Good Will?

President Bush has made another mistake, and it is a matter of timing. He has decided to tour Southern American countries at this point in our history, on something of a “goodwill” tour and is, of course, receiving miniscule amounts of actual good will.

Gringo go home, eh?

Anyone else reading this blog about completely fed up with this shit besides myself?

First: fed up with Bush even putting himself and our nation in this position.

Second: for the countries that so readily sup at the cup of the American Taxpayers blood, sweat and labors and then, at the same moment, excoriate and gnaw the hand that feeds them?

Gringo go home, eh?

How about illegal MEXICANS and EL SALVADORANS and VENEZUELANS and URUGUAYANS “go home” and stay the fuck in your OWN country and assume, for once, an actual principled stance: REFUSE to take those horrible proffered American dollars.

But no — your countries and your peoples want it both ways: to suck dollars from the tits of the American Bitch and to slap her whilst she delivers breast milk to you and your children.

And then we, in the form of our very own President, turn the other cheek and, in essence, say: “thank you sir, may I have another fist to my face?”

To President Bush: you too can stay the fuck at home and take care of our domestic agenda, our terrorist agenda, and firm up our borders.

“Firm up our borders?” Bush asks with a pronounced laugh. “The Minutemen are vigilantes.”

Why do you so bend over for Mexico and Latin America, President Bush? Are you so in need of a good ass-fucking? Because it is surely what you are inviting and receiving publicly for this country. You refuse to even call Chavez what he is: a tinpot dictator who has found a temporary place in time.

I have pretty much lost all faith in you sir. I almost cannot wait for you to vacate the White House. You shame my country. And I am ashamed for you. You fight for some things and then completely and totally abandon our country on other fronts and, moreover, do your best to ensure that our sovereignty is damaged and threatened.

I cannot understand you. I cannot understand your motives. You are strong in one area and so incredibly weak in others. You make no sense.

And I am sick and tired of America being pushed against the wall and ass-fucked by countries not fit to shine their own shoes.

BZ

300

In 480 BC the forces of the Persian Empire under King Xerses, numbering according to Herodotus two million men, bridged the Hellespont and marched in their myriads to invade and enslave Greece.

In a desperate delaying action, a picked force of three hundred Spartans was dispatched to the pass of Thermopylae, where the confines between mountains and sea were so narrow that the Persian multitudes and their cavalry would be at least partially neutralized. Here, it was hoped, an elite force willing to sacrifice their lives could keep back, at least for a few days, the invading millions.

Three hundred Spartans and their allies held off the invaders for seven days, until, their weapons smashed and broken from the slaughter, they fought “with bare hands and teeth” (as recorded by Herodotus) before being at last overwhelmed.

The Spartans and their Thespian allies died to the last man, but the standard of valor they set by their sacrifice inspired the Greeks to rally and, in that fall and spring, defeat the Persians at Salamis and Plataea and preserve the beginnings of Western democracy and freedom from perishing in the cradle.

Two memorials remain today at Thermopylae. Upon the modern one, called the Leonidas Monument in honor of the Spartan king who fell there, is engraved his response to Xerses’ demand that the Spartans lay down their arms. Leonidas’ reply was two words:

“Come and get them.”

I have returned from viewing one of the finest movies from Hollywood in some time. Yes, some liberties were taken to make the film visually more dramatic; yes, the movie minimizes or completely dismisses the true number of warriors firming up the pass at Thermopylae (actually numbering, it is estimated, at 5,200) accompanying the 300 Spartans. And yes, much to the chagrin of the New York Times, it becomes a matter of lighter-skinned warriors (Greeks and their variants) vs. darker skinned warriors (Persians). Mr. Scott, in his review, completely dismisses 300 as an excursion into violence and stupidity. His review reveals himself to be likewise ignorant of core values such as loyalty, honor and courage. In times like these the film stands accused of improperly emphasizing the maleness of its characters, and there is much testosterone on the screen. I’ll get back to this in a moment.

Inspiration for the film comes from the Frank Miller/Lynn Varley graphic novel of the same name: 300. Frank Miller, a minimalist artist who once worked for Marvel Comics and was responsible for taking the character Daredevil to his most lofty heights, has also drawn a number of comics for DC, Dark Horse and produced many of his own graphic novels to include the infamous, corrupt and groundbreaking Sin City. Miller is known for the stark and sometimes harsh noir-like lighting of his work — as well as its unabashed violence (excellent all-encompassing Miller website here).

Midpoint through the film I began to think: this is nothing more than an allegory for our times now. Here is a king, Leonidas, who decides to do what he must to save his country and, in making this decision, goes against an edict from the Oracle and therefore stands against the law. He takes a small group of 300 true warriors, inspired by his leadership, buttressed by some allies, and decides to make a strategic stand in the best possible place extant utilizing tactics born and bred of the best Spartan traditions.

King Leonides is betrayed on two fronts: first by Ephialtes, a misshapen Greek who is told he must stand completely erect with his shield firmly in place in order to not provide the proverbial weak link in a necessarily-strong chain (and who subsequently reveals to King Xerxes the “back door” to the Spartan stand), and at home by Theron, a politician who rapes and then betrays Leonidas’ wife (and Queen) Gorgo. A Spartan woman to the core, Gorgo runs a sword through Theron in the Sparta assembly where it is revealed, through clattering gold Persian coins displaying the profile of Xerxes, that Theron is indeed a traitor. And Ephialtes learns that where once he could have stood, he now must kneel.

Love, honor, courage, loyalty, strength, manliness, resolution, capacitance, bravery — this film embodies all those traits and more. It indicates that a motivated few can stop or stay an irresolute many.

And at a time when we need these traits to be emphasized, to have the gray removed from our perspective, 300 manages to do this and more. My audience sucked in their breath at the violence, leaned forward in its anticipation, cheered at the victories and clapped at the end.

And whilst the staid and unknowing of Sparta discussed and debated, the warriors of its culture willingly laid down their lives in sacrifice.

Although extraordinary valor was displayed by the entire corps of Spartans and Thespians, yet bravest of all was declared the Spartan Dienekes. It is said that on the eve of battle, he was told by a native of Trachis that the Persian archers were so numerous that, when they fired their volleys, the mass of arrows blocked out the sun. Dienekes, however, quite undaunted by this prospect, remarked with a laugh, “Good, then we’ll have our battle in the shade.”

— Herodutus, The Histories

Make no mistake, the movie is remarkably violent and bloody. Much of its action is Sam Peckinpah-ishly slow in motion. But it is an absolute feast for the eyes on every level, visually, audibly. And it teaches a very important lesson:

The second monument, the ancient one, is an unadorned stone engraved with the words of the poet Simonides. Its verses comprise perhaps the most famous of the warrior epitaphs:

Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by,
that here obedient to their laws we lie.

You must see this film.
BZ

Can Today’s Muslim Be A Good American?

I received an e-mail recently that postulated: can today’s Muslim be a Good American?

That got me to thinking: is this possible?

The e-mail sender proffered:

________________

Theologicallyno. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia.

Religiouslyno. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)

Scripturallyno. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran).

Geographicallyno. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Sociallyno. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politicallyno. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domesticallyno. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).

Intellectuallyno. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophicallyno. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic

Spirituallyno. Because when we declare “one nation under God,” the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran’s 99 excellent names.

Therefore after much study and deliberation — perhaps we should be suspicious of all Muslims in this country.

They clearly cannot be both “good” Muslims and “good” Americans. There are too many fundamental conflicts.

____________________

Is this true?

BZ

At The Bar

My ISP lines have been been up and down until now, hence my dearth of posts. Now I am up and rollicking at my normally-astounding and blazing 48.2 to 53 Kbps, via a common black phone jack. God bless dial-up (for that’s all we have in the Sierra Nevada mountains)!
BZ

Greatest Bass Players


About a year ago I postulated the best drummer was Ginger Baker. Many disagreed and proclaimed Neil Peart to be the best drummer of all. I claim now the temerity to list the best bass players extant (electric bass, that is):

1. Les Claypool (Primus)
2. Jack Bruce (Cream)
3. Felix Pappalardi (Mountain)
4. Chris Squire (Yes)
5. Geddy Lee (Rush)
6. Jaco Pastorius (Weather Report)
7. Bill Laswell (Material)
8. Sir Paul McCartney (The Beatles)
9. Jonas Hellborg (jazz)
10. Stanley Clarke (jazz)
11. Percy Jones (Brand X)
12. Leland Sklar (The Section
13. John Wetton (King Crimson)
14. Geezer Butler (Black Sabbath)
15. Jack Casady (Hot Tuna)

These are in no particular order, by the way, except position #1. Your thoughts?

BZ