Figure 1: The most arrogant, pompous, berating, snide, smug, self-righteous, biased and untrustworthy person recently displayed on US television. At least until another alphabet agency Deep State actor appears on US television.

First, from FoxNews.com:

Lisa Page ‘cooperative,’ ‘credible,’ lawmakers say after 5-hour closed-door session

by Amy Lieu

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and “credible” in a closed-door session Friday with select House committee members that lasted nearly five hours.

U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill.

Meadows said he thinks the American people “would be happy” with Friday’s transcribed interviews, the Washington Post reported.

“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency. … We’ve certainly learned additional things today,” Meadows said.  

That would certainly be in direct contravention of what little information the superior and keening Peter Strzok deigned to parse out on Wednesday past.

Page, who defied a subpoena Wednesday, would have been held in contempt of Congress had she not appeared at Friday’s session, lawmakers said.

In the private testimony, she primarily answered questions about text messages with Peter Strzok that allegedly showed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump, the New York Post reported.

Meadows called Page a “credible witness,” as he walked out of the hearing, the report said.

“There is new information,” he told reporters. “And that information is credible.”

Lisa Page was, let’s be blunt, nothing more than a stepping stone in a whirlwind of choices Peter Strzok had to make in the past few years. Lisa Page was possessed of a, well, a certain “mien” the likes of which Strzok apparently couldn’t otherwise acquire at home or else he wouldn’t have strayed. Common soldiers united in thought, deed, pillow biting and politics. Say, isn’t that a new Austrian industrial music group, Pillow Biting and Politics — Kissenbeißen und Politik? Or a new Angela Merkel call-in radio show?

You, of course, remember this as the infamous Peter Strzok/Lisa Page illicit liaison in 2016 (perhaps even farther back) of a married man and an unmarried woman.

Was Louis Gohmert correct in this tactic? I suggest that, yes, clearly, he was.

Let’s be honest. Robert Mueller wasn’t going to fire and replace Peter Strzok until the day that the DOJ — not Mueller or any of his group — brought certain problems to Mueller’s attention. Strzok was doing God’s work on the Mueller team in keeping with his theme of “against Trump by any means.” Mueller had the latitude but, sadly, lost a very devoted soldier but only because Strzok was, well, stupid. Had the texts not been revealed or perhaps not even created on FBI/taxpayer equipment on FBI/taxpayer time, Mueller would have continued to be the happy bivalve/mollusk packed in sand. “Bias? What bias?”

Bank on it.

So this is an “expert counterintelligence agent,” one who hangs his ass out in a potential honey pot scheme, opens himself to potential blackmail by opposing agents or forces, and then conducts his biased business essentially “in the clear” in today’s digital age? We’re supposed to trust this guy? And then add in all of his numerous and egregious examples of bias in the HRC investigation and the Trump/Russia investigation? In the eyes of Strzok and others like him, yes, we are that daft.

Let me ask those who believe Strzok’s documented written biases didn’t affect his thoughts, deeds or actions this question: let’s insert your name for Trump’s in all those text messages. Peter Strzok is subject to sitting on a jury where you are the defendant. Would you want him seated in the jury? I mean, after all, he insists he can be completely unbiased.

Further, former FBI Assistant Director Andrew McCabe has already said something similar to “if I’m going down, others are going down with me.” Or words to that effect, Senator. Heh.

Is Andrew McCabe the as-yet unacknowledged proverbial floater in the punchbowl?

Perhaps an incredibly important adjunct question is this: why is McCabe free and Manafort behind bars in solitary confinement?

BZ