TEA Party to Utah’s Bob Bennett: RINOs OUT


The message is being emphasized early:

Senator Robert (Bob) Bennett, Utah Republican was denied re-nomination Saturday after serving three terms in office, and the Utah Tea Party has been credited with pushing him out. Bennett voted for the bank bailout and that vote (among others) had Utah’s Tea Party and many Utah Republicans up in arms.

Bennett, 76, failed to make it to Utah’s GOP primary or win his party’s nomination. He is the first congressional incumbent to be tossed out in 2010.

The DNC, therefore, thinks the TEA Party now runs the GOP zoo because Mr Bennett was so extremely conservative:

Today the Tea Party strengthened its hold on the Republican Party by ousting Utah’s Senator Bob Bennett from the primary. That the Tea Party would consider Bob Bennett – one of the most conservative members of the U.S. Senate – too liberal, just goes to show how extreme the Tea Party is. This is just the latest battle in the corrosive Republican intra-party civil war that has resulted in the Tea Party devouring two Republicans in just as many weeks. If there was any question before, there should now be no doubt that the Republican leadership has handed the reigns to the Tea Party.”

Bennett himself said:

The political atmosphere obviously has been toxic and it’s very clear that some of the votes that I have cast have added to the toxic environment.”

“Looking back on them, with one or two very minor exceptions, I wouldn’t have cast any of them any differently even if I had known at the time they were going to cost me my career.”

“Don’t take a chance on a newcomer,” Bennett pleaded before the second round of voting. “There’s too much at stake.”

Many are trying to push the “incumbent” theory: voters simply want all incumbents out.

I say: it’s just a wee bit more complicated than that.

Good riddance to Mr Bennett, your RINO days are now concluded. Go away.

BZ

Net Neutrality

Whilst the rest of the world falls about our ears, I’d care to discuss “net neutrality” today.

Here are three articles that I read for reference:

1. New US Push To Regulate Internet Access
2. Takeover Of Internet
3. Some Search Engines to Profit

Interesting article here. Internet censorship article here. ISPs and Net Neutrality article here.

Can someone elucidate: why is the FCC considering internet regulation, what brought us here, why is this good — or bad — and what are the ramifications of potential FCC regulations?

In clear and easy to understand words and phrases, please?

BZ

Mr Obaka: Our Admirable President

We were to have the most ethical Congress in history, so said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

We were going to have true governmental transparency, so said Mr Obaka in his campaigning.

Instead, we have (from Politico.com):

While the BP oil geyser pumps millions of gallons of petroleum into the Gulf of Mexico, President Barack Obama and members of Congress may have to answer for the millions in campaign contributions they’ve taken from the oil and gas giant over the years.

BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama [my emphasis – BZ], according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company’s political action committees — $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals.

During his time in the Senate and while running for president, Obama received a total of $77,051 from the oil giant and is the top recipient of BP PAC and individual money over the past 20 years [my emphasis – BZ], according to financial disclosure records.

An Obama spokesman rejected the notion that the president took big oil money.

Make no mistake: this is Mr Obaka and his sniveling sycophants LYING, publicly, to your FACE, and assuming you are too stupid to know this.

Further, Mr Obaka wants bipartisanship and cooperation, hates labeling, but pejoratively labels the bulk of America when he calls those interested in saving this nation “teabaggers“:

Though he aspires to promote civility, evidence has surfaced that President Obama has added “tea-bagger” to his public lexicon, though it’s considered a cheap and tawdry insult by “tea party” activists. Watchdogs at Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) barked when they saw the proof, tucked in a sneak peak of Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter’s new book, “The Promise: President Obama, Year One,” to be released May 18.

[By the way, why the umbrage regarding the label of teabagger? Go here for clarity.]

The DSCC, by the way, decided that capitalizing on the oil spill would be the perfect way to raise money for the Demorats.

Rome Burns, people, and Mr Obaka is immobile. He is “concerned” and “monitoring” which means he is clueless. And not only does Rome Burn, the rest of the world burns.

Greece is falling apart;
There is a Euro debt crisis;
Stocks crash worldwide;
Grecian violence escalates now;
The UK’s budget deficit is set to surpass that of Greece;

And finally: if Faisal Shahzad hated President Bush, then I suspect Mr Bush must have been doing something correct.

Note to Mr Obaka: relying on LUCK and the INCOMPETENCE of terrorists does NOT comprise a National Security Policy. You bleeding idiot.

BZ

Applicable, Anyone?

Considering the temper of these tempestuous times, I’d say there’s a manner of applicability in the gentleman’s sign.
NOTE:

Speaking of signs, why is it that no one in the US media covered the violent illegal immigrant riots in Santa Cruz, Fornicalia, where property was destroyed and people were hurt? THIS was purposely ignored by the US national media because it involved brown people. Lord knows, Mexicans can do no wrong in this country. It was quantified as a “methodical and coordinated attack by anarchists.”

Where, instead, the DEM/MSM continues to focus upon the TEA Parties and their rather boring sign-waving and speech-making.

In the meantime, Rome Burns.

Mr Obaka’s response to an event that potentially threatens the entire southern and southeast portions of the United States is limp-wristed. He sends two C-130s and attorneys. He sends vicarious jackboots to clamp the neck of BP.

He ignores the floods in Tennessee.

He basks in the glow of simple, good Cop Work in New York where, within 53 hours, the suspect (oh my gosh, not a white racist male!) is arrested. Mr Obaka purposely does NOT use the “T” word in the description of this event. But, again, a POS boards a plane when that person’s name is on a No Fly list. That is Mr Obaka’s responsibility.
When you cannot even quantify, with words and phrases, what and who the enemy is, you are offering up the entire country to sacrifice. Sometimes what you don’t officially say is as important as what you do say.
At what point do the American People begin to doubt the ability and resolution of the Obaka Administration to actually want to protect its inhabitants? Or is it simply content to go whistling past the graveyard?

Meanwhile, he jokes and banties about vulgarities at a dinner whilst his country is crumbling around his shoulders.

There have been five domestic terror events in the past 15 months. This is something the likes of which Mr Obaka has no capability to grasp the logical extension.

We are no longer capturing, detaining and questioning senior terrorist leaders. Our intelligence has been gutted. When you capture a KSM, they allow you to connect the dots. We lack the authority to capture and question when necessary. We afford rights that don’t exist to persons who don’t deserve them.

Just as Mr Clinton encouraged the Final Insult of 9/11 by a purposeful lack of response, Mr Obaka is encouraging another, different, Final Result.

We can only hope it will not involve the loss of additional thousands and thousands of American citizens.

BZ

P.S.
I’ll let you in on a little secret: Islam is in the process of attempting to violently radicalize our incarcerees in various domestic prison systems, with an emphasis in Fornicalia prisons. Imams are making demands to visit prisons at geometric rates.