Obama Blames U.S. For Gun Violence In Mexico

From RealClearPolitics.com:

“Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States,” President Obama said during a speech at Mexico’s Anthropology Museum.

Unspoken was the fact that those so-called “deadly guns in Mexico” also sourced from the US government itself, via the “Fast & Furious” program under BATFE.  Univision in Mexico also discovered additional information about how the US government more fully armed the Mexican drug cartels.  Thank you, Mr Obaka, for your lies spewed directly upon the sovereign soil of Mexico on Friday.  A refresher for us all:

As with all else on the planet, whatever ill that occurs is the responsibility and fault of the United States of America.
Yes, the US is the root cause of all gang violence in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of all the gun violence in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of all the poverty in Mexico.  Yes, the US is the root cause of anyone in Mexico having a firearm in their possession.  If Mexico wanted to stop foreign gun violence, perhaps they should build their own firearms manufacturing facilities.  Then the drug cartels could take over these factories for their own ends and simply cut out the middle man.Let’s take a step back.  Ultimately, what is Mr Obama doing here?  I say it is this:

He is speaking directly to the new voters of the United States.  He is speaking directly to the new Tit-Sucking Underclass about to be created when amnesty occurs, and when Illegal Mexicans are allowed to be seated on juries and decide criminal and civil cases involving their drug-dealing and law-violating friends.

Because, you must ask, just how will these new Mexicans vote when amnesty passes and they remain in the United States, and when Obama and the Demorats continue to provide Free Cheese?  Why yes, that would be correct: Demorat.

Mr Obama was doing nothing more, on Friday in Mexico, than speaking to his newest conglomerate of voters.

More apologism, more breast-beating, more America bashing in order to pander and subjugate the country for the demographically-increasing Mexican Illegal Invader vote.

I feel comforted.

Don’t you?

BZ

 

 

Some comments regarding Illegals

Obama Undocumented DemocratsFirst, check this link.

Then note the first comment, penned by a Leftist idiot who thinks that accurate communication is as important as tits on a hubcap:

Well this is basacally a rasist comment to put hate on more people the economic problem is not on illegal aliens” is on a system that rule the world i bet my life that this Doctor” employ humans slaves workers paying nickels for services.

From this source — the second commenter makes an excellent and accurate summation:

  • You don’t need to be using the term “racists” when you can’t even SPELL the word or “basically”. We are overrun by 100 million illegals, NOT the 12 million constantly touted by the press for the last 40 years. THEY get paid under the table, subverting American workers, and DON’T PAY INCOME TAXES! Not only THAT, the IRS is GIVING them huge IRS scam payouts, with protection and no audits. I put the blame squarely on Congress, especially the northeast states, and on the entire FEDERAL government for REFUSING to do their job of border control. THEY ARE OPENLY INVITING THESE ILLEGALS WITH JOBS, NO PROSECUTION, AND OPEN BORDERS. Taxpayers are paying for Bill Gates’ workers public schools, foodstamps, medical bills, border babies with monthly stipends for diapers and food, food stamps, SSI and social security payments, prisons, more teachers, more schools, more police, more highways, more courts, and FREE ATTORNEYS for the huge number of crimes, murders, rapes they commit. If war breaks out here in America, I’m coming for THEM first and then their benefactors.

    JOE LEGAL vs JOSE ILLEGAL

    You have 2 families… “Joe Legal” and “Jose Illegal”. Both families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.

    “Joe Legal” works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted.

    “Jose Illegal” also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash “under the table”.

    Joe Legal… $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week = $52,000 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax. Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.

    Jose Illegal… $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week = $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

    Joe Legal pays for Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage … $1000.00 per month = $12,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $19,231.00.

    Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

    Joe Legal makes too much money to be eligible for Food Stamps or Welfare so Joe Legal pays for food… $1,000.00 per month = $12,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

    Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

    Joe Legal pays rent of $1,000.00 per month = $12,000.00 per year. Joe Legal is now in the hole -<$4,769.00>.

    Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy, which entirely pays his rent of $500.00 per month = $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

    Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays and gets a part time job after work to make ends meet.

    Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

    Joe Legal’s and Jose Illegal’s children both attend the same school.

    Joe Legal pays for his children’s lunches while Jose Illegal’s children get free government sponsored lunches.

    Joe Legal’s children go home after school. Jose Illegal’s children have an after school ESL program which, again, is provided free of charge.

    Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but Joe Legal paid for them and Jose Illegal did not pay.

Imagine that.

So why would both sides of the aisle agree to this “illegal amnesty for Mexicans” abortion-on-toast?  Answer: money and power.  And the ability to keep themselves entrenched into their positions so they can keep their money and power flowing incessantly.

Finally: sometimes there are inherently more truths expressed in comments than in the original articles themselves.  This would be one of those times.

BZ

 

 

Napolitano lies before or after: which is it?

Janet-Napolitano-face-palmI’m sure everyone recalls Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano — Big Sis — saying that the border is secure, and that border security is better than ever.  A rather declarative sentence, really.

Except:

Exclusive: Illegal Border Crossings Double, Border Becomes Less Secure as Beltway Gets Close to Deal on Immigration Reform

Katie Pavlich
News Editor, Townhall

As the immigration reform Gang of Eight inside the Beltway prepares to announce a deal later this week, claiming border security will come before a path to citizenship for millions of illegals, Border Patrol agents have seen illegal border crossings double and warn the cutting of agent work hours will only result in less border security, not more.

“We’ve seen the number of illegal aliens double, maybe even triple since amnesty talk started happening,” an agent told Townhall, who asked to remain unnamed due to fears of retaliation within Customs and Border Protection [CBP], something he said is common. “A lot of these people, although not the majority, are criminals or aggravated felons.  This is a direct danger to our communities.”

Imagine that!  You even begin to speak about amnesty and crossings double!  Who would ever have thought that the remotest of possibilities?

In response she now says:

Janet Napolitano: We shouldn’t wait until the border is secure to legalize illegals

posted at 10:41 am on March 27, 2013 by Allahpundit

No worries. She says the border’s already “as secure as it’s ever been,” even though her department has given up trying to measure that. Marco Rubio recently claimed that 10 million new illegals would cross the border over the next decade if there’s no new guest-worker program in place. Maybe Napolitano could quantify border control that way. Are things secure enough now to ensure that only nine million of them would make it? Eight million?

“I think that once people really look at the whole system and how it works, relying on one thing as a so-called ‘trigger’ is not the way to go,” she said at a Christian Science Monitor event. “There needs to be some kind of certainty in the bill so that people can know when they can legalize and then when the pathway to citizenship, earned citizenship, will open up.”

Says she.

So, to Janet Napolitano: were you lying then, or are you lying now?  Because you are lying to the American public.

BZ

 

 

Liberal UK limiting immigration: US will not

UK BIAEven the rather liberal British realize that illegal immigration is harmful in a poor economy.

From the UKTelegraph.com:

MPs want immigrant ban to save British jobs

Britain should be able to block immigration from other EU countries during the current period of high unemployment, according to a group of influential MPs.

In an article for The Telegraph, the joint chairmen of the cross party group on balanced migration, Frank Field, a former Labour minister, and Nicholas Soames, a former Conservative minister, say that David Cameron must do more to tackle “the elephant in the room” by restricting European immigration.

The MPs, two of the most influential politicians in the immigration debate, suggest that draconian action should now be considered “during periods of high unemployment” — such as now — to protect low-skilled British workers struggling to compete with foreigners for jobs.

One in five young British workers is currently unemployed, with about one million people aged 18 to 24 out of work.

Oddly enough, the UK seems to understand that not only illegal immigration, but immigration in general, jeopardizes the employment possibilities of true citizens in tempestuous fiscal times.

Not so the United States, in which Mr Obama, the Demorats and any number of Republicans want to, in essence, grant amnesty to literally millions of illegal Mexicans already violating US laws.  Mexicans that are neither bringing money nor particularly necessary skillsets with them — but instead in many cases are bringing disease and crime and who then tend to commit crimes here, as many are already up into either various cartels or MS13 and then, in Fornicalia, car up into Surenos.

Do you not sense a trend here?  That is, Europe is beginning to re-examine its Multi-Kulti and Socialist leanings, whilst here in the US the current Obaka Administration is willing to engage in the very experiment failing Europe.

Proving, once again, two things:

1. Everyone thinks they can do Socialism better than the last despot, and
2. Obama and his sycophants possess Historical Alzheimers; no one seems to learn from it.

BZ