The Obama Administration’s take on illegal invaders from Mexico, Central American, South America and points beyond is nothing more than the largest Voter Registration Program on record.
For the Demorats only, of course.
HOUSTON, Texas — About half of the nation’s federal criminal cases last year were filed in regions near the U.S.-Mexico border, according to an alarming annual report from the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ).
by Kristin Tate
During FY 2013, U.S. Attorney’s offices filed a total of 61,529 criminal cases against defendants, according to the DOJ. Regions along the border each had more convictions than in any other district. 6,341 cases were filed in Western Texas, suggesting it is home to the country’s most severe crime patterns. 6,130 cases were filed in Southern Texas; 4,848 were filed in Southern California; 3,889 were filed in New Mexico; and 3,538 were filed in Arizona.
Judicial Watch pointed out that out of the 94 U.S. federal court districts, the five near the Mexico border “see a large portion of criminal cases. … [and] also have the biggest number of defendants actually convicted of federal crimes.”
The most common crimes committed over the year were immigration related, with 23,744 such cases having been filed by the feds. Judicial Watch pointed out that immigration crimes accounted for 38.6 percent of all federal cases.
In the meantime, borders are stricken with the human and budgetary costs associated with a veritable flood of illegals unbidden and unwanted by the states who must carry the burden.
Further, the federal government does its level best to purposely “bury” these people into states throughout the nation in order to hide them from scrutiny, knowing full well that a minimal percentile will reappear in court once released from custody.
That means: you don’t have to “go through” Mexico any more. What fun!
From the NYTimes.com:
U.S. Considering Refugee Status for Hondurans
by Frances Robles and Michael D. Shear
Hoping to stem the recent surge of migrants at the Southwest border, the Obama administration is considering whether to allow hundreds of minors and young adults from Honduras into the United States without making the dangerous trek through Mexico, according to a draft of the proposal.
If approved, the plan would direct the government to screen thousands of children and youths in Honduras to see if they can enter the United States as refugees or on emergency humanitarian grounds. It would be the first American refugee effort in a nation reachable by land to the United States, the White House said, putting the violence in Honduras on the level of humanitarian emergencies in Haiti and Vietnam, where such programs have been conducted in the past amid war and major crises.
Oh joyous day. A more direct route.
I have a great idea: why not refugee status for Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Guyana, Suriname, Bolivia, Paraguay, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay.
Why not all of Central and South America?
Why stop there? Choose another continent and let’s enable refugee status for those nations as well. Except, of course, those countries who have Evil Caucasoids. They can stay the hell at home.
You would expect no less from an historically-blue and Leftist state such as Massachusetts, having hosted such stellar luminaries as John Friggin’ Kerry, Ted Kennedy, the Kennedys in general, Elizabeth Warren and even Mitt (“I’m not sure I really want this presidency”) Romney. More on Elizabeth Warren later, the bint.
Feds Ask Massachusetts to House Illegal Immigrants at Unused Shopping Malls
by Tony Lee
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick (D) said that the Obama administration asked whether his state had facilities to house up to 1,000 illegal immigrant children at military bases or unused shopping malls.
On Friday, Patrick announced that he proposed two military bases where illegal immigrants can be housed. He said Joint Base Cape Cod in Bourne and Westover Air Base in Chicopee would have “spaces for children to sleep, eat, play and go to school,” and “the average stay for children sheltered there would be 35 days.” He said the federal government would pick up the tab.
Patrick said the illegal immigrant children will “need age-appropriate toys and books” and the “company of responsible adults, especially those who speak Spanish.” He also said the state may work with the federal government, in addition to “faith and refugee organizations.”
I’d formerly decided to table this topic for a while, but circumstances dictate that I may as well address it now: here is where some people of faith and I part ways drastically.
Including Hugh Hewitt and me.
He says: “Make the border kids American.” I say: his suggestions will not help this country. The United States was not set up to become the farrow bucket to the world.
Some young Journalistas have said this is an influx unprecedented. Not precisely: there was the slam of Vietnamese from the 70s following Vietnam, and the Marieli boat lift courtesy of James Earl Carter. But this flood from the southern border is unprecedented in that DC has no intent to make it stop.
Very few people protested then.
I say now: move these illegals right around and back from whence they came. The Inn is full. The US cannot be the repository for the world’s ills. The No Vacancy sign should be illuminated in its finest neon stance.
I believe in national sovereignty. I believe in closed borders, which help establish and keep national sovereignty. I do not believe it is the job of the United States of America to take in every person from every surrounding or distant country. It is the job of the United States to keep itself sovereign which means it can be free and independent.
For now, those persons “fleeing” South America and Mexico are fleeing pretty much what Mr Obama and Leftists want to establish — a Leftist and/or Socialist state.
So: if these Leftist/Socialist regimes are so superior to what exists in the United States, why is it that people want to “flee” them and enter the US?
- Cowardice asks the question: is it safe?
- Expediency asks the question: is it politic?
- Vanity asks the question: is it popular?
- But conscience asks the question: is it right?
Right for the nation or right for some individuals? Thinking: demography is prophecy.
I am not willing to make the United States another Third World armpit, as seems to be advocated by Hugh and any number of Leftist “Progressives.”
Enough is enough.
Meaning: he was an illegal alien Mexican.
Plus, he was a validated Norteno gang member, as were the other two suspects. As a “Dreamer,” he was allowed to stay in this country since 2010. That is precisely the information the federal government does not want to get out And this laissez-faire attitude, made policy by the Obama Administration, resulted in the death of an innocent woman taken hostage in this critical incident, named Misty Holt-Singh.
For those living in Occupied Fornicalia and possessing situational awareness, this is no shock whatsoever. The state is rife with Mexican gangs whose members are swelled by the flow from Mexico, unstemmed by the moribund Obama federal government..
In summary, from the DailyMailUK.com (another UK media link getting it right):
The three suspects in a bank robbery gone wrong who used a married mother as a human shield during a high-speed chase and gun battle with police are believed to be part of a notorious street gang, authorities said.
Misty Holt-Singh was one of three women – another customer and a bank employee – taken hostage and used as human shields during shootout that saw 20 officers fire shots and three of the getaway SUV’s six occupants including her die.
A 19-year-old gang-banger was taken alive by police and two of the hostages pushed from the moving vehicle after being shot are miraculously expected to survive their injuries, authorities said.
The other two hostages had far different outcomes.
The thieves only went 14 blocks before shooting one of the hostages who was then either pushed from the truck or jumped. Doctors say her injuries are not life threatening.
For the next 45 minutes, the robbers led dozens of police cars on a chase across highways and city streets, according to Stockton police Officer Joe Silva.
The robbers not only had assault rifles but extra magazines taped or strapped to their bodies. The gunfire was unrelenting, police said. Officers had no choice but to engage the suspects.
Police lost the SUV at approximately 2:28 p.m. as it pulled off the highway. However, rather than using the advantage to speed away the thieves stopped in position to ambush the police they knew were just seconds away.
Luckily for authorities, another officer saw them from another angle and warned the pursuing officers.