Tag Archives: Kathleen Sebelius

Obama continues to LIE: the Bill O’Reilly interview on Super Bowl Sunday

Posted on by

Obama LiesOn Super Bowl Sunday, in an interview with Fox’s Bill O’Reilly, Mr Barack Hussein Obama continued to LIE, and in a bald faced way, to the American public.  His SOTU last week was the lowest-rated in years due to its empty rhetoric.  He was unimpressive last week and he was unimpressive with O’Reilly — but, at least, was consistent in his insistence on lying to the American Taxpayer.

Obama doesn’t “prevaricate,” he doesn’t “shade,” he doesn’t “hedge,” he doesn’t make a “falsehood,” he doesn’t “invent,” he doesn’t “fictionalize.”  He LIES.

Throughout the interview, Obama consistently tried to overtalk O’Reilly again and again and again.  Mr Obama possesses no cogent argument other than to push the issue back into the face of Fox and make it personal and the responsibility of a media network and not the President of the United States.

Obama believes that he is clearly The Smartest Guy In The Room, no matter where he goes.  And that is a derailment factor.

Obama promulgates a pattern of deception and outright lies that I haven’t before witnessed from a sitting president in my 60+ years.

The ten minute interview is below; the transcript is here.

Excerpts from the interview:

O’REILLY: And I’m paying Kathleen Sebelius’ salary and she screwed up.

OBAMA: Yes.

O’REILLY: And you’re not holding her accountable.

OBAMA: Yes, well, I… I promise you that we hold everybody up and down the line accountable. But when we’re…

O’REILLY: But she’s still there.

OBAMA: …when we’re in midstream, Bill, we want to make sure that our main focus is how do we make this thing work so that people are able to sign up?

And that’s what we’ve done.

O’REILLY: All right.

A LIE.  Obama holds no one accountable, least of all himself.

O’REILLY: All right.

Libya, House Armed Services testimony, General Carter Ham, you know, the general?

OBAMA: Yes. Right.

O’REILLY: Security in Africa.

OBAMA: Yes.

O’REILLY: He testified that on the day that the ambassador was murdered and the three other Americans, all right, he told Secretary Panetta it was a terrorist attack. Shortly after Ham, General Ham, said that, Secretary Panetta came in to you.

OBAMA: Yes.

O’REILLY: Did he tell you, Secretary Panetta, it was a terrorist attack?

OBAMA: You know what he told me was that there was an attack on our compound…

O’REILLY: He didn’t tell you…

OBAMA: (INAUDIBLE)

O’REILLY: …he didn’t use the word “terror?”

OBAMA: You know, in… in the heat of the moment, Bill, what folks are focused on is what’s happening on the ground, do we have eyes on it, how can we make sure our folks are secure…

O’REILLY: Because I just want to get this on the record…

OBAMA: So, I…

O’REILLY: …did he tell you it was a terror attack?

OBAMA: Bill… and what I’m… I’m answering your question. What he said to me was, we’ve got an attack on our compound. We don’t know yet…

O’REILLY: No terror attack?

OBAMA: …we don’t know yet who’s doing it. Understand, by definition, Bill, when somebody is attacking our compound…

O’REILLY: Yes?

OBAMA: …that’s an act of terror, which is how I characterized it the day after it happened. So the… so the question ends up being who, in fact, was attacking us?

A LIE.  Obama did NOT characterize it as a terror attack the day after.  He and Clinton characterized it as an uprising from a video.

O’REILLY: …but I just want to say that they’re… your detractors believe that you did not tell the world it was a terror attack because your campaign didn’t want that out.

OBAMA: Bill, think about…

O’REILLY: That’s what they believe.

OBAMA: …and they believe it because folks like you are telling them that.

Because, Mr Obama, that just happens to be the TRUTH.  And Barack Hussein Obama is the world’s best filibusterer and consistently refuses to answer questions that aren’t the most base of softballs.

O’REILLY: OK, so you don’t… you don’t recall seeing Shulman, because what some people are saying is that the IRS was used…

OBAMA: Yes.

O’REILLY: …at a… at a local level in Cincinnati, and maybe other places to go after…

OBAMA: Absolutely wrong.

O’REILLY: …to go after.

OBAMA: Absolutely wrong.

O’REILLY: But how do you know that, because we… we still don’t know what happened there?

OBAMA: Bill, we do… that’s not what happened. They… folks have, again, had multiple hearings on this. I mean these kinds of things keep on surfacing, in part because you and your TV station will promote them.

And once again Mr Obama tries to bullshit his way out of being pinned down.  He LIES once again.

And the greatest, most bald-faced and blatant LIE of all?  See if you can get past reading this:

O’REILLY: You’re saying no corruption (about the IRS)?

OBAMA: No.

O’REILLY: None? No?

OBAMA: There were some — there were some bone-headed decisions…

O’REILLY: Bone-headed decisions…

OBAMA: …out of… out of a local office…

O’REILLY: But no mass corruption?

OBAMA: Not even mass corruption, not even a smidgeon of corruption, I would say.

No.  Not even a “smidgeon of corruption” by the IRS.  Not a molecule.  A LIE.  A HUGE LIE.

O’REILLY: OK. I got a letter from Kathy La Master, Fresno, California. I said I would read one letter from the folks, all right?

OBAMA: All right.

O’REILLY: Mr. President, why do you feel it’s necessary to fundamentally transform the nation that has afforded you so much opportunity and success?

OBAMA: I don’t think we have to fundamentally transform the nation…

O’REILLY: But those are your words.

Another LIE.  How about a little video, Mr Obama:

Dana Milbank from the Washington Post recently took O’Reilly to task in an editorial, here.  He thinks Bill O’Reilly was disrespectful and rude.

But this time, O’Reilly gave only a passing pleasantry at the end (“I think your heart is in the right place”) and otherwise was hostile from the start. He leaned forward in his seat, waving his pen and pointing his finger at the president. He shook his head doubtfully at some of Obama’s answers.

Well boo-hoo-hoo, Mr Milbank, Bill O’Reilly actually stood some ground and at least attempted to acquire some answers — which Barack Hussein Obama deflected and filibustered.  O’Reilly waved a pen!  O’Reilly leaned forward!  Heinous!  Despicable!  Apparently you interpret journalists attempting to do what journalists do as rudeness.  Reverse the role.  Now insert GW Bush.  No objection from you, I’d submit.  Bush must pay!  O’Reilly as Dick Cheney!

Dick Cheney Can Kill YouI’ve already written about how Mr Obama lies about his lies.  Obama’s deceptive statements were deliberate and were intended to bolster his ability to get Obamacare passed in 2010 and get him reelected in 2012, according to aides cited in a Wall Street Journal article.

As I documented here and here and here and here and here, Obama lies and covers up his lies.  And the gullible and the idiots in American continue to sup up his dirty bowl of lies.

Various media forms are saying Bill O’Reilly was “rude” in his interview with Mr Obama.  I say that Bill O’Reilly was much more taciturn than I’ve seen him in a while.  I also submit that it was, instead, Mr Obama who was rude.  Note how many times Obama attempts to verbally steamroller over O’Reilly and interrupts him.

Obama was, once again, a petulant child in his interview with Bill O’Reilly.

And, once again, Obama spewed lie after lie after lie.

BZ

 

 Share

The goodness and kindness of Leftists: young black single mother fired from ObamaCare Help Line for speaking to Sean Hannity

Posted on by

I’d posit this video says it all:

Ah, the virtuous, kind, understanding, loving, all-inclusive, humble, non-judgmental, nurturing, moral, accepting and ethical goodness of Leftists nationwide, and particularly those in charge of the administration of Obamacare, no matter who they may be, from Kathleen Sebelius on down.

After all, Lord knows, this young single black mother with one son certainly needed to be fired from her five-week, low-paying Obamacare phone-help job (the Healthcare Marketplace Call Center) — as she deigned to be helpful and speak to the Evil Sean Hannity.

Earline Davis had the temerity to speak to the “enemy” and, for that, was fired summarily the very next day, held in a locked room, not allowed to go back to her place at the phone desk, not allowed to go back to her locker.  She was then escorted, by a number of security people (you can see, Earline Davis being an imposing thug herself), out of the building where she worked — past tense.

Sean Hannity makes an excellent point: Earline Davis lost her job for being effective, helpful and kind, whilst Kathleen Sebelius, as arrogant, unhelpful, condescending and ineffectual as she is, still has her job.

Imagine that.

Those kind Leftists.

BZ

 

 

 Share

Ouch! Tenn. state senator presents Kathleen Sebelius with book that might come in handy

Posted on by

From Twitchy.com:

Tennessee State Senator Brian Kelsey presented Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius with a gift today during her visit to his state:

Kathleen Sebelius Twieet from KelseyFollowing that, the photograph is simply too priceless for words.  Please, oh please, lock onto the gesicht of Sebelius.  Enlarge for even greater grandeur.

Kathleen Sebelius Websites For DummiesSometimes Life is simply this enjoyable.

BZ

 

 Share

Kathleen Sebelius in her arrogance to America: “whatever.”

Posted on by

Kathleen Sebelius CUKathleen Sebelius is one quite arrogant bitch.

And that’s the best I can say of her.

From the BusinessInsider.com:

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS TO CONGRESS: ‘Whatever’

by Brett LoGiurato

It was two and a half hours into her testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday when Secretary of Health and Human Services became so exasperated enough to answer repeated questions with a simple, “Whatever.”

“Exasperated.”

Let me, as pols say, “unpack that.”

Translated = tired of having to defend her steps and activities, and actually answer for decisions and actions to which she is tasked and responsible.

A mere two and a half hours into testimony.

Anyone who is a cop has been on the stand in open court for at least one to two hours, minimum.  On roughly each and every case.  You will have perhaps hundreds of cases in your career upon which you must testify.  And for which you are directly and personally answerable and responsible.

As a Homcide Bureau detective for my department, I have been on the stand not just for two days, not just four days, not just five days, but two weeks straight.

So, that Kathleen Sebelius had to actually answer a few questions for two hours and, at that point, decided to cork off into Dismissively Smarmy Mode, I say: boo fucking hoo.  My heart bleeds for you, as HHS Secretary, to the tune of a minimum of $180,000 per year.

Any of you make $180K a year?  Bueller?

“Did I hear it wrong?”

“Why aren’t you losing your health insurance?” Rep. Cory Gardner asks.  “Why are you not in the exchange?”

“I am not eligible for the exchange,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius replies.

FoxNews wrote:

Sebelius responded that given that she has affordable, available health insurance through her employee, she is not eligible to participate in the exchange, and it would in fact be illegal.

To applause from the chamber, Gardner said, “With all due respect Madame Secretary, I would encourage you to be just like the American people and enter the exchange.”

That was a LIE.  She is eligible.

She LIES.

And Mr Obama LIES and Jay Carney LIES and the bulk of persons in the Obama Administration LIE.

After all: “whatever.”

She has hers.  And the rest of you are Serfs, Proles and Groundlings, less than the mucus from her nostrils, the pus from her cysts.

BZ

 

 Share

What the AMM aren’t covering: “Sebelius shakes down companies she regulates for cash to implement ObamaCare”

Posted on by

Sibelius LeftistFrom the Cato Institute:

By

Michael F. Cannon

Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius’ latest abuse of power has strengthened the case for her removal from office. Before discussing her latest misconduct, let’s review some of Sebelius’ past abuses of power.

  • In 2010, Sebelius described anonymous political speech as “dangerous.” Ironically, Sebelius’ lashing out at her political opponents’ free-speech rights is dangerous because it is the sort of rhetoric that might encourage agencies like the IRS to target groups that “criticize how the country is being run.” That’s exactly what the IRS has admitted doing – which in turn is a good argument for protecting anonymous political speech.
  • So too is Sebelius’ 2010 threat to put health insurance companies out of business. Shortly after ObamaCare became law, insurers began telling their customers how much it was going to increase their premiums. In a September 2010 letter to insurers, Sebelius shot back that premiums would rise no more than 2 percent, even as her department predicted increases as high as 7 percent. Insurers that didn’t toe the party line “may be excluded from health insurance Exchanges in 2014.” That was no idle threat, I wrote at the time. Since “Medicare’s chief actuary predicts that in the future, ‘essentially all‘ Americans will get their health insurance through those exchanges,” Sebelius was essentially threatening to put insurers out of business if they disagreed with her.
  • In 2011, Sebelius approved her department issuing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to private health insurance companies under the rubric of ObamaCare that the statute expressly forbids HHS to issue.
  • In 2012, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel concluded that Sebelius violated the Hatch Act by campaigning for President Obama and other political candidates while traveling on official business, an offense for which other federal workers are fired.
  • In a July 2012 letter to the nation’s governors, Sebelius arbitrarily rewrote and narrowed the Supreme Court’s ruling in NFIB v. Sebelius to allow HHS to continue coercing states into implementing parts of ObamaCare’s Medicaid expansion.
  • When it became apparent that two-thirds of states would not implement one of ObamaCare’s health insurance “exchanges,” Sebelius dismissed the idea that a lack of congressionally authorized funding for federal Exchanges would stop her department from implementing them. “We are going to get it done,” she said. Now we learn she substituted her own judgment for Congress’ by raiding ObamaCare’s Prevention and Public Health Fund to the tune of $454 million to fund federal Exchanges. But even that wasn’t enough.

But wait; here is the crux of the biscuit:

Now we learn, from the Washington Post’s Sarah Kliff, “Sebelius has, over the past three months, made multiple phone calls to health industry executives, community organizations and church groups and directly asked that they contribute to non-profits that are working to enroll uninsured Americans and increase awareness of the law.”

Once again, Leftist government steamrolling over citizens and organizations in order to ram down a political agenda at the behest of Barack Milhous Obama.

Seen in the media?  Discussed by the American Media Maggots?

Of course not.

And one teeny-tiny thing one might want to consider: this is illegal.

BZ

 

 

 Share