Detroit, water, and the UN building

Water Is A Human RightWater is apparently a human right, according to residents in Detroit, Michigan.

Deadbeat residents in Detroit, Michigan, can’t pay their water bills.  All roughly 17,000 of them.  However, no one quite knows how many of those bills represent persons still living in Detroit, and those who have abandoned their homes.  Because, in general, Detroit looks much like this:

Detroit Abandoned HomesDetroit Abandoned Homes 1That said, the city of Detroit is now doing its worst: actually turning OFF water to those who haven’t made their payments.  This is, clearly, beyond evil.  So sayeth those whose presence still exists.


Detroit Residents: Restore Our Water

Detroit Homeowners Delinquent in Making Payments Testify About Hardships

by Matthew Dolan

DETROIT—In this bedeviled city struggling to convince residents to pay their bills, a slash of blue spray paint on front lawns serves as a kind of scarlet letter of debt.

“I was really embarrassed. I started to cry,” Carol Ann Bogden, a 68-year-old retired emergency-room nurse told a federal judge Monday, describing how city water department officials marked her home before shutting off service in July.

During the last two years, the city’s water and sewerage department has put its mark on tens of thousands of residences. With the help of advocacy groups, some homeowners are suing to restore service and stop future residential shut-offs for at least six months.

Your problem, madame, is that you still live in and believe in Detroit.  I’d have guessed you’d understood that basic conundrum from its establishment because, as a nurse, you are clearly not stupid.

People in the rest of the United States laugh out loud at the so-called “predicament” of Detroit.  They predominantly ignore you because they perceive you as too stupid to understand your plight.  They readily compare Detroit to Hiroshima.

And your expectations of some kind of deus ex machina.

But wait.  Aren’t those blacks?  Protesting the decisions of blacks?  Because blacks are mostly in charge of Detroit?

Urban experts see Detroit’s dilemma as a result of the city’s inability to cover the expense of an outsize infrastructure system built when the city’s population approached 2 million. As of 2013, the city had about 688,000 residents.

“Detroit is a bit like a teenager who has inherited an expensive sedan—the car may have been free, but he doesn’t have the income to cover the insurance or maintenance and maybe not even the gas,” Harvard University economics professor Edward Glaeser said in an email.

But here’s where it gets even better:

The utility cutoffs in Detroit amid its municipal bankruptcy have drawn international criticism, including from a United Nations group that alleged the city was violating basic human rights for water.

There you go.  The United Nations now involving itself in Detroit.

Let’s go a bit deeper into the topic, shall we?

Now weighs in.

UN panel: Detroit water cutoffs violate human rights

A large-scale water shutoff is underway in Detroit, a move that advocates say is taking its toll on the poor

by Amel Ahmed

A United Nations team of experts said Wednesday that Detroit officials’ decision to shut off water service to thousands of residents who are late in paying bills is an affront to human rights.

“Disconnection of water services because of failure to pay due to lack of means constitutes a violation of the human right to water and other international human rights,” the U.N. officials said in a news release. “Because of a high poverty rate and a high unemployment rate, relatively expensive water bills in Detroit are unaffordable for a significant portion of the population.”

The U.N. assessment comes days after a coalition of welfare rights groups — including the Detroit People’s Water Board, Food and Water Watch and Canada-based Blue Planet Project — pleaded in an open letter for the world body to intervene.

A wonderful way to invite the United Nations into the once-sovereign country formerly known as the United States of America.

Here is one amazing thing: the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) actually expects to try to acquire a minimal percentage of its bills due.

How onerous to think that DWSD should have to maintain an ancient infrastructure heretofore unaddressed.  How terrible to think that the DWSD should attempt even briefly to recoup costs it had to place up front.  That it had to attempt to replace pipes and motors and systems once ignored?  Hello, anyone?  Infrastructure?

That said, however: should these bills be dismissed summarily due to the overall goodness of the UN?

But wait.  It gets better.

The No. 1 scofflaw isn’t a business but the State of Michigan, which the department said owes more than $5 million. Dave Murray, deputy press secretary for Gov. Rick Snyder (who is sheparding Detroit through the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history) said the bills have been disputed for the last five years over a possible broken water main near the old state fairgrounds in the city limits, which was mothballed several years ago.

And, with UN intervention, should not everything in Detroit simply “get better”?

With that, the UN is invited.

The UN weighs in, as per

The large-scale service shutoffs risk being inequitable, according to Leilani Farha, one member of the U.N. team. “If these water disconnections disproportionately affect African-Americans they may be discriminatory, in violation of treaties the U.S. has ratified,” Farha said in the press release.

She urged the U.S. government to ensure due process guarantees in relation to water disconnections.  

According to international human rights law, states are obligated to provide urgent remedial measures, including financial assistance, to ensure access to essential water and sanitation. “The households which suffered unjustified disconnections must be immediately reconnected,” the U.N. experts said.

UN intervention.

Further, in consideration of the UN, I have a suggestion.

Remove the UN from US shores.

Then, further, turn the UN buildings into either 1) expensive condos or 2) low income apartments.

My my my.

Nothing better than that.



Obama targets Syrian oil fields for air strikes

ISIS AirstrikesAnd this from the Enviro-Friendly President?

From, of all places:

Pentagon: New airstrikes target refineries used by ISIS in Syria

by Chelsea J. Carter, Barbara Starr and Gul Tuysuz

Washington (CNN)U.S. and coalition warplanes pounded ISIS positions in eastern Syria on Wednesday, targeting what a Pentagon official described as mobile oil refineries being used by the so-called Islamic State terror group.

The latest round of airstrikes were aimed at cutting off money flowing to ISIS, which makes up to $2 million a day from oil produced by the refineries, Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, told CNN.

Fighter jets from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates flew alongside U.S. aircraft during the operation, hitting 12 locations, Kirby said.

The airstrikes came just hours after U.S. President Barack Obama called for united action to confront ISIS, also referred to as ISIL.

Mr Obama has now bombed seven countries.  That is more than G.W. Bush.  That should make all Obaka Supporters so proud.  Pride in a man who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009.  And then was asked to return same.  Which he did not.

Nine wars now, Mr Obama?

And pride in a man who apparently supports the bombing of points to include oil sites.

Oil Fields BombedThere couldn’t possibly be anything LESS Enviro-Friendly than bombing an oil field, unless you believe that BP possesses its own air force.

And yet, despite this:

Bachmann Pull Their PassportMr Obaka does not make this embracement.  He couldn’t care less.  His priority includes the raping of our earth via military bombing of susceptible oil fields.

A despoiler of the environment?

A spiller of oil?

An igniter of chaos?

Thy name is Barack Hussein Obama.



Obama’s disdain for our military

Obama Disrespectful Salute to MarinesHere is the respect Mr Obama feels for our US military.  His coffee is more important than his Marines.

Not only does Mr Obama lack leadership, he lacks any semblance of respect for the office, our military, our traditions.  He has no interest in the office itself, save what it can do to feather his bed post-presidency.  He likes the thought of “being president” but despises the job itself because he is not obeyed instantly.

His legacy will be this: a worse president than even Jimmy Carter or William Henry Harrison.

Sir: it’s not a matter of optics.  It’s a matter of caring.