Where America isn’t America

Illegal Mexicans In Pickup, AZWhere would America not be America?

Why, where America is controlled by the Mexican drug cartels.

Are you kidding me? you ask.  No, no kidding from me, not about this topic.  From Breitbart.com:

AZ Sheriff Paul Babeu: Drug Cartels With AK-47s Control American Soil 30 Miles from Phoenix

by Pam Key

Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “Your World With Neil Cavuto,” Pinal Co., AZ  Sheriff Paul Babeu said drug cartels armed with AK-47’s “control many areas on American soil” noting that they are only 30 miles from Phoenix.

Babeu detailed touring the border yesterday with Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson and said, “We flew him in our helicopter, showed him the drug smuggling routes, the actual caves—these cartel scouts live on top of mountains, 30 days at a time. And how on mountain top to mountain top, over a 50-mile swath of land, and this is only 30 miles from Phoenix.”

He continued, “This is literally an unsecured border. We have cartels that think they own the place. They control many areas on American soil and this how they freely move billions of dollars of drugs and hundreds of thousands of illegals into our country.”

One question:

Who’s running the United States?  Is it actual American citizens or is it Mexicans?  Mexico seems to control our southern border, and apparently controls our politicians in DC and some other national localities.

From this separate article by Breitbart’s Matthew Boyle:

FLORENCE, Arizona — “Nobody does,” Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu told Breitbart News when asked who has operational control of this region of the United States of America.

Babeu was on a helicopter tour of Mexican drug cartel scout locations in caves in the side of mountains throughout the desert about 70 miles inside the U.S. border. Essentially, that means U.S. sovereignty is gone for hundreds, perhaps thousands, of square miles throughout the American southwest.

This is the predicament into which Mr Obama has placed us and others of his ilk, as well as members of the Old Staid / Establishment GOP.  They have all decided, along with Leftists and Demorats who advocate for “sanctuary cities,” that your safety and the sovereignty of the United States takes a second place to the well-being and security of our nation.  They have decided that votes, cheaper labor and emotions are more important than national safety, unification and continuation of America as we know it.

We do not control “hundreds, perhaps thousands, of square miles throughout the American southwest.”

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu says that the US/Mexican border being “more secure than it’s ever been” is a complete and utter lie.

Am I the only one who finds that insane?  Forty years ago, thirty years ago, what president would even consider allowing this to occur on AMERICAN SOIL?

Just as with LGBT issues, America was pushed to transition in this fashion regarding Leftist issues — now involving illegal immigration and anchor babies:

  • Tolerance
  • Acceptance
  • Advocacy

if you are not an overt advocate of LGBT issues, you are a sexist.  If you do not advocate for illegal immigrants and anchor babies, you are a racist.  The phrase “anchor babies” is now being pushed by the American Media Maggots as racist, as witnessed by press interaction with Jeb Bush and Donald Trump.

Kabuki TheatreIn the meantime, incidents such as this continue.

More Kabuki Theater in an alternate dimension.

BZ

P.S.

Read this story of how Mexican drug cartels keep the Arizona border open for their own benefit.  To include:

How do the smugglers know where to go?  Wirth says cartel scouts keep law enforcement under surveillance around the clock.  They occupy mountaintops all over Arizona’s borderlands, and all the way up to Phoenix, 150 miles north.

Drug cartel scouts “occupy mountaintops” in Arizona with 24/7 surveillance.

Folks, we can stop this.

The only reason we don’t is because we — the government — choose not to.

Illegal Immigrant Superior Rights In USA

The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America

Muslim Who Is ModerateAnd it is a myth.  There now exist the statistics to prove it.  Which begins to lend credence to the graphic below.

Muslim Radical vs ModerateOf course, it is not proper or politically correct to state the obvious when the obvious is screamed to be stated — primarily by Islam itself.

The Center for Security Policy released the following information just this last month on June 23rd.

Poll of U.S. Muslims Reveals Ominous Levels Of Support For Islamic Supremacists’ Doctrine of Shariah, Jihad

Press Releases | | The Muslim Brotherhood in America, Understanding the Shariah Threat Doctrine

According to a new nationwide online survey (Below) of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.

Read this very carefully, Americans.  What is portrayed by your government and Leftists appears to be in direct contravention to the truth.

The numbers of potential jihadists among the majority of Muslims who appear not to be sympathetic to such notions raise a number of public policy choices that warrant careful consideration and urgent debate, including: the necessity for enhanced surveillance of Muslim communities; refugee resettlement, asylum and other immigration programs that are swelling their numbers and density; and the viability of so-called “countering violent extremism” initiatives that are supposed to stymie radicalization within those communities.

Overall, the survey, which was conducted by The Polling Company for the Center for Security Policy (CSP), suggests that a substantial number of Muslims living in the United States see the country very differently than does the population overall.  The sentiments of the latter were sampled in late May in another CSP-commissioned Polling Company nationwide survey.

But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

In this way Muslims appear to be something akin to the current occupants of the White House and DC: those pesky American laws simply don’t apply to me.

People who look upon Islam as nothing but another religion are duped and ignorant.  Islam is much more than a mere religion; it is a way of life, a duty, a political entity, something that crosses all aspects of Muslim life.  It crosses every aspect and influences and informs every decision made by a devout Muslim.

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

Understand this, however:

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

Note: please see the complete poll here.

Frank Gaffney writes:

The findings of the Center for Security Policy’s survey of Muslims in America suggests that we have a serious problem.  The Pew Research Center estimates that the number of Muslims in the United States was 2.75 million in 2011, and growing at a rate of 80-90 thousand a year.  If those estimates are accurate, the United States would have approximately 3 million Muslims today.  That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that shariah is “The Muslim God Allah’s law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad.”

“If telling the truth about something can get you killed, then that truth needs to be told again and again and again. And acting on that truth will save us.”

Bosch Fawstin

BZ

 

Schadenfreude: watching Hillary implode

Hillary Clinton Stunned

Here, Hillary shows she’s familiar with Federal Bureau of Prisons coverall colors.

I have to tell you, it’s good clean fun to watch.

And it happened today as The Queen deigned to walk out of the throne room when she was asked one too many questions by subjects she thought were once loyal to the Her Royal Realm.

First the video, captured in all its YouTubely glory:

From TheHill.com (oh, the buttery goodness of it all):

Clinton pulls plug on testy presser over server questions

by Ben Kamisar

Hillary Clinton dismissed the controversy surrounding her private email server and defended her conduct as legal during a press conference Tuesday in Las Vegas. 

“What I did was legally permitted, number one, first and foremost,” the Democratic presidential candidate said in response to a question from Fox News reporter Ed Henry. “We turned over everything that was work-related, every single thing.”

Hillary Clinton made the consequential mistake on Tuesday of not taking the events seriously and it did not play well.  Instead, it sounded dismissive, cavalier and arrogant.

Asked if the server, which has been turned over to the Department of Justice, had been wiped clean, Clinton initially shrugged and later joked: “Like with a cloth or something?” 

“I don’t know how it works digitally at all,” she added. 

Hillary Clinton didn’t answer one question directly.  Not one.  Then she became dismissive and cavalier.

Guess what?

That’s not playing very well any more.

The days when the Clintons managed to skate on most every issue may be finally at an end.  It is beginning to appear that Hillary could face some actual consequences for her actions, even if it only to derail her candidacy.

Hillary tanked in 2008.  I submit she is well on her way to a replay of 2008.  Hillary Clinton believes it is “her turn” whereas, in truth, Hillary is imploding due to her lies, her arrogance and her being as likable as the average eastern diamondback rattler — and as warm.

At least, as I pointed out, she’s familiarizing herself with FBOP federal jumper colors.

BZ

 

Bernie Sanders to go Independent?

Hillary Clinton and Sanders-AThe Demorats are worried.

For obvious server-like reasons.

Bernie Sanders is tending to attract more persons to his rallies than is Hillary Rodham Clinton, despite the fact that she has, at this point, a greater purse.

Yes, there may be trouble in River City, with a capital T and that rhymes with P and that stands for Fool.  Okay; maybe that doesn’t completely rhyme.

But it still portends trouble.

Just as Trump is beginning to seriously worry persons in the Old Staid GOP — the RINO RINO Being Walked by Michalle ObamaElement if you will — Bernie Sanders is beginning to worry the DNC.  Because if there’s one thing that Sanders can’t stand, it’s corporatists like Hillary Rodham Clinton, no matter what she says.  Her son-in-law, for example, Marc Mezvinsky, is a hedge fund manager for Eaglevale Partners (which lost its investors 48% last year; that’s called a “massive hedge fund loss”), and he and Chelsea live in a $10.5 million dollar condo in Manhattan.  Paid for by — wait for it — hedge fund profits and the Clinton Foundation.

Sanders makes no bones about his disdain for a capitalistic society, and his equal disdain for all things corporate.

That said, the Demorats profit, truly, more from corporate donations than do Republicans, in a greater dollar amount.  Cut off those donations, as Sanders wants to do, and —

I’m certain you can see the problem.

Bernie Sanders sees the problem as well.

That’s why the Sanders world is quietly abuzz — by those who buzz — about his consideration for going Independent.  He not only doesn’t want to be beholden to corporate interests and payback, he wants to — gulp! — curtail those things altogether, ideally.

[Cue the breast-beating, wailing, tears, floor-stomping by Demorats.]

Not precisely what you wanted to hear or read, Demorats, but there it is.  Now publicly put out into the ether that is the internet.

Bernie Sanders is waiting to see if the Demorats may turn their ship another direction, and just how well — ala Trump — he is treated or mistreated by them.

My my my, how the plot thickens.

And isn’t that just a fine kettle of fish?

BZ

Kettle of Fish

MORE Leftist MSM BIAS clearly displayed

20150817_094917The August 14th issue of a magazine called The Week displayed its standard hand-painted cover by artist Fred Harper, but this time the subject was Cecil the lion, showing a man with a scoped rifle taking aim at a baby Mufasa from the Disney film Lion King.

The cover displays not just one but three beloved Leftist memes: animals being frequently more important than people — in other words, accelerated and unrealistic “animal rights” — anti-gun sentiments, and anti-hunting sentiments.

In keeping with standard Leftist memes, it is also inaccurate.

The Minnesota dentist, Walter Palmer, did not shoot the lion with a rifle.  He shot the animal with a bow.  Nowhere in media articles is it written that Palmer shot the lion with a rifle.

Hence, the LIE which The Week has promoted on its cover — but is not supported by the article as printed inside the magazine itself.

Imagine that.

No matter what you think of hunting, firearms or animals, The Week is part of a continuing Leftist series of memes which clearly and obviously eschew facts and the truth.

Thanks, The Week, for outing yourself.

Scratch that; confirming what I already knew.

BZ