Tag Archives: Reconquista

Racist Jorge Ramos: America is “our country”

Posted on by

Meaning: Mexico’s.

That is my opinion.

Univision’s senior journalist Jorge Ramos said that the US is their country — meaning Mexico’s — not ours — meaning the rest of America.

From Breitbart.com:

Jorge Ramos: America Is ‘Our Country, Not Theirs’—‘And We Are Not Going to Leave’

by Katie McHugh

Univision senior anchor Jorge Ramos declared on Friday that the United States belongs to Latino migrants, emphatically stating to a Spanish-speaking audience that “it is our country, not theirs.”

Ramos took an unusual tack, pivoting from talk of diversity and togetherness into boasts of conquest. Mass immigration, particularly illegal immigration, was a fait accompli. There is nothing the U.S. can do about it, and they must accept that America is “not their” country and that illegal aliens, particularly Latinos, “are not going to leave,” he said.

“But you know what? This is also our country. Let me repeat this: Our country, not theirs. It is our country. And we are not going to leave. We are nearly 60 million Latinos in the United States,” he continued. “And thanks to us, the United States eats, grows and, as we’ve seen today, sings and dances.”

“So when they attack us, we already know what we are going to do. We are not going to sit down. We will not shut up. And we will not leave. That is what we are going to do,” he added.

Let us not forget the word Hispandering, conjured by GOWPs.

The moderators of, for example, the 8th Demorat debates were the racists Jorge Ramos, Maria Elena Salinas and a token female Caucasoid journalista named Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post, who mostly remained silent.

When those two clear racists sat at a moderator’s panel and pushed agendas specific to only one race — Hispanics (God I hate that word) — and the name of La Raza (translated: The Race, which advocates “reconquista“) even escapes their lips, I know they are racists.

Reverse it: imagine there was a Caucasoid Channel sponsoring the GOP debates and moderators were asking what the candidates could do for whites?

Why are they racist?  Supremely easy to answer: either everyone is equal or no one is equal.

It is a conundrum I had to address at the earliest stages of my career as a law enforcement officer. Either everyone matters, or no one matters. I chose the former philosophy.

There is also La Raza. Translation: “The Race.” Meaning Mexicans. Then there is MEChA.

Can you think of an equally egregious racist statement made on behalf of Caucasoids this week? Any recent week? This year? Last year?

I cannot.

BZ

 

 Share

Demography is prophecy: listen up, America

Posted on by

As I have emphasized for a number of years now, “demography is prophecy.” It is true with regard to Mexicans attempting “Reconquista,” as well as Muslims entering the US and using our system against us.

Please listen carefully to Dr James Mitchell on “The Kelly File.”

Islam has no problem telling Westernized countries precisely what it wants to do and how it will accomplish its goals of assimilation or the elimination of infidels.

From the UKExpress.com:

Christian worship plummets in Britain as Muslim following rockets by 72 per cent

by Siobhan McFadyen

A GOVERNMENT report has revealed that Christianity is on the wane in Britain dropping to record lows while the number of those following the Muslim faith has rocketed by 72 per cent.

And the decline in Christianity has fallen from 40.2million down to 36.1m with further declines projected.

Christianity is still the largest faith group in the UK by a significant margin but those falling away from the church are increasing in numbers and more has to be done by faith leaders to prevent further decline, says the report.

The Casey Review published earlier this month shows that Islam is now the largest non-Christian religious population in the UK.

This should come as no surprise when it’s revealed the number one name for male infants in the UK is Mohammed.

“Among faith groups the number of people identifying themselves as Muslim grew most significantly, by 1.2m people.

“This 72 per cent increase is higher than for any other religious group and Muslims make up the largest non-Christian religious population in the UK at 2.8m in total, compared with 0.8m Hindus, 0.4m Sikhs, 0.3m Jews and 0.3m Buddhists.”

Even Bill Maher — encountering pushback of his own — recognizes the Islamic threat.

Wearing a YOU CAN PEE T-shirt. Are you kidding me? You want me to provide the briefest, most fleeting moment of serious consideration? Uh, no.

To me that bespeaks volumes. Because, as I wrote here, ideology even trumps Leftist survival instincts. Do you not realize, you blithering bints, that Leftists, women and gays would be the first sacrificed in the name of Islamic good?

From PewResearch.org:

World’s Muslim population more widespread than you might think

by Drew DeSilver

There are an estimated 1.6 billion Muslims around the world, making Islam the world’s second-largest religious tradition after Christianity, according to the December 2012 Global Religious Landscape report from the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life.

Although many people, especially in the United States, may associate Islam with countries in the Middle East or North Africa, nearly two-thirds (62%) of Muslims live in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the Pew Research analysis. In fact, more Muslims live in India and Pakistan (344 million combined) than in the entire Middle East-North Africa region (317 million).

And those humans who are awake realize the greatest number of Muslims don’t live in the Middle East, but instead live in Indonesia.

CAIR exists for the promotion of Muslims over anyone and everyone else. CAIR exists to practice and promote taqiyya sub rosa, no matter the day, no matter the accusation, no matter the instance.

It is already known that, for instance, in the United States, a majority of Muslims in America prefer Sharia Law to conventional US law.

ChristianityToday.com writes:

Here’s the Best Prediction Yet of How Christianity and Islam Will Change Worldwide by 2050

by Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra

If fertility rates, the size of youth populations, and rates of religion switching remain the same, Christianity will still be the largest religion in the world in 2050, according to a detailed report released today by the Pew Research Center.

But Islam will be gaining fast, nearly neck-and-neck with Christianity “possibly for the first time in history,” and potentially eclipsing Christianity after 2070.

Meaning one very important thing in, at least, the unencumbered United States: Islam is heading for a very serious future confrontation with Mexicans. Birthrates tell us this. Caucasoids are diminishing because of lack of interest, blacks are diminishing due to abortions, Asians are diminishing because there is no new country to flood the US since Vietnam. So when things were settling, it was time for the First Melanin-In-Chief to tip the political and refugee scales as he passed.

The same is ever more true for Europe.

Perhaps you think I’m writing this in terms of the pale. Caspar. Becky. Albino. 8 Mile. Betty Crocker. Bird shit. Blue eyed devil. Boss. Brady. Cauc. Cracker. Eminem. Flour bag. Frosty. Gringo. Haole. Hillbilly. Honkie. Horseface. Ivory. Keebler. Leche. Lice. Maggot. Mayonnaise. Milk. Moss eater. Mudshark. Musungu. Nigger Magnet. Peckerwood. Pinkaloid. Round eye. Sheethead. Slim Shady. Snowman. Termite. Trailer trash. Tiny Tim. Triscuit. WAM. WASP. White Out. Wonder Bread. YT (White-ee).

But actually I’m writing this as an elder observer who is interested in seeing my country thrive no matter the melanin count of the largest organ in the body politic. Because as Westerners don’t quite yet Grok, Islam isn’t stopping.

And neither was Barack Hussein Obama. From Breitbart.com:

Obama Administration Nearly Doubles Number of Refugee Arrivals So Far in FY 2017

by Michael Patrick Leahy

The Obama administration has accepted 25,584 refugees into the United States in the two months and 26 days since FY 2017 began on October 1, according to the Department of State interactive website. That number is nearly double the 13,791 refugees accepted during the comparable period between October 1, 2015 and December 26, 2015 of the prior fiscal year (FY 2016).

Obama only had a specific limited window in which to finally hose the United States and, frankly, don’t think he wasn’t doing his level best every day to do so. When once he would have been holding daily press conferences, his focus was on enabling his “legacy,” whatever the hell that connotation might be.

Wake up America. I will continue to say and write that until my last breath.

Wake. Up. America.

BZ

 

 Share

Bill introduced to defund “sanctuary cities”

Posted on by

US mayors and governors don’t have the power to defy the federal government. Or do they? Are there legal teeth in Donald Trump’s words to “defund sanctuary cities”?

Representative Lou Barletta (PA, 11th) introduced a bill on Thursday that would grow a nice set of chompers and provide consequences for defiance of federal law. From Barletta.house.gov:

BARLETTA’S 1ST BILL OF 115TH CONGRESS: DEFUND SANCTUARY CITIES

Stops Federal Funding for Cities Failing to Cooperate with Immigration Officials

WASHINGTON – Congressman Lou Barletta (PA-11) today introduced the Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act, H.R. 83, which will stop all federal funds from flowing to states or localities which resist or ban enforcement of federal immigration laws, or flatly refuse to cooperate with immigration officials.  The bill is the first piece of legislation introduced by Barletta in the 115th Congress and represents the third time the congressman has introduced the measure.  In 2011, the bill was the first piece of legislation he ever introduced as a member of Congress.  He introduced it a second time in the 114th Congress in 2015.

“One of the principal duties of the government is to protect its citizens, and the idea of sanctuary cities runs completely counter to that responsibility,” Barletta said.  “Too many mayors and local governments think that they are above federal law and place their own ideology ahead of the safety of their residents.  This bill will stop that practice by saying to these sanctuary cities, ‘If you refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, you will lose your federal funding.’”

The Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act prohibits any federal funding for a minimum period of one year to any state or local government which has a policy or law that prevents them from assisting immigration authorities in enforcing federal immigration law.  The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) lists about 300 such localities in the United States.  Barletta’s bill directs the attorney general to compile an annual list of such cities and issue a report on any particular state or locality upon request from a member of Congress.  A state or local government would only regain federal funding eligibility after the attorney general certifies that its laws and policies are in compliance with federal immigration statutes.

The issue is this: 300 cities already refuse to cooperate with federal authorities over detainer requests from ICE officials, making illegals shielded from deportation — even those accused or convicted of felonies — as there is nothing in existing law obligating a city, county or state to cooperate, with no legal consequences when those entities fail to work with ICE.

Does anyone recall when then-Arizona Governor Jan Brewer passed a bill mandating state illegal immigrant enforcement that was tougher than the federal standard? Obama stated the US “cannot have fifty different immigration policies,” which the US Supreme Court affirmed. However, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and that ruling may lend precedent, credence and authority to Barletta’s bill.

The Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act would cease federal funding to sanctuary regions or entities for one year. As Barletta said, “they would not get one federal cent.” We’re talking potentially billions of federal dollars of highway, education and medicaid cash.

The map above, provided by the Center for Immigration Studies, shows the location of US sanctuary cities, counties and one Leftist state, Fornicalia.

Then there is this point from CIS.org:

Tackling Sanctuaries

By Dan Cadman, Jessica Vaughan December 2016

Key Findings

This report examines the justifications given by sanctuary jurisdictions for their policies, and finds them to be largely unfounded:

  • Cooperation with immigration enforcement has not been shown to undermine community trust nor cause immigrants to refrain from reporting crimes; there are better ways to address issues of access to police assistance without obstructing enforcement;

  • Simply cooperating with federal immigration agencies does not turn local officers into de facto immigration officers, because federal officers make the decisions on which aliens are targeted for deportation;

  • Such cooperation is not very costly for local jurisdictions because the removal of criminal aliens spares future victims and saves future supervision, incarceration, and social services costs to criminal aliens. In addition, cooperative localities can receive partial reimbursement for their incarceration costs.

  • Claims by some local law enforcement agencies that they need a warrant in order to hold aliens for ICE are dubious but can be accommodated by the issuance of ICE administrative warrants.

The Trump administration has a number of tools available at its disposal and within the confines of executive authority to address the problem of sanctuaries and the public safety problems they create.

Here’s how to do so:

  • Rescind the Obama administration actions and policies that encourage and enable sanctuaries, including clarifying that local agencies are expected to comply with detainers;

  • Cut federal funding to sanctuaries;

  • Initiate civil litigation to enjoin state or local laws and policies that egregiously obstruct enforcement of federal immigration laws and regulations;

  • Selectively initiate prosecution under the alien harboring-and-shielding statute, which is a federal felony; and

  • When requested, issue administrative warrants to accompany detainers as a reasonable accommodation to state or local concerns. Negotiating over which aliens will be subject to detainers, as is current policy, is not a reasonable accommodation.

  • Direct ICE to begin publishing a weekly report providing the public with information on all criminal aliens released by the sanctuaries.

Please read the excellent but somewhat lengthy article here.

Representative Barletta’s H.R. 83 is an important bill submitted at the proper time. Barletta is correct; we’re either a nation of laws or we are not. We either obey the rule of law or we do not. If we do not — by allowing sanctuary cities, counties and states to stand, in direct contradiction of federal law — then we undermine ourselves.

If we have no rule of law, then most any city, county or state may arbitrarily decide which laws they wish to obey or disregard. Therefore, if that stands, it logically follows that the individual likewise has the freedom to obey or disregard the laws that he or she chooses, when he or she chooses.

It is the path to chaos.

The time is now to stop the chaos, and establish and reaffirm discipline and sovereignty.

BZ

 Share

Leftists riot in Burlingame over Trump

Posted on by

At the California GOP Convention in Burlingame.

Mexico Wants US AgainWhat Mexican Leftists want, paraded in front of Mexican flag in Burlingame.

And all of it FUNDED by GEORGE SOROS.

None of this was spontaneous.  It was well funded and well planned.

The American people have grown fat, lazy and stupid.  They don’t care about freedom any more, they don’t care about privacy, they don’t care about responsibility or accountability.  All they care about is Free Cheese and what the government can do for them.   People today cannot handle real, actual, freedom.  And they don’t want to be responsible.  Americans aren’t smart enough to realize this because they have been brainwashed by “educators” and the American Media Maggots.  Patriotism is now “jingoism.”  Independence is considered vulgar and anathema.

But Burlingame wasn’t just a simple protest.  It was a riot and an assault on the First Amendment.

Leftists couldn’t give a fuck about the First Amendment, as witnessed by our pussified willting sensitive little Millennial flowers in universities across the nation.

Look.  Let’s get something straight up front.  I don’t like Donald Trump.  He’s not “my guy.”  I advocate and have contributed to Ted Cruz, who is an actual Conservative and has fought in our Supreme Court for conservative values, including gun rights and a refusal to accept amnesty for illegal aliens.  When John Boehner called Ted Cruz “Lucifer” I took that as a feather in the cap of Cruz.  Because John Boehner is a simpering, tearful fuckwit whose over-bronzed persona found little fault in most everything the Demorats proposed.  He frequently did his level best to suck Barack Hussein Obama’s political cock.  Anyone who is an enemy of John Boehner is a friend of mine.

When Republicans bent, America broke.  And America is broken.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, is a Johnny-Come-Lately and a self-serving individual whose philosophies change with his personal self interests.  He cannot provide serious details about his positions and wishes to actually expand government and increase taxes.

I know where he came from.  I know why he emerged.  The GOP let everyone down time after time after time.  People got tired of the GOP and Trump resonated because he said, initially, what many people themselves were thinking and feeling.

That said, he’s not my guy.  He’s too coarse and unspecific for me.  He is too unfamiliar with vastly important topics critical in today’s global scheme.

Fine.  He is still resonating with Americans and he appears to be chosen by quite a number of Americans.  Therefore, he is deserving of his own freedoms.  The freedom to make speeches, the freedom to appear at various locales, the freedom to not have his thoughts and expressions suppressed.

Trump Protest Burlingame

Trump protest Burlingame. Mexican flags predominate. La Raza’s reconquista.

George Soros, the Leftist billionaire, doesn’t believe in America.  He doesn’t believe in our Founding Fathers, he doesn’t believe in the US Constitution, he doesn’t believe in our Bill of Rights.  This doddering Greek motherfucker believes in turning America into Europe.

But what is revealed is even more foundational.  Yes, this is a rally — a riot, really — against Donald Trump.  But at its core this is an anti-American spasm.  Rioters burned the American flag and held the Mexican flag up high.

This is what Trump supporters had to endure just to get inside the convention.

This is what occurred to another person who simply wanted to attend the convention.

Sacramento’s very own Leftist Maile Hampton, a wonderful Islamist, led the flag burning in Burlingame.

Leftists cannot stomach opposition.  They cannot stomach mere protests.  Now it must be violent.

Stationed at the California GOP convention outside the Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport in Burlingame, reporters documented the moment angry demonstrators set Old Glory ablaze while labeling it a symbol of “genocide.”

“Fuck colonialism, fuck genocide, fuck slavery. That’s what the American flag stands for,” yelled a woman with a bullhorn. “We don’t stand for that shit.”

Free Tit LeftistsThe wacky Free Tit Leftists had to weigh in as well.

Good to know that Mexicans couldn’t care less for American laws.

A few words to that Mexican cunt.  First, I thank you.  I thank you for your clarity and your honesty.  You’ve outed yourself and your other “reconquista” La Raza adherents as the baldly-naked racists you are.  La Raza means “the race.”  Not just any race.  The race.

I guess I need to go “bottom line.”

The bottom line is this.

If Trump is the Republican nominee, I will vote for Donald John Trump.

Because that is how much I hate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And fuckwit Leftists.

BZ

 

 Share

Hispandering: el Debate Democrata

Posted on by

UNIVISION MEXICAN RACISTSIn case you didn’t watch — and I’m guessing you didn’t — you missed out on the Wednesday night Univision/Washington Post Demorat debate, the 8th in the series of Demorat debates.

Held in Miami, Univision took over and broadcast most everything in Spanish on CNN, under “el Debate Democrata, conversacion politica.”

Right.  Because Mexican women are talking about economia numero uno, religion numero dos, and aborto numero tres.

Mexican men are concerned about etica gubernamental numero uno, problemas raciales numero dos, and economia numero tres.

Good of CNN to turn themselves completely over to Univision so that actual Americans who speak English were at a complete disadvantage.

The moderators were the racists Jorge Ramos, Maria Elena Salinas and token female Caucasoid journalista Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post, who mostly remained silent.

Jorge Ramos hammered Hillary Clinton on Obama’s having deported more than 2.5 million ILLEGAL immigrants (most Mexicans) during his tenure.  He called her potentially the next Deporter In Chief.  “Can you promise you won’t deport children and you won’t deport immigrants with no criminal record?  Can I get a yes or no answer?”

Clinton said, “yes, you can.”  Hillary wants to change the laws and “stop the raids, stop the roundups, stop the deporting of people who are living here, doing their lives, doing their jobs and that’s my priority.”

The racist Jorge Ramos had kittens in response and asked the question again and again.  Sanders promised too, of course.

There you go.  Once again Leftists and Demorats deciding just which laws they will or will not enforce, which laws illegals must or must not obey.

If only that mindset translated over to actual living, breathing, lawful American Taxpayers — you know, that 55% of persons in the US who are still stupid enough and cowed enough to pay taxes — as opposed to the 45% who do not.

That was enough for me.  The entire purpose of the Univision debate was to ensure that there was a Demorat confirmation to fellate the Hispanic willy.

I have to hand it to Bernie Sanders.  He is a known quantity and hasn’t much changed his tune for decades.  He is truly a Democratic Socialist.  I can respect Sanders for that.  He’ll tell you what he is and you know what his stances are and will be.  Props to Sanders for having the stones to be honest.

Hillary Clinton was braced with being an lying untrustworthy bitch to the tune of a 37% believability rate.  In response Clinton proffered verbal effluvium, as per normal.

Let me be clear: these two Mexican racists — with their little biclavial token journalista GOWP female sitting next to them — existed in space on Wednesday night only to make sure their Mexican “needs” were met.  In a word: Hispandering.

Why are they racist?  Supremely easy to answer: either everyone is equal or no one is equal.

Aztlan-La-RazaWhen these two racists sit at a moderator’s panel and push agendas specific to only one race — Hispanics (God I hate that word) — and the name of La Raza (translated: The Race, which advocates “reconquista“) even escapes their lips, I know they are racists.

Reverse it: imagine there was a Caucasoid Channel sponsoring the GOP debates and moderators were asking what the candidates could do for whites?

Bernie Sanders is at least honest.  He is what he is.

Hillary Clinton is a lying, plotting, calculating snake of a politician who exists only to line her own pockets and those of her family.  Everyone else — and I mean everyone else — can go to hell.

She will say and do whatever it takes to feather her personal bed.  If that happens to benefit the Demorats, so be it.  But her allegiance lies much more inwards, much more centrally-focused.

I can understand why Hillary is seen as the Establishment candidate and Bernie as the outsider, despite a lengthy career in politics.

For those whose comments will include “I wouldn’t have wasted my time,” I say: never ignore your enemy.

Know your enemy.

Besides: I watched so you wouldn’t have to.

BZ

P.S.
Not one mention of the national debt.  Not one mention of how the policies will be paid for other than to “tax the one per-cent.”

As if money simply gets created if one but simply wills it into existence.

Oh, wait; government simply makes the money.

 

 Share