Obama on Syria: cowardice, indecision or a head-fake?

SyriaToday, we are not in Syria nor have we bombed.

I suspect because, primarily, the UK bowed out of this option.

Cameron’s nonbinding motion was defeated 285-272 and he conceded after the vote that “the British Parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action.”

So, is Mr Obama a coward, is it indecision or is it a head-fake?

BZ

 

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

7 thoughts on “Obama on Syria: cowardice, indecision or a head-fake?

  1. I like multiple choice. I pick a and b. IMO he is an indecisive coward. A very dangerous combination.

    Maybe this is how ovomit will get out of this. He’ll put it to congress, get no support and then can say, okay, it’s the will of the people not to intervene and I am a good and responsive leader who works for the people and i will abide by their decison…Oh wait. I’m the chosen one…screw the serfs. Tally ho on to war!

    • You bet it’s dangerous. And reflective of his lack of real world skills — skills that he should have acquired during his life and political past.

      But that’s right: he’s accomplished nothing, done nothing, built nothing, managed nothing, never run a business, never had to balance a ledger.

      BZ

Comments are closed.