Why, you attempt to federally legislate the creation and maintenance of unions, naturally.
This is done by the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (HR 1409 or S 560), a blatant attempt to remove the “secret ballot” — not in written theory but in actual practice.
When those around you, your peers, get to see whether or not you physically choose, at a work site, to organize and instigate a union, and your vote is registered for all to see, there is a purposeful and clearly massive pressure on you to positively vote for union organization.
And that’s the purpose of the EFCA — which has, as you can see, little if anything to do with actual free choice.
The SEIU is all about taking away your right to free choice in terms of unions:
You may wish to consult with the National Right to Work Committee, here.
Check out SEIU pressure tactics here:
Freedom, you ask? Demorats are all about intimidation and the removal of freedoms from the American People.
Card Check? Forced unions? Coming soon to a community near you if you sit back and do nothing.
BZ
Thanks for the fear and half truths. Obama is solidly pro-union. Bush was not.
In case anyone missed it where I’ve written it otherwise:
The unions are no longer needed. They are duplicating what laws have mandated, and in the process are taking more from workers than they give back. Forcing a shop to unionize costs more jobs and businesses than it helps.
In short, I am anti-union.
Deacon, you are such a dupe.
Cary, you are spot on. It’s all about power plays and about cash. The bottom line is that, yes, forcing a shop to unionize will hurt more than it helps.
BZ
Great post! I really like your blog – keep up the excellent work!!
Common Cents
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com
ps. Link Exchange??