The four stages of Islamic conquest

Compare them to what you see occurring in this nation, in your state, in your town and perhaps even in your own neighborhood.

Hiding and pushing in plain sight.

STAGE 1: INFILTRATION

Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.

  • First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
  • Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
  • Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
  • High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
  • Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
  • Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
  • Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
  • Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.

STAGE 2:   CONSOLIDATION OF POWER

Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation in employment, education, social services, financing and courts.

  • Proselytizing increases; Establishment and Recruitment of Jihadi cells.
  • Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population to Islam.
  • Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.
  • Efforts to destroy historic evidence that reveal true Islamism.
  • Increased anti-western propaganda and psychological warfare.
  • Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals (communists, anarchists).
  • Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint.
  • Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslims.
  • Efforts to introduce blasphemy and hate laws in order to silence critics.
  • Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and immigration.
  • Use of charities to recruit supporters and fund jihad.
  • Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of host society from within.
  • Development of Muslim political base in non-Muslim host society.
  • Islamic Financial networks fund political growth, acquisition of land.
  • Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.
  • Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes.
  • Greater demands to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
  • Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives in hidden locations.
  • Overt disregard/rejection of non-Muslim society’s legal system, culture.
  • Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions including and especially Jews and Christians.

STAGE 3: OPEN WAR w/ LEADERSHIP & CULTURE

Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions; rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.

  • Intentional efforts to undermine the host government & culture.
  • Acts of barbarity to intimidate citizens and foster fear and submission.
  • Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.
  • All opposition is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.
  • Mass execution of non-Muslims.
  • Widespread ethnic cleansing by Islamic militias.
  • Rejection and defiance of host society secular laws or culture.
  • Murder of “moderate” Muslim intellectuals who don’t support Islamization.
  • Destruction of churches, synagogues and other non-Muslim institutions.
  • Women are restricted further in accordance with Sharia law.
  • Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, bombings.
  • Toppling of government and usurpation of political power.
  • Imposition of Sharia law

STAGE 4: Totalitarian ISLAMIC “THEOCRACY”

Islam becomes the only religious-political-judicial-cultural ideology.

  • Sharia becomes the “law of the land.
  • All non-Islamic human rights cancelled.
  • Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population.
  • Freedom of speech and the press eradicated.
  • All religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed.
  • Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, populations and symbols in country (Buddhas, houses of worship, art, etc).

It should be noted that, most recently, on the heels of Keith Ellison (Minnesota Representative for the 5th District, Deputy DNC Chair and has ties to CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood) and Andre Carson (Indiana Representative for the 7th District), two more Muslims are running for Congress and Governor respectively.

Nadeem Mazen, 34, is running for the Congressional 3rd District seat in Massachusetts behind Jetpac, a political action committee aimed at getting more Muslims elected into offices around the US. Mazen is a founding director of the Massachusetts chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations, a Hamas front group blacklisted by the FBI because of its terrorist connections.

Dr Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed will be running for governor of Michigan in 2018. Sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood, it is understood that George Soros is eyeing El-Sayed for future funding as a presidential candidate. Al Jazeera is rooting for El-Sayed as is the loving Linda Sarsour, and Muslim Brotherhood linked organizations such as CAIR, ISNA, NAIT, ICNA, MSA and MAS.

Finally: what if — what if — Paddock acted on behalf of ISIS or a Muslim-aligned group?

BZ

 

The truth about Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison, up for DNC chair

keith-ellison-muslim-influence(And no, ignorant Leftists, the “Rep.” does not stand for “Republican.” Just a hint from me to you.)

Conservatives have been screamed at, goaded, scolded, taunted and physically assaulted by Leftists because we are the racists, Islamophobes, fill-in the ___-ist.

Now, up for DNC Chair is Representative Keith Ellison of Minnesota (5th District), who was sworn in on the Koran. A black Muslim, you see. The proverbial Demorat “best of both worlds.”

keith-ellison-sworn-in-on-koranProving — just as the donks re-established Nancy Pelosi as leader in the House — that Demorats are doubling-down on insane. You know that definition by heart.

Good for the GOP so to speak, bad for the Demorats, who fail to see that both things are very poor ideas. For one, Kevin Jackson reveals on Fox:

Interesting. This is the man the Dems seek as DNC head, an ethnocentric racist who wants to establish a separate country just for blacks.

After all, what doesn’t soothe the savage breast of a good Leftist other than calling someone a racist, illustrated below.

I say: keep it up, Demorats, please keep it up.

We need to continue seeing the massively divisive and truly racist underbelly of Leftists and Demorats exposed.

Additionally, we know nothing satisfies Leftists more than supporting entirely daft memes for entirely daft reasons, as the Caucasoid female CNN host says below, in response to the black Somali Muslim who attacked students at OSU this week. Yes, we must show support for ISIS and all Muslims who commended the now-dead suspect for his actions.

  • Male host: “I think self-defense training is good for everybody.” Translated: you need to be free to protect yourself.
  • Female host: “I know, you’re a big proponent of that.” Translated (and stated with dripping condescension): you oppressive male thug, resorting to violence as per normal.

These GOWPs are entirely — and I submit purposely — unaware of the meaning of the Muslim hijab as worn by women in the Islamic world. It is a means of exhibiting the dominance of men over women in the Muslim culture.

  • Q 24:31 – Women must cover themselves and be seen only by their husbands, father, relatives, eunuchs, slaves, and children who have not yet had sex with women.
  • Q 2:222 – Menstruating women are unclean and men must stay away from them.
  • Q 4:11, 2:282, 2:228 – A woman is worth one-half of a man and men are above women.
  • Q 4:34 – Men are above women and have authority over them, yet women must obey men or risk being beaten.

Ad nauseum. Doubt me? Read the Koran.

You bet. Make Rep Keith Ellison DNC chair.

I can’t wait.

BZ

 

CAIR: Idaho is racist

Islam Koran 1CAIR objects to a new bill proposed in the state of Idaho.  It intimates that the entire state is racist because of the nature of the bill.

What does the bill do?

It would prohibit Sharia Law in the state of Idaho.

From the Idaho Spokesman.com:

North Idaho lawmaker’s first bill targets Sharia law

by Betsy Z. Russell

BOISE – Rep. Eric Redman, R-Post Falls, introduced his first bill on Wednesday: a measure seeking to ban recognition of Sharia, or Islamic, law in Idaho courts.

Redman distributed stacks of handouts to the Idaho House Ways and Means Committee, including a photo of a severed hand and printouts from websites critical of Islam. The committee voted 4-3 along party lines to introduce the bill.

The bill follows model legislation developed by the American Public Policy Alliance, a nonprofit that warns of foreign laws infiltrating the U.S. court system and has gotten similar laws passed in several states. A 2010 Oklahoma constitutional amendment forbidding that state’s courts from considering Sharia law in decisions was overturned in federal court in 2013.

But wait, CAIR and some legislators are saying.  There are no Muslim enclaves yet in the United States.  That is preposterous thinking.  Hamtramck and Dearborn simply don’t exist.

House Minority Leader John Rusche, D-Lewiston, voted against the bill saying, “There is no issue right now, there is no issue. And to bring this piece of legislation and the supporting documents that showed severed hands and called the Prophet Mohammed a pedophile was just beyond the pale.”

Except that, Rusche, severed hands are the result of Sharia Law in the Middle East, and Mohammad was in fact a pedophile.

Again, GOWPs who don’t know history and don’t know the Koran and are ignorant of how Islam is practiced.  Not how people wish it to be — but how it is practiced.  Islam is as Islam does.

Obama already wants to increase the current number of 10,000 Syrian refugees to over 100,000 by 2017, plus the number of refugees from 2015 and 2016.

These Syrian refugees, containing ISIS personnel we cannot reliably screen out — per FBI Director James Comey — are not Buddhists or pacifists or Shinto.  They are Muslims.

Point one: Islam isn’t a race.
Point two: Islam is a barbaric culture — it’s much more than simply a religion — that utilizes Sharia Law to oppress people, primarily women.  Check Robert Spencer’s site here.  Advocates of Sharia Law say it should naturally trump American law on every level.  That cannot and should never be.

Even Pakistan grapples with the issue, accusing Imams of squandering their moral authority on the suppression of people instead of fatwas for healthy children and charity.  Instead, in support of Sharia Law, Islamic clerics are in support of everything socially or economically regressive and backward.

Irfan Husain of Dawn in Pakistan writes that in about every Muslim majority nation clerics “focus on the subjugation of women” and outlawing chess, yoga and laws that uphold child marriage, inability for women to divorce, all under Sharia.

Husain indicates whereas “liberals love to say Islam is a religion of peace that is being hijacked by terrorists, in reality, the faith has been hijacked by the clergy.”

Again: Islam is as Islam does.

CAIR lacks any form of veracity or authority in any event, as it is an Islamic Supremacist group which is listed by the UAE in its terror manifest, was actually created by the Muslim Brotherhood, receives financial support from foreign powers who have also provided direct support to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda and Hamas — and the FBI has charted direct links between CAIR and Hamas.

Yes, America can be noble.

But it can’t afford to be ignorant and stupid in the face of a movement that thinks not just in terms of days or years, but decades and centuries.

BZ

 

This is with whom Obama negotiates

Khamenei Tweet About ObamaYes, the persons who continue to advocate “death to America” and, now, send Twitter messages about Obama committing suicide.

Is this not absolute insanity unbridled?  Why do we negotiate with the mentally unbalanced, those persons who have not and will not hold to treaties and agreements?

With this issue and that of Planned Parenthood, I become more convinced that I am inhabiting some sort of alternate reality from my worst nightmares.

Then I wake up and read the news for another day.

BZ

P.S.

Blogging intermittent due to issues with forest fires in my area; see my prior posts for Saturday and Sunday.

Obama: mixed up and muddled

And that quote is from his supporters regarding Iranian negotiations.

Imagine what his detractors are saying.  Like myself and others.

This president is having his house fall all about his shoulders, but few are noticing AMM-American-Media-Maggots-2because his water-carriers, the American Media Maggots, are shielding him continuously like the good lap doggies they promised to be at the outset.  GOWPs and the AMM, have shielded and protected Obama to the point where their credulity is now mostly lost.

Marie Harf Glittering JewelEven Marie Harf, the Department of State Flack, has to “explain” what Obaka really meant.  From CNSNews.com:

State Dep’t Clarifies Obama’s ‘Muddled’ Words on Iran Nuclear Breakout Time

by Patrick Goodenough

(CNSNews.com) – President Obama appeared to concede this week that under a final nuclear deal, Iran — after 13 or so years — would be able to build a nuclear bomb quickly if it chooses to do so. But State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf insisted later that the words had been misread.

Of course.  The words have been “misread.”

Harf told a daily briefing that Obama’s words “were a little mixed up” and “a little muddled,” saying they had referred to a hypothetical state of affairs in which an agreement had not been reached, rather than the situation as it will be in 13 years’ time under a negotiated agreement.

This is Marie Harf, the most ignorant glassesed bint on a current elevated government pedestal, quoting Barack Hussein Obama as “a little mixed up” and “a little muddled”?  And this is support?

Marie Harf did her level best to “walk back” Obama’s statements.  Please click the link.

Further, from Algemeiner.com:

“Open confusion” reigned today at the State Department after spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to withdraw a quote from President Barack Obama regarding Iran’s nuclear breakout time, advocacy group The Israel Project said.

In the interview with NPR’s Steve Inskeep, the President acknowledged that, after year 13, the current deal being worked out with Iran would not provide the international community with the promised 1-year warning should Iran decide to violate the deal and go for a nuclear weapon.

Details details details.  And on whom do these details fall?  Who wins, who loses?

Check out this article written by Henry Kissinger and George Shultz at WSJ.com.

NewsMax.com provides the article as an alternate, because the WSJ mandates a subscription and I won’t pay for internet sources.  I may provide dead links to you, but never at my own choosing.  And if I find dead links, I do my best to provide alternatives.  As I do now:

Kissinger, Shultz: Iran Deal Likely to Deepen US Involvement

The recently announced framework agreement on Iran’s nuclear program is more likely to increase American involvement in the Middle East rather than decrease it, former Republican Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George P. Shultz write in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

In the 2,000-word piece posted on the Journal’s website on Tuesday night, Kissinger and Shultz wrote that “Rather than enabling American disengagement from the Middle East, the nuclear framework is more likely to necessitate deepening involvement there — on complex new terms.”

Meaning: in over six years, there is still no one sitting at the Adult’s Table in the Obama Administration.

Since the number of Iran’s centrifuges have jumped from 100 at the start of talks 12 years ago to almost 20,000 today, “The threat of war now constrains the West more than Iran,” the former secretaries wrote. “While Iran treated the mere fact of its willingness to negotiate as a concession, the West has felt compelled to break every deadlock with a new proposal.”

Now, Iran’s program is within two to three months of building a nuclear weapon.

“In a large country with multiple facilities and ample experience in nuclear concealment, violations will be inherently difficult to detect,” they said. “Devising theoretical models of inspection is one thing. Enforcing compliance, week after week, despite competing international crises and domestic distractions, is another.”

Damn them for daring to speak and write the truth.  As Caucasoids, Kissinger and Schultz must be racists, not senior analysts.

Now, Iran’s program is within two to three months of building a nuclear weapon.

“In a large country with multiple facilities and ample experience in nuclear concealment, violations will be inherently difficult to detect,” they said. “Devising theoretical models of inspection is one thing. Enforcing compliance, week after week, despite competing international crises and domestic distractions, is another.”

And Iran has been completely forthcoming with current and past IAEA demands?  Allowed inspectors in?

Uh.  No.  Not even remotely.

Past behavior is the best predictor of future performance or the lack thereof.

A wonderful “out”:

Another wrench thrown into the gears is the means of enforcement, “which provides Iran permanent relief from sanctions in exchange for temporary restraints on Iranian conduct,” Kissinger and Shultz said.

Further:

Kissinger and Shultz also attack the idea of a nuclear umbrella provided to Iran’s Arab neighbors by the United States.

“Are the guarantees extended against the use of nuclear weapons — or against any military attack, conventional or nuclear? Is it the domination by Iran that we oppose or the method for achieving it?” they say. “What if nuclear weapons are employed as psychological blackmail?”

The central argument and paragraph:

“If the world is to be spared even worse turmoil, the U.S. must develop a strategic doctrine for the region,” they argue. “Stability requires an active American role. For Iran to be a valuable member of the international community, the prerequisite is that it accepts restraint on its ability to destabilize the Middle East and challenge the broader international order.”

Let’s be frank: Barack Hussein Obama couldn’t negotiate himself or his loved ones out of a paper bag.

What makes anyone think BHO could make any cogent negotiation?

BZ