Ah yes, more Hillary voter fraud in Nevada (What is it with Nevada anyway?):
You, of course, already watched Part I yesterday; click here to see it.
After embedding this video, I wondered: just what would you get in Google if you searched “Hillary voter fraud”?
Being Google and all, and being extra superior about its auto-filling logarithms, I immediately noticed that Google absolutely did not “auto-fill” as I typed on the keyboard. You had to type the complete phrase “Hillary voter fraud” into the field and, even with that, there was nothing provided below until you hit the ENTER key.
Try it.
Hmmm, I thought, I wonder what other search engines might be yielding?
So I tried Bing.com. Which, oddly enough, I’ve never tried before. This time, at the point I got to “Hillary voter” this is what appeared below:
-
hillary voter fraud
-
hillary voter fraud exposed
-
hillary voters meme
-
hillary voter registration
-
hillary voters stupid
-
hillary voters are suckers
-
hillary voters
-
hillary voter suppression
How odd, I thought. “Hillary voter fraud” came up immediately and was at the top of the list. My guess: this is precisely what most persons are searching for when they begin typing that phrase.
But wait, I thought. There are other search engines. I wonder what Yahoo.com would show? I wrote “Hillary voter” in the field and this is what I received:
- hillary voter fraud
- hillary voters grave markers
- hillary voters
- hillary voter suppression
- hillary voter cartoon
- hillary voter registration
- hillary voter stumped
- hillary voter turnout
- hillary voter fraud cartoon
- hillary voter fraud lawsuit
Once again, “Hillary voter fraud” came out on top. A real chin-scratcher, that. But what the hell, let’s try it one more time. I lastly went to Ask.com using the same methods. It came up with:
- hillary voter fraud
- hillary voter fraud exposed
- hillary voters meme
- hillary voter registration
- hillary voters stupid
- hillary voters are suckers
- hillary voters
- hillary voter fraud iowa
I suspected I was starting to see a pattern. It made me wonder: do you think that Google would in any way purposely jiggle its search engine AlGoreIthms with regard to Hillary Clinton or the Democrats or Leftists or voter fraud identification/information on behalf of the Democrats?
Would Larry Page or Sergei Brin or Alphabet or Eric Schmidt or Ruth Porat actually lean left on as serious an issue as this? As in, purposely skewing or hiding results that became immediately obvious on other search engines?
Nah.
BZ
P.S.
Above, please note Barack Hussein Obama meeting personally and intimately with Silicon Valley tech leaders on February 17, 2011, to include Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Google CEO Eric Schmidt (far Left, imagine that) and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.
Tried this on DuckDuckGo. Same thing happened. What a surprise! Got to stop being lazy and stop supporting Google. Time to use a site that doesn’t track its users.
If Trump supporters were caught doing these things the media would rain such fire and brimstone down on him that Sodom and Gomorrah would look like mere fireworks in comparison. It would engender non stop vitriol and no doubt calls for all sorts of investigations.
Yet Clinton’s minions get away with nefariousness once again. I suspect unless she drops dead in her tracks (I have a dream..) nothing will change… I only hope that all those polls where she is leading Trump are not really indicative of what the country believes.
Now: combine that with the US’s willingness to give up control of the internet via ICANN. And who should swoop in for the Globalist Good Of All?
Why, the UN of course.
BZ
P.S.
Abigal: here’s what polls can’t track. Those who are going to vote for Trump but would never tell anyone.
This is upsetting to say the least. They accuse us of wrongdoing, yet never provide proof. They accuse us of violence, but again, no proof. When there is violence, a democrat is always the cause. They say that voter fraud is a myth, but here it is.
Cops set up traps for drug sales and prostitution stings…why not for crap like this. I mean, what is the worst to happen when a guy pays to get laid or get high? It’s really not that big of a deal. But rigged elections destroys a country. Send cops out undercover for this nonsense. After all, these are felonies. Cops set up traps for misdemeanors, and think they are doing good. So why not for this?
Anyway, people doing this crap is one thing, but attorneys…well that’s a whole other issue. I am a retired cop and an attorney. Nothing rubs me the wrong way worse than seeing crooked cops or corrupt attorneys. Attorneys are not supposed to tell clients or others to break the law. And they certainly are now allowed to tell others how to get away with breaking the law. (as in “hide those”).
I filed a BAR complaint against Ms. Gupana. I wonder if it will do any good? Depends on if a liberal employee at the BAR receives the complaint. What I suggest we all could do to send a message to Ms. Gupana, is for everyone who reads this to file the same complaint. They may be able to ignore one complaint. But if they get dozens, or hundreds, or more, well, they may just have to investigate.
Here is the link to file the complaint. It even has a link to file online, instead of mail or fax.
https://www.nvbar.org/member-services-3895/ethics-discipline/complaint/
And here is a link to the video by itself, separate from this article, that you can refer to in your complaint.
If enough people complain, then maybe Ms. Gupana will get a strongly worded letter telling her she’s a bad girl. Or…maybe more.
Excellent idea. Readers: be so inclined.
BZ
Very interesting… And almost grudging when you DO finish it and do the search.
Yes NFO, it’s not much interested in revealing anything to you about the topic.
BZ