On Super Bowl Sunday, in an interview with Fox’s Bill O’Reilly, Mr Barack Hussein Obama continued to LIE, and in a bald faced way, to the American public. His SOTU last week was the lowest-rated in years due to its empty rhetoric. He was unimpressive last week and he was unimpressive with O’Reilly — but, at least, was consistent in his insistence on lying to the American Taxpayer.
Obama doesn’t “prevaricate,” he doesn’t “shade,” he doesn’t “hedge,” he doesn’t make a “falsehood,” he doesn’t “invent,” he doesn’t “fictionalize.” He LIES.
Throughout the interview, Obama consistently tried to overtalk O’Reilly again and again and again. Mr Obama possesses no cogent argument other than to push the issue back into the face of Fox and make it personal and the responsibility of a media network and not the President of the United States.
Obama believes that he is clearly The Smartest Guy In The Room, no matter where he goes. And that is a derailment factor.
Obama promulgates a pattern of deception and outright lies that I haven’t before witnessed from a sitting president in my 60+ years.
The ten minute interview is below; the transcript is here.
Excerpts from the interview:
O’REILLY: And I’m paying Kathleen Sebelius’ salary and she screwed up.
OBAMA: Yes.
O’REILLY: And you’re not holding her accountable.
OBAMA: Yes, well, I… I promise you that we hold everybody up and down the line accountable. But when we’re…
O’REILLY: But she’s still there.
OBAMA: …when we’re in midstream, Bill, we want to make sure that our main focus is how do we make this thing work so that people are able to sign up?
And that’s what we’ve done.
O’REILLY: All right.
A LIE. Obama holds no one accountable, least of all himself.
O’REILLY: All right.
Libya, House Armed Services testimony, General Carter Ham, you know, the general?
OBAMA: Yes. Right.
O’REILLY: Security in Africa.
OBAMA: Yes.
O’REILLY: He testified that on the day that the ambassador was murdered and the three other Americans, all right, he told Secretary Panetta it was a terrorist attack. Shortly after Ham, General Ham, said that, Secretary Panetta came in to you.
OBAMA: Yes.
O’REILLY: Did he tell you, Secretary Panetta, it was a terrorist attack?
OBAMA: You know what he told me was that there was an attack on our compound…
O’REILLY: He didn’t tell you…
OBAMA: (INAUDIBLE)
O’REILLY: …he didn’t use the word “terror?”
OBAMA: You know, in… in the heat of the moment, Bill, what folks are focused on is what’s happening on the ground, do we have eyes on it, how can we make sure our folks are secure…
O’REILLY: Because I just want to get this on the record…
OBAMA: So, I…
O’REILLY: …did he tell you it was a terror attack?
OBAMA: Bill… and what I’m… I’m answering your question. What he said to me was, we’ve got an attack on our compound. We don’t know yet…
O’REILLY: No terror attack?
OBAMA: …we don’t know yet who’s doing it. Understand, by definition, Bill, when somebody is attacking our compound…
O’REILLY: Yes?
OBAMA: …that’s an act of terror, which is how I characterized it the day after it happened. So the… so the question ends up being who, in fact, was attacking us?
A LIE. Obama did NOT characterize it as a terror attack the day after. He and Clinton characterized it as an uprising from a video.
O’REILLY: …but I just want to say that they’re… your detractors believe that you did not tell the world it was a terror attack because your campaign didn’t want that out.
OBAMA: Bill, think about…
O’REILLY: That’s what they believe.
OBAMA: …and they believe it because folks like you are telling them that.
Because, Mr Obama, that just happens to be the TRUTH. And Barack Hussein Obama is the world’s best filibusterer and consistently refuses to answer questions that aren’t the most base of softballs.
O’REILLY: OK, so you don’t… you don’t recall seeing Shulman, because what some people are saying is that the IRS was used…
OBAMA: Yes.
O’REILLY: …at a… at a local level in Cincinnati, and maybe other places to go after…
OBAMA: Absolutely wrong.
O’REILLY: …to go after.
OBAMA: Absolutely wrong.
O’REILLY: But how do you know that, because we… we still don’t know what happened there?
OBAMA: Bill, we do… that’s not what happened. They… folks have, again, had multiple hearings on this. I mean these kinds of things keep on surfacing, in part because you and your TV station will promote them.
And once again Mr Obama tries to bullshit his way out of being pinned down. He LIES once again.
And the greatest, most bald-faced and blatant LIE of all? See if you can get past reading this:
O’REILLY: You’re saying no corruption (about the IRS)?
OBAMA: No.
O’REILLY: None? No?
OBAMA: There were some — there were some bone-headed decisions…
O’REILLY: Bone-headed decisions…
OBAMA: …out of… out of a local office…
O’REILLY: But no mass corruption?
OBAMA: Not even mass corruption, not even a smidgeon of corruption, I would say.
No. Not even a “smidgeon of corruption” by the IRS. Not a molecule. A LIE. A HUGE LIE.
O’REILLY: OK. I got a letter from Kathy La Master, Fresno, California. I said I would read one letter from the folks, all right?
OBAMA: All right.
O’REILLY: Mr. President, why do you feel it’s necessary to fundamentally transform the nation that has afforded you so much opportunity and success?
OBAMA: I don’t think we have to fundamentally transform the nation…
O’REILLY: But those are your words.
Another LIE. How about a little video, Mr Obama:
Dana Milbank from the Washington Post recently took O’Reilly to task in an editorial, here. He thinks Bill O’Reilly was disrespectful and rude.
But this time, O’Reilly gave only a passing pleasantry at the end (“I think your heart is in the right place”) and otherwise was hostile from the start. He leaned forward in his seat, waving his pen and pointing his finger at the president. He shook his head doubtfully at some of Obama’s answers.
Well boo-hoo-hoo, Mr Milbank, Bill O’Reilly actually stood some ground and at least attempted to acquire some answers — which Barack Hussein Obama deflected and filibustered. O’Reilly waved a pen! O’Reilly leaned forward! Heinous! Despicable! Apparently you interpret journalists attempting to do what journalists do as rudeness. Reverse the role. Now insert GW Bush. No objection from you, I’d submit. Bush must pay! O’Reilly as Dick Cheney!
I’ve already written about how Mr Obama lies about his lies. Obama’s deceptive statements were deliberate and were intended to bolster his ability to get Obamacare passed in 2010 and get him reelected in 2012, according to aides cited in a Wall Street Journal article.
As I documented here and here and here and here and here, Obama lies and covers up his lies. And the gullible and the idiots in American continue to sup up his dirty bowl of lies.
Various media forms are saying Bill O’Reilly was “rude” in his interview with Mr Obama. I say that Bill O’Reilly was much more taciturn than I’ve seen him in a while. I also submit that it was, instead, Mr Obama who was rude. Note how many times Obama attempts to verbally steamroller over O’Reilly and interrupts him.
Obama was, once again, a petulant child in his interview with Bill O’Reilly.
And, once again, Obama spewed lie after lie after lie.
BZ
