Science Fiction author Ray Bradbury: dead at 91 in Los Angeles


Ray Douglas Bradbury was a science fiction author compared, frequently, to his compatriots, Isaac Asimov, Arthur C Clark and Robert Heinlein.

Though not a particular fan of Bradbury’s works, I respected his vision and his perseverance and insight. He wrote 27+ novels and close to 600 short stories.

I believe that many other sci-fi authors of Bradbury’s generation overshadowed him greatly. That is simply my opinion.

He died at the age of 91 in Los Angeles, as documented by the LATimes.com:

Ray Bradbury, the writer whose expansive flights of fantasy and vividly rendered space-scapes have provided the world with one of the most enduring speculative blueprints for the future, has died. He was 91.

Bradbury died Tuesday night in Los Angeles, his agent Michael Congdon confirmed. His family said in a statement that he had suffered from a long illness.

Author of more than 27 novels and story collections—most famously “The Martian Chronicles,” “Fahrenheit 451,” “Dandelion Wine” and “Something Wicked This Way Comes”—and more than 600 short stories, Bradbury has frequently been credited with elevating the often-maligned reputation of science fiction. Some say he singlehandedly helped to move the genre into the realm of literature.

Bradbury was not my specific “cup of tea,” so to speak.

But I will always acknowledge his import in the overall narrative of science fiction, the import of his originality. Of his voice.

Ray Bradbury was born the same year of my father: 1920. He survived the Roaring 20s. He survived the Great Depression. And he brought that same toughness and insight to his printed page.

He refused to drive a car. He refused to ride in an aircraft. He wrote on a mechanical typewriter. Further, Bradbury was a noted conservative.[51]

  1. ^ “Ray Bradbury – Conservative turns 90 – WSJ Political Diary”. Politicalnewsnow.com. 2010-08-20. Retrieved 2012-06-06.

God bless the man for his truth, his creativity, his innovation, his willingness to craft social issues into science fiction and fantasy genres.

Rest now, sir. You deserve it and you have my ultimate respect.

You blazed a path where few other American authors did so.

BZ

Ray Bradbury and his wife Maggie, 1970, in Bradbury’s personal library.

“The only way to turn the economy around is to turn the economy loose.” -David Mamet

Even William Jefferson Clinton realizes this.

From GlobalPost.com:

Former President Clinton broke with President Obama on extending the Bush-era tax cuts, saying on Tuesday that they should be renewed temporarily in the current economic climate, according to Politico.

Speaking on CNBC, Clinton said, “That’s probably the best thing to do right now.” He added, “But the Republicans don’t want to do that unless he agrees to extend the tax cuts permanently, including for upper income people. And I don’t think the president should do that.”

The tax cuts, which were passed in 2001 and 2003, will expire early next year and Democrats want to extend them for everyone except the wealthy while the Republicans want them renewed across the board.

Bill Clinton also typified Romney’s presence as “sterling.”

Bill Clinton praised Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s business career in an interview on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight” on Thursday, calling his record as CEO of Bain Capital “sterling.”

“I don’t think that we ought to get into the position where we say ‘This is bad work. This is good work,'” said the former Democratic President, speaking of Romney’s role in the private equity industry. “I think the real issue ought to be, what has Governor Romney advocated in the campaign that he will do as president? What has President Obama done and what does he propose to do? How do these things stack up against each other?”

Clinton’s comments about Romney directly undermine Obama’s re-election campaign strategy, which has sought to portray Romney as a rampant capitalist who is out of touch with ordinary American voters, The New York Times’ Caucus blog pointed out.

Fornicalia is Greece:


From Dale Franks at Questions & Observations:

Californians

The list of odd things Californians believe that are directly contradicted by observable reality is, of course, far to long to be described here. A representative sample, however, includes:

  • Maintaining a permanent class of illegal immigrants in modern-day helotage will not reduce employment among the minority citizenry. Giving them full access to state benefits and education will not strain the schools, medical system, or state budget.
  • California must have the strictest environmental, tax, and employment regulation possible. This will not result slower economic growth, or a business exodus to another state. Similarly, stringent environmental regulation for the benefit of small fish or birds, and significantly reducing the water available for irrigation, will have no effect on farming in the central valley, and, hence, agricultural prices paid by consumers.
  • It is completely possible to allow state employees to retire as young as 50, with an annual pension payment 85% of their highest salary, and fully meet our pension obligations, because the Dow will be at 24,000 by 2009, and 24,000,000 by 2099, thus making the latest round of pension increases perfectly sustainable through investment.
  • If we’re taxing California workers 10% of their income, and we have a $16 billion budget deficit, the problem is that we obviously aren’t taxing enough. We should, therefore, tax higher income earners much more, because they can never leave California and move to Arizona. Or Texas.

California is just Greece with movie stars.

Yes. Fornicalia is wantonly destroying businesses.

I agree with Mr Frank with one exception: I worked 35+ years in law enforcement, in Fornicalia, to acquire the retirement I paid for. My retirement isn’t freely “paid for” by my department. What I may get, I worked for. And I predicated my retirement upon plans I signed up for 30+ years ago.

That said, Fornicalia still doesn’t “get it.” It’s Leftist governor, Jerry Brown, doesn’t “get it.”

One possible shining light?

The “pushback” on Fornicalia’s LOSER “bullet train.”

Because, yeah, after all, I want more gangbangers from SoCal to be able to bring their violent bullshit into NorCal and into the counties that still haven’t completely fallen prey to the Leftists. [Like Nevada County, Placer County, Sierra County, Glenn, Humboldt, Del Norte.] Quickly and cheaply. At a loss. Paid for, times over and again (when its admin realizes it’s a fiscally failing venture) by the Fornicalia Hosts. For Parasites.

But: did I find this information in US news? Of course not! As I’ve submitted for quite some time: if you want to discover what’s actually occurring in the world, check the UK media.

To wit — from the UKTelegraph.com:

Buyers’ remorse for California’s ‘bullet train to nowhere’

California voters are experiencing buyers’ remorse over a $68.4 billion (£44.4 billion) high speed rail project which critics say risks becoming a “bullet train to nowhere.”

Ambitious plans for a fast track linking Los Angeles and San Francisco at speeds of up to 220mph in just over two-and-a-half hours were slimly approved by 53 per cent in a statewide ballot in 2008. That allowed the state to raise $10 billion from bonds and secured an injection of $3.5 billion in stimulus money from the Obama administration. There is currently no direct train route between the two.

Construction is expected to begin later this year in the middle of California’s Central Valley near Merced, a town of 80,000 people known for having one of the highest home foreclosure rates in America.

The plan calls for around 300 miles of track to be laid south from there over the next 10 years to reach the northern outskirts of Los Angeles. A northern link from the Central Valley to San Francisco would not be completed until 2028.

The project is still $54.9 billion short of what is needed, raising fears that the state will be unable to find the funds to finish later sections, and could be left with a futuristic rail line linking minor cities and farming communities.

Amid disillusion over the cost and handling of the project, voters have now turned against what was supposed to become a symbol of state pride.

Imagine that. What’s left of the actually sane taxpayers in the state are beginning to question the HSR plan.

A new poll shows almost three fifths would oppose the bullet train and halt public borrowing if given another chance to vote.

Almost seven in 10 said that, if the train ever does run between Los Angeles and San Francisco, they would “never or hardly ever” use it.

Not a single person said they would use it more than once a week, and only 33 per cent said they would prefer the bullet train over a one hour plane journey or seven hour drive. The cost of a ticket, estimated at $123 each way, also put many off. Jerry Brown, California’s Democrat governor, has championed the project as a way to create jobs and is backed by unions. The 74-year-old governor has been personally committed to a high speed rail link since the 1970s.

But he is trying to convince voters to spend billions on a train while at the same time proposing tax increases and austere public spending cuts, including a five per cent pay cut for state workers, to deal with a budget deficit that has ballooned to $16 billion.

Because Jerry Brown is insane.

And some of his former Leftists may actually be starting to wake up.

Greece WILL fall.

And so WILL Fornicalia.

BZ

P.S.
More pointedly, in an illustration, here is what I don’t want imported to my north from LA: