Bisexuals in college need food

Figure 1: Bisexual female withering away in a college dorm, physically located in a room that is tens of feet too far away from the dormitory cafeteria.

And they’re dying. You can see their bodies littered throughout most any American campus today.

Because I need to larf, I quote the HuffingtonPost.com:

The Truth About Bisexual College Students And Hunger

by Heron Greenesmith

In a USA Today opinion column published Thursday, contributor James Bovard takes issue with a new study finding 36 percent of students at colleges and universities experienced food insecurity in the last month. The study looked at data from 43,000 students at two- and four-year schools from 20 states and Washington, D.C. Researchers also found that 36 percent of students experienced housing insecurity in the past year.

Despite what appears to be a crisis for many students across the country, according to Bovard, “better research shows” these young people are simply “overweight and lazy.”

You have been warned: Bovard’s column is rife with hateful stereotyping and mean-spirited bullying.

Stop. Wait. Did the author write anything similar to “not factual” or “factually incorrect” or “this is unmitigated factual bullshite”?

“Almost half of the more than 2,000 bisexual students at universities experienced food and/or housing insecurity, compared to about one-third of their heterosexual peers,” researchers found.

The study also uncovered that “more than one in five bisexual community college students and 18% of homosexual community college students experienced homelessness, compared to 11% of their heterosexual peers.”

You can read the rest of the breathless, melodramatic article if you can withstand the pain, oh, the pain. Cue Dr Smith.

One must ask: there has to be a good reason for this, correct? Clear and obvious bias by stores nationwide who refuse to sell food to the bisexual community, the LGBT community? Histories of keeping bisexuals and gays from good jobs, keeping them out of the general economy? Continuing discrimination by states and the federal government against bisexuals and gays in terms of acquiring food stamps or meal assistance? Being able to clearly create said bias because, as we all know, every bisexual sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb.

After all, there are no solutions to hunger. Or are there? How odd is it that YouTube removed my ability to embed this video offering a solution to college hunger?

In college I was on my own. I had a car payment and insurance and an apartment to pay for. I worked five jobs from roughly 5 AM to, sometimes, 11 PM. Weekdays and weekends. Same for classes. I was young. I could take it. I didn’t know any better. It was what you did. On top of that I found the time to drink heavily, swive women, be happy and — evidently — be blissfully ignorant of my terribly oppressive college plight.

Then there’s this from USAToday.com:

Starvation issues in universities? The real college problem is obesity.

by James Bovard

A new report claims college students are ‘food insecure’ and starving. But better research shows they’re overweight and lazy.

Starvation might be stalking among college students, according to shocking headlines in Newsweek and elsewhere, and The Washington Post warns of “The hidden crisis on college campuses.”

In reality, last week’s report from Temple University and Wisconsin HOPE Lab is typical of the baloney that spawns policy hysteria nowadays.

Oh my God. Cue the exploding Leftist heads.

Temple University/HOPE researchers assert that 36% of four-year college students and 42% of community college students are “food insecure” — a vaporous term beloved by pro-welfare advocates.

“Food insecure”? They’re not acquiring a sufficient caramel shot in their MaccaFrappaChoppaRippaLatte’s? The twist of lemon is too meager? You can’t get a gluten-free Twinkie or Bergers Cookie? Perhaps they should be more concerned about being “test insecure” with regard to their studies, their classes?

This analysis is modeled on the Department of Agriculture’s annual Food Security survey. USDA is emphatic that its survey does not measure hunger, but that neon-sized warning sign was ignored by this study (titled “Still Hungry and Homeless in College”).

“It does not measure hunger”? Then what’s the damned point? Translated: it appears these people aren’t actually starving. In fact, the reverse may be true.

But wait. Here’s how stupid it really gets.

Temple/HOPE respondents were asked questions such as whether they feared “food would run out before I got money to buy more,” or “Did you ever eat less than you felt you should because there wasn’t enough money for food?” Redefining hunger as abstaining from second servings makes for a push-button crisis.

It gets better.

The study asserts that 26% of students with a college meal plan are “food insecure.” Did they oversleep and miss breakfast? 

Precisely. That’s how dire are the current circumstances for bisexual and LGBT students in American colleges. Thank you. Just where were the persons responsible for waking them for daily meals? Who should be punished? Their parents? Government aids? Friends? Relatives?

But wait BZ. Don’t we ship cash to students? Can’t programs be identified, located and then subscribed-to? Where is all this taxpayer cash going?

Half the respondents who received Pell grants ($26.6 billion for 7 million low-income students in 2016) were labeled “food insecure.”

This study offers no clues on what happened to that largesse — or to the other $100 billion in federal assistance provided to college students in 2016.

I suspect it really will take another level of government to solve this incredibly-serious problem.

Apparently, no matter how many handouts government provides, students still cannot be expected or trusted to feed themselves.

You see? Just as I suggested. Bisexual and LGBT students need further government assistance in terms of figuring out how to eat, when to eat and where to eat. How can they be expected — with all the chaotic trauma in their lives — to keep track of any of it? They are the victims here.

Please read the rest of Bovard’s article because, frankly, the silliness of it all is becoming tedious.

Bisexuals, gays, lesbians, LGBT members are such incredible dullards as to fail to realize where to go for assistance, how to get it, whom to call, and where Kraft Mac N Cheese resides. They cannot be counted on to ask friends, check programs, consult parents, walk into a grocery store?

Yet they somehow managed to navigate the bloody, chummed waters of government student loans — the point is that they’re poor, right, so they need loans? —  but somehow lack the requisite fecundity to open their mouths and feed themselves?

But wait. We need to address this massive issue as well. Ahem. Don’t we?

Thank Gaia. I was about to faint due to lack of food and Leftist navel gazing.

BZ

 

Transgender ideology is the new child abuse formula

And it’s being spread with wild abandon by Leftists nationally and globally.

First, an overall examination of the issue by Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Dr Michelle Critella, President of the American College of Pediatricians. We must establish a base line for the post. If you wish to be gobsmacked about the madness of it all, please read Dr Critella’s article here. Prepare to hear about the most immediate and personally destructive junk science of all involving children.

“Puberty blockers” which “castrate children chemically,” followed by “surgical mutilation later on.”

Children, people. These are children.

When did health care become essentially another iteration of child rape ala NAMBLA only this time endorsed by doctors and social workers? What kind of insanity is this, and what kind of unhinged people recommend such things?

The answer: when Leftists took charge of various facets of society and education, unimpeded due to rampant fear and cringing, abject GOWPishness.

“Children three to ten engage in magical thinking.” Ponder that for a moment. Let that concept sink in. Then bring in the Leftist ideology.

When is it that we did two very important things: 1. Removed childhood, and 2. Allowed children to make these kinds of decisions?

Listen: “Puberty is not a disease.”

Stop. Here is a situation I wrote about in 2013. Right out of, naturally, Fornicalia.

The little boy who started a sex change aged eight because he (and his lesbian parents) knew he always wanted to be a girl

This, ladies and gentlemen, is absolute insanity writ large.

And, with the bulk of drugged and greedy and insouciant Free Cheese gatherers in the United States, no one seems to care because — as per normal — the American Media Maggots refuse to cover the story.

Yes: I found this story on UK media.

From the UKDailyMail.com:

The lesbian parents of an 11-year-old boy who is undergoing the process of becoming a girl last night defended the decision, claiming it was better for a child to have a sex change when young.

Thomas Lobel, who now calls himself Tammy, is undergoing controversial hormone blocking treatment in Berkeley, California to stop him going through puberty as a boy.

But Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel warn that children with gender identity disorder forced to postpone transitioning could face a higher risk of suicide.

Because an 11-year-old is so much in touch with themselves and clearly recognize, at that age, what they wish to be and do in their future.

If you think that was unhinged, read this.

The mothers say that one of the first things Thomas told them when he learned sign language aged three – because of a speech impediment – was, ‘I am a girl’.

So guess what? The lesbians fed that fire, stoked it day and night. They didn’t want the boy; they wanted the girl. It was a cold and calculating maneuver conducted for their benefit, not the child’s. It was, as I am wont to coldly but logically call it, a mindfuck.

This is precisely what child abusers do. Take advantage of their adults brains over the undeveloped brains of children. Their mastery of language and twisted crafting of their version of truth.

P U B E R T Y   B L O C K E R S .

San Francisco, right by Berkeley, is one of four cities in the United States with a hospital that has a program for transgender children.

The University of California San Francisco is home to the Center of Excellence for Transgender Health.

Why, of course. Why wouldn’t it be there? The Center for Piledriving the Impressionable and Malleable Brains of Infants and Children, or CPIMBIC.

In April of 2016, I wrote this about the results of the insanity: Let the dangerous sexual lunacy about kids commence.

From the HoustonChronicle.com:

Complaint: Katy-area teacher fired for refusing to address girl, 6, as transgender boy

by Emily Foxhall

An educator this week filed a federal discrimination complaint against a learning center in Katy, alleging that she was wrongly fired for refusing to address a 6-year-old girl as a transgender boy, the teacher’s attorneys said Tuesday.

Madeline Kirksey, a former employee of the Children’s Lighthouse Learning Center on Clay Road in Katy, was fired Nov. 3 after she would not agree to treat the child as a male and call the child by a new male name, according to a copy of a filing with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission provided by her attorneys.

But here is what’s buried further down in the story:

Using fake names, Taylor said that the child left school Friday as “Sally” and returned on Monday going by “Johnny.”

“They had a real issue on their hands,” Taylor said of the school staff.

The child reportedly showed up Monday with a short haircut, and Taylor said the child’s gender identity wasn’t set in stone. He said the child continued to use the girls’ bathroom. The 6-year-old also played football with the boys and, when hit hard, cried and said, “I’m really not a little boy.”

Then as now, here is the point that Leftists purposely fail to even hear or consider, which thrusts the issue directly into the realm of child abuse.

Further, I have to wholeheartedly agree with Madeline Kirksey’s attorney, Andy Taylor, when he said:

Taylor likened the imposition of such a decision over gender on a child to “child abuse.” At such a young age, he said, kids haven’t even decided what ice cream or cereal they prefer.

My point precisely.

Children are no more equipped to make these decisions than are Mexican Water Rats or centipedes.

Much less adults.

From the UKMirror.com:

Britain’s youngest sex swap patient reveals why she’s undergoing surgery to switch gender for the third time

by Grace Macaskill

Ria Cooper was born a boy, became the UK’s youngest sex-swap patient at 15 but transitioned back to being a man at the age of 18

Like many young women, Ria Cooper dreams of one day getting married and having children.

But the 23-year-old knows the odds are stacked against her.

Not only because she was born a boy, but because she has now switched gender an astonishing three times in her short life.

Ria – who was born Brad – became ­Britain’s youngest sex-swap patient at 15. Doctors controversially backed her belief she was a girl in a boy’s body.

She was given blockers to stop her going through puberty, followed by injections of female hormones to impede face and chest hair and trigger the formation of breasts.

P U B E R T Y   B L O C K E R S .

But with her life spiraling out of control as she struggled with her new identity – and the fears of never being accepted as a woman – Ria decided to transition back and live her life instead as a gay man.

Before having crucial surgery, she ended her treatment and became Brad again soon after her 18th birthday.

It turned her into the unwitting poster boy for those who claimed teenagers were too young to be given gender reassignment.

Imagine that. Didn’t see that one coming at all.

But five years on Ria is more certain than ever that is not the real her – and is making her second attempt at becoming a woman to have the future she always dreamed of.

She said: “I’ve always known I was female – it was everyone else who was confused, not me. I was wearing make-up and heels at the age of 12, there was no question.

“But I felt under so much pressure from society that six years later I caved in. I was torn. I knew exactly who I was, but I also wanted to conform and be ‘normal’.

Because, after all, children display only the finest decision-making capabilities in any event.

Then — do what I call the Logical Extension — there are now transgender summer camps.

Oh, right. For four-year-olds.

From the GatewayPundit.com:

Transgender Summer Camp Offers Programs for Children as Young as FOUR Years Old

by Matt Miller

Rainbow Day Camp is a summer camp for transgender and “gender fluid” children that is accepting children as young as four years old, and unfortunately enrollment is booming.

Oh wait. Did you just say this is a business? Do the BZ Logical Extension. It’s becoming its own industry. And cash is its hub.

Many opponents to the transgender agenda would go as far to say that this is indoctrination and even a form of child abuse, perhaps with good reason. Considering the trans suicide rate (at near 40%), and dozens of other life challenges trans people experience, could anyone blame a parent for wanting to exhaust all other options before casting their child down a road of life long identity and sexual confusion? The Rainbow Day Camp is the antithesis of that sentiment, hurrying the child into making severe and permanent decisions about their life before they reach a double digit age.

I have one basic question: if it is inherently evil to be male, then why is it that any female would even remotely want to become “male” and embrace the stoic ethos, the short hair, the beard, the pants, the lower voice, the provider philosophy, the whole “male” aspect? Why would this be sought-after for any reason whatsoever?

If males are so inherently evil.

Then there is the most recent issue of transgenders in the military. I’ll let Tucker Carlson again set the tone and the pace with logic and facts, not emotions.

Yes. $1.3 billion dollars over 10 years, for a minority of a minority of a minority. Roughly $183,000 per operation per person. Not to mention the $1,200 per month required to chemically transition via hormone therapy. With each individual off duty and unavailable following surgery for 238 days. Someone will have to replace them, yes? Of course.

If you thought pregnancy leave was sufficient, it has nothing on transition surgery.

Want to get your surgery free? Join the US military. That would soon be the battle cry, incentivized by your federal tax dollars. Who doesn’t want a free penis, free breasts or a free vagina?

Military readiness? Unit cohesion? Right. Who cares? The military exists only as a social experiment in any event, yes? Damn this guy for daring to speak the truth backed by facts.

Let’s be honest. This guy was brilliantly extemporaneous.

Yet, there are those in the military who think President Trump is on the wrong track with his ban. They would be the persons far removed from being immediately affected by the inclusion of transgenders in combat. Ensconced in their insulated Pentagon offices as they are.

But wait. Even more, you as males should be forced to date transgenders. Right? For the good of the order. Right?

Certainly more to come.

Oh my.

BZ

 

Transgender bathrooms: the ultimate goal

TRANSGENDER BATHROOM OCCUPANTSWhen the “LGBTQ Community” decided to push transgender bathrooms — on the heels of the sex change of Bruce Jenner, who attracted nationwide attention to the concept — any logical and clear-thinking human being knew there were going to be problems.

But perhaps you didn’t or don’t understand the ultimate goal.  I’ll get to that.

In the meantime, any clear-thinking person could certainly have foreseen this as one of many deleterious outcomes.  From dfwCBSLocal.com:

Shopper Upset Man Allowed To Use Women’s Dressing Room In Ross

by Dan Haggerty

MESQUITE (CBSDFW.COM) A Forney woman says a Ross department store in Mesquite let a man into the women’s dressing room Monday.

“I was in the dressing room, when we heard a man’s voice,” said Lisa Stickles, who says she quickly told a manager.

“She went inside the dressing room, came right back out and called me to the side and told me… he was representing himself as a woman today,” Stickles said.

A customer service representative with Ross would not comment on the alleged incident but said they do not discriminate against the transgender community; adding, customers may use changing rooms that apply to their gender identity.

Leftist translation: “you’re only pretty as you feel,” meaning that you can feel like a female one hour and a male the next hour.  Choose your dressing rooms and your bathrooms depending on just how your libido moves you.  How wonderful.

“What about me? Or my feelings?” said Sickles. “(The manager) told me that if I felt uncomfortable in the dressing room with him there… I’d have to wait until he’s finished.”

Leftist translation: your puny little “standard female” feelings can go straight to hell.  Get over it.

But wait, it gets better — as you knew it would.

Sickles said she waited, and was shocked when she watched the man walk out.

“He was in no way dressed as a woman,” Sickles said. “He had on jeans, a t-shirt, 5 o’clock shadow, very deep voice. He was a man.”

Aw, who cares?  You shouldn’t.  Judgmental = bad.  Besides, college students say there isn’t any difference between men and women anyway.  “Gender is fluid,” say these brain-dead Millennial zombies.

Essentially, Obama and Leftists created a problem where no problem really existed prior.  Before Bruce Jenner and his conversion — which he is now beginning to regret seriously — the issue wasn’t an issue.  I don’t seem to recall hordes of transgenders descending upon bathrooms and cops quick to respond to calls for the invasion.  In fact, I’ll wager I’ve probably been in a men’s bathroom when there was a tranny with me.  I didn’t care because I didn’t know.  The tranny’s job was to blend and apparently they blended.  No harm no foul.

It’s an issue because it has been forced to become an issue, on the heels of the massive Bruce Jenner media coverage.  That was the tipping point.

But that’s the problem with Leftists.  Force.  Conscription.  Pushing.  Leftists are not satisfied with allowing people to make their own decisions or to leave people alone.  They must, instead, tear down in order to build back up a system that only they can see and understand.  You, as a non-Leftist, do not have the mental capacity to understand their concepts and, as the menial Groundling, Prole or Serf that you are, you must be forced to comply.  Dissent cannot be tolerated.  Differing viewpoints cannot exist.  You have not the capability to perceive their higher-level thinking patterns and, because of this, there is no other option save that of duress, mandatory compulsion, intimidation and, ultimately, the law.  Further: there must be pain.  You must be punished for transgressions.  See NY Mayor Bill DeBlasio’s new insane law.

You cannot be trusted to make your own decisions if they are incongruent with Leftists.  Plain and simple.

Here is the ultimate goal of Leftists: the norming of all things sexual.  Following this, there will be a push to legalize multiple wives.  Multiple husbands.  Scratch that.  Just multiple people in marriage.  Polyamory.  Objectum sexuals.  Sex with animals will not be far behind and, of course, the norming of sex with children.

If you doubt me, stay tuned.

In the meantime, if you wish to see how pederasts truly operate, go to AbsoluteZeroUnited — where I used to write — and check the archived posts by myself and the other warriors for children.  Guaranteed, unless you’re a NAMBLA member, you’ll throw up.  I was a detective for a major California department in the Child Abuse Bureau.  I know how pederasts think and operate.  I put them in jail for decades.  I would commonly acquire much greater sentences for my suspects in Child Abuse than I did when I worked Homicide.  I am proud of my work as a defender of the defenseless.

The norming of all things sexual.

Coming soon.

Don’t doubt me for a moment.

BZ

 

We must now ban this flag

Gay FlagWhen a crazy white person killed black people in a Charlotte church on June 17th, it was determined by the press and society that the flag with which he associated — the Confederate flag — must be banned.

We discovered in a very short order that flag was banned across the nation, from Amazon to Walmart, Target, eBay, Sears and all points in between.  Some objected but they were immediately labeled as racists because it was a white male who killed black people.

Confederate Flag BannedThe Confederate flag, associated with the white murderer, was associated with hate and killing.

We know that much if not all of the Leftist-Progressive-Demorat world is predicated upon fairness and equality.

It is only proper and fitting, now, that the LGBT or gay flag be banned across the United States in the same fashion as was the Confederate flag, for the same reasons.

The black, gay murderer (BGM) associated and embraced the LGBT flag due to his sexual orientation and the fact that he was in the process of soliciting for gay males of a muscular and attractive nature to pose and engage in various activities for the BGM’s porn sites.  Further, the LGBT flag was found in the BGM’s apartment.  That was his flag.  It represented him and, we must conclude, his activities.  As a black, gay male he targeted and killed whites.  Straight whites.

Just as the white murderer apparently represented all racists and the Confederate flag was associated with him, the BGM represents all LGBT persons as well and their flag must likewise be banned.

To be fair and equal, as in the case of the white murderer, those who object to the removal of the gay flag must be labeled as sexists.

If the Charlotte incident was sufficient for a clarion call to remove the Confederate flag, so must the gay flag be banned.  In the interest of fairness and equality.

BZ

LGBT Flag Must Be Banned

Public money for sex changes at age 15 in Oregon

COMPLY is the New COEXISTEvery day this nation becomes more morally corrupt thanks to government.

Here is another example.

From Breitbart.com:

Oregon Medicaid Now Paying for Sex Changes for 15-Yr-Olds Without Parent’s Consent

by Warner Todd Huston

Parents across Oregon are critical of a new Medicaid program that would pay out state aid to help teenagers as young as 15 get a sex change operation without parental consent.

The new policy directs Oregon’s Medicaid program to cover sex change surgeries, puberty suppressing drugs, and cross-sex hormones for teens starting at age 15, all without consultations with a teen’s parents.

The decision to begin the program was made by the state’s Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC), a board whose members are appointed by the governor, not elected, and are unaccountable to the citizens.

HERC says that the state’s Medicaid program will cover up to $150,000 a year per patient in sex change expenses.

Let’s see: can’t drink, smoke, drive or get a tattoo at 15 in Oregon.

Can get a sex change at 15 in Oregon.

Out of the lot, one doctor with common sense and balls:

“Children age 15 may not fully understand all the consequences of the procedures they are undergoing,” Dr. Jack Drescher, a member of the APA who worked on the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group, told Fox News.

Shocking to hear at least one adult state the obvious, even if in a squishy sort of way.  How intelligent were you at age 15, and certain about your future?

However, as the LGBTQ crowd would demand: do not question, do not doubt, do not do anything but: comply.

BZ