Playing Tag Can KILL


Thank God that, despite these tumultuous times when up is down, white is black, wrong is right, there are still some educators in these United States with an amount of common sense, perspective and proportion.

And despite it being Teddy’s state, Massachusetts has clearly set itself to take the lead in terms of childrens’ safety:

An elementary school south of Boston has outlawed traditional recess chase games such as tag because they’re deemed too rough for kids.

Concerned educators at Willett Elementary School in Attleboro, Mass., are trying to quash unsupervised contact games on the playground out of fear that injured children could hold the school liable.

The risk of children running into each other prompted principal Gaylene Heppe to approve the tag ban, calling recess “a time when accidents can happen.”

Let us be thankful for principals such as Geylene Heppe, having the mandate from parents and her surrounding community to consider the overall welfare of the children who, left unto themselves, would proceed with such over-the-top games such as Tag itself, and possibly others as heinous as Whip The Line, Four Square, Tetherball and (gulp!) Hopscotch.

This would also be an overarching point to consider, luckily having been addressed in Fornicalia:

In 2002, a Santa Monica school banned unsupervised tag because officials felt it not only led to physical injuries, but could also create emotional injuries and self-esteem problems for the weaker or slower kids.

With luck, saving our childrens’ sensitive egos can only be a growing national trend.

THE FALLOUT FROM THIS TREND:

Now back to reality; after all, you didn’t think I’d bite on this tripe, did you?

What is next for American children? Shall we raise them in the humid loam of basements with dark lights like mushrooms? Then they’ll not come in contact with much of anything — but certainly they won’t be injured.

We’ve managed to eliminate Dodgeball. We’ve now eliminated Tag from many schools. There are even, if you can believe it, new schools extant and under construction which do NOT contain any playgrounds whatsoever. Parents are asking: when do you build the playgrounds? Answer from the contractor and the school district admin staff: never.

Are we insane? Have we lost our minds? Do we have any concept whatsoever as to what we are doing to our upcoming generations?

All in the name of that Money Monster called “liability” and, to a lesser degree, “esteem.”

But money will win over esteem any day.

And I submit this: it’s all about the vaginification and pussification of our current generation of little boys. Many educators, most of them women, will not be happy or satisfied until little boys become precisely like little girls: quiet, verbal, demure, obedient, inactive.

Which is why little boys are being medicated at a higher rate than at any other time in our history, by Ritalin and other drugs, why ADD is a “rampant epidemic.”

Little boys don’t need Ritalin; ADD isn’t an “epidemic.” We just have a staff of “educators,” mostly women, who don’t have the patience or the inclination to deal with the base nature of boys. And these “educators” will not be happy until little boys have been completely feminized.

Little boys NEED recess. They NEED contact and running and yelling and movement. It is the very nature of The Beast. It was my nature. It was the nature of anyone raised in the late 1950s and 1960s.

We were told by both our mothers and our fathers: shake it off. Stop that crying. Get up and walk it off. And we did.

Recess and games and active play are mandatory for little boys. I can remember coming back from recess, in elementary school, dripping with sweat. Educators then were smart enough to realize that little boys and, to an extent, little girls needed to vent all that pent-up anxious blood. We were kids; it’s what we all needed.

And now, at a time when Esteem rules all, inactive children are more obese than ever, PE classes have been eliminated, and the outlets for the venting of little boys have been all but eliminated — well, is it any wonder that little boys are finding themselves medicated in public schools more and more? And it won’t stop at this point; it will only become worse.

But even more than that, let’s do what I call the Logical Extension:

What kind of generations are we raising? How well are we preparing them for the Reality of not only these United States, but the realities of the World, a World Economy, and those assholes who would do us national harm simply because we are successful?

Whilst the Islamists become stronger, more determined, we are raising and encouraging generations to become weaker, more medicated, fatter, more inactive, less willing to engage in challenging thought: little whining, complaining male pussies.

I think this mother sums it all up:

Celeste D’Elia, a Willett Elementary School parent, said her son feels safer because of the new rule against tag. “I’ve witnessed enough near collisions,” she said.

Oooh. How bad! “Near collisions”??!!?

Give me a fucking break.

BZ

Corruption: One Small Recommendation


There is rampant corruption in American politics.

And clearly there are problems with money and politicians — with both the Dems and the GOP. The corruption is endemic on both sides of the aisle and no one party can claim it’s impervious to the corruptive forces of cash or cash and lobbyists.

There are two types of corruption: there is moral corruption and there is financial corruption. Despite the FACT that Foley committed no crime (unlike Democratic Senator Gerry Studds) he is excoriated in the DEM press and is the Devil incarnate — and has been for weeks, I might add.

On the other hand, following his passing on October 14th, former House Democratic leader Gerry Studds was lionized in his New York Times obituary as a “Gay Pioneer.” Equitable, do you think?

Studds was censured in 1983 for having sex with a 17-year-old male congressional intern. His act was overt and illegal. Studd’s himself called the act a “very serious error in judgment.”

Foley’s act was with text messages to a former page over 18 — scummy, inappropriate and clearly wrong in any case — but Foley did not have sex with him, consensual or otherwise. With the name Foley I see the linked adjective “disgraced.” I did not then nor now see that word associated with Studds.

Both the acts on Studds’s and Foley’s part were horribly wrong; Foley may be but Studds was a sexual predator. But you already know my point.

Moral corruption aside, another current point purposely underplayed by the DEM are the fiscally-corruptive issues of Democrat Harry Reid –regarding properties and Christmas bonuses. A screaming silence here.

But all is not lost for I have two solutions; the first is simple, expeditious and can be backed with a second suggestion which will mandate (and here’s why the DEM won’t go for it) that the Mainstream Media “put up or shut up.”

First:

Limit all campaign contributions to no more that $100. Period. End of statement. No contributions can be accepted from corporations. Individual living persons only. If you truly do have a “mandate from the people” then the people shall speak with their individual pocketbooks and their votes.

Second:

The Mainstream Media will provide, for television, airtime on their channels for individual candidates’ political statments and debates; this airtime will be credited towards television’s federal PSA (Public Service Announcement) licensed mandate. For the print media, they shall provide column inches, as another public service to the country and community, for same.

You, of course, realize that neither shall happen. Just wistful thinking.

But wouldn’t it be wonderful? And wouldn’t it solve an entire host of issues?

Heavy sigh.

BZ

The Bush Admin Gets It Wrong Again?

Thanks to Rebecca for the “heads-up:”

Go to this site first: Yoni’s Blog.

From Rebecca:

If the Bush admin is helping the Palestinians this way it is wrong. Jews will die as a result and who knows if they will use the weapons we give them to topple Hamas? What if they use the stuff we give them to topple the Jews? Democracy in the Middle East spreading is a great idea, but when it comes to who we are dealing with it may end up being a pipe dream. I also agree that it is a “make-believe” mindset to think that there could ever be peace between the Palestinians and the Jews. But, that is my opinion, and evidently it is Yoni’s as well.

So, let’s examine this on its face.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says Palestinians deserve to live better than they do and be “free of the humiliation of occupation” in a state of their own.

“I promise you my personal commitment to that goal,” Rice said at a dinner marking the third anniversary of the American Task Force on Palestine.

“There could be no greater legacy for America,” Rice told the group, which describes itself as nonpartisan and supportive of a Palestinian state living side by side with Israel.

“The Palestinian people deserve a better life … free of the humiliation of occupation,” she said.

Rice has made five trips to the region as secretary of state, looking for ways to promote President George W. Bush’s advocacy of a two-state solution to the decades-long conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Yoni The Blogger said:

This woman is STUPID.

The Palestinians are the Nazi’s of today they don’t deserve anything more than a harsh war fought with no quarter given to them.

Rice saying this makes as much sense as saying the KKK deserves to be free of the humiliation of occupation of the USA by normal people so that they can be free to spread their filth and hate.

I’m with Yoni on this one. The Palestinians have made their points clearer than crystal: there can be no Jewish State. And certainly there can be no Jewish State even remotely close to their own. That would be a massive mistake.

In my opinion, it would be a Massive Mistake to lend ANY credence to what the Palestinians want.

If their wants and desires were so incredibly important (and let there be NO MISTAKE about my thoughts on this matter), then various Middle Eastern factions would have designated and accounted for a Palestinian State amongst their millions of acres.

If a soulful Palestine was a priority then Muslims in control would have provided their own territories for this necessary accommodation.

But Muslim countries didn’t volunteer an INCH of land.

That bespeaks volumes in and of itself.

Yoni is right.

And Condi is wrong. Flat-ass wrong.

BZ

Muslims Begin to Set the Rules In the US


It’s already occurring.

What? you might ask. That could never occur on domestic United States soil.

Get over it; it’s here and it’s now. Muslims are dictating to our sovereign citizens what will or will not occur.

You may not be aware but there is a numerically-large contingent of Muslims in Minnesota — of all places. And in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area local Muslim cabbies have decided they will not transport those persons they believe have alcohol with them.

Cabdriver Muhamed Mursal doesn’t wear his Muslim beliefs on his sleeve, but he soon may broadcast them via a light on top of his cab.

Mursal and hundreds of other Muslim cabdrivers at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport refuse to take travelers they know are carrying alcohol. No one is searching bags, but a Napa Valley wine box or a see-through bag from the duty-free store can be enough to leave a fare waiting for the next cab. Airport officials estimate that happens at least three times a day.

There is clearly strength in numbers and the Muslim community in general certainly realizes this. USA Today cites:

Minneapolis-St. Paul is concerned that its taxi service is deteriorating. Citing their religious beliefs, some Muslim taxi drivers from Somalia are refusing to transport customers carrying or suspected of carrying alcohol. It started with one driver a few years ago, but the average number of fare refusals has grown to about three a day, says airport spokesman Patrick Hogan. “Travelers often feel surprised and insulted,” he says. “Sometimes, several drivers in a row refuse carriage.”

Minneapolis-St. Paul is wondering how to accommodate the drivers.

Really?

Here is how you accommodate the drivers who refuse certain fares:

You fire them and hire others.

From PipelineNews.org:

By Beila Rabinowitz
September 19, 2006 – San Francisco, CA –
PipeLineNews.org – In another sign of increasing Muslim intolerance in the U.S., Islamic taxi drivers – primarily of Somali extraction – at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport are refusing to accept fares whom they suspect of possibly transporting alcohol.

Recent changes at the terminal have proved a boon for the drivers, forcing passengers to use the ubiquitous taxis to get around within the confines of the airport making them ripe for exploitation.

Another angle is that such discrimination by Muslim drivers might make it possible for them to weed out the low fare inter-terminal travelers from those wishing to travel outbound at substantially higher fees, thus assigning themselves all the longer distance fares while the infidels are taking the short ones.

Why airport officials have caved to the unreasonable religious demands of an extremist minority is puzzling but the involvement of the Muslim American Society – an Islamist group whose name pretty much denotes their ultimate intent – in this process may help explain it, MAS being adept at injecting itself into such controversies and always on the side of the extension of Sharia into mainstream America.

Airport spokesman Patrick Hogan though unwilling to tackle the issue head-on, did at least give lip service to the image problem this was causing the airport “Travelers often feel surprised and insulted…Sometimes, several drivers in a row refuse carriage.”

Partially addressing the obvious inequities in such behavior, airport authorities are now forcing those who have refused a fare because of the alcohol issue to go to the end of the line in the taxi queue.

Reports have claimed that a system of roof lights might be proposed by the airport as early as today with the idea that for instance a yellow light would indicate a taxi willing to take a fare carrying alcohol whereas one having a red light would not.

So. How much shall we accommodate Muslims in this country? Where will this end? A refusal to carry blind persons with Seeing Eye dogs? No pork in containers? A search of the potential fare? A series of questions about one’s political leanings? Or perhaps a complete refusal of all those who refuse to adhere to Sharia law?

And what shall be the terms of our national surrender?

BZ