Mexican who shot three and killed two California deputies is ILLEGAL

Obama Murderer In ChiefLet me be blunt.

The abject ambush and murder of two deputies by an ILLEGAL MEXICAN in the central Sacramento Valley of California was completely avoidable.  The people who have blood on their hands because of these two murders are the POLITICIANS on both sides of the aisle who either voted for the borders to remain open and porous or placed the issue on Ignore Mode because it was too “touchy” for them to address.  Too “sensitive.”  We might offend illegal Mexicans, ISIS, welfare cheats or Free Cheesers who otherwise would vote — illegally or not.  We might “offend” people who don’t care about our laws or want to kill us.

And make no mistake: the DHS, CBP and Barack Hussein Obama have blood directly on their hands — particularly Mr Obama.  He is the man who refuses to close the southern border for any reason under any conditions, be it violence or terror or disease.

Two families have have their lives torn apart since last Friday the 24th, when an illegal Mexican shot two deputies in Sacramento, California, during a suspicious vehicle contact.  He killed one of the deputies, Danny Oliver, 47, with a long gun.  Oliver’s partner, Scott Brown, was able to return fire and wound the assailant in the hand.  The Oliver family has been torn asunder, as Danny leaves a wife and two daughters behind.

This is Deputy Oliver, Mr Obama.  Take a close look at him.  He was a good man, a warrior, and he helped keep Sacramento County safe and free.  He was what Lt. Col. Dave Grossman would term a sheepdog.  Please click that link in order to understand the word.

Deputy Danny Oliver, SSDThis is the man you couldn’t care less about.  This is the man who lost his life directly and distinctly because of your political policy regarding illegal Mexicans.  This is what not only your indifference has wrought, but your purposeful plans.

A short time and roughly 35 miles later, the Mexican (in the company of his wife) drove up Interstate 80 into Placer County outside the town of Auburn.  Two Placer County deputies came upon the red Ford pickup that the Mexican had carjacked from Sacramento.  Both were shot; Placer County Detective Michael Davis Jr. was killed.

Once again, Mr Obama, take a good and close look at Detective Michael Davis.

Deputy Michael Davis, Placer County SODetective Michael David Davis Jr. was killed 26 years — to the day — after his own law enforcement father was killed.  He too was a warrior and a sheepdog.

Deputies Father and Son“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”
– George Orwell

The illegal Mexican’s wife was caught.  He was later taken into custody from a rural home into which he had violently overtaken in order to escape.  Like most cowards, he did not take his own life when confronted by overwhelming law enforcement odds.  According to him, his life was infinitely more valuable than those he had previously taken.

Both suspects, the husband and wife, are from West Valley City in Utah.

We find, however, that the illegal Mexican was deported twice and convicted of drugs.

Sheriff’s officials have identified the suspect as Marcelo Marquez, but the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said in a statement Saturday that his name actually is Luis Enrique Monroy-Bracamonte.

Monroy-Bracamonte was first deported to Mexico in 1997 following his arrest and conviction in Arizona for possession of narcotics for sale; he was arrested and returned to Mexico a second time in 2001.

ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said the agency had filed an immigration detainer against him asking that he be turned over to federal authorities if and when he is released by local law enforcement.

Virginia Kice, sorry, I can only say: screw you.  You are more than a day late and a dollar short.  You should be embarrassed to be representing such a despotic regime as occurs under Mr Obama.  As if deporting this piece of excrement after-the-fact somehow makes up for or absolves the destruction he has wrought at the hands of the federal government.

You should be ashamed.  Terribly ashamed.

Where are the Republicans on this?  Frankly, I haven’t heard a peep.  I haven’t heard a tsunami of objection and outrage.  Where is it?  Why hasn’t it occurred?  Oh wait; I know.  Because DC politicians are, again — across the board — feckless cowards.

My suggestion to the families of the victims?

Instigate a 42 USC 1983 deprivation of civil rights action.  Why?  Because the civil rights of Deputies Oliver and Davis were abrogated by this illegal Mexican.  Because of the inactions of politicians in DC.

Specifically against Barack Hussein Obama.

He is the man responsible.  He is where the buck stops.

1983 Actions should work both ways and all ways.  Name him and shame him.

Finally: I lay the bodies of these two dead deputies at your feet, Barack Hussein Obama.

But you will do nothing but “monitor” and be “concerned.”

BZ

P.S.

Thank goodness Bill O’Reilly and other agents are taking the case of this illegal murdering Mexican under their collective wings.

 

 

Jack Bruce, bass player extraordinaire, dead at age 71

Jack Bruce Fretless Warwick BassOne of my all-time favorite bass players — who since 1976 embraced the fretless bass (made by Warwick, but Bruce originally played a Gibson EB-3 with Cream), passed away Saturday at the age of 71, of liver failure, at his home in Suffolk, England, with family about him.  Bruce had already been the recipient of a liver transplant in 2003, and he almost died because of organ rejection.

Born in Scotland in 1943, Jack Bruce gained his celebrity as the lead vocalist and bass player for the short-lived power trio Cream, with a young Eric Clapton on guitar and the incredible Ginger Baker on drums.  Cream lasted from 1966 to its breakup in 1968, with only three major albums under their belt, and an abbreviated fourth live album.

From there, Jack Bruce played with a host of artists and became a member of other smaller groups.  He also issued a number a solo albums.

He reunited in May of 2005 with Eric Clapton and Ginger Baker, as Cream, in order to play live at the Royal Albert Hall and Madison Square Garden.  Bruce was recovering from his liver transplant, and Ginger Baker played through terrible arthritis.  I have the DVD of these concerts and, frankly, the performances are absolutely splendid.

Let’s be frank: the playing of Jack Bruce is the reason that many young musicians decided to take up the bass instead of electric guitar.

God bless you sir, millions of people enjoyed your playing and you were an inspiration to all who aspired to take up the electric bass guitar as a musical instrument.

Here, Jack Bruce’s first solo album, “Songs For a Tailor” (1969) is hosted in its entirety:

BZ

Jack Bruce

BZ’s very own federal government: coming for MY First Amendment rights

First Amendment WrappedFirst, from the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Dems on FEC move to regulate Internet campaigns, blogs, Drudge

by Paul Bedard

In a surprise move late Friday, a key Democrat on the Federal Election Commission called for burdensome new rules on Internet-based campaigning, prompting the Republican chairman to warn that Democrats want to regulate online political sites and even news media like the Drudge Report.

Democratic FEC Vice Chair Ann M. Ravel announced plans to begin the process to win regulations on Internet-based campaigns and videos, currently free from most of the FEC’s rules. “A reexamination of the commission’s approach to the internet and other emerging technologies is long over due,” she said.

Does anyone with a semblance of common sense realize, for example, what the Drudge Report actually is?  For the most part Matt Drudge doesn’t write his stories; his site is merely an aggregator of stories from around the globe and around the internet.

He takes them and collates them, then places them on his site with accompanying headlines.  It is the headlines and the types of stories featured on Drudge to which Leftists object.  They also object to Drudge’s massive popularity and his incalculable hit ratio.

When Drudge makes a link to a story, that site’s servers can frequently be downed due to the quantity of hits.  To object to Drudge, however, is to object to reality.

“I told you this was coming.”

Under a 2006 FEC rule, free political videos and advocacy sites have been free of regulation in a bid to boost voter participation in politics. Only Internet videos that are placed for a fee on websites, such as the Washington Examiner, are regulated just like normal TV ads.

Ravel’s statement suggests that she would regulate right-leaning groups like America Rising that posts anti-Democrat YouTube videos on its website.

FEC Chairman Lee E. Goodman, a Republican, said if regulation extends that far, then anybody who writes a political blog, runs a politically active news site or even chat room could be regulated. He added that funny internet campaigns like “Obama Girl,” and “Jib Jab” would also face regulations.

“I told you this was coming,” he told Secrets. Earlier this year he warned that Democrats on the panel were gunning for conservative Internet sites like the Drudge Report.

An incredibly important final paragraph:

“Regrettably, the 3-to-3 vote in this matter suggests a desire to retreat from these important protections for online political speech — a shift in course that could threaten the continued development of the Internet’s virtual free marketplace of political ideas and democratic debate,” they concluded.

Ladies and gentlemen, when did you ever possibly believe that your First Amendment rights could even remotely be threatened by some capricious force that is not guaranteed by your federal government in its Bill of Rights or US Constitution?

Is that not insane?  Your federal government threatening its own guarantees?

BZ

US Flag Under Attack

Why Demorats do not want voter ID, and why they want illegals to vote:

From the WashingtonPost.com:

Could non-citizens decide the November election?

by Jesse Richman and David Earnest

Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.

In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.

That is precisely what the Demorats want.

Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.

But here’s the Crux of the Biscuit:

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

And there you go.  “Non-citizens tended to favor Democrats.”  That is precisely the reason for the Demorat pushback on voter ID laws, and the insistence on not closing our southern border.  It is no more complicated or craven than that.  Demorats seeking perpetual and unchallenged power.

BZ