Tag Archives: Chris Christie

“And then there were three”

Posted on by

GOP Debate 1-14-2016No, that’s not a reference to the group Genesis when lead singer Peter Gabriel and guitarist Steve Hackett had departed.

It’s a reference to the only three GOP presidential candidates who are still viable.

Thursday’s debate featured Chris Christie, Donald Trump, Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, John Kasich, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Cruz answers the “New York” question with logic whilst Trump conflates conservatives, Manhattan and 9/11. Hubcaps and fruitbats, Mr Trump.

Rand Paul was not present because of his failure to make the varsity squad.  He decided to take all his toys and go home.  Ho-hum, no loss.  The “undercard” debate is here.

The three remaining feasible presidential candidates in the GOP race are Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.  I would, however, throw Chris Christie into the mix as a proverbial wild card.

John Kasich is estimably a zero, Jeb Bush continues to disappoint and Ben Carson, though likely a dear man, has proven once and for all that he is nowhere prepared to take the office of president.  Frankly, Ben Carson was embarrassing to watch.

People say the GOP is falling apart.  Certainly there is tension and discontent between what I term the GOPEE (GOP Establishment Elite) and the conservative, fresher elements of the Republican Party.  Fractious, yes, but not moribund just yet.

People are forgetting what’s occurring directly across the street.

Hillary Clinton is fragmenting and beginning to implode herself.  Her numbers are plummeting.  Some analysts are saying Hillary is back in 2008.  Voters don’t trust her and, evidently, she doesn’t trust them either.

Finally, the GOP fog is beginning to clear.

I say: it’s about time.

Time to focus.

BZ

 

 Share

Tuesday night’s GOP debate

Posted on by

Hugh Hewitt & Donald TrumpCNN hosted the final Republican debate of 2015, Tuesday, December 15th.  Once again Hugh Hewitt was one of the questioners, and Wolf Blitzer was the moderator.

GOP Debate 12-15-2015First Debate:

Consisting of George Pataki, Rick Santorum, Lindsay Graham and Mike Huckabee, Huckabee appeared the most relaxed and easily spoken, whilst Graham was the most contentious but most emotive and passionate of the bunch, making some points as well.  In my mind, Graham was the winner though I certainly did not agree on all of his points.  The bottom line is this: the GOP could do without all of those persons clotting the ranks.  They should all move on.  They are yesterday’s news.

Second Debate:

The “prime” debate consisted of John Kasich, Carly Fiorina, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Ron Paul.

Rand Paul was obnoxious, Trump neither won nor lost and, to my mind, it was a toss-up between Cruz and Rubio.  Though, I must say, Christie did in fact score some serious points.

Ben Carson was massively unimpressive; a manikin could have been substituted with equal efficacy.  Carson isn’t ready for much of anything political.  Yes, no argument, Carson is the quintessential nice and good man.  He is not a politician and not ready for a position like this at all.  I should submit he’d best stick with his day job and, at most, local politics.

Kasich was also obnoxious.  He always has been.  There is a certain “something” about Kasich that simply rubs me the wrong way.

Fiorina spoke well but no one seems interested in listening to her. Her campaign appears to be, however, run by morons who have no idea how to market her.

Bush tried massively to be what he is not: overbearing, pushy, contentious — and it doesn’t play well with him because that’s not his nature.  Most everyone can tell it’s a FALSE persona, apparently shoved onto him by his handlers.  It’s fallacious and duplicitous and even 5-year-olds can see through it.  Bush is done, stick a fork in him.  He’s not the future of the GOP.  This proves Bush will do anything to win the presidency.  Things that are so incredibly removed from his comfort factor.

We see you, Jeb.  We know who you are and who you aren’t.

Since writing this a few hours ago, I have some further input.

Upon further consideration, Cruz and Rubio disappoint.

It is Christie who, frankly, appears more presidential and not so navel-gazing.

BZ

 

 Share

Wednesday GOP debate

Posted on by
BOULDER, CO - OCTOBER 28: Presidential candidates Ohio Governor John Kasich (L-R), Mike Huckabee, Jeb Bush, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Ted Cruz (R-TX), New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) take the stage at the CNBC Republican Presidential Debate at University of Colorados Coors Events Center October 28, 2015 in Boulder, Colorado. Fourteen Republican presidential candidates are participating in the third set of Republican presidential debates. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

BOULDER, CO – OCTOBER 28: Presidential candidates Ohio Governor John Kasich (L-R), Mike Huckabee, Jeb Bush, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Ted Cruz (R-TX), New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) take the stage at the CNBC Republican Presidential Debate at University of Colorados Coors Events Center October 28, 2015 in Boulder, Colorado. Fourteen Republican presidential candidates are participating in the third set of Republican presidential debates. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

As Americans, we tend to quantify people as winners or losers.

In this debate, first, who was the loser?

In my opinion, that’s easy: CNBC was the loser.  The “moderators.”

They should be ashamed of their clear bias but Leftists have no concept of “shame.”  Shame itself is a biased concept according to the Leftist philosophy.  No one should be made to feel ashamed.  Except, of course, Conservatives.  They actually stood up for themselves.

This debate boosted CNBC’s ratings more in one night than in the last few years.  CNBC knows that, which is why they agreed.  John Harwood was a smug NYT-typical goon displaying his true colors.  Proving nothing more than: CNBC still sucks.  And CNBC, tomorrow, will go back to being as insignificant as it was on Tuesday.  A fly speck.

Specifically, CNBC ratings became higher in one night than they’ve been in the past four years. Due to the GOP.  And CNBC despises the GOP.  It’s their job.

The very first question: “what’s your greatest weakness.”  Each question was no accident.  It wasn’t “off the cuff.”  There was nothing “off the cuff” for these debate questions.  The primary question was: “how are we going to fuck these Republicans?”

“Even in New Jersey what you’re doing now is called rude.”

Frankly, the candidates beat the moderators Wednesday night.  Each moderator was a Flaming Liberal.

The story was: the moderators tried, at every turn, to bait the candidates.  The story slowly became about the coalescence of the GOP group as opposed to the moderators.  Carly Fiorina spoke for the greatest amount of time, Jeb Bush for the least amount of time, with Rand Paul next least.  Rubio spoke for the “second greatest” amount of time.  Jeb Bush is now in keeping with his replacement of Mitt Romney for the poster child of “uninvolved.”

The judgment in retrospect will be: this was a train wreck for CNBC and validates what more people are coming to realize.  The American Media Maggots really are maggots.

Cruz did well, Rubio did well and Fiorina did well.

Trump, though he was of lesser energy, didn’t lose points.

Carson will stay the same.  People either love him or hate him.

Christie did well but he’s on the bubble.  This was make or break for Christie.

Kasich and Huckabee and Paul were unimpressive.  They will and should subsume.  Kasich always pisses me off so I’m biased — but — I couldn’t care less.  And no, I couldn’t care less that blind people have “non-24” either.

Jeb Bush attacking Marco Rubio was a bit of craven theater that resulted in Bush being diminished still.  Bush still doesn’t “get it.”  Thankfully, to his demise.

Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina.

Those are my Top Three.

Advice to the GOP debaters in the future.  Turn against Obama, then turn against his policies, then proffer your own solutions.  Make the linkage.  Connect the dots.  You’ve made a good advancement in terms of not attacking yourselves, particularly in this debate.  Keep calm and carry on.

Continue this trend at the next debate.

BZ

 

 Share

Why tonight’s GOP debate might be different

Posted on by

Hugh Hewitt Looks Right Smiling - DDifferent from what?

Different from most every other debate.

Why?  Because someone from the Right is going to be asking the questions of the candidates.

That would be Hugh Hewitt, he of Salem Radio and of the Hugh Hewitt Radio Show, broadcasting from a secret studio “somewhere” in Southern California.

Hugh is an unvarnished and unabashed supporter of the Republicans, and is going to work alongside Jake Tapper on the second GOP debate tonight at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley (to now include Carly Fiorina), hosted by CNN.  Tapper will moderate and Hewitt will pitch the questions.

2016 GOP Presidential Candidates 8-2015Once this became known, many GOP brokers who formerly disdained any appearance with Hewitt somewhat soiled their shorts in order to line up a segment on his radio show.  As a result Hugh has interviewed Chris Christie, Jeb Bush and any number of GOP presidential contenders.  People who wouldn’t have given Mr Hewitt the time of day prior.

To include Donald Trump, who accused Hugh of throwing him “gotcha” questions.  He later called Hugh a “third rate” radio announcer.  The full transcript of that interview is here, should you wish to read it.

He doesn’t mind asking difficult questions of his guests.  He was accused of attempting to sink Dr Ben Carson as well as Donald Trump.

The truth is, they only sank themselves by not being sufficiently prepared to appear on his show.

Further, you have to be smart enough to realize that the questions Hugh asked may be remarkably similar to the questions he’ll pose tonight.  That was called “show prep.”

This Politico article makes an interesting observation

Donald Trump’s Grand Inquisitor

Hugh Hewitt drew Trump’s ire with a smart question. On Wednesday night, the conservative talk radio host will be ready for round 2.

by Todd S. Purdum

When the motor-mouthed mogul next takes the stage with the ten nearest rivals who have failed for months to trip him up—much less get traction against him—Hugh Hewitt will be the only person in the debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library who has already managed to get the best of Donald Trump.

That distinction—earned ten days ago when Hewitt stumped Trump in an interview on his weekday radio show about the names of major world terrorist leaders, and the differences between Hamas and Hezbollah—means that Hewitt, who will serve as one of three debate questioners, may end up emerging as one of the central characters in the ongoing reality TV show that is this year’s GOP presidential primary. After all, it was Trump’s tangles in the last debate with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly that led days of news stories after the last debate—and Kelly and Trump only sparred once. What could a second round with Hewitt mean?

How did Hugh Hewitt find himself sitting in a chair asking questions at this debate?

“I lobbied incessantly,” with GOP chairman Reince Priebus, Hewitt explains during a break in taping his daily three-hour “Hugh Hewitt Show,” which has aired for 15 years on the conservative Salem Radio Network, co-sponsor with CNN of the debate. “For the general principle that conservative journalists be included as a counterbalance to mainstream media’s left tilt.”

So will this be a repeat of the Trump-Hewitt clash earlier this month?  Or will it be Trump vs Everyone Else On Stage?

No matter what, the questions posed will have punch, relevancy and intelligence.

BZ

 

 Share