ISIS burn 45 people to death in captured Iraqi town

“We need answers that go beyond military answers,” so says US Vice President Joe Biden.

Leftist ThinkingJobs, Joe?  Should the US hire ISIS for various jobs?

I can think of one job, offhand: close-up muzzle inspectors for US M-4 rifles deployed in the Middle East.

Once again, the loving kindness of Islam, the Religion of Peace.  From UKDailyMail.com:

ISIS burn 45 people to death in captured Iraqi town of al-Baghdadi as Islamists attack the homes of security forces’ families

by Kate Pickles

  • Western town al-Baghdadi captured by ISIS fighters last week 
  • Victims thought to be members of security forces and their families
  • Follows barbaric video of Jordanian pilot Lieutenant Muath al-Kaseasbeh 
  • Attack is only five miles from air base with 320 US Marines 

Militants from Islamic State have burned 45 people to death in the western Iraqi town of al-Baghdadi, according to the local police chief.

Col Qasim al-Obeidi said the motive was unknown but he believed some of the victims were members of the security forces.

He has pleaded for help from the government and international community and said the compound, which houses the families of security personnel and local officials, was now under attack.

It follows the capture of al-Baghdadi, near Ain al-Asad air base, by ISIS fighters last week.

ISIS marches across the Middle East, and we have a president who cannot even name the enemy because of his background and his upraising.  Obama is still warring with Christianity because of the Crusades — started because of Islamic oppression.

You cannot hope to defeat an enemy you don’t even admit exists.

And here’s where things become concerning:

Al-Baghdadi had been besieged for months by Islamic State fighters before its fall. It had been one of the few towns to still be controlled by the Iraqi government in Anbar province, where IS and allied Sunni Arab tribesmen launched an offensive in January 2014.

But with 320 US Marines stationed just five miles away at the Ain al-Asad air base, training members of the Iraqi army’s 7th Division, it will cause concern.

The base was attacked by several suicide bombers, on Friday with the militant repelled by Iraqi troops backed by US-led coalition aircraft.

How long until our own ME troops come across ISIS?

And, with that battle, how will our president respond?

Will he buttress and support those troops?

Or will he treat those initial troops as he treated Benghazi?

Just one simple question.

Obama Unable to Use Proper WordsWhen you cannot name your enemy.  And Eric Holder says “we’re not at war.”

Italy now wonders when ISIS will come to its shores.

Libya is just 109 miles away from the island of Lampedusa and 300 miles from Sicily—made worse by a 64 percent increase in illegal migrant arrivals by sea since last year.  In all of 2014, more than 170,000 people arrived from Libya and Turkey, the highest number ever recorded.   Last weekend, as the embassy staff made their way to Italy on a mercantile ship, 2,164 migrants left the same Libyan shores en route to Sicily.  The week before, more than 300 people were lost in the same seas as their rickety fishing boats capsized before rescuers could save them.

Still and all, it’s all purple skies and ignorant shitsticks at our State Department:

Marie Harf State Dept BuffoonAnd just as Marie Harf is ending each sentence in an upswing like a good Valley Gurl, our own Miss Mary is, well, you guessed it:

Obama ISIS CartoonPlease.  Please.  Can someone please locate at least one adult in DC?

Please?

BZ

 

Obama’s Middle East policy:

And that’s why I love Obama political cartoons.

Obama Middle East PolicyBecause humor isn’t funny unless it’s based in fact.

And Obama cannot even name those responsible for terror.  He lives in a world of purple skies and unicorns and My Little Pony.

BZ

 

Obama’s perfect Cloward-Piven Strategy:

Barack ObamaIt would seem that Mr Obama has finally revealed his true purpose:

To keep Demorats in control in perpetuity.

Cloward-PivenDo what I call the Logical Extension.

First, understand the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

With that under your belt, now read from the DailyCaller.com:

Obama “Hopeful” Immigration Will Drown Conservatism

by Neil Munro

The spread of vibrant social diversity is constricting the GOP’s ability to champion conservative causes, such as smaller government and independent families, President Barack Obama said in a softball media interview.

“Over the long term, I’m pretty optimistic, and the reason is because this country just becomes more and more of a hodgepodge of folks,” Obama told Vox editor Ezra Klein.

Check where this is going.

“People are getting more and more comfortable with the diversity of this country, much more sophisticated about both the cultural differences but more importantly, the basic commonality that we have,” he said in his talk, which was recorded Jan 23.

But for Obama, “commonality” is a go-to euphemism for big, intrusive, nation-wide government by progressive experts.

The nation’s governors “all have a common interest, and that is making sure that their constituents — who are also my constituents — are able to gain opportunity, work hard, prosper, feel secure,” Obama said in a Dec. 5 comment about visiting governors. “That happens best when we work together, whether we’re talking about Democrats and Republicans and independents working together, or whether we’re talking about state, federal and local officials working together,” he said.

Further:

Free-market variety is contrary to a common purpose, Obama said Jan. 21. “Our media is all segmented now so that instead of just watching three stations, we got 600,” he said in an Idaho speech. “You got the [single] conservative station and the liberal stations. So everybody is only listening to what they already agree with. And then you’ve got political gerrymandering… so there are a lot of institutional forces that make it seem like we have nothing in common,” he said.

What does that mean to you?

To me it means: when the nation is consumed by a greater and greater number of illegal immigrants and by an increasing number of persons who will, in fact, vote themselves “largesse” (immigrants, of course, having the right to vote) because they find dependence on the government to be vividly attractive, then Conservatives and the GOP will have nothing to offer the population.

Meaning: the electorate will continue to vote, in perpetuity, for Free Cheese, thus eliminating any competition to Demorats.

Voila.  Mr Obama enables Cloward-Piven writ large over the entire nation.

A project being worked on with great vigor by Mr Barack Hussein Obama.

BZ

 

Net “neutrality” LIES from Obama:

Let’s see:

Obama is a liar.

He has been proven so time and again.

He lied about Obamacare.  Obamacare was passed in the dead of night, unilaterally.

Just like Obamacare, we have to wait for the FCC to institute “net neutrality” before we can read its true contents.

The FCC “won’t release the actual text of the regulations until after it approves them on Feb. 26.”

Sound vaguely familiar?

From NationalJournal.com:

Republican FCC Commissioner: Public Is Being Misled About Net-Neutrality Plan

by Brendan Sasso

“I have studied the 332-page plan in detail, and it is worse than I had imagined.”

February 10, 2015 The Federal Communications Commission is misleading the public about its 332-page plan to regulate the Internet, a Republican member of the commission said Tuesday.

The net-neutrality plan could in fact open the door to new fees and taxes, as well as government control over the prices that Internet providers charge their customers, Commissioner Ajit Pai told reporters.

The claims echo attacks from Republicans on Capitol Hill, who are also scrambling to thwart the new regulations. Committees in the House and Senate have launched investigations into whether President Obama inappropriately influenced the FCC’s decision, and Republican lawmakers are working on their own alternative net-neutrality legislation to override FCC action.

Read:

“The claim that President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet does not include rate regulation is flat-out false,” Pai said. “Indeed, the only limit on the FCC’s discretion to regulate rates is its own determination of whether rates are ‘just and reasonable,’ which isn’t much of a restriction at all.”

So-called “net neutrality” isn’t quite so neutral?

What a shock.

Not.

BZ