The Journal News is “Armed and Dangerous” and FULL OF HYPOCRITES:

RGA InvestigationsROCKLAND COUNTY TIMES EXCLUSIVE:

Armed guards from RGA Investigations have taken up post at the Journal News’ Rockland County headquarters.

BY DYLAN SKRILOFF

Guns are good for the goose but NOT for the gander.

A Clarkstown police report issued on December 28, 2012, confirmed that The Journal News has hired armed security guards from New City-based RGA Investigations and that they are manning the newspaper’s Rockland County headquarters at 1 Crosfield Ave., West Nyack, through at least tomorrow, Wednesday, January 2, 2013.

According to police reports on public record, Journal News Rockland Editor Caryn A. McBride was alarmed by the volume of “negative correspondence,” namely an avalanche of phone calls and emails to the Journal News office, following the newspaper’s publishing of a map of all pistol permit holders in Rockland and Westchester.

Due to apparent safety concerns, the newspaper then decided to hire RGA Investigations to provide armed personnel to man the location.

Rather than take the map down following the public uproar, the executive board at the Journal News has decided to “stick to their guns” and double-down on their original decision, as they have said a map listing all pistol permit holders in Putnam County will soon to be posted.

Imagine that.

This is the same newspaper that thought it prudent to print the names and addresses of persons holding lawful firearms permits in Rockland and Westchester counties in New York state.  Thusly placing all those persons in great potential jeopardy.

In reaction, a blogger acquired the personal information of the article’s author as well as the publisher and editors of that newspaper.

Now the newspaper that hates guns — is itself relying upon guns to keep its employees “safe.”

What?  You mean there are actual applications for firearms?

You blustering, hypocritical American Media Maggots.

BZ

P.S.
The best comment to the above article?  Here:

The Journal News has exercised the rights they clearly want to deny everyone else. Their hiring protection for themselves has validated the pure rationale of every single one of those pistol permit holders they demonized by their propaganda piece. Pure Abbott and Costello comedy.

Our Rockland County Legislators are yet again a day late and dollar short by being aimlessly reactive. They know they cannot legislate the press on what not to publish. Pistol Permit holders’ private information is now out there for any miscreant to exploit. That damage is already done.

So, now their kabuki dance to craft some kind of privacy legislation is for show and ineffective, because it will be struck by the 1st Amendment, if it so much as smells like press censorship.

By next fiscal quarter, the Journal News will soon be obliged to make a business decision, when their product demand, will be measured by the consumer need, to line the bottom of bird cages.

What our community needs to seriously reconsider is a security experts review of this so called school lock down policy.

We will eventually discover that the Newton, Ct. school massacre was enabled by a counter-intuitive policy that huddled victims into a corral for slaughter, instead of crafting an escape and evasion plan.

The Newton, CT. investigation has yet to disclose any findings that can explain why it happened. Judging from the inconsistent reporting, they have yet to disclose precisely what happened. We need to be prepared to stop the next one.

Clearly, the answer is no where near the hysteria driven agenda of grabbing guns from the law abiding to protect us from the evil possessed, intent on mass murder.

~ Anthony Mele.

[Want real gun facts? Go here.]

 

One Marine’s letter to Diane Feinstein:

Gathering Gun StormFrom guns.com:

Senator Dianne Feinstein,

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime.

You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.

Respectfully Submitted,

Joshua Boston

Cpl, United States Marine Corps

2004-2012

God bless the United States military, and God bless that Marine, Joshua Boston.

I am an Oathkeeper.

BZ

Big Brother B&W

 

DEM/MSM: cherry-picking gun stories and IGNORING San Antonio, TX

[While we await the results of our incompetent Congress — the Senate passed its own “fiscal cliff” bill by 89 to 8 in the dark of Tuesday morning — I provide the following. –BZ]
San Antonio Theater Shooting, 12-17-12All we’ve heard recently is the need for gun control and confiscation, directly resulting from the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting.

Diane Feinstein swears to confiscate our gunsSo does Barack Hussein Obama.

“Mr and Mrs America, turn ’em all in.”

Both persons (and more) demand an abrogation of the Second Amendment.  I am unwilling to do so, for children, for my family, for anyone — particularly in light of violent crime trending down nationally.  A statistic you will not read or hear coupled with recent shootings.

[Want real gun facts? Go here.]

Here’s another recent shooting (December 17th, photo at top) which was UNcovered nationally, because it was halted mid-stride by an off-duty deputy who shot the assailant four times.  This is not a “made-up story.”

Two people were wounded late Sunday when gunfire erupted at a local movie theater, sending panicked moviegoers rushing to exits and ducking for cover, police and witnesses said.

Jesus Manuel Garcia, 19, an employee at a nearby China Garden restaurant, apparently became upset Sunday night after his girlfriend broke up with him.

Why no coverage?

Because it is an inconvenient story.  It doesn’t fit the DEM/MSM/Leftist/Progressive/Demorat meme of “guns bad; must confiscate guns.”

Here is an incident where someone — ARMED IN PUBLIC — was able to avoid a further tragedy by using a firearm for protection of themselves and the public.

The DEM/MSM knows: we can’t have that.  We can’t publicize that.  We cannot assist in carrying the thought that guns can be tools for good.

THAT’s how corrupt your American media maggots are.

BZ

P.S.
Newsweek magazine is folding, having produced its last print version this week.  It will now be available only on the web.  I say: goodbye and good riddance.  Its obvious slant, with other variables, killed it.  Newsweek will soon find its presence on the web likewise diminished.  A safety tip for “Newsweek” employees: you’d best start familiarizing yourself with a McDonald’s keyboard.

You Ignorant Journalista Maggots.

You are just now beginning to reap what you’ve sown for, literally, decades.  Live with it.  Embrace it.  Then realize it pays nothing.  You’re all Thick as a Brick.

DEM-Logo

 

Let the knee-jerk anti-gun legislation commence:

Penn Jillette BANFirst, outright confiscation is advocated by MSNBC’s Leftist Ed Schultz on Twitter:

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd @gt500cws who’s facts ? I have a fact for you. We are the Constitution and we as a people can change whatever we want. Get ready Dude !

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd @gt500cws a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon.

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd The NRA needs to state the case why assault weapons are needed by anyone.

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd @gt500cws a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon.

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd Write all the feel good laws you want, it’s the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.

Ed Schultz ‏@WeGotEd Why should anyone own an assault rifle ? We need to be realistic about the 2nd amendment..society has changed, views have changed.

“Write all the feel good laws you want, it’s the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”

Two Demorat senators want an outright assault weapons ban here.

Fornicalia Senator Diane Feinstein, 79, said on Monday:

“This is really the straw that breaks the camel’s back.  I’m beside myself over this.”

She’s going for “assault weapons,” she states.

Adam Lanza was, in fact, “deranged.”

And so-called “gun-free zones” do nothing but guarantee, to an offender, that they will not be met with resistance of any kind.  A bit of an obvious conclusion, yes?  But, of course, not to Leftists, Progressives and Demorats, who possess not the capacity to understand such concepts.  They act and react only upon emotions, not logic or common sense — a sense of which is not common any more.

Further, let us harken back to Eric Holder in 1995: “we need to brainwash people against guns.”

How about this, Mr Holder: we portray crime and criminals as they are?  Losers.  Cultural losers.  And to whom are you aiming this ire?  Truthfully: to large and compacted cities such as Detroit, Chicago, New York, Boston, Atlanta, Los Angeles — cities that are packed with a high “minority content” (Though, in Fornicalia, as a Caucasoid I am now the literal statistical minority.) that belong to gangs because they have no two-parent families.  A paradigm that was eliminated by the very federal government with which you now work.  At one time the black family was the tightest nucleus possible.  But when you — the federal government — paid black women for more children absent a male in the household, the nuclear black family was inexorably doomed.  By Demorats.  Leftists.

But what will Demorats and Leftists and Progressives fail to mention?  Yes.  That would be statistics.  As in: violent crime has been trending down for the past 20 years.

Yoni the Blogger writes more truth:

Rampage violence is not solely an American problem.

It is a world wide problem.  Since 1904 the world has seen over 1,261 such incidents.

They happen in free countries such as America, and they have happened in dictatorships such as the former USSR and China.

The weapons range from edged weapons, firearms and metal bars.

I predict that America will see new gun control, over the latest school shooting. Despite the evidence of the good that guns have done in two of the latest incidents.

But prepare to be confronted with Truth that NO ONE in the DEM/MSM has mentioned, and that most persons fail to mention.  Truth:

We know that the shooter in Oregon was confronted by a civilian that was carrying a pistol, the civilian held fire because of people being behind the shooter. The shooter was working to try and clear a malfunction in his rifle, he saw the civilian aiming at him.

The shooter only fired one more round, the one that took his own life.

We know at the Sandy Hook, that when the shooter heard the first responders approaching he took his own life.

It is time we have a serious discussion about the positive aspect of gun ownership.

Guns in the hands of good people, prevent violence.

Israel proved that guns in our schools, stopped our schools from being targeted by terrorist.

Gun free zones create a pool of victims for these sick individuals.

I promise you, let a teacher kill one of these crazies and the rampage violence at schools will stop.

Precisely.  Because America and American politicians are addressing the wrong issue.  They are — of course, once again — taking the EASY WAY “out.”

Just as cash is an “answer” and is completely impersonal, so is addressing the tool in violence — the gun — an “answer” and is completely impersonal.  Because “impersonal” won’t cost votes.

Because Demorats and Leftists and Progressives and the DEM/MSM refuse to address the true issue: PEOPLE.

Why?

People VOTE.  Tools and cold pieces of paper and metal do not.  People — votersdon’t want to hear or read that they are the problem.

However, the Second Amendment has been upheld:

Most recently, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 11 struck down an Illinois law that prohibited most individuals other than hunters or law enforcement personnel from carrying weapons in public. The ruling relied, in part, on a 2008 Supreme Court decision striking down Washington, D.C.,’s strict handgun ban.

“The constitutional right of armed self-defense is broader than the right to have a gun in one’s home,” Judge Richard Posner wrote in striking down the Illinois law.

There are serious issues here.

Issues that the Demorats are truly unwilling to address.

BZ

P.S.
I will write about the “mental health” factors later — a much-needed issue to be discussed.

 

 

Reflections upon the Newtown, Connecticut shootings:

Newtown 1A great tragedy occurred last Friday.

Twenty small children and six adults were killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.  One adult, the mother of the suspect, was killed first, in her home.

Since then a major fuse has been lighted due to the significance of the event, and (predominantly in the DEM/MSM) the obvious and simple solution is to confiscate your weapons and proscribe personal ownership of firearms.  Then, clearly, all will be well with the nation and the world.

In the meantime, the bloody deaths of small children is fodder for competition, job advancement and ratings in the national media:

Tweet for Childrens' DeathsNothing that any logically-thinking and informed American didn’t already know and expect, however, from the DEM/MSM maggots.

[A small aside for those unfamiliar with the firearms industry in America: there are, to the best of my knowledge, at least seven firearms or firearms-associated manufacturers located in the state of Connecticut, to include Smith & Wesson; Colt; Sturm, Ruger & Co.; Mossberg; Winchester; Remington; and Martin Firearms.]

Mr Obama made it very clear that he believes immediate action is necessary:

“And this must change.  We can’t tolerate this any longer.  These tragedies must end.  Are we prepared to say that we’re powerless in the face of such carnage? That the politics are too hard? Are we prepared to say that such violence visited on our children year after year after year is the price of our freedom?”

Good and true words.  To be utilized — like any tool — for good or for ill.

Involving Mr Obama and Demorats, Leftists and Progressives — in consideration of my inherently doubting and questioning nature — I cannot help but think that what Mr Obama has in mind isn’t really much of an observance of our Bill of Rights.

But instead, something more along the lines of what Mr Bush created with Homeland Security — and worse.  Much worse.

Texas Fred has an excellent installment regarding his post-Newtown thoughts here.

Further: “we all know that guns are evil,” but do they ever save lives — and — who advocates them?  None other than black rapper Ice-T:

Asked by a London news anchor about America’s gun culture, Ice-T said: “Well, I’d give up my gun when everybody does. Doesn’t that make sense?  If there were guns here, would you want to be the only person without one?”

Anchor Krishnan Guru-Murthy, Channel 4 News: “So do you carry guns routinely at home?”

Ice-T: “Yeah, it’s legal in the United States. It’s part of our Constitution. You know, the right to bear arms is because that’s the last form of defense against tyranny. Not to hunt. It’s to protect yourself from the police.”

Anchor: “And do you see any link between that and these sorts of (Aurora-type) incidents?”

Ice-T: “No. Nah. Not really. You know what I’m saying, if somebody wants to kill people, you know, they don’t need a gun to do it.”

Anchor: “It makes it easier, though, doesn’t it?”

Ice-T: “Not really. You can strap explosives on your body. They [Muslims!BZ] do that all the time.”

Anchor: “So when there’s the inevitable backlash of the anti-gun lobby, as a result of this instance, as there always is–“

Ice-T: “Well, that’s not going to change anything.  The United States is based on guns.”

Alas, finally, a truism.  One that we must all face.  Because history precludes us.

There is an American gun magazine that has featured a monthly column, for years, documenting incidents where the presence of a gun saved lives.

Check this from John Stossel:

Outrageous.  More guns lead to more violence.  Plainly.  Or — dare we say it? — not?

But: “if someone breaks into your house, which would you rather have?  A handgun, or a telephone?”

Clearly, Leftists, Demorats and Progressives would prefer this sign on their front yards:

Unarmed HomeOh wait.  No they wouldn’t.  Because those signs don’t exist on front yards.  ANYone’s front yard.  Does that mean that — gulp! — Demorats and Leftists and Progressives are slightly smarter than your average houseplant?  Answer: yes.  And calculatingly so.  They say one thing and espouse and live another.

Yes, I know you’re quite shocked.  Shocked, I tell you!

Various other killings stopped by armed citizens?  Click here.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch:

Democrats vow to push for gun control measures in Congress
Progressives Plan March On NRA In DC Monday

But if you’re not retarded or an idiot or a Demorat or a Leftist or a Progressive or immature or ill-educated or homeless or autistic or a GOWP or a parasite or an advocate or consumer of Free Cheese.  .  .

.  .  . then your gun rights are under assault.

Oh, right.  That would equate to a normal human being protected by the Constitution of the United States of America.

BZ