CNN hosted the final Republican debate of 2015, Tuesday, December 15th. Once again Hugh Hewitt was one of the questioners, and Wolf Blitzer was the moderator.
First Debate:
Consisting of George Pataki, Rick Santorum, Lindsay Graham and Mike Huckabee, Huckabee appeared the most relaxed and easily spoken, whilst Graham was the most contentious but most emotive and passionate of the bunch, making some points as well. In my mind, Graham was the winner though I certainly did not agree on all of his points. The bottom line is this: the GOP could do without all of those persons clotting the ranks. They should all move on. They are yesterday’s news.
Second Debate:
The “prime” debate consisted of John Kasich, Carly Fiorina, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Ron Paul.
Rand Paul was obnoxious, Trump neither won nor lost and, to my mind, it was a toss-up between Cruz and Rubio. Though, I must say, Christie did in fact score some serious points.
Ben Carson was massively unimpressive; a manikin could have been substituted with equal efficacy. Carson isn’t ready for much of anything political. Yes, no argument, Carson is the quintessential nice and good man. He is not a politician and not ready for a position like this at all. I should submit he’d best stick with his day job and, at most, local politics.
Kasich was also obnoxious. He always has been. There is a certain “something” about Kasich that simply rubs me the wrong way.
Fiorina spoke well but no one seems interested in listening to her. Her campaign appears to be, however, run by morons who have no idea how to market her.
Bush tried massively to be what he is not: overbearing, pushy, contentious — and it doesn’t play well with him because that’s not his nature. Most everyone can tell it’s a FALSE persona, apparently shoved onto him by his handlers. It’s fallacious and duplicitous and even 5-year-olds can see through it. Bush is done, stick a fork in him. He’s not the future of the GOP. This proves Bush will do anything to win the presidency. Things that are so incredibly removed from his comfort factor.
We see you, Jeb. We know who you are and who you aren’t.
Since writing this a few hours ago, I have some further input.
Upon further consideration, Cruz and Rubio disappoint.
It is Christie who, frankly, appears more presidential and not so navel-gazing.
FORMER San Francisco County Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi wasn’t a cop anyway. He was a Leftist poseur who donned a law enforcement uniform in order to further his own perverse Leftist agendas because he could. And shamed the uniform itself during his ridiculous rule. He also has the blood of Kate Steinle on his hands.
Now he’s gone. The citizens of San Francisco voted him out, and a former SFSO Chief Deputy Sheriff named Vicki Hennessy is in. Even SF voters can act like a broken clock now and then.
Let’s recall: Ross Mirkarimi was the co-founder of the Green Party of Fornicalia. His claim to fame as a SF Supervisor was to ban plastic bags. He introduced legislation to legalize marijuana. He wanted to ban smoking on golf courses. He introduced the re-naming of Eddy Street to Marcus Garvey Way, because he knew the name change would convince black residents to stay in the city despite cost of living increases. He wanted reparations for SF blacks displaced in the 1960s when the Fillmore District was mostly torn down.
Mirkarimi was a heavy advocate of gun control despite the fact that he owned firearms. One happy note: he had those firearms confiscated, and was convicted of false imprisonment stemming from a domestic violence call where he was initially charged with battery, child endangerment and dissuading a witness. Good times, eh Ross? Smack the ol’ wife around, get convicted of false imprisonment and then “somehow” manage to get that conviction expunged? Good times, eh Ross? Read about that here. His firearm was given back due to a plea bargain. He was Sheriff, after all.
Except for this: if me or any other LEO in Fornicalia were convicted for any domestic-violence-related charge, we would be mandated to forfeit our firearms under Fornicalia law, which in turn means we would forfeit our jobs.
Mirkarimi also had his license suspended when he was involved in an accident with his official County of San Francisco vehicle and did not report the accident to DMV as required by law. Oddly enough, his county G-ride got repaired. Imagine that.
Sort of a clue: Mirkarimi did not receive an endorsement from the SF Deputy Sheriff’s Association when he ran for Sheriff.
Finally, if you recall, it was the agenda and directives of Ross Mirkarimi that resulted in the needless death of Kate Steinle on SFs’ Pier 14. The illegal Mexican suspect had been deported five times. Despite that, it was the policy of the SFSO — under Mirkarimi — that illegals should not be held. SFSO asked for the Mexican suspect to be transferred to their agency so that they could free him.
The initial focus of job elimination will be on unskilled workers primarily because of the recent insistence on a minimum “living wage” of $15 for jobs that were never meant to be anything more than entry-level introductory jobs.
One of the first targeted forms of job elimination will be at what are termed “fast food” type restaurants, where a kiosk can somewhat readily streamline the ordering process. Whereas a human employee once touched the CHEESEBURGER icon, you will be able to do that yourself. These various kiosks are already in operation in Europe and here in the US. McDonalds readily admits they are a response to $15 minimum wage demands.
Of course, there will be “unforeseen consequences” to this wage increase demand — that I readily and easily foresee. More on that in a moment.
Robots are going to steal the jobs of chefs, salespeople and models, researchers say as they unveil full list of likely robot professions
by Andrew Griffin
Scientists have created a huge, in-depth analysis of what jobs are under threat from robots — with salesmen, chefs and even models all in the firing line.
Researchers have assembled a full list of all the things that robots are good and bad at, and so what jobs they are likely to take. In all, about 35 per cent of jobs are likely to have been taken on by robots in the next 20 years, the researchers said.
Some professions — such as therapists, personal trainers and teachers — are safe from the coming robot apocalypse. But those that require repetitive skills, the manipulation of data or manual entering of information could see their jobs taken away.
The first question you must ask: is this me? If you have one of those delineated jobs, that means you likely inhabit an unskilled or semi-skilled job that isn’t long for this earth.
That also means you need to refocus your attention on upgrading your job skills or perhaps moving into a different job altogether.
Cops and firefighters, you’re somewhat safe for now. But many more Intersection lights and speed cams are coming. Some people want to eliminate the police traffic stop altogether, as well as pursuits.
Some traits don’t immediately lend themselves to a robotic takeover.
Those traits include creative endeavours, such as writing, entrepreneurship or scientific discovery.
For the time being, jobs that demand a high degree of human interaction are safe.
But that brings us back to unskilled and/or repetitive jobs.
Like those that illegal aliens used to fill — and jobs the likes of which are being eliminated due to, in Fornicalia, the drought — and in other places by the more rapid introduction of various forms of technology because of increased business costs.
In other words, the argument supporters of illegal Mexican (and other) invaders make on behalf of those invaders — that they do jobs others won’t or can’t — isn’t holding water any more. A greater number of jobs in the agricultural or various service fields are being mechanized. This isn’t speculation; it’s occurring right now.
Therefore, the “need” for more illegal immigrants in order to fill the increasing number of unskilled jobs is a specious one at best, more and more unnecessary with each and every passing week and month.
For real Americans, the writing is on the wall: adapt and educate yourself or become superfluous.
For illegals, we don’t need your unskilled labor. We don’t have enough room to accommodate the unskilled true American citizens in the labor force already.
Which translates to: illegal invaders these days mean only to acquire their portions of American Free Cheese, their own piece of the Entitlement Pie.
Their future is to take and not to produce.
Adding unskilled Syrians who bring only more Islam to the equation?
Pier 14 killing: S.F. sheriff asked feds to send immigrant here
by Jaxon Van Derbeken
San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi has deflected blame in the release of a Mexican national now facing murder charges in the Pier 14 slaying by demanding to know why federal authorities returned him to San Francisco to face a 20-year-old marijuana charge in the first place.
An excellent question. Why? Finally, a journalist with an inquisitive mind.
The answer, it turns out, is that the Sheriff’s Department asked federal officials to do so.
Mirkarimi’s agency requested custody of Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez as he was completing a 46-month stint in federal prison in March in San Bernardino County, according to a Sheriff’s Department letter obtained by The Chronicle. Lopez-Sanchez had been deported five times to Mexico, and had been imprisoned for illegally re-entering the U.S.
Curiouser and curiouser.
The federal Bureau of Prisons alerted the Sheriff’s Department in March that Lopez-Sanchez was going to be released. Mirkarimi’s agency, realizing that Lopez-Sanchez was wanted on a $5,000 bench warrant related to a 1995 marijuana possession for sale case, asked prison officials March 23 to hold onto him and to notify San Francisco authorities “when the subject is ready for our pick-up.”
“Also, please notify us if the hold cannot be placed or the named subject is released to another jurisdiction prior to our receipt,” said the letter, signed by Vic Gaerlan of the sheriff’s warrant bureau.
Lopez-Sanchez arrived in San Francisco on March 26, and the marijuana case against him was discharged the following day. He was returned to jail, however.
For the next three weeks, sources with knowledge of the matter told The Chronicle, sheriff’s deputies sought clarification from the department’s legal division on whether to hold onto Lopez-Sanchez so Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials could pick him up for possible deportation. ICE had requested that the city detain Lopez-Sanchez.
About now, you’re asking yourself a question, aren’t you?
Lopez-Sanchez was scheduled for release from federal prison in southern California in March. Given that information, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began processing a reinstatement of removal order for the five-time deportee, Breitbart News previously reported.
The San Francisco Sheriff’s Department was also alerted to Lopez-Sanchez’s impending release from federal Bureau of Prisons custody in March, according to a Sheriff’s department letter obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle. Noting Lopez-Sanchez had a 20-year-old bench warrant on possession-for-sale of marijuana, on March 23 the Sheriff’s department requested notification when Lopez-Sanchez was “ready for our pickup.”
“Ready for pickup” on a $5,000 dope charge about which the SF District Attorney couldn’t care less.
Lopez-Sanchez was transferred from the federal Bureau of Prisons in Victorville, California to San Francisco Sheriffs’ department custody on March 26.
A court dismissed Lopez-Sanchez’s charges the day after he arrived in San Francisco, March 27.
It was not until after Lopez-Sanchez was delivered to San Francisco County custody that ICE was notified of the transfer. ICE then issued a detention request for Lopez-Sanchez. That request simply asked for notification prior to Lopez-Sanchez’s release, not that he be detained for an extended period of time.
In other words, as a “sanctuary city,” San Francisco chooses not to comply with the law.
So why request his return?
Please allow me to state what, in my opinion, may be the answer to: why did they request Sanchez?
I believe it’s because they are a “sanctuary city” and that, by acquiring physical custody of Sanchez, they could assure his release prior to being detained by the feds for deportation back to Mexico.
San Francisco quite proudly declared itself a sanctuary city 26 years ago. It is proud of that fact. A “sanctuary city” means that Illegals of all shapes and sizes will, according to the mindset of Leftists, not be “ratted out” to various authorities for deportation just because they are “undocumented” — LeftSpeak for illegal.
San Francisco is proud of that label.
San Francisco is proud, even after a 32-year-old Pleasanton woman, Kate Steinle, was shot and killed in front of her father at Pier 14 on the Embarcadero in San Francisco, on Wednesday, July 1st, at about 6:30 PM.
Her last words were: “Dad, help me, help me.”
Her father was powerless, considering Kate Steinle had been shot directly in the chest three times by an illegal immigrant who purposely sought out San Francisco because he knew it was a sanctuary city.
Here’s where the pride of San Francisco comes in:
Had San Francisco authorities not refused a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer request, Lopez-Sanchez may not have been in the United States and Steinle might still be alive.
San Francisco’s Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi is defending the intentional April release of five-times-deported Mexican national Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, who has since confessed to the Wednesday shooting death of a young woman at Pier 14.
Sheriff Mirkarimi appeared agitated as he spoke to San Francisco-based KRON 4 News, casting blame on U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for not filing a formal court application to detain Lopez-Sanchez. In a separate CNN interview, Mirkarimi defended his refusal of ICE detainers. He called ICE policy the “imperfect deportation and transferring of people.”
It is San Francisco Sheriff’s department policy to deny all ICE detainer requests. He indicated that he only honors court orders.
Mirkarimi also told CNN’s Jake Tapper that sanctuary city policies “make us safer.”
Safer, yes, of course. Why didn’t I think of that?
Further, the San Francisco mayor, Edwin Lee, said in part:
As I said in 2013, we must protect both civil liberties and uphold public safety. Which is why, at the time, I promised to veto any legislation that completely eliminated the Sheriff’s ability to make a case-by-case determination about honoring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainers. Our sanctuary policies should not create a safe harbor for convicted, violent felons.
Translated: Mayor Lee just threw Mirkarimi under the bus. But of course Lee takes the golden opportunity to turn a death into a political wiffle ball. It’s the fault of the Republicans:
Even after repeated attempts by President Obama and Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to reform our immigration laws, Republicans in Congress have blocked those efforts, unfortunately, leaving cities and local municipalities to act upon immigration issues that affect its residents. I will continue to work with the Obama Administration on Comprehensive Immigration Reform to ensure cities aren’t forced to make and enforce immigration law.
That said, what actually happened with Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez? He shouldn’t have even been in the United States. With seven felony convictions — not arrests, but convictions — Sanchez had been deported to Mexico five times. And came back each time.
Even CNN wrote about the circumstances surrounding the multiple releases of the murder suspect:
In March, Lopez-Sanchez was turned over to San Francisco authorities and ultimately released after completing a federal prison sentence.
U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement said San Francisco wanted Lopez-Sanchez on a drug warrant, so the agency handed him over with a request to let it know if he was to be released.
Despite that request, San Francisco authorities let him go in April after the drug charges were dropped.
Freya Horne, chief legal counsel to the San Francisco County Sheriff, said city officials believe such requests violate Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Question, Freya: if a federal detainer violated federal law, then how has the federal government been getting away with its various USC sections over the numerous years regarding deportations of illegals? When I worked Booking in the Sacramento County Main Jail as a deputy in the 80s, I would pick up the phone and call the USBP when we suspected a LE agency had arrested an illegal. The USBP did the rest. Simple.
Sanchez confessed to the murder but his Public Defender subsequently insisted he was not guilty.
It is San Francisco Sheriff’s department policy to deny all ICE detainer requests. He indicated that he only honors court orders.
ICE had begun processing the reinstatement of Lopez-Sanchez’s removal order before the prisoner was transferred on March 26 from a Bureau of Prisons facility in Victorville to San Francisco Sheriff’s custody pursuant to an old drug warrant.
ICE was informed of the transfer afterwards and alternatively issued a detainer request for the prisoner.
A San Francisco court dismissed Lopez-Sanchez’s drug charge on March 27.
On April 15, 2015, authorities dismissing the ICE request for detention released the seven-time convicted felon Lopez-Sanchez onto the streets.
Finally, I submit to Leftist sheriff Ross Mirkarimi (he is, you should know, a co-founder of the Green Party of California) that you, sir, are damned near equally responsible for the death of Kate Steinle. You go explain your philosophy and mindset to the parents, siblings, friends and relatives of Kate Steinle. Personally.
But you won’t. Because you are a coward and your belief system is “Leftist Mindset Uber Alles.” It’s funny, however, how you call Trump an “opportunist” when he dared to speak the truth about Mexico. Mexico is out for Mexico — but of course on your planet of purple skies you hadn’t remotely thought of that. Mexico does not give us our best and brightest. Its children have brought disease to this nation. It sends us more MS13 gangbangers. Its illegals commit crimes in this nation and commit murders. Yet your purple skies, Mirkarimi, “Trump all.”
You are absolutely disgusting in your willingness to forsake your law enforcement oath for murdering Leftist values. You sicken me. You are unfit to wear your badge. I say this, sir, as a recently retired (two weeks ago) Sergeant with a California department much larger than yours, after 41 years of service: you sicken me.
Ladies and gentlemen, let me finally write: wake up. Some of your police and sheriff departments are killing you in the fashion of the SFSO. They are killing you either by fear, cowardice, ignorance or by dint of wishing to be politically correct. But they are doing it nevertheless.
They are killing you because they are not obeying the law. Their not obeying the law is because they have chosen to do so for expedience — AND — because the federal government does not obey its own laws. More on that in a subsequent post.
I submit: the American taxpayers are not too terribly far away from picking and choosing which laws they will or will not obey.
Because the federal government and some agencies in law enforcement have already led the way on the issue.
Gavin Newsom has had the link to his Executive Order 07-01 Sanctuary City Policy REMOVED. The link, when clicked, now indicates: For Your Information – Page Not Found
Isn’t that just terribly convenient, as Stick points out, since it would appear that Newsom will likely be running for governor?
CNN hosted the final Republican debate of 2015, Tuesday, December 15th. Once again Hugh Hewitt was one of the questioners, and Wolf Blitzer was the moderator.
First Debate:
