Category Archives: Political Correctness

PC Leftists don’t care if YOU die for their ideology

Posted on by

Scania 18-wheel big rig at Berlin Christmas market attack, Monday, December 19th, where 12 people were killed and 56 injured by Anis Amri, ISIS-inspired Muslim terrorist. Amri was later shot and killed on Friday, December 23rd at a railway station near Milan by Italian police. Prints from the truck matched those of Amri.

They’ve show this to be the case time and again. Leftists here and abroad couldn’t care less if you or anyone else perishes because of their politically-correct belief systems. Their ideology trumps your safety any and every time.

From Breitbart.com:

German Politician Prevented Police Sharing Image of Christmas Market Attacker ‘to Prevent Racism’

by Victoria Friedman

German police and judiciary have accused Hamburg Justice Minister Till Steffen of delaying the release of pictures of the Christmas market attacker Anis Amri because he was worried about provoking “racist” comments on Facebook.

And completely logical, don’t you think? Weighing the search for a naked murderer against potential comments. Perfectly normal.

Green Party politician Steffen cited “privacy concerns” when he initially prevented law enforcers from releasing pictures of Anis Amri.

However, it has been claimed by members of the judiciary and the police that Steffen, who is the head of the judicial authority in Hamburg, denied the release of images of Amri because he was concerned it would incite racial hatred.

It is alleged that he only released images after a 12-hour delay following a call from German newspaper Bild.

“Privacy concerns.” Because, as anyone knows, all murder suspects deserve consideration of their privacy when being sought for the ultimate capital offense.

Parliamentary leader André Trepoll, who is a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, called “Scandalsenator” Steffen a “security risk” for delaying the search for the world’s most wanted man.

Accusing the Hamburg justice minister of “fetishising” data protection, Trepoll added: “Green data protection fetishism should not delay the public search for a terror suspect.”

That’s not the worst. Read on.

CDU judiciary spokesman Richard Seelmaeker called for a special meeting of the Justice Committee, stressing: “Anis Amri allegedly murdered twelve people, but instead of using all means necessary to search for him, Hamburg’s green justice senator was more concerned about the state of comments in a Facebook post – which hindered our police.”

Political correctness on the part of Leftists has crossed a line — a terrible line. To the point where Leftists in positions of power are now jeopardizing the safety and security of persons in lesser power who do not have their own personal security contingents, do not live in a bubble or behind gates or walls, aren’t insulated by money and power and surrounded by deference.

Leftists continue to prove that anyone and everyone can be sacrificed on their altar of ideology, as long as it serves their purposes of being politically-correct in any social or cultural situation. Common sense, logic, proportion, rationality, history and facts must never be allowed to stand in their way.

It is far past time for this madness to stop.

Perhaps this might change a bit in 2017.

BZ

 Share

Trump is weaponizing “Merry Christmas”

Posted on by

Now it’s time to simply laugh our collective arses off at Leftists. With each passing day they prove more ludicrous and dispensable.

We know that Christmas is under assault. Christian values are under assault. We know that “being a good person” is under assault. Consideration is under assault. Rudeness is becoming the norm predominantly because so many people are self-centered and narcissistic — as exemplified by none other than Barack Hussein Obama.

Now, Leftists are simply being risible.

From Slate.com (you know, that fine, credible source of Leftist news):

Donald Trump Is Trying to Take Ownership of the Phrase Merry Christmas

by Ben Mathis-Lilley

So now the phrase Merry Christmas, thanks to the long-running far-right “War on Christmas” conspiracy theory—which was invented by the white-nationalist John Birch Society in 1959—has been officially weaponized into the partisan slogan of a president elected on a wave of hateful rhetoric about, among others, refugees.

Truly, it’s what a Middle Eastern Jew who was born in a barn because no one else would take his parents in would have wanted.

Right. The intimation here is that Donald Trump is too Christian, too religious (as he, in one photo, is surrounded by six Christmas trees) and, simultaneously a racist — as goes the reference to John Birch. It’s all, you see, a Christmas “conspiracy theory.”

The sad thing for Leftists is that I have a memory, I have experienced the US for 60+ years, I have internet access and I know Christmas has been denigrated to the point where it’s nothing like it was in the 50s, 60s or even the 70s. Every seasonal commercial at Christmas had specific references to Christmas. Now? It’s just the “holidays.” The increasingly-Leftist culture has systematically pushed the word Christmas to the point where to hear it is to be the exception and not the rule.

Slate.com says there is no evidence whatsoever of any sort of “attack on Christmas,” that it’s simply some convenient “conspiracy theory” by conservatives. Here, then, are just a smattering of specific references with attributions:

Those citations are just from my blog.

As a refresher, because this is where the Left gets their foundational declaration that Donald Trump is racist, let’s review what he originally said about Mexico and the border. Here is the precise quote.

When do we beat Mexico at the border? They’re laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they are beating us economically. They are not our friend, believe me. But they’re killing us economically.

The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everybody else’s problems.

Thank you. It’s true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we’re getting. And it only makes common sense. It only makes common sense. They’re sending us not the right people.

It’s coming from more than Mexico. It’s coming from all over South and Latin America, and it’s coming probably— probably— from the Middle East. But we don’t know. Because we have no protection and we have no competence, we don’t know what’s happening. And it’s got to stop and it’s got to stop fast.

Donald Trump did not say that all Mexicans are rapists and criminals as has been stated again and again by the American Media Maggots. Yet massive evidence does exist of illegal Mexicans and others as criminals and rapists, not to mention the fiscal drain that illegals are on state and federal budgets.

The latest statistics provided by the Fake News Outlet CNN in 2015 — and I will go with these to be gracious — indicate there are 11.2 million illegals in the US. 177,960 of those were deported. 121 illegals were released from immigration custody who were charged with murder between 2010 and 2014. 73,665 illegals are in state and federal prisons.

CNN and Leftists would have you believe — using their own statistics — that 121 lawful American citizens killed by illegals is inconsequential.

I submit: it’s the very number of persons we could have done much more to stop. I’d wager the family of Katie Steinle would agree, as their daughter’s killer had been deported on five prior occasions. Further, the US spent $1.87 BILLION dollars in 2014 to incarcerate illegal immigrant criminals. Illegal immigrant incarceration rates are greatly under-represented.

The discrepancy seems to be this: Donald Trump appears to support America. He also seems to support the application of border law.

So: Donald Trump “weaponizing” Christmas?

Leftists continuing to prove: M O R O N S.

BZ

 

 Share

About men: what you DON’T hear or read of

Posted on by

Because it’s not “politically correct.”

For MenLet me give you some statistics from my adjunct work in Sex Assaults when I was a detective for a major California law enforcement agency: roughly 40% to 50% of rape claims by women were false, at my time in the 90s.  When investigated fully, the bulk of these women had, in fact, post-coaital regrets.  Force and/or rape — non-consensual sex — was not factually or evidentiarily involved.

But I was forbidden from revealing these statistics to my Executive Staff or to others.  I was young enough and stupid enough to conform and obey.  We were also forbidden from seeking charges against these persons for filing false reports.  The DA would not take them because our administration refused to create the cases.

How bad of me to reveal the actual truth from my time in detectives to you now.  I am not in keeping with the purple-skied reality of Millennials.

Oh, and yes.  The number of men with prostate cancer roughly equal the number of women with breast cancer.  Yet, do you see blue ribbons or people walking or running for prostate cancer?  Serious sexual disparity, anyone?  Bueller?

Of course you don’t.

That would be sexist to reveal the truth.

BZ

 

 Share

SPOC: a “Shady Person Of Color” speaks out against “safe spaces” on college campus

Posted on by

SPOC 2That can get you potentially expelled from college, if you are a student.  It can wreak havoc on your social media accounts and attract Leftist Maggots like flies on shite.

It can certainly get you body slammed by your fellow college peers because you don’t pull the line that all the mooing brainless student cows believe their wilting-flower sensitivities trump surrounding reality.

Hanna Oh is now a SPOC — a “Shady Person Of Color” according to Claremont McKenna College’s school newspaper — for suggesting as editor of that paper in November of 2015 that “safe spaces” have no place on college campuses.

She partially wrote (see the complete article):

To our fellow Claremont students, we are disappointed in you as well.

We are disappointed in the fact that your movement has successfully managed to convince its members that anyone who dissents does so not for intelligent reasons, but due to moral failure or maliciousness.

We are disappointed that you’ve used phrases like “silence is violence” to not only demonize those who oppose you, but all who are not actively supporting you.

We are most disappointed, however, in the rhetoric surrounding “safe spaces.”

College is the last place that should be a safe space. We come here to learn about views that differ from our own, and if we aren’t made to feel uncomfortable by these ideas, then perhaps we aren’t venturing far enough outside of our comfort zone.

We would be doing ourselves a disservice to ignore viewpoints solely on the grounds that they may make us uncomfortable, and we would not be preparing ourselves to cope well with adversity in the future.

Dealing with ideas that make us uncomfortable is an important part of growing as students and as people, and your ideas will inhibit opportunities for that growth.

The problem is that Oh has dared to expose the truth about college’s little dainty darlings across the nation.

But when you control college campus ranguage as Leftists do, you can write anything you want about someone “of color” if they don’t pull their own “color weight.”

Like Hannah Oh.  Who betrayed her college values by spilling the Leftist beans that not only did students demand a “safe space” on campus — but via a private Google document — wanted a sound system, kitchenware, and a “board of SPOCs” that they wished to post on the wall in their “safe space.”  Not a board as in a council, but a board that would reveal those persons they believed were no longer worthy of their swarthiness.

Claremont then reacted as predicted by firing people and creating a temporary “safe space” whilst working on a permanent one.  Was there an administrative reaction to the concept of “SPOC” on their campus? — which is a demeaning term to persons of color — no.  There was no reaction by the Claremont administration.  As you would expect.

But as Oh revealed, here’s the practical kicker: no Caucasoids allowed.  They can’t enter the so-called “safe space.”  In the real world this is termed segregation.  Even Obama spoke out against “safe spaces.”

Oh revealed this — the treachery of it all! — when she again went against the Leftist grain and had the temerity to expose the situation on Fox News with Greta Van Susteren this very week.  The nerve of that SPOC!

As she and the editors dared to summarize in a published editorial:

Lastly, we are disappointed in students like ourselves, who were scared into silence.

We are not racist for having different opinions.

We are not immoral because we don’t buy the flawed rhetoric of a spiteful movement.

We are not evil because we don’t want this movement to tear across our campuses completely unchecked.

We are no longer afraid to be voices of dissent.

That is what scares Leftists.  That there would be any pushback at all.  That people would not automatically accept as rote what Leftists demand.  This cannot be.

Is pushback actually beginning?

BZ

 

 Share

More DOJ word pablum

Posted on by

Loretta Lynch & ObakaI wrote here that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has decided to call convicted criminals “justice involved individuals.”

Hell, cops could be termed “justice involved individuals” as could judges, bailiffs, law clerks, probation officers and people who file legal records.  They could all be labeled “justice involved individuals.”  In the DOJ’s eyes law enforcement and felons are one and the same.

Now, the DOJ wants to eliminate the words “felon.” and “convict.”

Too judgmental, don’t you know.

From the WashingtonTimes.com:

Justice Department program to no longer use ‘disparaging’ terms ‘felons’ and ‘convicts’

by Andrea Noble

The Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs is eschewing the terms “felon” and “convict” when officials refer to individuals convicted of crimes, opting instead for less “disparaging labels,” Assistant Attorney General Karol Mason announced Wednesday.

The Office of Justice Programs plans to substitute terminology such as “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated” in speeches and other communications as part of an effort to remove barriers that officials say hinder progress of those who re-enter society after completing their prison sentences.

More WORD PABLUM from our federal Department of Justice under Obama-appointed Leftist Loretta Lynch.

Mouth pablum, euphemisms, verbal drivel, word salad.  What is the reason?

Votes.  Felon voters.  More votes for Demorats.  “Smoothing things out” for criminals so that the Demorats are remembered at voting time.

Just look at Virginia: a quarter of a million new voters for Demorats at the stroke of Democrat Governor Terry McAuliffe’s imperial pen — an act not put past the voters, mind you — to include rapists and murderers.

Now, since McAuliffe’s executive order, Breitbart reports:

Leftist groups sprung into action after Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe granted 206,000 felons the right to vote in April, including rapists and murderers, and have been working around the clock to get them on voter rolls.

According to a report by the Washington Post, activists want to swing the state for the Democratic nominee in November and for Democratic state officials. They’ve registered over 2,000 felons in two weeks. Hours after McAuliffe gave his order, activists were in poor and urban neighborhoods to start signing up ex-cons.

Just as Obama decided that a terrorist can’t be called a terrorist, and words don’t have real meanings any more, Obama’s rogue states have become “outliers” and pablum like “overseas contingency operations,” “man-caused disasters,” “countering violent extremism” and “kinetic military action” are the norm.

It should be no shock, then, that Obama’s DOJ now calls convicted felons “justice involved individuals” and more recently, “persons who committed a crime” and “individuals who were incarcerated.”  No more felons, no more convicts.  Perfect.

Again, why all of this, you ask?

VOTES.

BZ

 

 Share