Coming Sooner: Removal of Union Free Choice

Amongst everything else:
With ObamaKare, the greatest deficit in this nation’s history, CapNTax, amnesty for Illegal Invaders, further “stimulus” cash thrown away.  .  .
.   .   . what do you do when unions appear to be lapsing in strength, when the once-strong locus of Unionism — Detroit’s UAW — has collapsed under its own weight? What do you do when corporations are literally moving from strong union areas of the nation to other areas so they won’t be crushed by union demands?

Why, you attempt to federally legislate the creation and maintenance of unions, naturally.

This is done by the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (HR 1409 or S 560), a blatant attempt to remove the “secret ballot” — not in written theory but in actual practice.

When those around you, your peers, get to see whether or not you physically choose, at a work site, to organize and instigate a union, and your vote is registered for all to see, there is a purposeful and clearly massive pressure on you to positively vote for union organization.

And that’s the purpose of the EFCA — which has, as you can see, little if anything to do with actual free choice.

The SEIU is all about taking away your right to free choice in terms of unions:

You may wish to consult with the National Right to Work Committee, here.

Check out SEIU pressure tactics here:

Freedom, you ask? Demorats are all about intimidation and the removal of freedoms from the American People.

Card Check? Forced unions? Coming soon to a community near you if you sit back and do nothing.


Say, Mr Obama?  How’s your dose of Reality coming along?  Is Life just a bit sharper, more pungent, difficult, more strident, more confusing, more complicated, more demanding of maturity than you first thought?

BZ
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

4 thoughts on “Coming Sooner: Removal of Union Free Choice

  1. In case anyone missed it where I’ve written it otherwise:

    The unions are no longer needed. They are duplicating what laws have mandated, and in the process are taking more from workers than they give back. Forcing a shop to unionize costs more jobs and businesses than it helps.

    In short, I am anti-union.

Comments are closed.