Mexico tells Texas to lay off the National Guard — or else

Mexican President NietoFrom FoxNews.com:

Mexican president condemns Texas’ decision to deploy National Guard along border

Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto says Texas’ decision to deploy National Guard troops along the border is “unpleasant” and “reprehensible.”

Last month’s deployment had previously drawn Mexico’s ire. It says the border should not be militarized and issues should be solved jointly.

In an interview with the newspaper El Universal published Friday, Pena Nieto said Texas’ move could affect bilateral relations.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has criticized border security and suggested last month that Islamic terrorists could be entering the U.S. from Mexico, a charge Mexico has dismissed as “absurd.”

Let’s see: Boko Haram, ISIS or al Qaeda having to get their ankles moist via the Rio Grande, or trying to enter via other methods?  I think I know the answer of ISIS et al.  Besides, it’s already occurred.  And the feds themselves are warning of Islamist border incursions!  There is already clear evidence of Muslims having entered the US via our southern border.

Nieto is perturbed that his citizens cannot cross the border in order to acquire their share of Free American Cheese and either stay or come back readily.  Clearly, it is onerous to enforce one’s borders and attempt some semblance of sovereignty.

Sorry Mr Nieto; you’re dealing with Rick Perry, and he doesn’t much care for hypocrisy.

BZ

 

The reasons to leave California keep mounting: Jerry Brown welcomes all ILLEGAL Mexicans

ReconquistaJerry, riddle me this:

As someone who vetoed all water projects whilst you were governor in the 70s, how is that playing out for you now in your second stint as Gubner, sir, during Fornicalia’s worst extended drought in quite some time?

Not well.

And, as Gubner now, how will your willingness to turn Fornicalia over to Mexico play out in the future, sir?

Not well.

From Breitbart.com:

Gov. Jerry Brown to Mexican Illegals: ‘You’re All Welcome in California’

by Tony Lee

On Monday evening, California Governor Jerry Brown said all Mexicans, including illegal immigrants, are welcome in California. 

Of course they are.  They will continue to vote for either you, Mr Brown, or your Demorat replacement sir.  They will continue to vote for Free Cheese and various elements which, if examined, actually place illegals over the actual citizenry of Fornicalia.

According to the Los Angeles Times, while introducing Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, who said America is “the other Mexico,” Brown “spoke about the interwoven histories of Mexico and California.” He “nodded to the immigrants in the room, saying it didn’t matter if they had permission to be in the United States.”

“You’re all welcome in California,” Brown reportedly said.

On the other hand, let’s talk about just how racist Mexicans can be in terms of La Raza (The Race) and “Reconquista.”  That is, the “reconquering of the United States on behalf of Mexico.”

“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US–Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works–the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”

A vast majority of Mexicans hate citizens of the United States.  Come as a shock to you?

Further, thanks to former Mexican President Felipe Calderon:

“Wherever there’s a Mexican, there is Mexico!” — President Calderone. As an American living under Spanish speaking Mexican occupation, I would add to this “Where there’s a Mexican, there’s a violent Mexican gang!”

Plus:

La Raza has total contempt for freedom of speech. Anyone that disagrees is a “racist”. La Raza means “the race” — the Mexican race.  In sanctuary county of Los Angeles, Mexican gangs are murdering African-AMERICANS to “cleanse” the communities they are taking over. Google it.

Please read this article, “Funding Hate” by Joseph Fallon; many citations below.

Let’s also examine the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA), whose website reads:

As Chicanas and Chicanos of Aztlán, we are a nationalist movement of Indigenous Gente that lay claim to the land that is ours by birthright. As a nationalist movement we seek to free our people from the exploitation of an oppressive society that occupies our land. Thus, the principle of nationalism serves to preserve the cultural traditions of La Familia de La Raza and promotes our identity as a Chicana/Chicano Gente.

That’s correct; MEChA’s job is to take back the American Southwest, from its American “occupiers.”  Once again, “The Race,” La Raza — which means there is no other race.

Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan
“Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”
“Everything for the race. Everything outside the race, nothing.”

Aztlan - La Raza, Whites Get OutContinuing from Funding Hate:

English Only is incredibly divisive because it sends the message that the culture of language minorities is inferior and illegal. With a dramatic increase in hate crimes and right wing terrorist attacks in the United States, the last thing we need is a frivolous bill to fuel the fires of racism. …English Only is unnecessary because over 97 percent of Americans already speak English and those who don’t are eagerly trying to learn. English language classes have three year waiting lists in Los Angles and New York and current immigrants are learning English at a faster rate than their predecessors.

LULAC offered no evidence to support any of these claims. If what LULAC claimed was true, however, then why was LULAC – a) opposed to legally recognizing this fact by legally recognizing English as the official language of the United States and b) demanding that the U.S. government provide bilingual voting ballots, bilingual welfare forms, bilingual motor vehicle examinations, bilingual education, bilingual translators, etc.

An excellent point.  Why, indeed?

Then there is MALDEF — The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund.

* MALDEF filed charges alleging textbooks in California were biased against minorities.

* MALDEF litigated for free public education for the children of illegal aliens that successfully culminated in the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision in ‘Plyer v. Doe.’

* MALDEF opposed California Proposition 187 that denied illegal aliens free social and welfare services and filed a class action lawsuit ‘challenging its every provision.’

* Some individuals associated with MALDEF have demanded that U.S. citizenship be eliminated as a requirement to vote.

* MALDEF sought and received legal status to naturalize immigrants.

* MALDEF successfully lobbied for passage of the ‘motor-voter’ bill of 1993 that allows voter registration at welfare offices or when applying for a drivers’ license; mandates mail-in voter registration and discourages States from verifying the applicant’s eligibility or citizenship.

* MALDEF opposes immigration reform.

* MALDEF opposes securing the Mexican border even to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. When the Federal government launched ‘Joint Task Force Six’ to combat drug smuggling along the border, MALDEF filed suit to halt the project arguing in court that ‘it would cause irreparable damage to the human and physical environment in the area.’ What of the irreparable damage being done to the human and environment due to illegal aliens and drug smugglers? On that question, MALDEF is silent.

Here is the most accurate paragraph of all:

What is MALDEF’s goal? According to Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF, ‘California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who does not like it should leave.’ In 1998, Obledo was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Clinton.

In a land and a time where “demography is prophecy,” I submit:

In 2012, 28% of Californians were born outside the United States, according to The New York Times. Hispanic voters reportedly “made up 19.2% of California voters” in 2010. And according to Pew Research, Latinos make up nearly 40% of the state’s population and have made California “only the second state, behind New Mexico, where whites are not the majority and Latinos are the plurality.”

Even though the University of California has admitted a record number of Hispanics, the Latino Caucus has vowed to make affirmative action and bilingual education top legislative priorities.

Caucasoids, like myself, are now the statistical minority in Occupied Fornicalia on the Left Coast.  “Other than Caucasoids” are the majority.

Demography is, in fact, prophecy.

Get ready, blacks and Asians and others: Mexicans have the numbers and you do not.  Plain and simple.

One final question: does anyone ever ask why Mexicans want to be in the US?  Answer: because it’s not Mexico and because it’s better than Mexico.  So what will happen when the southern US is filled with Mexicans?  Answer: it will be Mexico.  Then what?

BZ

P.S.

Also read the following article from LiveLeak regarding La Raza, and visit the website of MEChA.

Aztlan Reconquista

Shock of shocks: “DOJ: Regions Near Mexico Border Most Crime Ridden in US”

The Obama Administration’s take on illegal invaders from Mexico, Central American, South America and points beyond is nothing more than the largest Voter Registration Program on record.

For the Demorats only, of course.

From Breitbart.com:

HOUSTON, Texas — About half of the nation’s federal criminal cases last year were filed in regions near the U.S.-Mexico border, according to an alarming annual report from the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ).

by Kristin Tate

During FY 2013, U.S. Attorney’s offices filed a total of 61,529 criminal cases against defendants, according to the DOJ. Regions along the border each had more convictions than in any other district. 6,341 cases were filed in Western Texas, suggesting it is home to the country’s most severe crime patterns. 6,130 cases were filed in Southern Texas; 4,848 were filed in Southern California; 3,889 were filed in New Mexico; and 3,538 were filed in Arizona.

Judicial Watch pointed out that out of the 94 U.S. federal court districts, the five near the Mexico border “see a large portion of criminal cases. … [and] also have the biggest number of defendants actually convicted of federal crimes.”

The most common crimes committed over the year were immigration related, with 23,744 such cases having been filed by the feds. Judicial Watch pointed out that immigration crimes accounted for 38.6 percent of all federal cases.

In the meantime, borders are stricken with the human and budgetary costs associated with a veritable flood of illegals unbidden and unwanted by the states who must carry the burden.

Further, the federal government does its level best to purposely “bury” these people into states throughout the nation in order to hide them from scrutiny, knowing full well that a minimal percentile will reappear in court once released from custody.

BZ

 

U.S. Considering Refugee Status for Hondurans

That means: you don’t have to “go through” Mexico any more.  What fun!

From the NYTimes.com:

U.S. Considering Refugee Status for Hondurans

by Frances Robles and Michael D. Shear

Hoping to stem the recent surge of migrants at the Southwest border, the Obama administration is considering whether to allow hundreds of minors and young adults from Honduras into the United States without making the dangerous trek through Mexico, according to a draft of the proposal.

If approved, the plan would direct the government to screen thousands of children and youths in Honduras to see if they can enter the United States as refugees or on emergency humanitarian grounds. It would be the first American refugee effort in a nation reachable by land to the United States, the White House said, putting the violence in Honduras on the level of humanitarian emergencies in Haiti and Vietnam, where such programs have been conducted in the past amid war and major crises.

Oh joyous day.  A more direct route.

I have a great idea: why not refugee status for Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Guyana, Suriname, Bolivia, Paraguay, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay.

Why not all of Central and South America?

Why stop there?  Choose another continent and let’s enable refugee status for those nations as well.  Except, of course, those countries who have Evil Caucasoids.  They can stay the hell at home.

BZ