Author Archives: BZ

81 year old California Senator puts American lives in jeopardy around the world: interrogation report released

Posted on by

CIA Political FootballDiane Feinstein Twit From BZProving that Diane Feinstein couldn’t care less about your sons or your daughters, serving in the military around the world.

Publicizing these details makes no sense.  No other country would even consider doing this: costing lives of your nationals.

Even John Kerry called up DiFi and said, “please don’t do this.”

This NOT a bi-partisan document or a bi-partisan release.  This is a last-gasp for attention by a doddering senator.  This will become nothing but propaganda fodder and will hurt our ability to acquire cooperation from other nations.  This will become a recruiting tool for terrorists.  These details do nothing but inflame Jihadists.  They harm national security interests.

Of what do I refer?  The report on enhanced interrogation by the US, released by the outgoing Chairman on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.  Are the Demorats out to smear the CIA and to dissuade/make a head-fake on other topics?  Like: Gruber’s testimony today?

The Demorats are doing nothing but attempting to smear where they can, because they have a Loser President and are trying to buttress “their” candidate for 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton.  This is also their last chance slam on Bush before the transition to a GOP majority in the Senate.

This is nothing more than a deeply inflammatory report released whilst our young men and women, our troops, are physically in harm’s way around the globe.  This isn’t a matter of criminality, it’s a matter of US policy at the time.  There was Congressional blessing at the time and Congressional oversight.

From TheHill.com:

McCaskill: CIA report ‘would never happen in North Korea or China’

 by Martin Matishak

The release of a report on CIA enhanced interrogations techniques “would never happen” in less open and accountable nations, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said on Monday.
 
The assessment, which could be released as soon as Monday, “exposes what the world already knows, and that is that the United States engaged in torture,” McCaskill said during an interview with CBS.

“But my feeling about this is that this is a gut-check moment for our democracy. The world knows we tortured. But does the world know yet that we’ll hold up our values and hold our government accountable?” she said.
 
McCaskill added that the report “would never happen in North Korea or China or Russia. But in the United States, we hold our government accountable. And I think that process is so important, so fundamental to our democracy that it’s essential that this report comes out.”

The report is the result of a probe by the Senate Intelligence Committee into the CIA’s enhanced interrogations during the George W. Bush administration.

Futher, from USAToday.com:

Officials fear torture report could spark violence

by Erin Kelly

WASHINGTON — Federal officials braced for possible violence at U.S. facilities around the world as senators prepared to release a report Tuesday detailing the CIA’s torture of suspected terrorists in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

“There are some indications that the release of the report could lead to a greater risk that is posed to U.S. facilities and individuals all around the world,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Monday. “So the administration has taken the prudent steps to ensure that the proper security precautions are in place at U.S. facilities around the globe.”

The Intelligence Committee is expected to release Tuesday a 500-page summary of a 6,200-page report on the the CIA’s use of waterboarding, sleep deprivation, humiliation and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” against al-Qaeda prisoners during the George W. Bush administration.

Diane Feinstein is Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.  She is in charge.  She determined if the report was released or not.  The report is here.

This is nothing but vengeance by an aging, doddering and outgoing 81-year-old US Senator.  Call her at (202) 224-3841, contact her on Twitter @SenFeinstein, or e-mail her.

Let her know that you are less than pleased with the release of the enhanced interrogations report.

She said: “Releasing this report is an important step to restoring our values and showing the world that we are a just society.”  It is also your final “getback” at Bush and the GOP.  What was the first thing your own Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel did in anticipation of the report’s release?  That’s correct, he put the US military on general alert, knowing the release would do nothing but stir the Middle East and terrorists.

Thanks so kindly, Feinstein.

BZ

P.S.

Overlooked in the “torture” report: how many terrorists were forced to burn alive, jump to their deaths, beheaded, received clitorectomies, or had hands severed from arms?  Right.  None.

 

 Share

Garner: what you haven’t seen or heard

Posted on by

Garner Event - Black Female Sgt PresentAnd that is this:

Whilst the event went down, there in fact was an NYPD supervisor present.  Who was, by dint of rank, in charge of the event itself.

Have you heard of this supervisor or had it made known to you that a supervisor was even present during the Garner Event?

Likely not.  And purposefully so, by way of the American Media Maggots.  Because it is not Politically Correct to reveal the race or the rank or the gender of the supervisor in this event.

A black female Sergeant.

From the AmericanThinker.com:

Sgt. Kizzy Adoni, Meet Sgt. Stacey Koon

by Jack Cashill

Although the major media remain mum on the subject, it appears that a black female sergeant by the name of Kizzy Adoni supervised the arrest of the 6’4,” 400 lb. Eric Garner in New York City on July 17, 2014. As NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo and former LAPD Sergeant Stacey Koon can attest, there seems to a serious double standard at play here.

Among the few media outlets to address the role of Sgt. Adoni was the aptly named LA Progressive. Cheryl Dorsey, a black former LAPD sergeant, took Adoni to task. “I am appalled by the seeming lack of leadership displayed by the sergeant on the scene during the #ICantBreathe incident,” Dorsey wrote.  Adoni, Dorsey explained, was expected to manage and control the subordinate officers under her command. “So then for a sergeant, and a black woman at that, to stand idly by and do nothing is egregious,” she concluded.

One very important differentiation between Sgt Koon and Sgt Adoni:

Only Pantaleo, however, faced indictment. Adoni, by contrast, was offered immunity to testify against him. Sgt. Stacey Koon, who managed the arrest of Rodney King after a high-speed chase in 1991, had no such luck.  Like Adoni, he merely supervised the scene and did not touch King during the arrest. Unlike Garner, King survived the arrest. Nevetheless, Koon was tried in a criminal court for an excess use of force.

Black vs Caucasoid?  Conclusions anyone?  Bueller?

But wait; it gets better yet:

Adoni could have called the officers off, much as Koon could have called the officers off King, but she did not. The initial police report quotes Adoni as saying, “The perpetrator’s condition did not seem serious and he did not appear to get worse.”

That Adoni was offered immunity, and Koon or Pantaleo not, gives the appearance at least of a race-based application of justice.

Race-based?  Under the Obaka Administration?  Perish the thought!

You’ve heard of The One Who Should Not Be Named.  Get ready for the Paragraph That  Should Not Be Written.

Pantaleo has one other major gripe. As a result of affirmative action, collective bargaining, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, the NYPD ranks are loaded with physically useless cops. Many of them were on the scene that day. At least two male officers were less than 5’ 6” and slight. Three other male officers were obese, one shockingly so, and the two female sergeants appeared to be both short and overweight. If Pantaleo had not been there, it is hard to imagine how his colleagues would have effected an arrest.

Fact or fiction?

You decide.

BZ

 

 Share

What does Joe Biden say?

Posted on by

Here is the photo:

Joe Biden At WindowWhat are Joe Biden’s comments, as you can make them?

This a meme throughout the internet.  Your chance to create some words here.

My submission:

“Glass.  How do it know to keep us cool in the summer and warm in the winter?”

Please leave a comment and make Joe Biden speak for you.

BZ

 

 Share

Hillary Clinton: we must “empathize” with our enemies

Posted on by

Clinton Empathize With Our EnemiesOf course.  We all want Kim Jung Il, Raul Castro, Vladimir Putin, Hassan Rouhani, Bashar al-Assad, Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi and Xi Jinping to sleep like babies at night, comforted in the knowledge that we care about their feelings.

From the WashingtonTimes.com:

Hillary Clinton hammered for insisting U.S. should ‘empathize’ with enemies

by David Sherfinski

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is getting pushback for saying this week that smart foreign policy should include empathizing with one’s enemies.

Mrs. Clinton spoke at Georgetown University about what she called “smart power,” which entails “using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security, leaving no one on the sidelines, showing respect, even for one’s enemies, trying to understand and insofar as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view, helping to define the problems, determine the solutions.”

I don’t believe, however, that Clinton anticipated pushback from a female Demorat, however:

From the WashingtonFreeBeacon.com:

Hillary Clinton Backer Jane Harman Questions Her Suggestion We ‘Empathize’ With Our ‘Enemies’

Long-time Hillary Clinton supporter, former Rep. Jane Harman (D., Calif.) tore apart Clinton’s claim that the U.S. needs to “respect” and “empathize with” its enemies.

Harman said she did not know what Clinton meant by “enemies” in her controversial statement.

“I take issue with the word ‘enemies,’” Harman told Fox’s Chris Wallace on Sunday. “I think we have to respect people with different points of view in order to win the argument with them. I don’t exactly know what she was saying.”

Harman, who has thrown her support behind a 2016 Clinton candidacy, said the U.S. does not have to “respect” terrorists ever.

“I don’t think we have to respect members of terror groups ever,” Harman said. “I think we have to have harsh policies against them.”

Please notice, however, Harman parses her words carefully.  She didn’t object solely to the word “empathize.”  She objected to the word “enemies” principally.  As in: it is harsh and judgmental to call any other nation an “enemy” of the United States.

Words matter.  Again, as in: we losing the ability to even identify our enemies.

BZ

 

 Share

Pro-Wilson Ferguson witness murdered?

Posted on by

Ferguson Witness MurderedAnd was he a witness who stated Michael Brown was shot in the back with his hands in the air?

Perhaps he was not.

Hearken back to this post first, then continue:

From the NYDailyNews.com:

Man found dead amid Ferguson riots had bullet in head, accelerant on body: police

by Nina Golgowski

Among those appearing to grieve for Joshua was Dorian Johnson, who witnessed Brown’s death.

A nearby resident, previously speaking to the St. Louis Post Dispatch, has claimed that hours before the young man’s body was found they overheard four people armed with guns talking about looting and killing someone Monday night.

“I knew it was going to be true,” said Richard Taylor after hearing word of Joshua’s death. “When I got up this morning, I saw this.”

Why was DeAndre Joshua killed?  It seems his death has been completely ignored and shuttled aside.  The national media, what I term the American Media Maggots, seem not AMM - American Media Maggots 2to be interested in the slightest and have asked not one question.

They appear to have taken whatever the Ferguson PD and/or the St Louis County authorities have said as gospel.  Why?  They don’t trust these authorities with any information regarding Michael Brown.

DeAndre Joshua’s death is the only one to have occurred in Ferguson following Brown, but it has apparently been disregarded and rejected by the AMM.  Doesn’t that seem just a tad bit odd to you, given the recent history of Ferguson?  After all, the AMM and specifically the late Christopher Hitchens accused President George Bush 43 of being “unusually uncurious.”  J’accuse, AMM, Mr Hitchens?

A death in Ferguson?  A black man’s death in Ferguson, following that of Brown?  Uncovered by the AMM and not splayed across the headlines of papers and media sites around the nation and the world?  I repeat: a black man killed in Ferguson is now ignored, following the death Michael Brown?

Just how can that be?

I am wondering: is it because the incident doesn’t fit the meme of blacks being killed by Caucasoids?  It is because Joshua may have been killed since he was perceived by the “black community” as being a “snitch” and worthy of death?  Because he may have been killed by a black male and not a Caucasoid?

I don’t know.

But at least I’m courageous enough to even pose the question.

J’accuse, American Media Maggots.  Is there not one ounce of testosterone amongst all of you?

BZ

 

 Share