Tag Archives: pay to play

Hillary voter fraud caught on video, Pt II — Google HIDES Hillary voter fraud

Posted on by

Ah yes, more Hillary voter fraud in Nevada (What is it with Nevada anyway?):

You, of course, already watched Part I yesterday; click here to see it.

After embedding this video, I wondered: just what would you get in Google if you searched “Hillary voter fraud”?

Being Google and all, and being extra superior about its auto-filling logarithms, I immediately noticed that Google absolutely did not “auto-fill” as I typed on the keyboard.  You had to type the complete phrase “Hillary voter fraud” into the field and, even with that, there was nothing provided below until you hit the ENTER key.

Try it.

Hmmm, I thought, I wonder what other search engines might be yielding?

So I tried Bing.com.  Which, oddly enough, I’ve never tried before.  This time, at the point I got to “Hillary voter” this is what appeared below:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voter fraud exposed
  • hillary voters meme
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voters stupid
  • hillary voters are suckers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter suppression

How odd, I thought.  “Hillary voter fraud” came up immediately and was at the top of the list.  My guess: this is precisely what most persons are searching for when they begin typing that phrase.

But wait, I thought.  There are other search engines.  I wonder what Yahoo.com would show?  I wrote “Hillary voter” in the field and this is what I received:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voters grave markers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter suppression
  • hillary voter cartoon
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voter stumped
  • hillary voter turnout
  • hillary voter fraud cartoon
  • hillary voter fraud lawsuit

Once again, “Hillary voter fraud” came out on top.  A real chin-scratcher, that.  But what the hell, let’s try it one more time.  I lastly went to Ask.com using the same methods.  It came up with:

  • hillary voter fraud
  • hillary voter fraud exposed
  • hillary voters meme
  • hillary voter registration
  • hillary voters stupid
  • hillary voters are suckers
  • hillary voters
  • hillary voter fraud iowa

I suspected I was starting to see a pattern.  It made me wonder: do you think that Google would in any way purposely jiggle its search engine AlGoreIthms with regard to Hillary Clinton or the Democrats or Leftists or voter fraud identification/information on behalf of the Democrats?

Would Larry Page or Sergei Brin or Alphabet or Eric Schmidt or Ruth Porat actually lean left on as serious an issue as this?  As in, purposely skewing or hiding results that became immediately obvious on other search engines?

Nah.

BZ

P.S.

Obama Meets Silicon Valley Tech LeadersAbove, please note Barack Hussein Obama meeting personally and intimately with Silicon Valley tech leaders on February 17, 2011, to include Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Google CEO Eric Schmidt (far Left, imagine that) and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.

 

 Share

State Department assists with Hillary’s corruption

Posted on by

Hillary Clinton CORRUPTWe already know that it took three years for the Associated Press — AP — to get records from the US State Department regarding Hillary Clinton’s meetings

The first story, from the NationalReview.com:

Clinton State Department Stonewalled AP for Three Years

by NRO Staff

It was a long wait. Today’s blockbuster report from the Associated Press about Hillary Clinton’s meetings with Clinton Foundation donors during her time as Secretary of State contained the following nugget: “The AP sought Clinton’s calendar and schedules three years ago, but delays led the AP to sue the State Department last year in federal court for those materials and other records.” Three years ago. The long wait was in keeping with a practice of slow-walking such requests for information.

Why was the AP stonewalled?  Because they suspected this:

Over 50% of the persons who met Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State ended up donating to the Clinton Foundation.

See my Thursday post entitled, Hillary’s corrupt “pay to play” — a three year AP story.

The very picture of corruption from Hillary Clinton and the Obama Department of State.

There is an update to this, clearly indicating more corruption and coverups from the Barack Hussein Obama Department of State, in order to assist fellow Demorat presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Let us not forget this cringeworthy video where the State Department shows its embrace of obfuscation and contempt for actual worthwhile questions.  “Am I not speaking English?” you have to admit, is likely one of the all-time greatest journalistic questions.

From the AP:

US: CLINTON CALENDARS WON’T BE RELEASED UNTIL AFTER ELECTION

by Ted Bridis

WASHINGTON (AP) — Seven months after a federal judge ordered the State Department to begin releasing monthly batches of the detailed daily schedules showing meetings by Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, the government told The Associated Press it won’t finish the job before Election Day.

Please note the word “won’t” as opposed to “can’t.”

The department has so far released about half of the schedules. Its lawyers said in a phone conference with the AP’s lawyers that the department now expects to release the last of the detailed schedules around Dec. 30, weeks before the next president is inaugurated.

Perfect.  Just in time to shield Hillary Clinton as much as possible.

Under the present rate, a government attorney working on behalf of the State Department notified the AP’s lawyers, it will take about four and one-half months – or until Dec. 30 – to release all the remaining schedules through the end of Clinton’s term, in February 2013. The government’s notice late Thursday was the first time the State Department has provided the AP with a measure of how many pages were remaining and when it expected to complete the job.

Ladies and gentlemen, you would have to be a brain-addled dolt to not see the corruption that bleeds from Hillary Clinton, from the State Department and the Obama administration which surely is complicit.  All Mr Obama would have to do is make one telephone call in order to light a fire under the State Department.

But he won’t do it, because it’s part and parcel of the partisan cover-up and corruption endemic with Demorats and the Obama administration.

There is only ONE reason why the job won’t be finished until after the election.

Can you imagine a Republican administration or Republican former Secretary of State being able to get away with this in front of the American Media Maggots?

BZ

Hillary Clinton Muslim Contributions

 Share

Hillary’s corrupt “pay to play” — a three year AP story

Posted on by

Hillary Clinton Common Good

“Then I’m going to give them to the Clinton Foundation and, specifically, me and Bill.”

What a grand week for Hillary Clinton!

After all, isn’t it said that “any publicity is good publicity”?

Hillary has certain earned her publicity this week.

The phrase “pay to play” was brought back to the forefront this week when AP broke the story — after three years of legal wrangling against the US State Department.

From Yahoo.com via AP:

Many donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.

At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

Donors who were granted time with Clinton included an internationally known economist who asked for her help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran; a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton’s help with a visa problem; and Estee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while her department worked with the firm’s corporate charity to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.

And that is the real story; let it sink in and percolate about in your brain pan:

Over 50% of the persons who met Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State ended up donating to the Clinton Foundation.  Perhaps the better portrayal is this: “donating.”  Air quotes.

Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

The Clinton Foundation has already “taken in” — air quotes — more than $2 billion dollars in funding since its creation in 2000.  In that time, there have been roughly 6,000 “donors” — air quotes — to the foundation.

“There’s a lot of potential conflicts and a lot of potential problems,” said Douglas White, an expert on nonprofits who previously directed Columbia University’s graduate fundraising management program. “The point is, she can’t just walk away from these 6,000 donors.”

This is Orwellian Newspeak for “these people paid cash and they expect something in return.”  You know.  Pay to play.  And they expect some play for their pay.

Here’s a little clincher buried deep in the story.  Read it and interpret it.  I can interpret it no other way than one.

Former senior White House ethics officials said a Clinton administration would have to take careful steps to ensure that past foundation donors would not have the same access as she allowed at the State Department.

What does that say to you?  To me it screams: she did it.  She took money for access to her in her role as Secretary of State.  Corruption.  No other word for it.

Some of Clinton’s most influential visitors donated millions to the Clinton Foundation and to her and her husband’s political coffers.

Now it’s personal money — not just to the foundation, but to the Clintons themselves.

Please read the story in full — a story that took the AP a full three years to acquire because of legal obstacles placed in its way by the State Department.  You know: the same State Department from which Hillary was Secretary.  From the NationalReview.com:

Clinton State Department Stonewalled AP for Three Years

by NRO Staff

It was a long wait. Today’s blockbuster report from the Associated Press about Hillary Clinton’s meetings with Clinton Foundation donors during her time as Secretary of State contained the following nugget: “The AP sought Clinton’s calendar and schedules three years ago, but delays led the AP to sue the State Department last year in federal court for those materials and other records.” Three years ago. The long wait was in keeping with a practice of slow-walking such requests for information.

As in: the State Department did its level best to block, stall and obfuscate the acquisition of the truth about Hillary Rodham Clinton by the Associated Press.

Let’s see; this past week’s Hillary publicity included:

Ah yes.  What a wonderful, engaging and revelatory week it was for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

BZ

 

 Share

Obama on Iran’s cash: “it’s not a ransom”

Posted on by

Iran Cash From Obama

A literal pallet of cash sent from the US to Iran, from Iranian television.

I swear, you can’t write this shite.

Video from Iran TV, above.  The full video of the ransom, cash and aircraft is below.

This is right out of a corny grade B movie thriller.  Except that it’s neither thrilling nor is it fiction.  It’s simply an Iranian economic stimulus, courtesy of the Barack Hussein Obama administration via the United States of America.

And guess what?  YOU paid for it.  The American Taxpayer.  The same American Taxpayer that provided Obama’s administration with the greatest amount of revenue in the history of the United States.

First, the story from 9News.com/AU:

US secretly airlifted $400m in cash to Iran on wooden pallets

by Matthew Henry

The Obama administration secretly airlifted $400m in cash to Iran in an unmarked cargo plane earlier this year in what Republicans allege was a “ransom payment”.

Wads of Euros and Swiss francs stacked on wooden pallets were delivered in January just as five American prisoners were granted clemency by Tehran, unnamed sources told the Wall Street Journal.

Procured from central banks in the Netherlands and Switzerland, the cash payment was not disclosed when President Obama announced the release of the hostages on January 17.

If that doesn’t conjure up a mental photo of a prototypical illegal exchange of cash in the dark of night during a rainstorm, I don’t know what does.  “Wads of Euros and Swiss francs stacked on wooden pallets.”  Sheesh.

Even Paul Ryan, RINO, said:

House Speaker Paul Ryan, one of the Republican party’s most senior officials, said the report, if true, “confirms our longstanding suspicion that the administration paid a ransom in exchange for Americans unjustly detained in Iran.

To continue:

The White House has denied any link between the payment and the release of hostages, saying it was the first installment in $1.7b owed to Iran over a failed arms deal just before Ayatollah Khomeini seized power 37 years ago.

“This $400 million is actually money that the Iranians had paid into a US account in 1979 as part of a transaction to procure military equipment,” said White House spokesman Josh Earnest.

“It is against the policy of the United States to pay ransom for hostages.”

I have but only one response: the definition of ransom.

ran·som
ˈransəm/
noun
noun: ransom; plural noun: ransoms
  1. 1.
    a sum of money or other payment demanded or paid for the release of a prisoner.
    synonyms: payoff, payment, sum, price

    “they demanded a huge ransom”

Charles Krauthammer nailed it, gangsta-style.

“Because it kinda feels like some spy novel, or a crime novel because cash was exchanged.”

The DOJ objected to the way the “deal” was structured, as they said — rightly so — that it would do nothing but appear as a ransom payout for the hostages because those two things occurred the same day.

Also, that is completely exclusive of the fact that, unless one wants to embolden hostage-takers, villains, dictators and criminals, a country or an entity or an individual should never pay a ransom because — obviously, due to the nature of criminals — the hostage-taking will not stop.  It merely proves that the act of hostage-taking is productive.

Further, that cash will be used in furtherance of one thing: terrorist acts against Muslims and against the West.  Violence, death, chaos and carnage.

I don’t believe in coincidences and, apparently, the hostages don’t believe it either.  From the NYPost.com:

Hostage: We couldn’t leave until second plane landed in Iran

by Joe Tacopino

One of the American hostages who was released the day the United States sent $400 million to Iran said his plane to freedom was not allowed to take off until “another plane” arrived in Tehran, according to a report.

Pastor Saeed Abedini, who was among four Americans released this past Jan. 17, told Fox Business he wound up waiting for an extended time for the second plane to reach the Iranian capital and was never told why the arriving aircraft was so important.

“I just remember the night at the airport sitting for hours and hours there, and I asked police, ‘Why are you not letting us go?’ ” Abedini said. “He said, ‘We are waiting for another plane so if that plane doesn’t come, we never let [you] go.’ ”

Please remember, however, that Mr Obama says that is the most dissolute of coincidences and no logical thinking person could possibly make the connection between a pallet full of cash and the release of the hostages.

But here is the conspicuous logic that Mr Obama fails to understand:

Suddenly, after 36 years — and entirely coincidentally, claims the White House — Obama decides it’s time to settle the matter of the $400 million. He’s going to give Iran back its $400 million, plus $1.3 billion in taxpayer money. And — entirely coincidentally — the hostages were being freed.  Said Obama on January 17, “With the nuclear deal done, prisoners released, the time was right to resolve this dispute as well.”

36 years, yes; but also seven years of the Obama Administration.  Why that day?  Why that shipment?  Why cash?  Do you think that Obama couldn’t have picked up the telephone, spoken to Iran and then ordered that $400 million be wired or transferred to Iran?

If not, I have nuclear centrifuges in Iran I’d like to sell you.

Oh wait, Iran’s not selling them.  They’re too busy being used right now.

BZ

 

 Share