Author Archives: BZ

Adm. James Lyons: Islam as a threat doctrine

Posted on by

As I attempt to be clear about Islam, retired Admiral James “Ace” Lyons is equally clear about Islam, if not more so:

“Islam is a political movement masquerading as a religion.”

Admiral Lyons then gets down to the essential brass tacks, the tacks of which few if any have the guts to actually speak in a public setting:

“The Obama Administration has a strategy.  It’s very simple.  Any thinking American should be able to grasp it.  It’s anti-American, anti-Western, it’s pro-Islamic, it’s pro-Iranian and pro-Muslim Brotherhood.”

Civilian handlers and executives, throughout the chronicles of the United States, have historically failed to listen to their military advisers, to the detriment of the United States and, via that, the entire planet.  Admiral Lyons tells us so — as he can now reveal, many years later, the true machinations behind the scenes in past administrations.

History exists for a reason: for us to learn from it.

And historically we find that, for example, Patton was correct, Schwarzkopf was correct and, in these cases, Lyons was correct.

It remains that this nation does in fact possess Historical Alzheimers.

BZ

P.S.
Thanks to HGPSURF for the h/t.

 

 Share

Islam in the UK

Posted on by

Take a peek at this British video.

Listen carefully to the words and actions of the Muslims involved.  Listen very carefully.

This is how far Islam has corrupted the UK, and UK GOWPs — Guilty Overeducated White Persons — are afraid to levy opinions and thoughts about what is good and what is Evil.  And Islam is evil.  Let there be no doubt.  This woman in the video has seen so, personally.

“Go put some clothes on.  You look naked.”

Does she?

“The law of the land is Islamic.  If it is not Islamic they can go to hell.”

“Non-Muslims are destined for the hellfire.”

“You’re destined for the hellfire unless you change.”

Islam is as Islam does.

I have made and embraced that statement for at least a decade.  To me it means this:

For all the violence and terrible deaths conducted on the quite clear and unequivocal behalf of Islam, let us make but one substitute.

Let us substitute the word, for example, “Catholic” for the words “Muslim” or “Islam.”

What would have happened had the slightest fraction of the deaths at the hand of Islam been conducted, say, in the name of Catholicism?

You and I both know that answer.

Catholics would have been excoriated and even hunted down physically.  There would have been deaths, churches burned, priests and nuns killed on the spot.  There would have been absolutely no tolerance for a fraction of deaths conducted in the name of Catholicism.  Instead, the reverse is true; Protestants are being specifically targeted by Muslims.

Let UK be the clarion call to wake up about the true nature of Islam.  Islam is what it does; therefore it is naught but a death cult.

BZ

 

 Share

Juan Williams: “what difference does it make?”

Posted on by

Just as we heard this shrill individual utter the same trigger phrase when four Americans were killed:

Juan Williams asked, on the Monday episode of Fox’s The Five, “what difference does it make?” with regard to Hillary’s e-mail issue.

“You know she won’t be prosecuted,” Mr Williams said.

Here is the difference, your palavering, jejune boob: the laws were created for a reason.  Why have e-mail rules at all, in your world?  Why have any oversight of any politician or government worker who interfaces with national security issues at all?

The true point at hand is that Hillary Clinton perceives herself to be — and you reaffirm this — far above answering to the common rabble for any reason whatsoever.  She continues on her arrogant and entitled path.  You do nothing, Williams, but enable her.

Grow up, Williams.

BZ

 

 Share

“An unprecedented act of surrender”

Posted on by

John Bolton GlassesJohn Bolton quantified Obama’s negotiations with Iran, according to TheHill.com, as:

Bolton calls Iran deal ‘unprecedented’ surrender

by Mark Hensch

Former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton said Saturday that President Obama is negotiating “an unprecedented act of surrender” with Iran in discussions over its nuclear weapons program.
 
“This deal is fundamentally flawed,” Bolton said at the South Carolina National Security Action Summit in West Columbia, S.C. “There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Repeat:

“There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Tom Cotton was correct, Rudy Giuliani was correct, and I was correct.

Controversy erupted over an open letter Republicans sent Iran’s leadership Monday. It vowed Congress can void any deal it finds unsatisfying and was signed by 47 GOP senators.

And the forty-seven Congressmen are correct.

Bolton rebuked the president’s response as unjustified Saturday. He said the Senators were not traitors, but rather lawmakers who “stood up for the Constitution.”
“The president coddles the Iranian ayatollah and attacks his own countrymen and our closest allies over this deal,” Bolton said Saturday. “The danger we hope to avoid is now imminent. This is just one example of how the President doesn’t care about America’s national security.”

I completely concur.  I wrote why I believe Mr Obama is willing to make such terrible concessions to Iran in my post “Obama: protecting Islam and Iran.”  I said that  “relations between Israel and Barack Hussein Obama have always been rocky.  I believe this is because Mr Obama sympathizes with Muslims and disdains Jews.  This is in consideration of his upbringing and his education, amongst other things.”

Bolton said Saturday that Obama’s eagerness for a deal would give Tehran a “free pass” for nuclear arms. He said American voters should thus make national security the central issue of 2016’s presidential elections.

There is no denying this statement whatsoever; it became true in 2008 and is equally true today:

“The gravest threat to our national security sits in the Oval Office,” Bolton said. “The next two years can’t pass swiftly enough. For God’s sake, let’s not make the same mistake in 2016.”

Mr Obama is one who makes US allies an enemy, and US enemies a friend.

BZ

 

 Share