Ending the 22nd Amendment: not just specious “Right-Wing conspiracy theories”

Obama Destroying US ConstitutionIt’s fact, it’s right in front of our faces and — yes — desired by the Left.  As introduced by Demorat Jose Serrano of NY:

U.S. Rep. Josè Serrano, D-N.Y., once again quietly introduced a resolution that would allow President Obama or any president to serve an unlimited number of terms, according to a report.

According to GovTrack.US, Rep. Serrano introduced House Joint Resolution 15 on Friday. The resolution is described as:

“Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.”

This resolution was assigned to a congressional committee on January 4, 2013, which would have to consider it before it would be sent to the House or Senate.

The bill was a reintroduction of House Joint Resolution 17 presented by Rep. Serrano in 2011. That resolution was never sent to committee.

So: why not allow an unlimited number of presidential terms?

Because, in my opinion, the wants of the bulk of the electorate just became abundantly clear this past November of 2012: give us more state and federal FREE CHEESE.  The parasites in the country are, now, roughly numerically on par with the hosts.  The producers and the consumers.  Taxpayers and non-taxpayers.

The national hard drive has been corrupted: corrupted by the elitist Worms in DC and the spreading Virus of Free Cheese.

Don’t you find it odd that the only persons who want the 22nd Amendment abolished are those on the Left?  And don’t you find it odd that the only presidential term under which the bill is introduced is that of Mr Obama’s?

Because, after all, there’s never any veracity to those incredibly crazy and suspect Right Wing Conspiracy Theories.

Is there?

BZ

P.S.
The 22nd Amendment reads, in full:

Amendment XXII

Section 1.

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

Bears At Welfare

 

Economist Thomas Sowell nails it:

Very pertinent quotes from Thomas Sowell:

1. “Elections should be held on April 16th — the day after we pay our income taxes.  That is one of the few things that might discourage politicians from being big spenders.”

[I have my own personal corollary: Every American should pay quarterly taxes like every business.  There should be NO “deductions” allowed from your paycheck.  That way, American taxpayers would realize just how MUCH money they pay in taxes to the federal government and — trust me — there would be a massive resulting insurrection.]

2. “If you have been voting for politicians who promise to give you goodies at someone else’s expense, then you have no right to complain when they take your money and give it to someone else, including themselves.”

[Facts in evidence, otherwise known as STFU.]

3. “I think this man (Obama) really does believe he can change the world, and people like that are inherently more dangerous than mere crooked politicians.”

[Though, I would submit, Mr Obama is also a “crooked politician.”]

4.” Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”

[Every new leader leaning towards Socialism thinks that only HE can “do” Socialism properly.  History proves this patently false.]

5. “Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good.”

[Corollary: there’s no learning from history.]

6. “One of the consequences of such notions as ‘entitlements’ is that people who have contributed nothing to society feel that society owes them something, apparently just for being nice enough to grace us with their presence.”

[A philosophy that has been pounded into young mold-a-brains from infancy — hence: T-ball and certificates for “showing up.”]

7. “I have never understood why it is ‘greed’ to want to keep the money you’ve earned, but not greed to want to take somebody else’s money.”

[Because this is a concept that is clearly beyond the ken of most American idiot voters whose day revolves around vacuosity such as Honey Boo Boo and Tweeting.]

8. “If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 60 years ago, a liberal 30 years ago and a racist today.”

[The efficacy of new public Leftist schooling clearly at work.]

9. “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

[That would be: generally, most everyone in every form of government., including administrators, judges, magistrates.  I have always maintained that not nearly enough government bureaucrats are killed, raped, sodomized, fleeced, cut with knives, stabbed, had their entire savings plans emptied, lost their homes to government fiat.  They represent an elite class that consistently maintains an unaffected mien behind gates, fences, protective rings, large sedans and SUVs, and purposely so.  Bottom line: until they hurt when we hurt, nothing will ever change.]

And that, Mr Sowell, would define the average DC politician.

We can learn, ladies and gentlemen, from the wise words of Mr Sowell.

BZ

 

 

More freedoms killed: RFID chips for AMERICAN STUDENTS

From CNSNews.com:

Andrea Hernandez won’t have to leave her high school for refusing to wear a badge designed to track her every move there – yet – her attorneys announced today.

There you have it.  RFID tags for human beings.  In this case, students in a Texas high school.

A district court judge for Bexar County, Texas, has granted a temporary restraining order to prevent Northside Independent School District from removing a Hernandez from John Jay High School’s Science and Engineering Academy because she refused to wear a name badge designed to use a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip to track students’ precise location on school property, the Hernandez’s attorneys announced today.

Frankly, to refuse to wear an RFID tag is nothing more than the exercise of one’s freedom from governmental and authoritative agencies.  Schools are that very same thing; they are not private.  They are publicly funded.

“The court’s willingness to grant a temporary restraining order is a good first step, but there is still a long way to go—not just in this case, but dealing with the mindset, in general, that everyone needs to be monitored and controlled,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute.

For what ultimate purpose is this RFID chipping of AMERICAN high school students?

“Regimes in the past have always started with the schools, where they develop a compliant citizenry. These ‘Student Locator’ programs are ultimately aimed at getting students used to living in a total surveillance state where there will be no privacy, and wherever you go and whatever you text or email will be watched by the government,” Whitehead warned.

Correct.

RFID chips originated for the tagging of railroad cars and locomotives, in order to keep track of power and individual cars throughout a given railroad system.  Pets and livestock are tracked with RFID chips.

Now people.

Treated like cattle and railroad cars.

In this case, Alex Jones is entirely correct.

Considering my prior post and all other instances involving removal of the privacy and liberties of Americans, I ask: where is the outrage?  Where is the hue and cry over rights diminished?

I predominantly don’t hear them — those warning cries.  Do you?

BZ

P.S.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is time to re-read George Orwell’s 1984.  My copy arrived just this week.  And I’m starting it tonight, along with my reading of Jon Meacham’s new biography: Thomas Jefferson, the Art of Power.

 

 

Under OBAMA: Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants

Because, after all, the Leftists and Mr Obama want nothing more than to increase your freedoms.  Because, after all, the Republicans and Conservatives want nothing more than to negate your freedoms.

I say: uh, no.  Your freedoms are entirely repressed by the Left.  And this continues to prove that notion:

Proposed law scheduled for a vote next week originally increased Americans’ e-mail privacy. Then law enforcement complained. Now it increases government access to e-mail and other digital files.

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law, CNET has learned.

Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns, according to three individuals who have been negotiating with Leahy’s staff over the changes. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

This wasn’t occurring under Bush I or Bush II or under Reagan.  It is occurring under His Majesty, Barack Hussein Obama — THE ONE.

Let there be no mistake: whatever privacy may exist in the world, will now be mostly gone under this senate bill.

Whatever revelations I wanted in years past, I would have had to mandatorily solicit under any number of crafted warrants.  Either search or arrest.  They’re not that tough.  But they are lawful.  If I wanted access as a Detective, I had to write and submit various and sundry but very specific and applicable warrants.  To a very specific court.

Warrants grant access to either things or persons.

Under Obama: no.

Under Obama: freedoms DIMINISHED.

BZ

 

 

6,125 Proposed Regulations and Notifications Posted in Last 90 Days–Average 68 per Day

From CNSNews.com:

(CNSNews.com) – It’s Friday morning, and so far today, the Obama administration has posted 165 new regulations and notifications on its reguations.gov website.

In the past 90 days, it has posted 6,125 regulations and notices – an average of 68 a day.

Some of the proposed regulations revise regulations already on the books.

The website also links to a video of a speech President Barack Obama gave at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 7, 2011, in which the president promised to remove “outdated and unnecessary regulations.”

A number of groups, including the Competitive Enterprise Institute, expect a rush of new regulations now that President Obama has won a second term.

Yes indeed, welcome, America, to the second terms of the president who believes you are simultaneously under-taxed and under-regulated.

And he’s going to do something about that.

Right now.

BZ

P.S.
When UK’s The Economist thinks you’re over-regulated, you have a problem, considering the magazine’s source.