Tag Archives: SJW

And the hate crime hoaxes just keep on coming

Posted on by

First, the situation and the article, from Breitbart.com:

Prosecutors Charge LGBT Activist with Burning Down Own Home with Pets Inside

by Joshua Caplan

Michigan prosecutors say Nikki Joly, a longtime LGBT activist, set fire to her home and killed her pets due to resentment from subsiding controversy over the enactment of nondiscrimination legislation he advocated for.

Let’s leave the identity politics out of this scenario for a moment. What kind of a sick and twisted person do you have to be in order to set your own home on fire for ________ motivation, knowing and then allowing your very own pets to immolate inside?

The Detroit News reported Monday that law enforcement charged Joly, a transgender man from Jackson, Michigan, burned down her own home, killing five pets inside, in what was initially investigated by the FBI as an alleged hate crime in 2017. The newspaper, citing two individuals who worked along Joly at St. Johns United Church of Christ, where the Jackson Pride Center is based from, reported that Jolly, 54, had become “frustrated the controversy over gay rights had died down with the passage of the nondiscrimination law.”

The Detroit News reported:

Meanwhile, a police investigative report suggests a possible reason for the fire.

Two people who worked with Joly at St. Johns United Church of Christ, where the Jackson Pride Center was located, said he had been frustrated the controversy over gay rights had died down with the passage of the nondiscrimination law, according to the report.

The church officials, Barbara Shelton and Bobby James, when asked by police about a possible motive for the fire, said Joly was disappointed the Jackson Pride Parade and Festival, held five days before the blaze, hadn’t received more attention or protests.

Continuing from the DN:

No one was home as flames leaped from the house Joly shared with Moore. But the home wasn’t unoccupied.

A neighbor, knowing the couple had pets, kicked in the front door but it was too hot to go inside, police said. When firefighters tried to open the back door, it was blocked by the body of a dog.

All five animals died: two German Shepherds and three cats.

Traces of gasoline were later found in five rooms on the first floor of the two-story, wooden-frame house, according to the police report.

Please allow me to pose a question if I may. Considering the extremely sensitive aspect of investigations of this nature — meaning that local departments have the easy ability to step on a series of large social land mines and take serious societal, national, budgetary and even violent casualties, do you think that law enforcement and local prosecutors take a decision like this lightly considering Ferguson? I don’t.

Translated: there’s something likely extremely compelling to the case to have crafted the decision to prosecute in light of the today’s SJW political environment.

That said, do you see some possible threads here, forms of linkage with the Jussie Smollett case? I believe I do. And that’s that of narcissism, stages of and enhancements involving victimhood, sociopathy and, in this case, sheer evil regarding the animals.

The sequence of events would have made it difficult for anyone but Joly to set the fire, Grove said in the police report.

“The timeline shows a window of less than five minutes for another person to enter the residence, splash gasoline around, ignite the fire and then leave without being scene,” wrote Grove.

Joly told an insurance company investigator the arsonist must have been in the home at the same time he was, according to the report.

Lab tests by police found traces of gasoline on the clothes Joly was wearing on the day of the fire, said the report.

Two weeks after the fire, Joly was questioned for four hours by a city police detective and two FBI agents.

During the interview, he drooped his head, staring at the floor, not looking at his interlocutors, according to the report. He didn’t admit setting the fire and didn’t deny it, either.

Being a victim in 2019 carries with it not only a sense of martyrdom but that of massive entitlement and, truth be told, its very own awarded Badge of Courage by Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots.

In the land of Leftists, now, you are nothing unless you are a significant victim of ____________. And you get to choose the grievance du jour, now “traditionally” involving an -obe, -ist or -ism at the end of the word.

Here is proof:

This explains why Leftist and Demorats are on the constant prowl for ideas, activities, events, words or writings by and from which to be “victimized.” The Victimhood Beast requires constant stoking and feeding in order to operate and grow. Yes, grow. Victimhood is Big Business in the United States. It can pay extremely well and, as such, has become an industry of its own. And it constantly screams “feed me!”

This isn’t the end nor was it the beginning. This constant seeking, building, restructuring and reorganization of the Hierarchy of Victims will continue unchecked by Leftists, Demorats, aided and abetted by the American Media Maggots.

I continue to refer people to the compilation website entitled FakeHateCrimes.org. A deep and detailed repository of just that.

But wait, there’s more. Just check tomorrow’s news.

Hold on there. Back up that car wash. Let’s have some additional facts, shall we, from (of all places) USAToday.com:

Hate crime hoaxes, like Jussie Smollett’s alleged attack, are more common than you think

by Wilfred Reilly

In writing a book about hate crime hoaxes, I found more than 400. Such frauds damage good race relations.

The hate attack on Empire star Jussie Smollett is now alleged to be a hoax. That shouldn’t surprise anyone.

The questions here are obvious. How many Trump supporters even exist in the downtown of a city that went 83% for Hillary Clinton — and how many of them watch “Empire?” How many guys looking for a fight carry rope and bottles of bleach around with them? Almost every normal citizen had questions like these about this incident, and we were justified in having them.

That this case turned out to be a hoax shouldn’t come as too big of a shock. A great many hate crime stories turn out to be hoaxes. Simply looking at what happened to the most widely reported hate crime stories over the past 4-5 years illustrates this: not only the Smollett case but also the Yasmin Seweid, Air Force Academy, Eastern Michigan, Wisconsin-Parkside, Kean College, Covington Catholic, and “Hopewell Baptist burning” racial scandals all turned out to be fakes. And, these cases are not isolated outliers.

Doing research for a book, Hate Crime Hoax, I was able to easily put together a data set of 409 confirmed hate hoaxes. An overlapping but substantially different list of 348 hoaxes exists at fakehatecrimes.org, and researcher Laird Wilcox put together another list of at least 300 in his still-contemporary book Crying Wolf. To put these numbers in context, a little over 7,000 hate crimes were reported by the FBI in 2017 and perhaps 8-10% of these are widely reported enough to catch the eye of a national researcher.

I have no memory but even I can recall the Tawana Brawley case, and the Duke Lacrosse case.

Now read this:

However, hate crime hoaxers are “calling attention to a problem” that is a very small part of total crimes. There is very little brutally violent racism in the modern USA. There are less than 7,000 real hate crimes reported in a typical year. Inter-racial crime is quite rare; 84% of white murder victims and 93% of Black murder victims are killed by criminals of their own race, and the person most likely to kill you is your ex-wife or husband. When violent inter-racial crimes do occur, whites are at least as likely to be the targets as are minorities. Simply put, Klansmen armed with nooses are not lurking on Chicago street corners.

In this context, what hate hoaxers actually do is worsen generally good race relations, and distract attention from real problems. As Chicago’s disgusted top cop, Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, pointed out yesterday, skilled police officers spent four weeks tracking down Smollett’s imaginary attackers — in a city that has seen 28 murders as of Feb. 9th, according to The Chicago Tribune. We all, media and citizens alike, would be better served to focus on real issues like gun violence and the opiate epidemic than on fairy tales like Jussie’s.

You and I both know this won’t stop, for any number of reasons. It frequently pays well. It keeps the industry moving, providing life blood. Sometimes literally. It soothes sensitive and snowflakey egos. But mostly?

In the world of Leftists, it provides and conveys status.

BZ

 

 Share

Hispanic female racist may acquire just desserts

Posted on by

First, for background, see my post here from October 1st. Then watch the video below for visual and aural reference.

Now that we’re all up to speed, here is an article from Breitbart.com:

Report: UC Riverside Student Faces Up to One Year in Jail over Alleged MAGA Hat Theft

by Tom Ciccotta

UC Riverside student Edith Macias has reportedly been charged with one misdemeanor count of grand theft for a September incident in which she allegedly stole a MAGA hat from one of her peers.

At this point I’m certain she’s hyperventilating at the thought. But wait, there’s more.

According to a document provided to The College Fix by the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office, Macias has been charged with one misdemeanor count of grand theft. Her next scheduled court date will take place in March 2018. According to a spokesman for the district attorney’s office, Macias could face up to one year in county jail.

Of course she won’t do a year. Likely she’ll be placed on probation. And the only reason she’ll acquire that is because the entire incident was properly documented by Matthew Vitale.

Note to Conservatives On Campus: the video and photo aspects of your phone can be your best friend in challenging times. Do what every other Leftist does. Record everything. Believe nothing.

“I’m very pleased that the DA decided to charge her, especially because I am skeptical that UCR student conduct did anything. I will be following up with the student conduct office to determine if anything was done,” he said.

Today, this is the best one can achieve considering the circumstances.

Vitale went on to explain that the charges against Macias should serve as a message to college students around the country as to what conduct is acceptable with regards to political discourse.

In my college years, had something like that occurred on campus and Edith stole an item belonging to another student and refused to give it back, her next memory would be that of awakening on the floor with a swollen jaw.

No one would have bartered or negotiated patiently for a return of their property. There would have been immediate consequences for stupid and/or illegal behavior.

Precisely what’s missing today: common sense and obvious consequences in a timely fashion.

That’s called problem-solving at the lowest possible level.

BZ

 

 Share

Parents, you’re paying for this

Posted on by

Ever wake up one morning and ask yourself: “I wonder what new and moronic idea some Social Justice Flower will unleash upon the US today?” Wonder no more.

First play the video. Then read the article. You’ll howl out loud with larfter at the ridiculous inanity of both. The sad thing: they’re both true.

From CampusReform.org:

Texas State seeks math profs with ‘social justice’ commitment

by Toni Airaksinen

  • Texas State University has two new job openings for Math Education professors, but wants applicants to have a demonstrated commitment to social justice.
  • For one of the professorships, the university would prefer a candidate with not only a commitment to social justice, but “evidence of research” on the subject as well.
  • Campus Reform reached out to the school for additional information, but it still remains unclear how such qualifications are expected to benefit the department.

Texas State University is hoping to hire two Math Education professors with a demonstrated and longstanding commitment to “social justice.”

According to the job postings on Inside Higher Ed, the two new professors must not only share TSU’s commitment to “education equity” and “social justice,” but should preferably also have a demonstrated record of engagement or academic research on the issue.

Right. Because demonstrated academic research on “social justice” has, as demonstrated in the video above, everything to do with mathematics.

Among the preferred qualifications for the Assistant Professor rank is a “demonstrated knowledge and engagement” with issues including “social justice, equity, access, and multilingual learning,” while the Associate and Full Professor ranks prefer “evidence of research and practices” on such topics.

You’ll love the kicker:

While the job application specifies that TSU is a “Hispanic Serving Institution,” it is unclear how exactly a background in social justice is expected to benefit the department, since it currently offers no social justice programming or classes.

“One of those things is not like the other.”

My, how degeneratively-stupid we’ve become as a nation.

BZ

 

 Share

Here is your typical Leftist racist

Posted on by

My mother-in-law told me, just before she passed away of pancreatic cancer in 2007, that some people are simply on this earth to be an example of what not to do or how not to act.

The young female Hispanic unit portrayed in the below video is a perfect example. I wanted to post the video here so you could see and watch the true nature of most Leftists today and certainly the bulk of the Silkworms** on campus. I think her behavior and her words illustrate my point infinitely better than I ever could.

This is another reason free speech is brilliant. It allows you see the true person behind the vocal cords.

She and other Leftists live in a land where “fuck you” is a legitimate reply to a question and to steal the property belonging to another is valid and where racist remarks are not only justified but mandated when it comes to Caucasoids.

The fact pattern is this. Both are students at the University of California at Riverside. On Thursday, September 28th, Edith “Chata” Macias (chata in Spanish means “boring”), the unit in the video, steals the red MAGA hat from the head of fellow student Matthew Vitale (his Facebook post is here) in a classroom.

Here is the video from the Facebook page of Macias where it clearly shows her stealing the red hat of Vitale.

Macias then runs to the “student life” office in order to “report” the hat. You see the rest.

Macias believed it was mandatory to steal the hat from the head of another student because she disagreed vehemently with the red MAGA item. That this act is illegal — theft — made no difference to her. That he had a right to wear it made no difference to her. That he had property rights made no difference to her. What made all the difference to her was that he was a Caucasoid and by dint of that and the hat, he is inherently racist and evil.

However, the only racist utterings we hear are those of Macias. The only disrespect, lies and foul language we hear and see is attributed to Macias. Frankly, it seems to me that Macias has committed a hate crime well documented on video.

Vitale states he only wants the hat back and what she did was illegal; that is, she stole property belonging to him.

Frankly, I could make an excellent case for the applicability of California section 211 PC, which reads as follows:

Robbery is the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.

That is completely immaterial to the Hispanic unit. Laws mean nothing to her. The country means little to her. You heard what she said.

“Look at the kind of shit he’s wearing?” she said. “You know what this represents? Genocide.”

The hat-owner began filming the altercation as the hat-taker implored administrators to punish him for wearing it. “This is mine,” he said. “You do not get to take other people’s property that is legally theirs in this country.”

“Man, fuck your laws,” was her reply.

The Hispanic unit began the entire loving event by saying:

“So this guy thought it would be a good idea to go into a conference wearing this fucking hat. Look at the kind of shit he’s wearing, You know what this represents? This represents genocide—genocide of a bunch of people.”

She pauses for a brief moment expecting vindication, a round of applause, an award, a porcelain dalmatian, a certificate of excellence, people to jump out of closets and tackle the guy taking the video and turning him into a puddle of beaten goo?

Yes. She altogether expected the cowering GOWPs behind the counter to instantly side with her and declare his obvious oppression.

Uh oh. Worse yet. They didn’t. Note their reactions throughout the whole mine minute video. It’s what you would expect of GOWPs.

“Your freedom of speech is killing a lot of people out there,” she said.

“Do you have any fucking conscience? Your fucking freedom of speech is genocide, homeboy,” she said.

“I swear to God I could burn this shit. I swear to God I could burn this shit,” she says.

“That’s full of shIt, because you all are just going to, like, mediate this and make it so like we’re all okay here, freedom of speech, whatever,” she says.

The laws of the land from the founding fathers: whatever.

“How about we think about what’s actually going on in this country?” she says.

As in your commission of a crime?

“Fuck your fucking freedom of speech, boy. Fuck it. Fuck it because your freedom of speech is literally killing a lot of people out there. That’s what it is, because you’re out there wearing hats like these that promote laws and legislations that literally kill and murder in the masses people of color,” she says.

Boring Macias accuses Vitale of “micro-aggressions against people of color.”

“Micro-aggressions.” Ripped from the Snowflake handbook. Not one original thought, Boring Macias.

“We need to get rid of all y’all,” she says. White genocide is peachy nifty with her.

“Oh, because ‘you stole my property.’ Y’all stole this land! Your ancestors stole this land, motherfucker,” she says.

We’ll get to that, Boring Macias.

The best yet?

“I fucking hate this country. I hate it, and I’m not leaving. I’m staying here because there’s shit that needs to be fixed here. We need to get rid of all y’all. You’ve got a shitload of privilege, and it shows by you wearing this hat. . .while there’s literally people getting killed out there.”

If you fucking hate this country, Boring Macias, I’ll wager there are thousands and thousands of Americans who feel the same way about you.

Vitale, by the way, said he’s half-Nicaraguan. Immaterial to Boring Macias because he is “white presenting.”

Her final point?

“Oh my God, you’re going to keep letting him wear it?” Macias says. “That just shows how the fucking UCR is and the education system. It’s geared to benefit white people, white people, not me.”

After all, it’s all about her and no else. No one may do anything she doesn’t approve in Chata Land.

I wonder how she would be acting if someone stole a piece of property from her? How would others on campus be reacting?

This is “Panchita’s” little motto she writes on Facebook: “La cara represora de un régimen débil que golpea para generar temor, el que agrede no muestra fuerza, sino miedo a la fuerza del agredido.”

Translated: The repressive face of a weak regime that strikes to generate fear, the one that attacks does not show force, but fear to the force of the aggressor.

One question to the Hispanic bint. Do you know why you speak Spanish instead of Nahuatl? Because Mexico was conquered. By Spain. You are speaking the language of your European conqueror. Spain is this odd country of Caucasoids far, far away. Look it up.

Yet she is being repressed in the United States. Only her.

An aside: Boring Macias begs GoFundMe for $200 on an apartment deposit. Why? You’ll love it.

I attend the University of California, Riverside. I found a place to stay next school year but need help getting enough money to put a down payment on it. I have one week to raise $200 but my mom can’t help and the rest of my family won’t help. My moms rent just went up $100 which makes it harder for her to help me. I had a job when summer started in riverside… But was forced to move to LA with my mom because I was evicted of my home by a racist white bitch. In LA finding a job has been hard for me. I’m going to be looking for other ways to make enough money to pay the down payment… But I thought id take a shot. Thanks you.

She’s the victim. Her mother is the victim. How horrible that the “racist white bitch” likely wanted rent for home. How evil to expect cash for shelter! Corporatist! Money grubber! These things must be provided for free! She has spoken!

Who’s the money grubber? She’s raised $1,067 so far after the video. Before the video, por nada. Are you thinking what I’m thinking.  .  . ?

On her Facebook post of the video, Macias wrote “You feel safe cuz you got the cops and politicians on your side. Youre not safe… just saying. We need to make racists scared.”

Let me please note that Reason.com thought Vitale, the student whose hat was stolen, was every bit responsible for the incident.

Watch and weep as two students at the University of California-Riverside fight—like children—over a MAGA hat.

These were adult college students. Not preschoolers. Not toddlers. We repeat, adults. One saw something she didn’t like—a hat—and thought the best thing to do was steal it, and tattle to mom and dad (the administration) assuming their obligation to protect her from hats she doesn’t like. His response was to tattle to the entire world— with his phone.

So recording it on the telephone was “tattling to the world.” In a world where the most minute event in which a conservative is involved would itself otherwise, not having been immured on video, resulted in the conservative being nothing but wrong wrong wrong. Even now, with video, elements insist the conservative — worse yet, a Caucasoid — was wrong wrong wrong. And a racist. And everything -ist and -obe.

Again, to be clear, people get to walk around a public university campus wearing whatever hats they want. If this makes you want to set something on fire, you’re in for a rough life.

But if someone takes your MAGA hat because they fell for the trap you set, maybe you don’t have to be such a whiny little snowflake about it.

Wait. “Reason” magazine made the heuristic leap from “you can wear whatever hat you want” to “this was nothing more than a trap for a poor little jejune Leftist Hispanic unit?” and, by dint of that, the actual victim in this case is “whiny”?

Apparently, Reason be damned. On oh-so-numerous levels.

Because Vitale’s summary was this:

“I respect her opinion. She has her opinion…..whatever sources and life experience… that’s okay. I have my opinion. That should be okay too.”

Oppressive! Heinous! Off with his head!

This Hispanic bint doesn’t care about our laws. She hates our country. She hates free speech. Only her thoughts matter. The GOWPs in the student life office offer what GOWPs offer: “let’s talk about this. We want you to feel safe. Let’s mediate. We’re neutral”

“You’re neutral my ass,” she said.

She has no interest in mediating anything. There is only one perspective here: hers. Every other opinion or speaker can go to hell. This is not up for debate. She has spoken. Everyone must accede to her wishes no matter what law is broken or where.

As far as she is concerned, she is inviolate. Untouchable.

She wasn’t born thinking this was. This was first taught to her and then reinforced in a consequence-free United States.

Thankfully, over the past weekend, the video went viral.

Thanks honey. You made all the points I ever needed about the true nature of today’s Leftists who are, at heart and soul, spoiled, petulant children.

BZ

P.S.

**Silkworm is a new term I’ve started for what are essentially Snowflakes. “Silk” because they way overvalue their worth and, simultaneously, are expensive to maintain and quite dainty. “Worms” because they are grubby, disgusting and primarily found to have no real purpose save that of, well, no real purpose.

P.P.S.

And while we’re on the topic, here’s a fabulous video of a swarm of loving black individuals deciding that it’s absolutely acceptable and recommended to beat Caucasoid women. Anyone think this might be a group hate crime? Perhaps to the tune of “slam her dumb white ass”?

Nah, me neither.

This is America, folks.

Why include the video, BZ?

Because you won’t see it anywhere else.

I am pushback.

 

 Share

Please: free the shackled tampon!

Posted on by

Not only should tampons be in women’s restrooms, they should be in men’s restrooms as well. Just ask all the SJWs by which this is becoming a movement. Get it? Movement? A movement in a restroom?

From Chronicle.com:

Tampons in Men’s Rooms? It’s Just a Small Part of ‘Menstrual Equity,’ Campus Activists Say

by Alex Arriaga

Over the past year, several colleges have improved access to menstrual products on their campuses, including in some men’s and gender-neutral restrooms. That last detail has prompted some conservative websites to take note.

The American Conservative mockingly headlined its report “Social Justice Washrooms,” from “tomorrow’s generation of American elites.” Commenters on Breitbart’s report on the trend called it “academic insanity,” pointing out that “men do not menstruate.”

Pointing out the obvious is insensitive and thuggish, though. Just ask any Social Justice Warrior on campus because, after all, no campus can cramp us.

But campus leaders say stocking all bathrooms with such products is a relatively easy way to make sure no one is left out. The University of Wisconsin at Madison, the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, and Brown University are a few other institutions that provide free menstrual products in some men’s and gender-neutral restrooms, in order to be more inclusive of transgender students.

I know. I have a great idea. Let’s all get butt-hurt and knicker-twisted over this silly Emo issue. Gallup polls, not known to inherently skew right, indicate that 3.8% of the US self-identifies as LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ. Or whatever. As opposed to the roughly 23% estimate offered by general public thought because of the wonderful marketing job done by the American Media Maggots, Hollywood and self-promoting entertainment in general.

Further, NPR.org indicates that 0.6% of Americans identify as transgender.

We as a nation are bending over and getting bent over by a minority of a minority.

So excuse me if I larf at you silly Emo bastards and bastardettes when you write a paragraph like this one.

Part of the growing “free the tampon” movement has been an effort to make college more fair for students who menstruate, a concept for which Jennifer Weiss-Wolf coined the phrase “menstrual equity.”

Right. Which is apparently why men who don’t menstruate are paying for the tampons of women who do — and paying for the birth control of women who also wish their gender-assured Free Cheese.

Are these Social Justice Warriors going to pay for the prostate exams, checkups, and vasectomies of men? Because men, after all, are stricken with prostate cancer at almost the same rate of breast cancer in women.

Of course.

I didn’t think so either.

BZ

P.S.

I have a question. If you menstruate, physically requiring a tampon — unless you don’t mind walking around in bloody shorts and pants then sitting on cloth-covered chairs in public areas — and you identify as a man that day, is it unfair to expect, because you identify as a man, that people must provide you with tampons the likes of which you deny because, after all, you mentally insist you are male?

Just asking.

 

 Share