Live and direct from the pederastic mouths of ISIS.

From Trendolizer.com:

Report: ISIS leader encourages pedophilia

Tells jihadists to “enjoy young boys in the absence of women”

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Caliph Ibrahim of the Islamic State, reportedly tweeted that it is permissible for jihadists “to enjoy young boys in the absence of women,” another shocking insight into the warped beliefs of ISIS.

Let me provide you with a tad bit of insight into the Middle East, with regard to our soldiers who serve there.  They rapidly discover the ME philosophy for Muslim men is this: 1) women are for procreation, and 2) boys are for pleasure.

You know, that nasty little hypocritical thingie where ISIS members kill people who do the same thing.  Or much less.

ISIS doesn’t mind doing this to a little girl.  And pederasty with boys can’t be worse.

According to Jihad Watch, the translation of the Arabic reads, “It is permissible for the mujahid [jihadi] to enjoy young boys in the absence of women.”

The message is justified with reference to Koran 52:24, which states, “There will circulate among them [servant] boys [especially] for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.”

Verses 76:19 also read, “There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them [as beautiful as] scattered pearls.”

But wait.  It gets even better:

A manual released by the publishing house of the Islamic State last year also includes graphic instructions on how to beat and sexually molest female slaves, including underage girls.

“It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn’t reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse,” the guide states.

As Jamie Dettmer explains, ISIS also relies on techniques used by pedophiles to groom underage prey when recruiting young westerners.

Somehow that seems fitting, does it not?  Islam working hand-in-hand with NAMBLA?

And yes, even in 2015, Islam has slaves.  Hear of it?  Of course not.  That would be, well, “anti-Islam” — and we certainly can’t have that in any Western culture, can we?  Not when GOWPs rule the roost.

So when you hear or read of someone referring to — in a less-than-cheerful or perhaps even a pejorative manner as delineated above — now you have a bit of background.  Yes.  Some of them are.  Now comes the official condonation.

Ah, Islam.  Isn’t it a truly wonderful religion of peace, understanding and tolerance?

BZ