New York Governor Eliot Spitzer wants to provide drivers licenses to illegal immigrants in his state. On its face, for any clear-thinking adult, this is insane.
However, the standard Left counter-argument equates Spitzer’s plan as an attempt to provide illegal immigrants with nothing more than a feeling of belonging and integration into the country, along with their ability to lawfully drive a vehicle in order to enable the jobs and duties they daily perform — that most Americans don’t want to do.
In truth, Spitzer’s move is nothing more than a transparent tactic to allow illegal immigrants to circumvent the system and vote. And for whom would they vote? For Republicans, who do not wish illegal immigrants to run wholesale into the country? Or for Demorats, who seem to WANT illegal immigrants to invade and soak our nation? Further, there is only one reason for this: the votes. They want the votes.
Demorats want the illegal votes from illegal immigrants and will do ANYTHING to acquire these votes.
Spitzer has proven this.
And why licenses?
Harken back to William Jefferson Clinton, our 42nd president (1993 – 2001), when he signed the Motor Voter Law (NVRA: National Voter Registration Act) on May 20 of 1993, which required all states to offer voter registration to anyone getting a driver’s license.
Get a license? Get a VOTE.
How many states require a valid ID to vote? In September of 2005, a national commission headed by Jimmy Carter and James Baker recommended that all states require a valid photo ID to vote. How odd. Several prosecutors say, underneath the current, that they fear being accused of racism and aiding voter-suppression tactics if they pursue “touchy” voter fraud cases. One district attorney told the U.S. Government Accountability Office that he doesn’t pursue phony voter registrations because they are “victimless and nonviolent crimes.”
Your government at work. The government for which you, ahem, pay taxes.
Fornicalia makes this attempt roughly every two years, spearheaded by our Speaker Fabio Nunez. Oddly enough, he appears to be, at first blush, Mexican.
No surprise there. The surprise is that Fornicalia has managed, to date, to sink every illegal immigrant license bill.
We can track UPS packages — even online. The same for FedEx. But we can’t track illegal immigrants.
I have to show an ID to get on board any airliner. I have to show an ID frequently in order to verify my credit card when I make purchases in stores. I have to show my ID when I rent a video at Blockbuster. I have to show my ID when I wish to make a deposit in my own checking or savings account.
But I don’t have to show an ID, a VALID ID, when I wish to consider voting in the US?
And now, with the chance of states issuing essentially invalid or unverified IDs for illegal immigrants, what does that do or say for MY having to proffer ID for various transactions? Why is it that I should comply? For that matter, why is it that I should comply with any single or multiple number of laws when my very own state and federal governments think that abiding by laws isn’t quite necessary — dependent upon, of course, who you are.
Bottom line: I’m not Mexican so I have to comply with each and every law. My wife is Mexican but she is naturalized and was born in the United States 50+ years ago and speaks English. Imagine that. She had and has to continually jump through each and every ongoing hoop for all her local, state and federal governments. Unlike ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
Yes, Hillary stepped on her dick (and trust me, she does have a bigger dick than any of her male competitors — especially Obama Osama) during the recent Demorat debates, regarding this very issue.
But still, make no mitsake: THE DEMORATS WANT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO VOTE, BECAUSE ILLEGALS WILL VOTE FOR FREE SHIT (i.e., — entitlements). And by that extension, Demorats = free shit which = a vote for Demorats.
From a John Fund Wall Street Journal opinion piece:
The potential for fraud is not trivial, as federal privacy laws prevent cross-checking voter registration rolls with immigration records. Nevertheless, a 1997 Congressional investigation found that “4,023 illegal voters possibly cast ballots in [a] disputed House election” in California. After 9/11, the Justice Department found that eight of the 19 hijackers were registered to vote.
You can take this to the bank:
- When DEMORATS want illegal immigration in ANY VENUE, they want the VOTES.
- When REPUBLICANS want illegal immigration in ANY VENUE, they want the CHEAP LABOR.
And further, what you must understand: to the collective detriment of our nation.
BZ
Ah, the Hillary! The Lady that put forward that the post-WWII concept of International Law was just so dead tired that we really don’t need it… all because of that nasty ‘runaway capitalism’ and that it really did need to be controlled. And her answer is the need for strong and efficient government!
Mind you ‘civil society’ is wedged in between government and economics, a poor after-thought to her that only requires that we find people who think believe in things and create their only little play-pen of civility. Citizenship? Just a collection of things you do,not a real concept to her… so Nationalistic based, we just don’t need that anymore.
That is Transnationalism 101 of the Progressive mode.
I don’t see the world that way… and if you like your liberty and freedom you had best keep government in check, lest it tell you what your life is about. That is what Hillary is aiming for, and she will stop at nothing to get it.
In all fairness.
Who is the President of the United States?
Who is the president that refuses to control our borders at this critical time?
Who is the President that tried to push a scam of a immagration policy?
Who is the President that is allowing Mexican Truck Drivers in our country?
Who is the President that’s pushing this N. A. T.?
Who is the President that wants to sell our ports to the Arabs?
There’s plenty of blame to go around, it’s not just one-sighted.
George W. Bush, without a question, the worst President this country has ever seen, IMO. He has sold us out.
I was gonna submit an answer but Ranando answered his own questions.. LMAO…
AJ: ever so true!
Ranando: I don’t disagree at all. We just don’t need anyone ELSE helping him out!
BZ
Why are “illegal aliens” and “enforcing existing border laws” so difficult for anyone to understand?
“Illegal alien” means you have no rights in any country but your own, you are arrested, and you’re deported…except, apparently, in either Canada or the United States.
Remember that non-enforcement started under Carter, continued under Reagan, continued after the first amnesty, continued under Bush (41), continued under Clinton, continued under Bush (43).
That is not a record of luster for either party and the R side has had 3 Presidents plus control of congress under the third to get this done. If the D party is bad for starting non-enforcement, what is the R party for continuing that policy?
I am a Nationalist, not a partisan between parties, but staunchly for my Nation. Neither of the two parties is Nationalist, that record is obvious for all to read of promising one thing and delivering something else. I do not want a ‘second Reagan’ because the *first* left so much unaddressed that could have easily been addressed by “the great communicator” that we are left with a enduring and nearly insurmountable problems that could have been nipped in the bud by that man. The D party is so low in regards to the standing for the Nation concept that the R only appears better off incomparison: they are both sinking and quickly.
History has no inevitable outcome, yet the direction we are taking has been warned about since the founding, and yet we ignore them blithely as if such history had never happened. ‘It can never happen here’ is the famous last words of dictators, tyrants and those who put forth that democracy cannot be subverted… it can and it has been, even in industrialized and Western Nations. The US is not immune.
I expect very little from our Presidents: protect the Nation, ensure the laws are enforced and keep our enemies at bay.
Can we get one of those, because all of the current candidates have positions contrary to these three things? I have looked at them all, and am not satisfied with this crop. They have created a field where they cannot be ploughed under and, so, the weeds grow as tall as corn and yet yield only bitter roots. The times, in comparison to a century and more ago, are not that complicated: the US dealt with pirates, thieves, brigands and those that would endanger us in those times. Now they can reach further, and the effort is *less* to end them. That is not a prescription for success, but a recipe for disaster. Those that made this country clearly saw how it could fail and warned us of that…
We take one head off the hydra… rejoice! Unfortunately the Terrible Swift Sword of the Republic was not used in flame to ensure that two do not grow back. If you want to try stitching it up, as we do today, then best stitch very, very, very quickly. And don’t mind the other heads now eye us as we try to do so… surely they will not bite… again…