Source: Obama White House did have Trump campaign wiretapped

So Mr Obama, while a sitting president, had Trump Tower bugged and surveilled whilst he still sat in the Oval Office?

Impossible, the Demorats and American Media Maggots bleat.

I say: show me the proof that Mr Obama did not do that. Tables turned. Just like “the Russians.”

After all, Mr Obama has an historic pattern of bugging and surveilling the offices and technology of sitting presidents. Why not an individual running for US president? Too far fetched?

What about Mr Obama attempting to undermine and influence the elections in Israel, because he didn’t want to see Benjamin Netanyahu elected? It seems to me the Obama administration was playing politics with a presidential election.

What about Jason Chaffetz who, during the Obama administration, had Secret Service agents combing through his personal records in a politically-driven revenge attack?

What about James Rosen, an American journalist, who had his emails and calls on roughly 20 phones exposed as a result of Obama’s minion, Eric Holder? Obama claimed he never ordered surveillance on any American citizen — but Holder wouldn’t have conducted something of this import without keeping his melanin-related BFF updated.

We know, via Wikileaks, that Obama did in fact surveil and violate the rights and privacy of American journalists. Here is a copy of a search warrant indicating so.

Wait. How about this set of Obama wiretaps?

WikiLeaks released the following list on February 23rd of Obama Administration wire taps:

* The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
* Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;
* Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;
* Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;
* Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);
* Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;
* Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception; and
* Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.

In addition to the above list we also know now that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration.  It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:

* In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks.  The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.
* Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance.  The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”
* Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration.  A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.

Hell, the CIA spied on the United States SENATE under Barack Hussein Obama:

All Obama’s oppressive actions seem to be forgiven. Yet, now all the Demorats and American Media Maggots require to elevate an allegation to a fact, if it concerns President Trump, conservatives or the GOP is.  .  .

The slightest of suppositions.

The official response of Obama, by former spokesman Kevin Lewis?

“A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false.”

What Lewis doesn’t do, however, is offer that same level of denial regarding the FBI or the DOJ. What Lewis specifically didn’t do is unequivocally state that Obama did not have Donald Trump tapped. It’s a proverbial non-denial denial. Gorgeous. Further, do you think Obama was so laissez-faire about his administration that he was unaware of what was occurring around him at all times? I do not.

On Sunday during Meet The Press, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI, a position above the CIA Director) James Clapper stated no agency operating under him — including the FBI — wiretapped the Trump concerns. Clapper added: “to my knowledge.” Equivocation.

Let us not forget this is the same James Clapper who lied nakedly to all of America when he testified under oath that the NSA never collected phone data on millions of Americans — when in fact the NSA Hoovered personal data like a baleen whale with krill. Clapper massages his pate and says “not wittingly.” Edward Snowden proved that Clapper was lying his political ass off.

But are these mere suppositions of wiretapping?


Fox’s Kimberly Guilfoyle spoke to a left-leaning journalist named Cathy Areu on Saturday the 4th, who told Guilfoyle that a source inside the White House said, about the tap:

There were concerns that Trump and his surrogates may have been colluding with the Russians as a possible bargaining chip to influence the election. Therefore a wiretap was conducted.

Areu’s female source said she was unsure who secured the warrant, but that it was granted. Areu said her female Obama administration source stated:

“The intelligence community did its due diligence given the threat of the Russian influence. The (Obama) White House was aware of it.”

Meaning two critically important thingies:

  • 1. The wiretap occurred, and
  • 2. The president had to know.

Let me repeat that at the risk of becoming a member of the Department of Redundancy Dept:

“The (Obama) White House was aware of it.”

Says the source.

Because, after all, we don’t need anything more to substantiate an allegation of corruption or abuse against President Trump other than an “unnamed source,” do we? Of course not. Turnabout is fair play.

Also: there was in fact a FISA request by the Obama Administration in June of 2016 and then in October of 2016, to monitor communications involving Donald Trump, not yet president-elect.

Former UN Ambassador John Bolton remarks to Fox’s Eric Shawn that James Comey should have been removed as FBI Director. I stated that myself back on February 17th: Trump should have ripped James Comey out of the FBI by his roots because Comey would do nothing but provide heartache. James Comey is a prevaricating hack whose opinions fluctuate with the prevailing political prairie winds. Let’s listen.

This is the same James Comey who didn’t wish to assist Sean Spicer in knocking down the Trump/Russia stories, but now wants the DOJ to bail his own ass out and dispute Trump’s claims of wiretapping. Comey wants what’s convenient for him when it’s convenient for him yet, when pressed with the job of simply moving a case over to the DOJ — with regard to the recommendation of an indictment for Hillary Clinton — Comey made a flawed, politically-based and self-serving decision. James Comey has no fidelity, no bravery, no integrity.

Who to replace the bereft-of-courage James Comey? Might I suggest John Bolton? Rudy Giuliani? Perhaps even Sheriff David Clarke? One does not have to be an attorney to be director. One must only have a keen managerial skill, fortitude and reverence for the law as opposed to naked politics.

Judge Andrew Napolitano reveals an important aspect of Obama’s presidential power.

“Because of the unique interpretation of a Ronald Reagan executive order, 13222, and because of the language in the USA Freedom Act, the successor to much of the FISA law, NSA now has the ability to capture in real time the digital copies of everybody’s phone calls. Everybody, cell and landline, everybody’s keystroke, mobile device and desktop.”

“All digital information going over fiber optics, into the US, out of the US or within the US. NSA works for the President. If the President asks for a transcribed copy of any of that, they’ll give it to him. As well, the FISA statute says in it, ‘not withstanding all of the rules above and below.’ The President of the United States can order surveillance on any person in the United States in conjunction with a certificate or a certification filed by the Attorney General.”

Napolitano admits that it’s legal but not constitutional from his point of view, describing it as “profoundly unconstitutional but it is legal because the statute says it. So think about this, if you’re Barack Obama and you have the ability by making a phone call to hear what Donald Trump is saying, are you going to bother with trying to get a warrant? Why would you get the warrant?”

National security expert Jim Hanson stated:

“The bottom line is, they did wiretap Trump Tower. They tapped a server they thought was communicating somehow with Russia. This is a legitimate charge and we need a serious investigation.”

Former Bush AG Mike Mukasey believes Trump is correct about the tapping, as does former NSA employee/whistleblower William Binney, who stated:

Asked whether he believes the NSA is tapping Trump, Binney replied: “Absolutely. How did they get the phone call between the president and the president of Australia? Or the one that he made with Mexico? Those are not targeted foreigners.”

Corey Lewandowski asserts the Obama administration wiretapped then-sitting Senator Jeff Sessions in 2016.

Please consider: how did anyone know the context of Michael Flynn’s phone calls from the Trump tower absent a wiretap? How did anyone know the context of President Trump’s phone calls to Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull absent a wiretap?


The shoe is now on the other foot with regard to the Demorats, Leftists, American Media Maggots and, more pointedly, on Barack Hussein Obama.

All of this is occurring predominantly because President Trump fundamentally threatens the sinecure of all the DC bureaucrats making bank on jobs that produce nothing but yield financial splendor and fiscal independence for life. Mel Brooks, from the film Blazing Saddles, sums it up best.

In the midst of an incredibly-serious election, to wiretap the communications of the leading Republican candidate for President of the United States?

Remember, Captain Kirk’s last words on film were: “Oh my.”



Who says the actors responsible for the wiretapping went through a FISA court anyway?


16 thoughts on “Source: Obama White House did have Trump campaign wiretapped

  1. Appears the tables are about to be turned on the former Obama regime. Watergate indeed, only larger in scope. And now we have Obama’s former AG calling for riots in the streets in order to protect their worthless Islamo/Marxist asses. Glad Gitmo is still open. The jail space may be needed for these traitors.

    • What a passel of America-hating power mongers — two clear racists working in concert to diminish the US, Obama and Lynch.


  2. of course Obama was wire tapping Trump. he was probably also wire tapping hisn own party members. and if any body thinks he would get a warrant to do this, we have lots of broken bridges to sell you. Obama signed legislation in the middle of the night without approval or informing anyone. He had a “pen and a phone” He no doubt phoned in an order for wire tapping. He didn’t need no stinkin warrant. He thought he was the emperor, but Now The Emperor Has No Clothes.

    • The emperor, Mary, also has Valerie Jarrett living in his house with his wife and children. This is the very definition of creepy and incestuous.


  3. Listening to the pundits today on this story, I was not willing to simply “wait for the results of an investigation” to form an opinion. The reason why, is because investigative agencies (like the FBI/CIA etc) and enforcement agencies like the DOJ are bloated with politically biased/ motivated leadership. Why would we want to “wait for the results of an investigation” when we have already been through this before with the FBI re Hillary’s Server. Or why would we want another Congressional Committee to intervene to get to get answers when it will result in people taking the 5th or lying before Congress which seems to be a regular response (Benghazi, IRS, E-mail scandal).

    The REAL scary problem is that political hacks like James Comey and countless other people in the intelligence/ investigative community are compromised political hack holdovers in from the Obama Administration with the resources at their disposal to destroy or exonerate a person in a near “god like” fashion. And destroying Trump was and IS job #1 for the leftist resistance hacks, leakers, players, hit-men in these institutions.

    Since we can’t simply prosecute someone based on an accusation alone (Trump’s tweets) and we can’t reveal national secrets that are classified as to how Trump likely figured out he was being listened in to, and the real scenario as to who was involved in the FISA warrant process won’t likely be revealed unless the warrant process and other security matters are declassified, I am only left with the solution that Trump will use this matter to start purging Obama holdovers from the ranks ASAP.

    Transition time is over. Obama and his minions aren’t going anywhere. Prosecute people you have evidence on, fire those you know are involved, and move on.

  4. You now want proof that it didn’t happen!!! This is getting as silly as believing the US is one of the highest taxed nations.

    Surely people have to take Trump tweet with a huge sack of salt…my crowd was bigger than your crowd etc etc….next he will be tweeting about the size of his penis…though perhaps not necessary seeing as he already announced that on national TV.

    • Hey, I’m doing nothing more than the American Media Maggots do. Go talk to them about their doctrine.

      In the meantime, where is the clear and obvious evidence that Russia hacked the elections and somehow managed to get Trump installed as president?

      Right. There isn’t any. There are simply statements.

      Gosharoo. Maybe you’re actually starting to see my point.


  5. One thing the Judge in the above video said makes this all the more confusing. If they got the warrant for the wiretap approved (the 2nd time around) it is also a criminal act by the person(s) leaking this info about the FISA warrant approval to the Trump Admin. and for Trump to reveal how he came to know that he had his “wires tapped” without being in violation of the law himself should he unwittingly reveal secret information. What a twisted web, and one I’m quite sure people on both sides are in think tank mode as to how to proceed.

  6. This is going to blow up in the Obama administration’s, the Democratic Party and the Main Sreet Media’s face and President Trump and We The People will win in the long run. Thank God this man is our President.

  7. The problem with all this “drivel” is two-fold: 1) Your main source of info seems to be that most honorable of trusted sources – WIKILEAKS 2) As with most Right Wingers you demonstrate the mental and emotional maturity of a preteen. These 2 things make ALL your points absolutely not believable. I therefor did what you did. I read about 1/5th of your article and deemed that was enuf to conclude that the remainder had to be more of the same garbage and therefor I concluded that it was all BS!

    • Apparently, “Bob,” (, got that from Wikileaks), you wouldn’t recognize a news source if it crashed into your place of employment at McDonald’s. Please tell me when Wikileaks has been wrong and provide attributions. You’ll note that I do in fact provide numerous attributions for what I write.

      It’s additionally sad that you fail to note said numerous attributions throughout the post and instead somehow concluded that Wikileaks was my primary source. Sir. Please thusly learn to read and then comprehend what you read.

      You fail to provide facts so, as you note in your comment above, you have nothing but base emotions. If you deem me preteen then I must only rightly conclude that you are infantile.

      Thanks for illustrating that Leftists have no facts and instead rely upon ad hominem attacks when they lack same.

      You’re a fine and stellar representation of your kind. Thanks for providing the example.


  8. Pingback: Sources: Obama went outside US to surveil Trump | Bloviating Zeppelin

Comments are closed.