City of Sacramento, another Leftist haven

Sacramento, City ofThat should be a surprise to no one, considering Sacramento is home to the Fornicalia Bill Mill and is the veritable Belly of the Beast, governmentally-speaking.

That the City of Sacramento wants to get rid of cars in the downtown area should, resultingly, be no shock either.  That they’re starting with jacking up the rates of parking and making parking itself more difficult goes with the Leftist territory.

Except for one teensy-weensy problem: those evil capitalists who have businesses downtown.

You know, like, eh, they have to make, like, money, like profit, dude?  You know?

From KCRA.com:

Proposed downtown parking changes met with concerns

Though this is a video, it indicates that the City of Sacramento wants to increase parking rates from $1.25 to $1.75 an hour.  The city wants drivers to move from on-street parking to off-street parking in garages.

The city says it is “trying to make this city more transit-oriented, trying to get people out of using their cars for everything they do every day.”

A proposed program called SpotZone will let people manage parking with their smartphones.  If they exceed the meter’s time, they can pay a higher rate instead of getting a ticket.

In a one hour zone that regularly costs $1.75 an hour, the second hour would jump to $3, with each additional hour costing $3.75.

Of course, that doesn’t do much if you can’t afford the higher base rates or the higher adjusted rates or the ticket itself.

But it’s not all bad news; the City of Sacramento also plans to expand its metered parking hours and days to include Sundays, holidays and special events.  It also plans to meter spots until 2 AM.

In many areas, places unmetered would magically become metered, become zoned as restrictive or there would be parking time limits.

The other good news?

If approved, the city believes meter revenue will increase by 10 to 25 percent.

The truth is, the City of Sacramento already makes $5.5 MILLION dollars on its parking fees.

The City of Sacramento complains about people coming into their city to park.  But who comes to the downtown area during the day to park?  That’s right, people from surrounding Sacramento County, people from surrounding counties (plural) and people throughout the state who are forced, by various ways, rules, regulations and mandates to do business with the city itself, the county itself or the State of California itself.  They have no choice.  That is where the seats of those various forms of govenrment exist.

Yippee!  The City of Sacramento will assist in making sure businesses in the downtown area lose customers, volume and, simultaneously, have to increase prices.

Now this is a true Leftist Success Story indeed!

BZ

 

Direct from Fornicalia: Baby taken from Sacramento parents who wanted a second opinion, judge expected to address case

sammy-nikolayevFrom Counsel&Heal.com:

On Monday, a judge is expected to weigh in on a local custody case that revolves around a young Russian couple living in Sacramento, California and their 5-month-old baby boy that was removed from them by Child Protective Services last Wednesday.

It all began when Anna Nikolayev and her husband Alex took their 5-month-old boy Sammy to Sutter Memorial Hospital to be treated for flu symptoms two weeks ago, but said they were not happy with the medical attention their son was receiving from the staff members, according to KXTV news.

Okay; sounds logical.  Let’s continue:

Since Sammy also suffers from a heart murmur, doctors at Sutter admitted him to the pediatric ICU to monitor his condition. After a few days, Anna said doctors began talking about heart surgery.

During their stay at the hospital, Anna asked once why a nurse was giving her son antibiotics.

“I asked her, for what is that? And she’s like, ‘I don’t know.’ I’m like, ‘you’re working as a nurse, and you don’t even know what to give to my baby for what,'” Anna recounted the event. Her enquiry potentially protected the little boy because later a doctor said Sammy shouldn’t have been on the antibiotics in the first place.

This sounds not-so-good.  A nurse not knowing why she’s administering a drug to a baby?

The couple promptly took Sammy out of the hospital without a proper discharge and sought a second opinion at rival hospital Kaiser Permanente.

Ah; there you go: a rival hospital.

While the Nikolayevs were at Kaiser, police arrived, presumably called by doctors at Sutter Memorial. Anna was forced to show the police a note from a Kaiser doctor, which read: “I do not have concern for the safety of the child at home with his parents.”

“[The police] saw the baby was fine,” Anna said. “They told us that Sutter was telling them so much bad stuff that they thought this baby was dying in our arms. So police saw the report from doctors and said, ‘Okay, you guys have a good day,’ then walked away.”

At this point: a problem.  Then likely a problem solved.  But it doesn’t stop there.  Continuing:

Just a day after Sammy was discharged home, police along with representatives from Child Protective Services (CPS) entered the family home without a warrant and took Sammy from Anna’s arms and walked out. A camera that Anna set up in the living room recorded the entire event. In the video, a police officer is heard telling Anna “I’m going to grab your baby, and don’t resist, and don’t fight me, okay?” 

Sammy remains in protective custody at Sutter Memorial Hospital, and his parents are only able to visit him under supervision for a few hours a day.

To which I respond: what the Hell??

Is the issue, truly, that doctors can no longer be second-guessed?  And police are entrapped between?

Frankly, ladies and gentlemen, at first blush, this completely stinks of police/government intrusion and wrongful intervention.

BZ