Your infant is racist

First you thought your toaster was racist.
Now you discover your infant is racist. What to do?

From the UKDailyMail.com.

Is YOUR baby racist? Scientists find six-to nine-month-old infants demonstrate bias in favor of members of their own race and against others

by Stacy Libertore

  • Two studies found 6- to 9-month-old infants showed racial-based bias
  • Found babies associate same race faces with happy music and others with sad 
  • Also are more inclined to take cues from adults of their race than other races
  • Experts said this is because most babies are only exposed to their own race 

It has been believed that children developed race-based bias during their preschool years, but a new study has suggested it starts much earlier.

Following a series of studies, researchers have discovered that six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrated racial bias in favor of members of their own race and bias against those of other races.

The findings are said to be a result of the overwhelming exposure infants have to their own race, and experts have warned it is wise to introduce children to people from a variety of races before the issues deepen.

There are now classes entitled “Reversing Your Baby’s Racism.”

Let’s watch Tucker Carlson interview Dr Kang Lee of the University of Toronto.

Carlson does what I call the Logical Extension, particularly with regard to how Leftists and an overbearing government are going to address what they perceive to be a major issue such as this. Studies like these will be used to justify an entirely new paradigm in terms of infant racial identification, norming, mainstreaming, and requirements for parent(s)** to comply with same.

Continuing with the Logical Extension, I submit this will lead to what I term “stairstepping” insofar as, by a certain age, an infant of two months must be exposed to ______. An infant of six months must be exposed to ______. A one-year-old must be exposed to ______ and so on. Think: California’s SB 18.

Let me guess. Such immersion won’t be mandated on behalf of any parent(s) other than Caucasoids. Because, after all, no one but Caucasoids can be racists.

The only sure way to ensure compliance is to create an entirely new bureaucracy with its concomitant mandatory monitoring, verifiable documentation and subsequent submission with training check-off lists approved by government bureaucrats, requiring its own unique and extended national database. States cannot be trusted with this. It must be federal. It’s for the children, you see.

Trust me, oh trust me, the Leftists are rubbing their hands over this one. They can’t wait.

Clearly, my toilet must be racist, as well as my sink. What about the walls of my house?

Racist.

Hand me that sledgehammer.

It better not be white. Think of the implications.

BZ

** It would be racist, sexist and overall genderist/parentist of me to think that the raising of a child in anything other than a single-parent household is better or any way slightly more beneficial than that of aforementioned single parent.

I see the error of my ways.

Like a bad Michelin truck tire with no side sipes, I must be sent in for mental re-grooving.

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

8 thoughts on “Your infant is racist

  1. Disgusts me how people will call themselves scientists when they are really con artists. Much of ‘behavioral’ science is B.S. Worse, funding is diverted from real problems and people in real need. As a peace officer, how much of your efforts were spent dealing with the mentally ill?

  2. **sarcasm alert**

    I have a black car, I’m so confused now, please help me, BZ, I don’t know what to think anymore.

    **alert off**

    chuckling, this is only going to get worse, until the ruckus kicks off. As the current saying goes, we’re only one mag dump away from CW2. That’s over on WRSA, for any readers that haven’t seen it.

    I suppose I shouldn’t find it amusing, yet with all the social dysfunction that is about to boil over, having an off sense of humor is a strong point to hold on to, because the alternative is to be an ostrich, and that’s not how I think. FWIW.

      • Yes and yes, unfortunately, so the primary question is what will be the event or false flag that tip the scales and causes the ruckus that none of who comment here want, but are ready for. As best we can be.

  3. This is one of the most preposterous studies I have ever heard of. Someone is pulling some mighty thin strings of racism to even begin thinking along these lines; it also worries me that the author of the study actually received some level of recognition for it. Absurd to the nth degree, I say. Thank you, BZ, for bringing this to the front and making us aware it exists. This is the kind of crap Al $harpton, Je$$e Jack$on and their ilk feed upon.

  4. Interesting…My daughter who is now 34, at the age of 9 months to 2 years old the only men she would have anything to do with was her father, who is Polish and her uncle who is African American. Not only is he African American, he is very, very dark. She would back away from any other man who approached her. Meaning my brother, her grandfather….

Comments are closed.