Tag Archives: Bill Clinton

Careful, Nancy Pelosi

Posted on by

Or you’re going to piss off the real power in the Demorat Party.

It’s no longer you. Or Joe Biden. Or Hillary and Bill Clinton. Or Patrick Leahy, Jerrold Nadler (pictured), Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Patty Murray. None of you old, wattle-necked Caucasoids.

Let’s be honest. The three people pulling the power in the Demorat Party are Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Ilhan Omar.

And Rashida Talib. All “women of color” with the last two being Muslims. Talib, visually, clearly isn’t all that Muslim unless she’s laboring under taqiyya/kitman.

AOC possesses Historical Alzheimers. And Ilhan Omar is the proverbial “gift that keeps on giving” in terms of “open mouth, insert foot.” A larger anti-Semite could not be found  in Ilhan Omar, with one exception: Louis Farrakhan. But he’s had over five decades to hone his “hate the termite Hebes” craft.

Twitter says it won’t suspend Louis Farrakhan over tweet comparing Jews to termites

by Megan Keller, 10-17-18

Twitter said Wednesday that it will not suspend Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan over a tweet comparing Jews to termites, the company confirmed to The Hill. 

Farrakhan, who has been accused of making anti-Semitic remarks for years, posted a clip to Twitter of a speech he gave captioned, “I’m not an anti-Semite. I’m anti-Termite.”

The tweet prompted backlash on the platform, with figures such as Chelsea Clinton blasting it as anti-Semitic.

Consider: these three bints are only in their fourth month. Translated: they’re gonna continue to be entertainment gold for the rest of their terms. Hold on. Fourth month. Wait a minute. Does that mean they should be aborted?

Sorta semi-important Demorat runner-ups would include Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and in last two places the whitest of Caucasoid males, Robert O-Rourke (another fake Mexican with the appropriated fake name of “Beto”) and milktoast Pete Buttigieg.

From FoxNews.com:

Pelosi plays down influence of AOC wing of Democrats, says it’s ‘like 5 people’

by Nicole Darrah

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., tried to tamp down the perceived influence of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other progressive freshman Democrats, saying their wing in Congress was “like five people.”

Speaking with CBS News’ Lesley Stahl on “60 Minutes,” Pelosi said the 29-year-old congresswoman from New York didn’t have a significant impact on the Democratic Party. The House speaker also said she rejected socialism “as an economic system.”

“You have these wings, AOC and her group on one side,” Stahl told Pelosi, to which the 79-year-old replied: “That’s like five people.”

Pelosi still tries bravely to be the anti-Trump trooper.

It’s clear the Demorat Party is on a very serious precipice, where they somehow manage to retain a shred of credibility or fall backwards completely into the mentally-defective genetic mutant pool of Socialism-Communism.

The drool-cup wing of the Demorats still retain a collectively-sufficient number of brain cells to realize that talking a long walk off a short Socialist political pier spells certain doom.

The New Breed of Demorats — who actually wouldn’t mind re-branding themselves as Demorat-Socialists — find absolutely nothing wrong with lurching the ship harder to port as they find most Demorats insufficiently left for the Left.

But there’s a problem with the New Breed. One of the problems is summed up thusly and as I indicated above: massive anti-Semite pro-Muslim/Sharia law Ilhan Omar.

If Ilhan Omar had somehow been a Republican the excoriation over her comments would still be making page one on newspapers across the nation as well as the American Media Maggots. Four weeks later.

Here is another example of Nancy Pelosi — who insists it is she who wields the true Demorat power — placating, petting and assuaging the true New Breed of power.

Pelosi Sides with Omar on Disgraceful 9/11 Comment, Makes Shock Demand of Trump

by C. Douglas Golden, 4-15-19

I’m pretty much convinced Rep. Ilhan Omar could do anything and the Democrats would uncritically get behind her.

If the Minnesota Democrat were to knock over a bank or two on the way to Capitol, I can almost picture Steny Hoyer referring to it as “an aggressive but reasonable reaction to the financial institution’s oppressive withdrawal policies.”

Omar hasn’t done anything criminal, mind you, but let’s remember that this is the individual who, just a few weeks ago, made anti-Semitic remarks implying Jewish Americans might have a dual loyalty to Israel.

Then, a resolution to condemn her anti-Semitism became a meaningless piece of drivel that condemned all sorts of hatred.

Of course it can’t be specifically critical. The Demorats are afraid of the New Breed.

This, mind you, was just a few weeks ago. Last week, footage of Omar reducing the 9/11 attacks to “some people did something” during a speech before the Council on American-Islamic Relations went viral, particularly because of a video released on President Donald Trump’s Twitter account that interspersed what she said with footage of the attacks.

More comments made in fear by Nancy Pelosi. Fear of losing her power. Fear of a perceived loss of power.

As with most Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi naturally turned her criticism to Trump for criticizing Omar’s remarks, not toward Omar for actually making them.

This was the video Tweeted by Trump. It is accurate in its disgust with some Somali’s disgusting, dismissive and disrespectful comment about 9-11.

Nancy Pelosi is very aware of what’s happening in front of her face.

Despite all that, who has the power?

It ain’t you, Nancy Pelosi.

BZ

 

 Share

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, November 21st, 2017, with guest Dan Butcher

Posted on by

Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract, as well as appear on the Sack Heads Radio Show each Wednesday evening.

Thursday night in the Saloon:

  • High Plains Pundit Media mogul Dan Butcher stopped by for the entire show;
  • Thanks to Whiskey Dale for being a chat room loyalista;
  • BZ explains the KC-135 Ketel One Refueling Team;
  • “If it’s Tuesday, it must be Dan.” Or Belgium;
  • “A better life through chemicals;”
  • Dan reveals that one of the finest times he’s every had on the Sack Heads Radio Show is when he was laboring under the influence of various Adult Beverages;
  • After all, this is a late night show and the kiddies should already be in bed;
  • Sexual harassment explodes this week and Leftists are in the bullseye;
  • Where does the next sexual harassment shoe drop?
  • It’s a new day and a new paradigm;
  • Dan and I talk media, changing sexual mores, hypocrisy, social media and the Left; Charlie Rose, Weinstein, Rep John Conyers. Yes; mostly Leftists;
  • Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton: they are so yesterday’s news;
  • Revenge on the Clintons is a dish best served cold;
  • Bill Clinton has four more women accuse Bill of sexual liberties;
  • Where does this country go next?

If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, please click on the yellow start button at the upper left.

Listen to “BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon, Tuesday, November 21, 2017” on Spreaker.

If you care to watch the show on YouTube, please click on the red start button.

Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin (on Twitter @BZep, Facebook as the Bloviating Zeppelin and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.

As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives in podcast? Go here.
  • Want to watch the past shows on YouTube? Please visit the SHR Media Network YouTube channel here.
  • Want to watch the show live on Facebook? Go to the SHR Media page on Facebook here.
  • Want to watch the show on High Plains TV? Go here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 Share

Special prosecutor for Hillary Clinton, et al?

Posted on by

People mock “Hillary Clinton’s bathroom home server.” This is a photograph of Hillary Clinton’s bathroom home server. This is true and accurate. That’s an actual toilet. Why was its existence ignored completely by the American Media Maggots?

And that is an idea whose time has more than come. It is long past due.

First, from FoxNews.com, the article written by Representatives Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Reps. Jordan and Gaetz: Special counsel needed as questions mount on Clinton, Comey, Russian Dossier and more

Mr. Attorney General, it’s time to do your job.

Why in 2016 did FBI Director James Comey call the Clinton Investigation a “matter,” not an investigation? After all, Mr. Comey wasn’t Director of the Federal Bureau of Matters.

Why in 2016 did FBI Director Comey begin drafting an exoneration letter for Secretary Clinton, whom he called “grossly negligent” in an early draft of the letter, before completing the investigation?  Before interviewing several witnesses? And before interviewing Secretary Clinton?

Why in 2016 did James Comey and the Justice Department give Cheryl Mills, Secretary Clinton’s Chief of Staff, an immunity agreement for turning over her laptop computer? Typically, the Department would issue a subpoena or get a warrant and seize it. Why in this case did the FBI agree to destroy the laptop?

Why in 2016—one day before the Benghazi report was released and five days before Secretary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI—did Attorney General Lynch meet with former President Clinton on the tarmac in Phoenix?

All excellent questions deserving of answers but obviously ignored by the American Media Maggots and all-but-ignored by EstabliHack Republicans. Why?

Why in the days following the meeting, and when emailing with the public relations staff at the Justice Department, did Loretta Lynch use the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle?” If your conversation with the former President was only about golf and grandchildren, then why not use your real name?

Why was the decision on whether to charge Secretary Clinton made by FBI Director Comey and not the Attorney General?

Why did James Comey publicize the Clinton Investigation?

Why in 2016 did the FBI pay for the Russian Dossier? It’s been reported that in addition to the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee paying FusionGPS for the dossier, the FBI also “reimbursed” Christopher Steele, author of the dossier.

Why was FusionGPS co-founder Glenn Simpson meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya both before and after her meeting with Donald Trump, Jr.? 

Why is the FBI so reluctant to tell Congress and the American people if the dossier was the basis for a FISA court order permitting the government to spy on Americans associated with President Trump’s campaign? If the dossier was a legitimate intelligence document relied on by the court, then why not just tell the country?

Why on January 6, 2017 did James Comey brief President-Elect Trump on the dossier? Again, if the dossier was a legitimate intelligence document, then why wait two months after the election to inform the President-Elect?

Oh my gosh, so please keep the questions coming. All necessary questions.

Why did the Obama Administration leak to CNN that Mr. Comey had briefed President-Elect Trump on the dossier? Several media outlets had the dossier prior to the briefing, yet no one would print it because most of the document could not be substantiated. In his Congressional testimony, Mr. Comey himself called the dossier “salacious and unverified.” As pointed out in The Federalist, did the fact that the FBI Director had briefed the President-Elect on the dossier give it the “legitimacy” the press needed to go ahead and print something they knew was not accurate?

Why did the intelligence community in the final months of the Obama Administration unmask names at a record rate? 

Why, after Mr. Comey was fired on May 9, 2017, was it so critical for a Special Counsel be named to examine possible Trump/Russia collusion? So critical that James Comey leaked a government document about his conversations with President Trump through a friend to the New York Times.

Why is the Special Counsel Robert Mueller? According to The Hill and Circa News, in 2009 and 2010, the FBI through an informant learned Russian companies seeking to do business in the United States were involved in kickbacks and bribes. Yet, FBI Director Robert Mueller did not inform Congress and did not inform the Committee of Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the entity responsible for the decision on whether to approve the Uranium One deal.

Why did Robert Mueller not inform CFIUS? And why did the Justice Department put a gag order on the informant?

But most importantly:

Finally, why won’t Attorney General Jeff Sessions—the person with the visibility and responsibility to answer these questions—do his job?

On July 27, 2017, twenty House Republican members of the Judiciary Committee sent a letter to the Attorney General calling for a Special Counsel to get answers to the above questions.

On September 28, 2017, five House Republican members of the Judiciary committee met with the Attorney General and Justice Department staff to inquire about the July letter.

The Justice Department’s response? Silence.

It’s time for Jeff Sessions to name a Special Counsel and get answers for the American people. If not, he should step down.

Indeed. It is past time for same.

Following that article there was something of a dam break. Did it require Jordan and Gaetz to weigh in with pressure, was it a chink in the Clinton armor, or a bit of freedom perceived by Jeff Sessions? I’m not sure we’ll know.

Because, after all, we are skirting the fringe of BZ’s DC Axiom here:

“It’s an institutional culture in government. We don’t want to go after our predecessors because we don’t want our successors to come after us.”

From the WashingtonPost.com:

Sessions considering second special counsel to investigate Republican concerns, letter shows

by Matt Zapotosky

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is entertaining the idea of appointing a second special counsel to investigate a host of Republican concerns — including alleged wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation and the controversial sale of a uranium company to Russia — and has directed senior federal prosecutors to explore at least some of the matters and report back to him and his top deputy, according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post.

The revelation came in a response by the Justice Department to an inquiry from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), who in July and again in September called for Sessions to appoint a second special counsel to investigate concerns he had related to the 2016 election and its aftermath.

Really? No pressure from Jordan and Gaetz factored?

The list of matters he wanted probed was wide ranging but included the FBI’s handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, various dealings of the Clinton Foundation and several matters connected to the purchase of the Canadian mining company Uranium One by Russia’s nuclear energy agency. Goodlatte took particular aim at former FBI director James B. Comey, asking for the second special counsel to evaluate the leaks he directed about his conversations with President Trump, among other things.

In response, Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote that Sessions had “directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate certain issues raised in your letters,” and that those prosecutors would “report directly to the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”

“Why did the intelligence community in the final months of the Obama Administration unmask names at a record rate?”

Laura Ingraham on her show discussed the issue on Monday with both Representatives Jordan and Gaetz. Please listen closely.

Things may be changing — on many fronts. This all, I should remind everyone, stems from the incessant bleat of Demorats, Leftists and the American Media Maggots of “Trump-Russia, Trump-Russia, Trump-Russia!”

Leftists, Dems and the AMM are getting what they want now — investigations. The problem is that these investigations are pointing most back to the Demorats and not the Republicans. Schadenfreude, heavy drinking, back-slapping all around.

In conclusion, there is this from TheAtlantic.com, indicating the reign of Bill & Hill may be over, perhaps to even include indictments on a criminal level.

Bill Clinton: A Reckoning

by Caitlin Flanagan

Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990s. They were on the wrong side of history; is it finally time to make things right?

The most remarkable thing about the current tide of sexual assault and harassment accusations is not their number. If every woman in America started talking about the things that happen during the course of an ordinary female life, it would never end. Nor is it the power of the men involved; history instructs us that for countless men, the ability to possess women sexually is not a spoil of power; it’s the point of power. What’s remarkable is that these women are being believed.

But then Bubba came along and blew up the tracks.

How vitiated Bill Clinton seemed at the last Democratic convention. Some of his appetites, at least, had waned; his wandering, “Norwegian Wood” speech about his wife struck the nostalgic notes of a husband’s fiftieth anniversary toast, and the crowd—for the most part—indulged it in that spirit. Clearly, he was no longer thinking about tomorrow. With a pencil neck and a sagging jacket he clambered gamely onto the stage after Hillary’s acceptance speech and played happily with the red balloons that fell from the ceiling.

Yet let us not forget the sex crimes of which the younger, stronger Bill Clinton was very credibly accused in the 1990s. Juanita Broaddrick reported that when she was a volunteer on one of his gubernatorial campaigns, she had arranged to meet him in a hotel coffee shop. At the last minute, he had changed the location to her room in the hotel, where she says he very violently raped her. She said she fought against Clinton throughout a rape that left her bloodied. At a different Arkansas hotel, he caught sight of a minor state employee named Paula Jones, and, Jones says, he sent a couple of state troopers to invite her to his suite, where he exposed his penis to her and told her to kiss it. Kathleen Willey said that she met him in the Oval Office for personal and professional advice and that he groped her, rubbed his erect penis on her, and pushed her hand to his crotch.

There is much more in the article for you to read.

This is, obviously, heretical writing — much less thinking — on the part of any Leftist.

When a standard Leftist organ turns, like The Atlantic, you know things aren’t playing well for you.

BZ

 

 Share

Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of sociopathy

Posted on by

As David Clarke said, “her ethics elevator has no bottom floor.”

  • She can lie nakedly in public and no one calls her on it. She can support and promote Margaret Sanger, an advocate of black genocide — which by dint of extension makes Hillary Clinton a racist — and no one calls her on it.
  • She can “stand by her man” while he places his penis down the throat of a young female intern and no one calls her on it.
  • She can take millions and millions of dollars of dirty cash from the enemies of the United States, sell our precious minerals to foreign hateful foreign governments, and no one calls her on it.
  • She can co-opt her own party by deceitful tactics enabling her to be the front-running for the Demorats and no one calls her on it.
  • She can lie to the FBI and no one calls her on it.
  • She can conduct business over illegal email servers for years — emails that likely got into the hands of US enemies — and no one calls her on it.
  • She can throw away every thread, every vestige of humanity for nothing more than political power and lie about every moment, every detail, justifying it in her mind with such easy readiness that I can only conclude sociopathy is at work.

Wait. One journalist calls Hillary Clinton out. Of course, it’s not an American Media Maggot. It’s a foreign journalist who, instead of a loving softball, throws an actual question.

Let’s be honest. Hillary Clinton couldn’t care less about anyone but herself. As far as she was concerned she was forced to have a child in order to further Bill’s political goals so as not to appear unapproachable and to mimic a family.

Do not think that, deep down, Chelsea isn’t aware of the fact.

Demorats and Leftists keep petting this animal, not realizing that one day it may well and truly bite back.

BZ

 

 Share