“Battleground Texas” intends to turn Texas completely blue. And vote in Wendy Davis.
And they — like other Demorats — couldn’t care less if they cheat, lie and disregard voting laws to do so.
James O’Keefe portrays the truth once again.
BZ
As Demorats in Chicago are wont to say: vote early and vote often.
Therefore: the votes for Chicago are in. Out of 978,000 voters, 1,738,998 voted for the Demorats.
BZ
And, of course, amply and ably documented by UK media. Take it away, UKDailyMailonline.com:
North Carolina election officials repeatedly offered ballots last week to an impostor who arrived at polling places with the names and addresses of ‘inactive’ voters who hadn’t participated in elections for many years.
No fraudulent votes were actually cast: It was the latest undercover video sting from conservative activist James O’Keefe, whose filmmaking résumé reads like a target list of liberal causes.
Voter fraud is a myth, say Demorats. I say: they’re full of shit:
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how Leftist traitors enable fraudulent votes for Demorats, election after election after election. Take this situation documented on video and multiply it times the remaining 49 states for the actual amount of voter fraud.
And is precisely WHY Demorats consistently rail against any form of voter ID laws — because it would diminish the number of votes cast solely for Demorats.
“Welcome aboard. Hah hah hah hah. . .”
A vote for any Demorat is a vote for fraud, corruption, the fleecing of taxpayers and the collapse of the United States of America.
You may recall, James O’Keefe was essentially single-handedly responsible for shutting down the corrupt organization known as ACORN.
For more, please visit and donate to Project Veritas. Information about James O’Keefe here.
BZ
From the WashingtonPost.com:
Could non-citizens decide the November election?
by Jesse Richman and David Earnest
Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.
In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.
That is precisely what the Demorats want.
Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.
But here’s the Crux of the Biscuit:
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.
And there you go. “Non-citizens tended to favor Democrats.” That is precisely the reason for the Demorat pushback on voter ID laws, and the insistence on not closing our southern border. It is no more complicated or craven than that. Demorats seeking perpetual and unchallenged power.
BZ
A very simple political answer: Demorats block it at every chance and point because Demorats benefit from stolen, illegal or magic “additional” votes.
Identification would cut potential votes for Demorats because it would help to reduce voter fraud at the polls.
ID is required for most any general transaction, financial or otherwise, in the US. ID was required to even rent a video back when there were video stores.
Only those people who want voter fraud block voter identification requirements. Voter ID “disenfranchises” only those who wish to be disenfranchised and are otherwise disengaged in any event.
BZ
P.S.
h/t to SC.