point out a “moderate Muslim” to me, I’ll point out someone who cannot recite a minimum of five surahs and hasn’t been to a mosque in months or years, whose wife doesn’t wear hajib and who doesn’t not have a beard or fear Mohammad.  Someone the rest of non-moderate Islam would consider too Westernized

Unless they are present in the US to blend in as they plot our infidel deaths.

There are the exceptions, you see.

hirsi-ali_-ayaan-B_W_Size4

Asked whether suicide bombing can be justified as a measure to defend Islam, 26 percent of American Muslims age eighteen to twenty-nine said yes. That is one quarter of the adult American Muslims under the age of thirty, and no matter how you count the number of Muslims in America (estimates vary from 2 million to 8 million), that is a lot of people.

– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician.

BZ

 

 Share

The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America

Posted on by

Muslim Who Is ModerateAnd it is a myth.  There now exist the statistics to prove it.  Which begins to lend credence to the graphic below.

Muslim Radical vs ModerateOf course, it is not proper or politically correct to state the obvious when the obvious is screamed to be stated — primarily by Islam itself.

The Center for Security Policy released the following information just this last month on June 23rd.

Poll of U.S. Muslims Reveals Ominous Levels Of Support For Islamic Supremacists’ Doctrine of Shariah, Jihad

Press Releases | | The Muslim Brotherhood in America, Understanding the Shariah Threat Doctrine

According to a new nationwide online survey (Below) of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.

Read this very carefully, Americans.  What is portrayed by your government and Leftists appears to be in direct contravention to the truth.

The numbers of potential jihadists among the majority of Muslims who appear not to be sympathetic to such notions raise a number of public policy choices that warrant careful consideration and urgent debate, including: the necessity for enhanced surveillance of Muslim communities; refugee resettlement, asylum and other immigration programs that are swelling their numbers and density; and the viability of so-called “countering violent extremism” initiatives that are supposed to stymie radicalization within those communities.

Overall, the survey, which was conducted by The Polling Company for the Center for Security Policy (CSP), suggests that a substantial number of Muslims living in the United States see the country very differently than does the population overall.  The sentiments of the latter were sampled in late May in another CSP-commissioned Polling Company nationwide survey.

But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

In this way Muslims appear to be something akin to the current occupants of the White House and DC: those pesky American laws simply don’t apply to me.

People who look upon Islam as nothing but another religion are duped and ignorant.  Islam is much more than a mere religion; it is a way of life, a duty, a political entity, something that crosses all aspects of Muslim life.  It crosses every aspect and influences and informs every decision made by a devout Muslim.

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

Understand this, however:

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

Note: please see the complete poll here.

Frank Gaffney writes:

The findings of the Center for Security Policy’s survey of Muslims in America suggests that we have a serious problem.  The Pew Research Center estimates that the number of Muslims in the United States was 2.75 million in 2011, and growing at a rate of 80-90 thousand a year.  If those estimates are accurate, the United States would have approximately 3 million Muslims today.  That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that shariah is “The Muslim God Allah’s law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad.”

“If telling the truth about something can get you killed, then that truth needs to be told again and again and again. And acting on that truth will save us.”

— Bosch Fawstin

BZ

 

 Share