I’ve not addressed many of my posts, here, regarding Mitt Romney.
Because, admittedly, Mitt Romney wasn’t my first choice for the GOP. That said, he is what he is and he holds what he holds. And that is this: the GOP choice for president.
I could go green, I could go Libertarian, I could go any number of LOSER parties. They just don’t have the clout, the numbers, the power. Plain and simple. It still comes down to Demorats vs the GOP. And me voting Demorat whilst I still have a brain? Uh, no: Never.
So I stacked my cards up with Mitt Romney. And then I placed, shall we say, a lot of cash with Mr Romney. To the point where I’ve been asked to attend a local dinner with him. As I placed with my local 4th District federal representative, Tom McClintock, some months earlier. When I walk a walk, I also talk a talk and fund a walk. Ask TF or Bushwack. Instead of shutting up, I put up.
And please remember, that said, he was far from my first choice. People talk about the elder elements in both parties — I’d have to place Mr Romney on that periphery. Although, just, a bit at the fringe because he hasn’t attained serial appointments for the past thirty years like much of the Staid GOP. The Comfortable, Elder, Bloated, Moderate, Elite, Back-Slapping GOP. The CEBMEBS.
Mitt Romney is potentially up 20 points amongst Caucasoid voters.
And as I surmised earlier, some black pastors aren’t quite so taken with Mr Obama’s stance on gay marriage. To the point where they are actively advocating against Mr Obama.
Washington (CNN) – A group of conservative black pastors are responding to President Barack Obama’s support of same-sex marriage with what they say will be a national campaign aimed at rallying black Americans to rethink their overwhelming support of the President, though the group’s leader is offering few specifics about the effort.
To help himself — Mr Obama decided to donate $5,000 to himself!
That said, Mr Romney had an incredibly-positive visit to Israel which could be summarized in this fashion:
BY BRET STEPHENS
Mitt Romney infuriated Palestinians during his visit to Israel on the weekend by calling Jerusalem “the capital of Israel.” He then added insult to injury by noting—in the context of a discussion of “culture”—the “dramatically stark difference in economic vitality” between Israelis and Palestinians. A Palestinian official called the remark “racist.”
Racist?
How about “Culturist”? Because, truly, the Palestinians exhibit a LOSING culture as contrasted to that of Israelis.
So there we go:
Again, as with Leftists, the truth gets kicked aside.
BZ