First you thought your toaster was racist.
Now you discover your infant is racist. What to do?

From the UKDailyMail.com.

Is YOUR baby racist? Scientists find six-to nine-month-old infants demonstrate bias in favor of members of their own race and against others

by Stacy Libertore

• Two studies found 6- to 9-month-old infants showed racial-based bias
• Found babies associate same race faces with happy music and others with sad 
• Also are more inclined to take cues from adults of their race than other races
• Experts said this is because most babies are only exposed to their own race 

It has been believed that children developed race-based bias during their preschool years, but a new study has suggested it starts much earlier.

Following a series of studies, researchers have discovered that six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrated racial bias in favor of members of their own race and bias against those of other races.

The findings are said to be a result of the overwhelming exposure infants have to their own race, and experts have warned it is wise to introduce children to people from a variety of races before the issues deepen.

There are now classes entitled “Reversing Your Baby’s Racism.”

Let’s watch Tucker Carlson interview Dr Kang Lee of the University of Toronto.

Carlson does what I call the Logical Extension, particularly with regard to how Leftists and an overbearing government are going to address what they perceive to be a major issue such as this. Studies like these will be used to justify an entirely new paradigm in terms of infant racial identification, norming, mainstreaming, and requirements for parent(s)** to comply with same.

Continuing with the Logical Extension, I submit this will lead to what I term “stairstepping” insofar as, by a certain age, an infant of two months must be exposed to ______. An infant of six months must be exposed to ______. A one-year-old must be exposed to ______ and so on. Think: California’s SB 18.

Let me guess. Such immersion won’t be mandated on behalf of any parent(s) other than Caucasoids. Because, after all, no one but Caucasoids can be racists.

The only sure way to ensure compliance is to create an entirely new bureaucracy with its concomitant mandatory monitoring, verifiable documentation and subsequent submission with training check-off lists approved by government bureaucrats, requiring its own unique and extended national database. States cannot be trusted with this. It must be federal. It’s for the children, you see.

Trust me, oh trust me, the Leftists are rubbing their hands over this one. They can’t wait.

Clearly, my toilet must be racist, as well as my sink. What about the walls of my house?

Racist.

Hand me that sledgehammer.

It better not be white. Think of the implications.

BZ

** It would be racist, sexist and overall genderist/parentist of me to think that the raising of a child in anything other than a single-parent household is better or any way slightly more beneficial than that of aforementioned single parent.

I see the error of my ways.

Like a bad Michelin truck tire with no side sipes, I must be sent in for mental re-grooving.