Democrats: the original and continuing party of racism

Who were the original KKK members in the south?

Correct. Demorats.

Who voted against freeing the slaves during Lincoln’s presidency?

Correct. Demorats. Demorats voted against every single piece of civil rights legislation in Congress. Demorats voted against the 13th Amendment — except for four.

President Lyndon Baines Johnson is known to have said “I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for 200 years.” Snopes, a Leftist site, denies this, but a person very close to LBJ, Robert MacMillin — an Air Force One steward — said LBJ made the comment to two governors during a conversation regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Of this conversation there is no doubt.

And of this Hillary Clinton quote there is no doubt.

Why should we let Hillary Clinton, a white female Demorat, “get away” with saying that? Can you imagine had a white female Republican made the same statement?

Kevin at Kevin’s Corner replies:

And of this Don Lemon quote there is no doubt.

And of this Senator Joe Donnelly quote there is no doubt.

You wonder why there’s #WalkAway? You wonder why there’s #BLEXIT? You want a testimonial? Try this on for size.

You wonder why there’s #WalkAway? I think you can wonder no more.

If you remain unconvinced, let’s pull up some Bill Whittle for a 12-minute history refresher on the real Demorat Party.

To me it’s pretty clear which party has been historically and is currently the oppressor in both deeds and words. We need to VOTE RED ON TUESDAY.

We can keep the House, and we can keep the Senate. As my Civics teacher, Mr Helms, told me in high school: “Democrats don’t win elections. Republicans lose them.”

With that in mind — the power is in our hands, not those of the Demorats.

PLEASE: you need to mail in or physically present your absentee ballots, and ensure that you get to the polls, vote early, and VOTE RED NEXT TUESDAY the 6th.

BZ

 

Elbert Guillory talks about “white privilege”

Not what your Leftist friends expected from a black man.

Guillory talks about not only “privilege” but other aspects as well.

We ought to be ashamed of ourselves. We have let a few black and white people who want to divide us — who want to draw us apart — we’ve let them place the burden of slavery on every white person from the North, the South, the East, the West, male or female, old or young — people whose families have never owned slaves — never had anything to do with slavery. We have placed that yoke of slavery — that burden of slavery upon all of them. So much so that now just plain hardworking Americans feel a need to sometimes defend their whiteness.

This is America — free and filled with opportunity. That opportunity is available for each and every one of us.

Try it — American privilege!

Finally, let me state the unequivocal truth: Caucasoids are equally or “more offended” than those whose melanin counts are diametrically opposed to theirs.

Let that sink in for a microsecond or three.

BZ

 

Your infant is racist

First you thought your toaster was racist.
Now you discover your infant is racist. What to do?

From the UKDailyMail.com.

Is YOUR baby racist? Scientists find six-to nine-month-old infants demonstrate bias in favor of members of their own race and against others

by Stacy Libertore

  • Two studies found 6- to 9-month-old infants showed racial-based bias
  • Found babies associate same race faces with happy music and others with sad 
  • Also are more inclined to take cues from adults of their race than other races
  • Experts said this is because most babies are only exposed to their own race 

It has been believed that children developed race-based bias during their preschool years, but a new study has suggested it starts much earlier.

Following a series of studies, researchers have discovered that six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrated racial bias in favor of members of their own race and bias against those of other races.

The findings are said to be a result of the overwhelming exposure infants have to their own race, and experts have warned it is wise to introduce children to people from a variety of races before the issues deepen.

There are now classes entitled “Reversing Your Baby’s Racism.”

Let’s watch Tucker Carlson interview Dr Kang Lee of the University of Toronto.

Carlson does what I call the Logical Extension, particularly with regard to how Leftists and an overbearing government are going to address what they perceive to be a major issue such as this. Studies like these will be used to justify an entirely new paradigm in terms of infant racial identification, norming, mainstreaming, and requirements for parent(s)** to comply with same.

Continuing with the Logical Extension, I submit this will lead to what I term “stairstepping” insofar as, by a certain age, an infant of two months must be exposed to ______. An infant of six months must be exposed to ______. A one-year-old must be exposed to ______ and so on. Think: California’s SB 18.

Let me guess. Such immersion won’t be mandated on behalf of any parent(s) other than Caucasoids. Because, after all, no one but Caucasoids can be racists.

The only sure way to ensure compliance is to create an entirely new bureaucracy with its concomitant mandatory monitoring, verifiable documentation and subsequent submission with training check-off lists approved by government bureaucrats, requiring its own unique and extended national database. States cannot be trusted with this. It must be federal. It’s for the children, you see.

Trust me, oh trust me, the Leftists are rubbing their hands over this one. They can’t wait.

Clearly, my toilet must be racist, as well as my sink. What about the walls of my house?

Racist.

Hand me that sledgehammer.

It better not be white. Think of the implications.

BZ

** It would be racist, sexist and overall genderist/parentist of me to think that the raising of a child in anything other than a single-parent household is better or any way slightly more beneficial than that of aforementioned single parent.

I see the error of my ways.

Like a bad Michelin truck tire with no side sipes, I must be sent in for mental re-grooving.

 

“Put the American flag down”

Rush Limbaugh was correct.  He said: first the assault on the Confederate flag, next will be attacks on the American flag.

That mushroomed.  Not only attacks on the Confederate flag itself, but representations of the Confederate flag to include not only Alabama CDs (a country and western group as offensive as milk that had the flag on album covers) sold by Amazon — now not sold by Amazon — to movie critics calling for the removal of the film “Gone With The Wind.”

Rush Limbaugh was correct.

From Breitbart.com:

Farrakhan: I Don’t Get Debate Over Confederate Flag, ‘We Need to Put the American Flag Down’

by Ian Hanchett

Louis Farrakhan stated “We need to put the American flag down. Because we’ve caught as much hell under that as the Confederate flag” in remarks before the Metropolitan AME Church in Washington, DC on Wednesday first reported by DC’s WMAL.

Farrakhan said, “White folks march with you because they don’t want you upsetting the city, they don’t give a damn about them nine.”

He added that when the police took suspected shooter Dylann Roof to Burger King they were saying “You did a good job. Kill all them [bleep.]”

Keep pushing, American Media Maggots.  Keep refusing to cover incidents like Farrahkan’s racist remarks.  Keep refusing to cover Caucasoids killed by blacks and other minorities.

Mr Obama and his ilk, Leftists, aren’t uniters, they are dividers.  They profit, literally and figuratively, from division.  It keeps them in power and it keeps the issue on the table so that they may continue to profit politically and financially.

Bill O’Reilly lit up over the issue and rightly so.

“Who are we fighting today? It’s the people that carry the American flag.”
— Louis Farrakhan, Racist

BZ

 

Testing teachers for reading comprehension is RACIST

Jabba The Karen Lewis HuttCTU Karen “The Hutt” Lewis says: ‘Rich White People’ To Blame For Stupid Ghetto Kids.’ Take that, Caucasoids!

Stupid Melanin TeacherJust ask a federal judge in New York.

From the DailyCaller.com:

NY Teacher Exam Thrown Out For Being Discriminatory

by Blake Neff

A federal judge in New York has struck down a test used by New York City to vet potential teachers, finding the test of knowledge illegally discriminated against racial minorities due to their lower scores.

At first glance, the city’s second Liberal Arts and Science Test (LAST-2) seems fairly innocuous. Unlike the unfair literacy tests of Jim Crow, LAST-2 was given to every teaching candidate in New York, and it was simply a test to make sure that teachers had a basic high school-level understanding of both the liberal arts and the sciences.

One sample question from the test asked prospective educators to identify the mathematical principle of a linear relationship when given four examples; another asked them to read four passages from the Constitution and identify which illustrated checks and balances. Besides factual knowledge, the test also checks basic academic skills, such as reading comprehension and the ability to read basic charts and graphs.

 

And there you have it.  Testing hispanics and blacks for reading comprehension is now racist.  Being able to understand a chart or a graph is racist.

This is the point to which we, as a nation, have now devolved.

Leftists couldn’t be happier.

Leftist TeachersWe are in fact heading directly for the movie “Idiocracy.”

The next telling paragraph:

Nevertheless, this apparently neutral subject matter contained an insidious kernel of racism, because Hispanic and black applicants had a passage rate only 54 to 75 percent of the passage rate for whites.

Oh no, say not so!  Hispanics and blacks that cannot pass tests requiring logic and common sense?  We can’t have that!

Once their higher failure rate was established, the burden shifted to New York to prove that LAST-2 measured skills that were essential for teachers and therefore was justified in having a racially unequal outcome. While it might seem obvious that possessing basic subject knowledge is a key skill for a teacher, District Judge Kimba Wood said the state hadn’t met that burden.

Judge Kimba Wood, lets us not forget, was appointed.  She never had to take an — ahem — actual test.  She may not be much keen on “tests.”

And just when you thought things couldn’t be more stupid, well — things indeed get more stupid.  Literally.

LAST-2 hasn’t been used in New York since 2012, but the ruling will still have repercussions. Minorities who failed the exam (who number in the thousands) may be owed years of back pay totaling millions of dollars, and those who were relegated to substitute teaching jobs could be promoted to having their own classrooms. In addition, while Wood’s ruling only applies to New York City, the test was used statewide, and it could serve as a precedent for further lawsuits.

The ruling could also pave the way for another ruling finding New York’s current teacher test, the Academic Literacy Skills Test (ALST), to be discriminatory as well. That test is even harder than LAST-2, with a strong focus on literacy skills such as writing and reading comprehension, and like LAST-2 it has a very large gap in scores between whites and minorities. A lawsuit, once again being heard by Wood, is already pending, with the plaintiffs arguing that there is no clear evidence strong literacy skills are essential for a teacher.

So: isn’t that just perfect?  Those morons insufficiently intelligent to pass these tests could sue the state of New York in order to get their jobs and back wages.  How perfect!  How classically Leftist!

Because, after all, it is infinitely more important to have a ignorant person of melanin in the classroom than someone who is actually educated and possesses knowledge, is it not?

Because, after all, “there is no clear evidence strong literacy skills are essential for a teacher.”

BZ

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA