The BLM false narrative of Keith Lamont Scott

charlotte-nc-shooting-gun-of-klsKeith Lamont Scott had a gun, was familiar with it, had prior gun charges. Why do we attribute three full names to mass murderers or killers? John Wayne Gacy? Mark David Chapman?

I wrote originally in this post, “false memes, lies and riots in Charlotte,” about the entire BLM “movement” being founded but upon a bitter lie — that is to say, “hands up, don’t shoot” with regard to Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. That never happened.

The lie currently being foisted upon the public by the American Media Maggots and the self-interested Leftists involved, in Charlotte, is that Keith Lamont Scott was a completely unarmed man who possessed naught but a book.

That too is incorrect.

In the released videos, why is Lamont’s wife, Rakeyia, yelling to him, “Keith, don’t do it” numerous times, and why are the police officers yelling at him, many times, “drop the gun”?

What was Keith not supposed to do? I suspect his wife was telling him not to reach for the firearm she knew was in the automobile; not to grab it.

Why?

Twitchy.com writes:

It appears the wife of Keith Lamont Scott recently filed a restraining order against him and specifically said he was a threat to law enforcement because he carried a 9MM pistol.

From Time Warner Cable New Charlotte reporter Jenna Barnes:

charlotte-nc-restraining-order-gunScott possessed a handgun at the time his wife, Rakeyia Scott, filed the above restraining order on October 3rd of 2015. Immured in print.

charlotte-nc-shooting-handgun-condition-oneThe photograph above, provided by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, shows quite a number of vitally important things to those who know something about firearms — which would not include today’s PlaySkool T-ball journalistas, Demorats, Leftists and Progressives.

They are absolutely critical elements, to include 1) The single action Colt semi-auto is in what instructors call Condition One. That is to say, ready to fire. 2) The handgun’s hammer is back but more importantly, 3) The thumb safety is off, making the handgun more dangerous and prepared to fire, even exceeding Condition One. To me, the pistol appears to be an older Colt Mustang in .380 ACP.

This handgun can kill a law enforcement officer just as dead as one chambered in 9mm. The .380 round is nothing more than 9mm kurz.

Why do you see it here?

Because I AM PUSHBACK

The antidote to the American Media Maggots.

BZ

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

10 thoughts on “The BLM false narrative of Keith Lamont Scott

  1. I have said it before and will say it again…why the hell do we not take back the media. Imagine a media that calls out our enemies…calls out obama and hiLIARy when they lie, calls out BLM and the IRS and the other BLM (Bureau of Land Mgmt), and every evil entity that seeks to undermine America. Our jobs of reversing the liberal progressive commie damage would be hundreds of times easier.

    Surely our rich conservative friends could afford to buy out certain institutions of this failing industry and turn them around to not only tell the truth, but once again make a profit. Am I wrong.

    Or maybe that is why the left is winning. They are willing to invest in a media that is failing and outdated for the intangible benefit of controlling the masses…whereas the right seeks only profits. Otherwise, why wouldn’t the right buy these companies en masse.

    The road back to what America used to be requires an unbiased media that keeps both the right and the left honest. But with a media not only working against the right stretching the falsehoods alleged against them, but covering for their friends on the left, how could the not be successful?

    How much credence would the people lend to the mass hysteria that is BLM is the news outlets had headline news of the truth, backed up with proof and photos? Hands up, don’t shoot (or is it “Pants Up, Don’t Loot) would have been proven a lie and shut down before it became a thing. The reason those on the left have any credibility is because the media tells We The People over and over again that they are credible. And the reason so many ignorant voters are against the right is because the media tells them to do so.

    So why is the insanely massive opinion making machine called the media allowed to have full control by the left. Fox news cannot do it all by itself. It needs backup. When will the right take back the media? Cause if they do, the rest will be a cakewalk in comparison to what we are fighting now. Not to mention, who doesn’t want to see a mile long line of liberal news reporters in the welfare line, unable to find work anywhere. That alone is worth something…isn’t it?

    • I’m quite uncertain as to how to “take it back.” It’s clear the AMM is at its lowest point in terms of trustworthiness — the American public already thinks so. Newspapers are becoming unsustainable and Millennials & Gen Z’rs, not used to paying for things on the internet, are NOT scrambling to subscribe to news materials.

      BZ

  2. Agree on the header, nicely done! Re the MSM, they are all about negative/sensational stories. They are hardwired to the “if it bleeds, it leads” mantra, and anything that can spice it up, they’re going that way. Sadly, today’s young people don’t CARE as they are inured to the violence, and 30 second sound bites…

    • Yes, true. But any sense of perspective or honesty is mostly gone in the media. They’re not just fighting to keep jobs, they’re fighting to keep the lights on.

      BZ

  3. Let me get this straight, what we have here is a convicted felon with a stolen handgun who was about to shoot a LEO and received his dirt nap for trying to do so………….and the pavement apes riot? hmmmmmm.

  4. I expect most of the rioters already have a lengthy rap sheet.
    Getting paid for their appearance is the only way to make money as a hood rat.
    I was hoping that a dozen or so were killed by the police.

Comments are closed.