Ann Coulter Is Right — Again

(My thanks to Rebecca for the following article!)

I’m not in the business of simply reprinting copies of others’ articles for a post but in this case I make an exception. Ann Coulter — a RWSS (Right Wing Shit Stirrer) of the first degree — you either despise her or admire her — has written an article that, in my estimation, deserves reproduction here in its entirety:

This is the only country on Earth that thinks it’s not sporting to consider our own interests in choosing immigrants.

Try showing up in any other country on the planet, illiterate and penniless, and announcing: “I’ve seen pictures of your country and it looks great. I think I’d like to live here! Oh, and by the way, would you mind changing all your government and business phone messages, street signs and ballots into my native language? Thanks!”

They would laugh you out of the country.

What seems not to have occurred to the “NO HUMAN BEING IS ILLEGAL” crowd is that this is a country, not a public park.

There are more than 6 billion people in the world, many of whom apparently like the idea of living in the wealthiest democracy on Earth. But if the billions of people of the world did live here, it wouldn’t be “here” anymore. America is special for a reason that must transcend the right to vote – or everyone would be trying to immigrate to Iraq right now.

America has a seller’s market in immigration, but thanks to Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration law, we no longer favor skilled workers from developed nations, but instead favor unskilled immigrants from the Third World.

Kennedy’s bill promptly cut the number of European immigrants in half and increased Third World immigrants to 85 percent of the total.

Not surprisingly, post-1965 immigrants have sharply higher levels of poverty and welfare dependence. Europeans may not seem like ideal new immigrants, but the truth is, if what they want is welfare, they’ll stay in France.

It’s as if we’ve got the last Xbox 360s available on Christmas Eve and instead of doubling the price, we’re entertaining low-ball offers. Or more accurately, we’re paying our customers to take the darn things off our hands – and the customers are still indignant with us.

On CNN’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on Monday, Dobbs was interviewing Nativo Lopez, president of the Mexican-American Political Association about his demand for “full immediate, unconditional legalization for all persons currently in the United States.”

Dobbs posed this innocuous question about Lopez’s planned boycott, “You’re talking about a boycott of all illegal aliens in this country?”

Lopez exploded: “Well, first off, I refute your terminology. You don’t say ‘kike,’ ‘patty,’ ‘WOP,’ OK. You don’t say “nigger”! … You’re using language that’s offensive to me and offensive to my people! … You pollute the air every day, Dobbs. … That language is offensive, it’s derogatory, it’s denigrating, and don’t use that terminology to me again, referring to my people!”

Dobbs eventually ended Lopez’s Tourette’s episode by calmly asking him what he expected the impact of the boycott to be.

An hour later on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” Dave Rodriguez, of the League of United Latin American Citizens, leapt in to denounce Rep. Tom Tancredo for using the word “amnesty.” He said: “There isn’t any such thing as amnesty in this law. I don’t understand what this debate is. That’s your own terminology on it …”

Bank robbers and drug dealers ought to start claiming that the words “bank robber” and “drug dealer” are akin to the N-word. They could accuse lawmakers of “criminalizing felonies” and claim they don’t understand what the word “jailbreak” means.

At the same time on CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Maria Elena Salinas, an anchor at Univision, was informing Wolf Blitzer that “all Hispanics feel offended by what has been going on, by the rhetoric, the level of the negativity that you hear coming out of Capitol Hill and also on some television stations and by some journalists.”

So it’s really more like we’ve got the last Xbox 360s available on Christmas Eve and the customers are not only demanding money to take the hottest sales item off our hands, but are verbally abusing us and acting petulant. I’m offended that you would even think about asking me to pay for the Xbox 360! You say it has a “20 GB detachable hard drive”? Well, would you use the word “kike”?

As hardworking as illegal immigrants are when they come here, they are immediately demagogued by liberals into adopting the victimhood pose so popular on college campuses.

Everybody wants to act like his ancestors were brought here on slave ships.

Consider this e-mail from Michele Waslin, La Raza’s director of Immigration Policy Research, to her members denouncing Sen. Lamar Alexander’s proposal to provide government grants to immigrants who want to learn English and American history and to organizations offering those courses. (I’d be happy with a law that simply trained new immigrants not to be “offended” all the time.)

Even though this potentially meant free money for La Raza, Waslin – of the Guadalajara Waslins – ominously warned that while the amendment “doesn’t overtly mention assimilation, it is very strong on the patriotism and traditional American values language in a way which is potentially dangerous to our communities.”

Meanwhile, Americans aren’t allowed to consider whether millions of immigrants refusing to learn English and American history is “potentially dangerous to our communities.”

Here, please – we’ll pay you, just take the whole Xbox 360 factory.

__________________

Thus endeth the lesson.

BZ

What Is Our Half-Life?

How Long Does America Have?

About the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”

“The average age of the worlds’ greatest civilizations, from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years.

“During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage”

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million;
Bush: 143 million;
Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000; Bush: 2,427,000
States won by: Gore: 19 Bush: 29
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2; Bush: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: “In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country.

Gore’s territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements living off government welfare. . .”

Olson believes the United States is now:

Somewhere between the “Complacency & Apathy” phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy — with some 40 percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.

________________________________

In truth where are we in this continuum?

I shall leave this determination to you.

________________________________

Perhaps it is time to discuss the Pygmalion Effect.

BZ

If This Is An Issue, Can Our Own CPE Be Far Behind?

They were fired “for standing up for their rights,” Herrada said.

Now the issue in the United States is becoming very much like France: Can you fire a worker? And under what circumstances? And what if that worker is illegal? And what if they demand their “entitlements” — like a job?
A manager at a Detroit meatpacking plant said Monday that 15 immigrant women were fired last month after attending a protest for immigrant rights. He said they had been told that they would be terminated if they missed work on the day of the protest. The fired workers were natives of Mexico and many had worked at the plant for several years. Most have children and are worried about supporting their families, Herrada said.
Many were employed by Minuteman Staffing. So when Wolverine wanted to fire the workers, the meatpacking company told Minuteman to let go of the workers, he said. A manager with Minuteman said he couldn’t comment on the case.
But the workers say they were treated wrongly.
“It was not fair,'” said Mercedes, a 31-year-old Detroit woman who attended the rally and was fired. “We went to fight for our rights.” Mercedes is undocumented and asked that her last name not be used.
“It was really unfair of a company to do that,” said Edith Castillo, head of the Detroit-based Latin Americans for Social and Economic Development.
The photo: Activists wait to see the owner of the Wolverine Packing Co. in Detroit on Monday.(MARY SCHROEDER/Detroit Free Press)
As The Entitlements Turn:
Allow me to examine the issue just a bit.
First: is life really fair? Has it always been “fair” to you? Oddly enough, as shocked as you may be, this older, male Anglo has not always been treated “fairly” by life. Is that a proper expectation? Is that a realistic expectation? I submit this: those who expect life to be “fair” shall experience their life’s path in two fashions — with a chip on their shoulder and with great disappointment. Life is Attitude. Life is what you make of it — and no one else. Why is it said that Republicans are generally more happy? Spiritual people more happy and more able to weather adversity? I think you have a bit of the answer already.
Second: it is indicated in the article that some of the workers may be or are illegal. And they have a “right” to a job because. . . . ?
Third: let’s assume everyone is legal. The workers have a right to a job because they decided, collectively or individually, to leave the job? After management told them what would occur?
Fourth: anyone hear or recall something about Free Will? About the ability to make decisions, and then accept responsibility for one’s chosen actions? Ring a bell? Because a person is illegal, does that mean that person is by nature inherently stupid and unable to reason out the foreseeable consequences of one’s actions?
Fifth: some or all of these people are illegal. See my previous posts for my clear and obvious opinions. Hello? Illegal.
Sixth: like France, we are becoming enthralled with the notion that more and more things are due us because we breathe and stand on two legs. Did or did not the ol’ BZ write, in past posts, that the issues before us now not only include illegal immigrants but also enfold the concept of more and greater entitlements?
What’s past is prologue, dear readers.
BZ
______________________________
(My apologies for the formatting. Blogger is pitching a tantrum with me and I cannot delineate paragraphs at this time. — BZ)
Also: I am leaving for my monthly week-long trip to San Diego for school. I will be away from blogging until Monday of next week, the 17th. If I acquire an earlier flight I may post on Sunday because, after all, I just can’t stay away. And who knows what might happen in the interim?

The French Reconsider; Caving Is Good. Is America Next?

MEXICANO 100%

Come check out this rhyme, The Last Laugh is Mine I just beat another case, right in your face this time. I shook a dime and a dozen- doing time with my cousins. Time flew by.

Question is… was I stressed? (thought I wasn’t) Pruno- buzzin’ on occassion, call it my ghetto vacation. My daily boast: “Let’s make a toast, to the host of my mental frustration”.

Incarceration made me stronger, yes, these words I believe. Lessons taught the laws are strict, but still got tricks up my sleeve. No need to grieve for lost moments, now there gone with the wind It’s all about timin’, I’ll get to grindin’- soon I’ll be ballin” again.

With all my friends that stayed loyal through these turbulent days and my family that understands me with my frivoluos ways.

We’re going to blaze a raging fire- take the World on by Storm you’ll be amazed at what transpires when true Riders perform. So sound the horns and pound the drums, call those that swore they would come.

War’s been declared so best beware and get prepared with a gun.

Estamos armados, por todos lados, somos los soldados muy locos en el mente, pero siempre marijuanos. Ya nos vamos a la guerra, luchando por la tierra con yeska en el mano, y cerveza en la llielera.

_______________________________

Just a bit of insight for my readers.

_______________________________

And the French government decided Monday to reconsider the taking of a national stand. As one might expect, the decision was to, essentially, completely fold. And of course how many of us are shocked and appalled? Not many, I suspect.

From BBC News:

French President Jacques Chirac has announced that the new youth employment law that sparked weeks of sometimes violent protests will be scrapped.

He said it would be replaced by other measures to tackle youth unemployment.

Millions of students and union members have taken to the streets over the last month in protest against the law, which made it easier to fire young workers.

Union and student leaders said it was a “great victory” but it is not clear if protests set for Tuesday are still on.

Union leaders had given the government until Easter weekend to withdraw the law or face a repeat of the recent general strikes.

What is the CPE? Contrat Premiere Embauche (CPE): A new work contract for under-26s allowing a two-year trial period. In that period, employers can end a contract without explanation. After two years, the CPE reverts to a standard full-time contract. It became law on 2 April, until Chirac’s revision.

__________________________

The French rolled over in another demand for government-supported entitlements.

Go here for information on the French labor law.

Illegal Mexican immigrants are demanding precisely the same thing. Give me. Make it free.

The backbone that we laughingly accuse the French of lacking — it would seem our national political backbone is equally missing.

Perhaps next week I’ll see a message for it on a milk carton.

BZ

Message To The American People From Its Politicians:


Perhaps it really is the time to roll over and let anyone who is an illegal immigrant do what they wish when they wish.

Though it is clear that a good 70% to 80% of the American public, including those persons who waded their way through the unfriendly INS system of legal immigration (a kludgy, convoluted, lengthy and costly process which, on its face, helps to cause people to move into the illegal realm) do not want an amnesty and want our borders enforced, it is apparent that both of our current political parties are not particularly interested in what the electorate wants.

From the Christian Science Monitor:

LOS ANGELES – In Los Angeles, Eun Sook Lee will march on behalf of Korean illegal immigrants, at least 50,000, living in southern California. On Boston Common, Punam Rogers will join other Indian émigrés, as well as business clients and students from China, Germany, and Britain. In Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Ivalier Duvra will take to the streets to draw attention to Haitian newcomers who he says need refugee status.

Coming on the heels of demonstrations in several larger cities, a National Day of Action on Immigrant Rights Monday is expected to involve people in some 90 US municipalities, well above organizers’ goal of 10. Described as the biggest social movement of Hispanics since the United Farm Workers of Cesar Chavez, the plans for protests, vigils, and marches include a less-visible tier of people stirred to action over American immigration policy: non-Latinos.

The national day of action seems to have expanded exponentially with the organizing power of the Internet. Besides demonstrations, speeches, processions, and assorted performances (from drumming to skits), groups are planning work-walkouts, product boycotts, fasting, and other measures.

Anger has been building among immigrants for decades, Ms. Hong says, but it has intensified over the past decade, as immigrants felt targeted by welfare reform, what they see as a civil-rights rollback, and, most recently, anti- terror laws. Post-9/11 crackdowns, legislation denying social services to illegals in California, and Minutemen border operations have roused immigrants, legal and not. “Immigrants have been feeling like targets for all that is wrong and want to stand up and show how they contribute to the diversity and richness of America,” she says.

So anger has been building? And what would happen had the countries been reversed? What would happen had “anger” been building in:

  • Russia
  • Korea
  • Mexico
  • China
  • Ethiopia
  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala

If we do not have the so-called cojones to defend our own sovereign nation, our borders, our language, our culture — well then, perhaps it really is time to let the barbarians past the gates and allow anyone, anywhere, for any reason, to do what they will when they will.

I once thought we were a nation of laws. I am no longer so convinced. Why should you or me, I posit, obey any laws extant in this country?

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

— George Orwell (1903–1950), British author. Animal Farm, ch. 10 (1945).

BZ