The longer Bernie Sanders stays in this race, the more that Millennials will determine not to vote for Hillary Clinton. They will even consider voting for Donald Trump, just to make a statement.
Millennials believe that, absent Bernie, Hillary is stiff, a sell-out, unlikeable, false. Those are their words.
Clinton refuses to say gun ownership a constitutional right
by Gabby Morrongiello
Hillary Clinton declined to say during an interview Sunday whether she believes the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution.
“Do you believe that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right, that it’s not linked to service in a militia?” ABC’s George Stephanopoulos asked the Democratic presidential front-runner.
“I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice [Antonin] Scalia, and there was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right, as we do with every amendment, to impose reasonable regulations,” Clinton responded.
She added, “So I believe we can have common-sense gun safety measures consistent with the Second Amendment.”
Here’s a clue: even for George Stephanopoulis, that wasn’t an answer. It was Mouth Jello. World pablum.
“But that’s not what I asked,” Stephanopoulos interjected. “I said, do you believe that their conclusion that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right?”
“If it is a constitutional right, then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulations, and what people have done with that decision is to take it as far as they possibly can and reject what has been our history from the very beginning of the republic, where some of the earliest laws that were passed were about firearms,” Clinton said, declining a second time to answer the question directly.
“IF.”
For God’s sake, even Bernie Sanders believes in the Second Amendment more than Hillary Clinton.
Elizabeth Warren, being a good Leftist sycophant for Hillary Clinton, opened up a proverbial Pandora’s Box (sorry, couldn’t resist) when she said, about Donald Trump:
“Donald Trump was drooling over the idea of a housing meltdown – because it meant he could buy up more property on the cheap,” Warren said Tuesday in Washington at a Center for Popular Democracy gala. “What kind of a man does that? What kind of a man roots for people to get thrown out of their house? What kind of man roots for people to get thrown out of their jobs?”
“I’ll tell you exactly what kind of a man does that: It is a man who cares about no one but himself,” she went on. “A small, insecure money-grubber who doesn’t care who gets hurt, so long as he makes a profit off it.”
But there’s a problem.
The problem is, Elizabeth Warren is also a money grubber because the made a quarter of a MILLION dollars in PROFIT from foreclosed homes. She made a ridiculous profit from the pain of others.
Elizabeth Warren accused of making a fortune from flipping foreclosed homes
Harvard professor and U.S. Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren is back in the headlines after it was revealed that she took part in around 12 lucrative real estate deals using manoeuvres such as ‘flipping’ properties to make profits.
Mind you, this article I found is from June of 2012 — long before Warren accused Trump of doing the same thing she did. Perhaps Warren has forgotten there is something called the “internet” which tends to have something of a longer memory than she does?
Warren has in the past rallied against predatory banks and heartless foreclosures but that didn’t stop her using the controversial tactics to make fortunes.
On her website she writes: ‘We are in the midst of one of the greatest economic crises in our country’s history — a crisis that began one lousy mortgage at a time’.
But apparently Trump is a money-grubber and she is not. Because she was hopeful that persons such as myself would somehow not conduct any kind of a search-engine consultation?
But the college professor was herself an active player in the real estate market in the 1990s, buying and selling properties at steep mark-ups across her home city of Oklahoma, land records show.
Money grubber.
She loaned money to relatives at high interest rates and paid bargain prices for foreclosed properties.
Money grubber.
One such property she bought for $30,000, then sold for $145,000 five months later, a 383 per cent mark-up.
A 383% mark-up. Damned money grubber.
Warren typically gained between 10 and 73 per cent on her sales, netting hefty profits.
Difference between Trump and Clinton as president: One million barrels of oil a day
by Sara Sjolin
U.S. oil production is bound for a significant shake up after the presidential election in November, says a senior editor at energy-information provider Platts.
“This election is going to have a major impact on the direction of U.S. and, possibly, global oil supply. Maybe the most significant impact of any election in U.S. history,” said Brian Scheid, senior oil editor at Platts, at the Platts Crude Oil Summit in London on Tuesday.
Looking at a worst case/best case scenario worked out between several analysts in Washington, he estimated that with a Republican win, U.S. oil production could jump by as much as 500,000 barrels a day. If the Democrats win, there could be a decline of 500,000 barrels a day, Scheid said.
I’ll say this again for those of you may just have tuned in.
I am not a Trump guy. I was a Ted Cruz guy.
But when Hillary is the opponent, I’ll go with anyone who essentially isn’t Hillary. And though it will make the enamel fleck off my teeth to do so, I will vote for Donald Trump. This may be another reason.