Tag Archives: Ted Cruz

What is #WalkAway?

Posted on by

Briefly, #WalkAway is a Twitter hashtag indicating that people should walk away from the Democrat Party for any number of reasons. Here is one.

Candace Owens talks about #WalkAway with Charles Payne.

Here is the man who started the #WalkAway campaign, in his own words.

Breitbart.com writes about #WalkAway:

WATCH: #WalkAway Movement to Abandon Liberalism Goes Viral

by Thomas D Williams, PhD

The #Walkaway movement that began with a popular Facebook video featuring a gay hairdresser in New York City explaining why he was leaving the Democratic Party has quickly morphed into a major force on social media and beyond.

Uh-oh. Just what Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots (LDAMM) don’t want.

According to an article last Thursday in the Epoch Times, some five million people on Facebook and YouTube have seen the groundbreaking video showing a “very handsome gay man” who describes his awakening to the inanities of liberalism and the Democratic Party.

It gets worse. For the LDAMM.

Straka published his original #WalkAway video on May 26, and since then his life “has been overtaken by a tidal wave,” the Epoch Times reports.

The movement has been especially successful because its spokespersons have not been the sort typically associated with conservativism. Young and old, black and white, men and women, gay and straight—the campaign seems to elude stereotypes and pigeonholing.

The popular young conservative commentator C.J. Pearson, for instance, has given the movement a significant push by highlighting the Democratic Party’s racist past. “The Democratic Party is the party of slavery. The party of Jim Crow. The party of segregation. The party of the KKK,” Pearson tweeted Saturday.

“Democrats walked away from black folks long ago. Now, it’s our time to #WalkAway,” he added.

Another explanation is here:

These aren’t bots. These are real people. With voices. And lives. And history. Listen to them. Listen to CJ Pearson:

There is also Brandon Tatum. He reminds everyone of some very, very inconvenient truths purposely ignored by the LDAMM. Tatum “nails it” in a comprehensive way that no one else has quite yet expressed so clearly and rationally.

You want more examples? Here is David Harris, Jr:

Here is Christopher Wright.

Another testimonial, this time from Kara Bustos:

David Harris in re Whoopi Goldberg. Because Leftists cannot not push the envelope.

I would be remiss not to point this out:

Why Blacks Are Leaving the Democratic Party

by Celia Farber

The focus on illegal immigrants is helping push away blacks

The dominant feeling among the defecting block of African-Americans is that the Democrats have abandoned them in favor of a new voting block of illegal immigrants whose victimhood will guarantee votes. In their view, the Democrats seem to have abandoned old loyalties for a new road to political power.

Here’s the unvarnished truth, Demorat warts and all.

“They are kind of rejecting black America, like that’s over and now it’s all about, ‘OK, how can we go all in on illegal immigration? How can we make this the next reliable Democratic voting block for the next 30 to 40 years?’

“This is not about morality, and it’s not about anything else—it’s literally about a new voting block.”

More unvarnished historical truth:

Sheila Lewis Ealey, an African-American mother of two from Texas, said: “Blacks coming out of slavery sided with the Republicans because those were the ones who fought for them. It was only because of the fact that we’ve got this revisionist history that you’ve got people who don’t know who they are and have formed an allegiance with the Democratic Party, because during the Kennedy administration, that was the party who really were forthright with the Civil Rights Act.

“When you look at blacks, they have been conservatives for a very long time. They are the group who really don’t believe in abortion. They follow the Bible to the letter, they are very rigid about the things that need to happen.

The Henry Davis video:

As if that was insufficient, Candace Owens said this:

So what’s really happening? What’s this about? Moreover, why is it occurring at a time when the LDAMM are trumpeting a great Blue Wave or perhaps a Blue Tsunami come November?

I submit it’s because of this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

Then there was the Leftist who talked about a “life sentence” for Sanders.

Rubin: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Should Be Harassed Publicly as a ‘Life Sentence’

by Brad Wilmouth

On Sunday’s AM Joy, MSNBC contributor and Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin declared that Sarah Huckabee Sanders deserves a “life sentence” of being harassed publicly as she asserted that the White House press secretary “has no right to live a life of no fuss, no muss” because of her negative interactions with the press.

The phony conservative columnist also freaked out over the possibility of abortion being banned, and suggested Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins are “phony pro-choice women” if they vote for President Donald Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Well, that’s pleasant. Kind. Understanding. Tolerant. Everything the LDAMM says it is? It isn’t.

Which led Sarah Huckabee Sanders — one of the strongest and most valiant White House Press Secretaries I’ve ever seen — to this response:

Which then led to this brilliant mock-up:

And this, the win of open and avowed 28-year-old Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who supports the abolishment of ICE, prisons, bail and outright Socialism — free money, free jobs, free housing.

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this, as protesters drive Ted Cruz and his wife Heidi out of a DC restaurant on Monday the 24th:

But wait, there’s more.

This type of behavior is championed by Maxine Waters. pic.twitter.com/KJOyOGw7tV

— Kyle Morris (@RealKyleMorris) September 25, 2018

A Columbian man tells us why he walked away.

#WalkAway is, of course, upset with the Kavanaugh hearing process whereupon a good man is smeared with unsubstantiated accusations up to and including his being a serial rapist — a charge levied by an attorney defending a whore with inflated, fake breasts.

Responses to this have included:

I was on the left at one time…thought I believed facts and truth. I even targeted Dinesh for his beliefs. But now I’ve had an awakening and can no longer support the evil and corruption that thrives under the name of liberalism. Open your eyes. It’s painfully obvious.

And

If this disturbing version of the Democratic party has reached the level where due process is not relevant anymore, and an accusation without evidence is enough to ruin someone’s life, then though I’m not a republican, I’ll welcome a red wave. . Remember Emmet Til.

And

When are people going to wake up to the reality of the criminals who are running the Democrat Party. They are truly the new Mafia. Gangsters. It takes someone as tough as Trump to deal with this lawless, godless, amoral group.

And

What, we’re supposed to believe women because they’re all automatically telling the truth?! So what about Keith Ellison’s accuser? And all men are lying sexual predators? This is the disgusting reasoning powering the movement… away from the Democrats.

And

They will continue to use the term “fair treatment ” as an excuse b/c they think it is effective. The committee has bent over backwards for this woman. Enough is enough! Take the vote.

There is this from Axios.com:

A Progressive “Blue Wave” Could Swamp Democrats

by Alexi McCammond & Mike Allen

The “Blue Wave” is crashing over the Democrats’ own party.

The dark blue wave … Democratic Socialists of America, which endorsed Ocasio-Cortez, is a growing force within the party. Its membership has ballooned from 7,000 to 37,000 members since the 2016 election, per NY Times.

  • The group supports things like Medicare for All and abolishing ICE, which more and more Democrats are embracing, like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Mayor Bill de Blasio.
  • Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), a leading progressive group, has launched a campaign to tarnish the New Dem brand of centrist House members.

The other side: After more moderate candidates like Doug Jones and Conor Lamb helped Democrats pick up seats in unlikely places, the party saw them as a path to the majority. They didn’t consider how President Trump has radicalized candidates on both sides.

Be smart: Democrats need to unite the competing wings of their party before November if they want to win, but they’re missing a central figure who can pull that off.

This from GatewayPundit.com:

“This Is Just the Beginning” – Liberal Website Warns Republicans of 70’s Style Bombings

Via Splinter.com:

Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning…

…Read a fucking history book. Read a recent history book. The U.S. had thousands of domestic bombings per year in the early 1970s. This is what happens when citizens decide en masse that their political system is corrupt, racist, and unresponsive. The people out of power have only just begun to flex their dissatisfaction. The day will come, sooner that you all think, when Trump administration officials will look back fondly on the time when all they had to worry about was getting hollered at at a Mexican restaurant. When you aggressively f*ck with people’s lives, you should not be surprised when they decide to fuck with yours.

Stop working for this man. Stop enabling him. Stop assisting him. Start fighting him. The people who are responsible for what is happening are not going to get out of this with their happy wealthy respectable lives unscathed. This is a country that locks poor people in cages for decades for trying to make $20. This is a country that is “tough on crime.” Remember? And the ones who make the laws are not going to like what happens when America starts to regard them as the criminals.

Isn’t that odd. Just as I previously mentioned: the 1970s.

The bottom line is this: #WalkAway is gaining momentum and the LDAMM elements all throughout the United States are quite literally in PSH (Pants-Shitting Hysteria) Mode, completely panicked, because whatever they’re trying appears to as yet not be working.

Which is why they are doubling down on lies, doubling down on cheating, doubling down on pushing the Demorat Party to abject and utter Socialism — they tell us that to our faces now — and why their violence, much less incivility, will only increase geometrically.

Which is why they are tripling down on the nomination process for Judge Brett Kavanaugh. The LDAMM are fully cognizant of the fact that, if they lose SCOTUS, they’ve lost the final outlet for pushing the ideas they can’t abide by lawful means, discussion or the electoral process. Their days of “discussion” are over. There is only, now, room for disruption, cheating, corruption, backstabbing, smearing and violence.

Folks, I saw all of this in the 1970s as a California law enforcement officer. I can remember when Leftist factions in California planted what would now be called IEDs under police vehicles, bombed police stations, robbed banks and carried names such as the Weather Underground, Black Panthers, Baader-Meinhof Gang, SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) and the SLA (Symbionese Liberation Army).

These are wounded, cornered animals who have never — in their blighted memories — been here before. They’re going to act like wounded, cornered animals because, in altogether too many cases, they are. They believe it to their very core. They are under assault — in their minds — like never before. Don’t count on a modicum of rationality. That’s out the door. They’ve told us precisely that.

Gird thy loins. We are returning to those times courtesy of the Left.

All we’re missing is Ulrike Meinhof and the RAF in Germany.

BZ

P.S.

Let me throw this out there: what if the Republicans keep the House and the Senate? What if the midterms are a replay of November 8th, 2016?

 

 Share

Points at the Kavanaugh hearing: first day

Posted on by

First, the execrable chaos brought down upon the hearing by Leftists.

This is insanity writ large.

Who is on Chairman Grassley’s left? Correct. Senator Diane Feinstein. She is quiet. Does she let the young chicks shit the bed or is she no longer interested in standing up for true Kabuki Theater? In any case, she is conspicuously silent. Crazy like a fox?

Following that pre-planned chaos, here is the most thoughtful and cogent introductory remarks that I have ever heard at a SCOTUS nomination hearing, provided by Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska with whom — I must admit — I sometimes vehemently disagree.

Not now.

Senator Ted Cruz weighs in:

Then South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham weighed in:

After all this hooliganism, Brett Kavanaugh is finally allowed to speak.

And this was just the first day of the hearings.

BZ

 

 Share

Trump to get second and likely third SCOTUS nomination

Posted on by

And trust me, the Demorats’ blood pressure right now is going 210/190. Numerous camshafts are being thrown and an abundancy of Leftist heads are exploding.

They just can’t seem to get a break.

From the AP.org:

Big cases, retirement rumors as Supreme Court nears finish

by Mark Sherman

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court enters its final week of work before a long summer hiatus with action expected on the Trump administration’s travel ban and a decision due in a separation of church and state case that arises from a Missouri church playground.

The biggest news of all, though, would be if Justice Anthony Kennedy were to use the court’s last public session on Monday to announce his retirement.

I received information in January of this year that another opening was coming for 2017 following Antonin Scalia’s passing, which was filled by Neil Gorsuch. Imagine that. Turns out I’m likely correct.

Of course, I’m not the only one saying it, but I was the first to say this publicly. Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley indicated this was likely in April. Senator Ted Cruz spoke about the likelihood while addressing the NRA in May.

Statistically speaking, let’s remember that two justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy, are in their 80s, and Justice Stephen Breyer is 78. I call that a clue.

Overall, Demorats have taken a few blows recently. They are in a significant kerfuffle. You know: disarray. Confusion. Even insanity as, reading the news, you see they are doubling down on what hasn’t worked. They are leaning into the punches. Yay team.

Even the New York Times, the old Gray Lady herself, bleeding readers and hemorrhaging advertisers, admits The Donald is winning. As “bad” as he is, Hillary Clinton was obviously worse and continues to be so. Her saliva still breaches Demorat decks and hulls not unlike that of the Alien creature.

Demorats are 0 for 4 in recent special elections yet, listening to them and to their paid cheering section, the American Media Maggots, they had it all in the bag because these elections were going to be a “referendum against Trump.” $23 million dollars was spent on the Jon Ossoff election in Georgia, the most expensive House race in history. George Soros money. Leftist money. Celebrity Leftist money. Cash from everywhere except the contested district. Despite all that, Republican Karen Handel handed Ossoff his own head.

Speaking of AMM cheerleaders for Leftists, Newt Gingrich suggests:

Shockingly, the NY Times in a brief clear-headed manner writes under Maureen Dowd:

Democrats cling to an idyllic version of a new progressive America where everyone tools around in electric cars, serenely uses gender-neutral bathrooms and happily searches the web for the best Obamacare options. In the Democrats’ vision, people are doing great and getting along.

The Demorats are still following Hillary Clinton’s “it’s my turn, dammit, because I’ve paid the dirty political price to get here no matter my song, no matter my content.” Demorats hate that they still have to represent the little people, the proles, the serfs, the groundlings, the rabble, the unilluminated and unwashed in the inconsequential flyover states. They hate that they still have to represent a few Caucasoids. They hate that they still have to realize there is actually a pitiful smattering of life outside the DC Beltway or New York or Los Angeles or Chicago or San Francisco. They hate that they can’t attend even more cocktail parties in DC or tool around in larger limousines or spend with no limitations whatsoever. They hate that they may appear to be a bit responsible for their decisions though, thankfully, they haven’t fully gotten there yet.

In the meantime they have Russia and they have identify politics and they have Russia and they have race and they have Russia and they have gender and they have Russia and they control all the -ists extant.

What, truly, are the Demorats? They are the Party of No.

A few final points.

1. The Demorats made a rather stupid mistake by insisting the Republicans push they so-called nuclear option on SCOTUS nominees, thinking they would do no such thing. 51 is now the magic number. Button pushed.

2. With Neil Gorsuch on the SCOTUS bench, the Supreme Court is mostly back to where it was when Scalia was alive; that is to say, with Kennedy being a bit of a major pendulum.

3. If a second opening occurs — and it will — resulting in President Trump’s installation of a true applier of law instead of a shill for Leftists, momentum will move to the right in terms of decisions.

4. Notice a trend? I do. It’s only 2017. What do you think the possibilities are that, between now and, say, 2019 or 2020 another Supreme Court justice retires? I’d wager the likelihood is rather high.

5. If Trump acquires a third nomination and keeps the Senate, the Supreme Court will be more conservative for at least another generation. Case closed.

I can hear the overpressure building from here.

BZ

 

 Share

Let the silencing of free speech commence

Posted on by

freedom-of-speechBecause, after all, you didn’t think it would stop at the internet, did you?

Silly person.

From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

FEC Dems lay groundwork to ban Fox, WSJ political coverage

by Paul Bedard

In their biggest threat yet to conservative media, Democrats on the Federal Election Commission are laying the groundwork to bar companies with even the tiniest foreign ownership from American politics, a move that could ban Fox, the Wall Street Journal and even the New York Times from covering political races or giving endorsements.

In a last-minute submission Wednesday, a top Democrat on the evenly split FEC proposed that the Thursday meeting of the commission begin the process to prohibit companies with foreign ownership as small as 5 percent “from funding expenditures, independent expenditures, or electioneering communications.”

Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub

Stop right there. Note: “Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub.”

said in her submission, “Given everything we have learned this year, it blinks reality to suggest that that there is no risk of foreign nationals taking advantage of current loopholes to intercede invisibly in American elections. This is a risk no member of the Federal Election Commission should be willing to tolerate.”

Under Weintraub’s proposal, entities that reach her foreign ownership target would conceivably be banned from advocating for a candidate’s election or defeat.

Right. It’s okay if we sell most anything to foreign nationals but the precious press — it must be protected so that it may continue to be the pure, unvarnished and unbiased agent for the Left that it was and is. The Leftist bent of the American Media Maggots cannot be diverted for any reason. So, we’ll simply make up as much specious shite as possible since we already recognize the internet has been compromised.

Several media giants have at least 5 percent foreign ownership, some with as much as 25 percent. Included is News Corp, which owns Fox, the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Times also has foreign ownership, as do many politically active firms like Ben & Jerry’s.

Oh no. American ice cream has been tainted by foreign ownership.

That prohibition could include Fox commentator Sean Hannity or Wall Street Journal editorials. And, according to one analysis, because foreign nationals also are prohibited from making electioneering communications, those media would not even be able to mention Donald Trump or Hillary Rodham Clinton, even if just covering them.

Democrats on the commission have been on a three-year campaign to limit the voice of conservative media, stopped by Republican commissioners who have warned that the First Amendment is under attack in the FEC.

Let us not forget that roughly two months ago the DNC was hacked and America learned the DNC was helping CBS to create the poll questions in a bias of clear and obvious proportions.

No. I’m not making this up.

Leftists, Demorats and Progressives really do wish to silence you — unless your speech, writings, opinions and thoughts are completely congruent with theirs. They will brook no opposition, no pushback, not even discussion.

The First Amendment is being attacked, openly, nakedly, right in front of our eyes, hiding in plain sight, because — guess who? — isn’t covering much of it at all.

This is orchestrated, this is purposeful, this is organized, this is an assault on your freedoms and my freedoms. Just wait a few minutes; the FCC will be piling on any moment now in the same manner.

America, are you listening? Are you seeing? Are you comprehending?

I fear you are asleep.

BZ

 

 Share

States’ suit in re ICANN: shot DOWN by OBAMA federal judge

Posted on by

free-speech-eliminatedA federal US District Court judge in the Southern District of Texas — nominated by Barack Hussein Obama on January 7th of 2015 — has denied an emergency request by Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada to stay the relinquishment of ICANN control from the US to a globalist body.

Transfer now occurs at midnight.

From UPI.com:

Judge rejects plea from states to stop U.S. from giving up control of Internet

by Allen Cone and Doug G. Ware

GALVESTON, Texas, Sept. 30 (UPI) — A federal judge on Friday rejected a last-ditch effort by four states to stop the U.S. government from handing over control of the Internet to an international body when the calendar turns to Saturday.

Judge George Hanks, Jr., of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas denied an emergency request by the states — Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada — for a temporary restraining order to interrupt the handover, which was scheduled for midnight Friday.

Attorneys general from the states filed the lawsuit Wednesday.

And there you have it. Your First Amendment protections on the internet surrendered not with a bang, but with a whimper.

The lawsuit argued that the states “will lose the predictability, certainty, and protections that currently flow from federal stewardship of the Internet and instead be subjected to ICANN’s unchecked control.”

The suit says Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet is an illegal transfer of U.S. government property and that it requires congressional approval.

Your grand and glorious Congress had its chance to intervene but decided — meh — not to.

No one forced us to do this. The United States was not under pressure to do so. The US was not sued in some globalist court in order to acquire this result.

It was the decision of one man.

Judge Hanks, however, ruled Friday that the plaintiffs failed to prove that irreparable harm would result from the handover and denied the injunction — clearing the way for the transfer to occur at midnight Friday.

And transfer it will.

BZ

 

 Share